fix: Settings ignores an endpoint check once the same "Save" is tapped again (closes #698)

Each RPC and Blockscout "Save" in Settings now counts its taps. A check
that answers after a newer tap of the same "Save" stores nothing and
leaves the flash message alone. Before this change, the older check's
error or refusal replaced the newer tap's "Saved.".

The save also checks for a newer tap at two points. A tap made while the
save waits for the lock means nothing is stored. A tap made during the
write means no flash message is shown.

Model: opus-5-5

README.md

@@ -1277,22 +1277,18 @@ see Transaction Decoding), do not always read as a number. They can read:
   step pays nothing itself and swaps whatever an earlier step sent to the pair,
   so the calldata states no quantity. A V3 exact-in `amountIn` of zero has no
   such meaning and is shown as a zero.
-- `None (no minimum guaranteed)`: the swap's `Min. received` line, when the
-  minimum it shows is zero, whether a V2, V3 or V4 swap's minimum or a
-  `BALANCE_CHECK_ERC20` step's `minBalance`. Before
-  [#359](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/359), a zero `minBalance`
-  read `0.0000` when the token's scale was known. The router passes a balance
-  check whenever the balance is at least `minBalance`, so a zero `minBalance`
-  guarantees nothing: it sets `Token Out` and `Min. received` only when the
-  output side holds no minimum, not even a zero one, at the point the check is
-  reached, and otherwise leaves the current token and figure in place. A nonzero
-  `minBalance` sets both lines, as a swap step does. Only a check of the
-  transaction's sender's own balance sets either line; a check of any other
-  address sets neither (see Transaction Decoding). A `BALANCE_CHECK_ERC20` step
-  that the router lets fail without reverting the transaction (see Transaction
-  Decoding) guarantees nothing either, whatever its `minBalance`, and is read as
-  one whose `minBalance` is zero. A minimum stated by a V4 swap step the router
-  lets fail is likewise read as zero.
+- `None (no minimum guaranteed)`: the swap's `Min. received` line, when it shows
+  a V2, V3 or V4 swap's minimum of zero. The router passes a
+  `BALANCE_CHECK_ERC20` step whenever the balance is at least `minBalance`, so a
+  zero `minBalance` guarantees nothing. A check with a zero `minBalance` sets
+  neither `Token Out` nor `Min. received`. A nonzero `minBalance` sets both
+  lines, as a swap step does. Only a check of the transaction's sender's own
+  balance sets either line; a check of any other address sets neither (see
+  Transaction Decoding). A `BALANCE_CHECK_ERC20` step that the router lets fail
+  without reverting the transaction (see Transaction Decoding) guarantees
+  nothing either, whatever its `minBalance`, and is read as one whose
+  `minBalance` is zero. A minimum stated by a V4 swap step the router lets fail
+  is likewise read as zero.
 
 The swap's `Token In` and `Token Out` lines name a currency, not an amount; each
 reads `Unknown (not named in the calldata)` when the decoder found no token for
@@ -2281,6 +2277,13 @@ view would leave a wallet one click from deletion.
         - Endpoint URL input + "Save" button. "Save" asks the URL for `/stats`
           and saves the URL only if that request succeeds. The request carries
           no user data and is made whether or not "Use Blockscout" is ticked.
+    - If the network changes before either "Save" stores its URL, the URL is not
+      saved and a flash message says so
+    - Either "Save" stores its URL only if the input still shows that URL when
+      the endpoint answers. Otherwise a flash message says that the URL was not
+      saved
+    - If the user taps the same "Save" again before the endpoint answers, the
+      earlier tap stores nothing and shows no flash message
     - Etherscan:
         - "Check recipients on Etherscan" checkbox, unticked until the user
           ticks it
@@ -3395,7 +3398,8 @@ Currently supported:
   `Balance Check (of another address)`. A check whose input does not decode,
   such as one whose owner word has a nonzero top byte (the router reads the
   owner from the word's last 20 bytes), likewise sets neither, and it is listed
-  as `Balance Check (could not be decoded)`. When a swap step, `TAKE` or
+  as `Balance Check (could not be decoded)`. A check with a zero `minBalance`
+  sets neither `Token Out` nor the minimum. When a swap step, `TAKE` or
   `TAKE_PORTION` pays the router any token, the swap's output or another, a
   `WRAP_ETH` pays it WETH, or an `UNWRAP_WETH` into the router turns WETH a step
   paid it into ETH, that token stays in the router unless a later step pays out
@@ -3477,119 +3481,133 @@ Currently supported:
   of any amount but `OPEN_DELTA` pays that amount, and a `SETTLE` of
   `OPEN_DELTA` or a `SETTLE_ALL` pays what the step owes, as above. So a V4 step
   that swaps 400 USDT, with a `SETTLE` of 5,000 USDT paid by the user and the
-  rest taken to another address, reads `5000.0000 USDT`. A later step paid from
-  the router spends what the router holds and takes nothing, and so does a V2
-  exact-in whose `amountIn` is `ALREADY_PAID`. A later take of `Token In` is
-  added to the total while both are quantities: a V3 exact-in of 600 USDT and a
-  V2 exact-in of 400 USDT, both paid by the user, read `1000.0000 USDT`. When
-  the decoder does not know a take's amount, the total is not known and there is
-  no `Amount` line. A `PERMIT2_PERMIT` names `Token In` only when its amount,
-  `Unlimited` included, stands as the `Amount` figure in place of the total,
-  which it does only in the plain shape of Uniswap's own routes: it comes before
-  the step that sets the input side, it is the only `PERMIT2_PERMIT` in the
-  transaction and there is no `PERMIT2_PERMIT_BATCH`, its spender is the router,
-  the router may not let it fail, no step before it takes its token, a
-  `PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM` of it included, or a token the decoder does not know,
-  and the decoder reads every step after it in full. Permit2 then lets the
-  router take no more of the token than that amount, so the permit covers every
-  take of it. A step before the permit takes under whatever allowance the router
-  already had, so it may take more than the permit's amount, which would then
-  read lower than what leaves the user's wallet: a `PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM` of
-  2,000 USDT into the router, then a permit of 600 USDT to the router and a V3
-  exact-in of 2,000 USDT paid from the router, read `Amount 2000.0000 USDT`. A
-  later permit or batch may raise what Permit2 lets the router take, and so may
-  a step the decoder does not read in full: a command the decoder does not read
-  (listed at the end of this section), a step whose input it cannot read, in
-  whole or in part, and a step it fails on. Every other `PERMIT2_PERMIT`, before
-  the step that sets the input side or after it, leaves `Token In` and the
-  `Amount` line as they read with no permit, unless it lets a spender other than
-  the router take `Token In` (see below): a permit of 5,000 DAI to another
-  address and then a V3 exact-in of 600 USDT read `Swap USDT → USDC` with
-  `Amount 600.0000 USDT`, and so do that exact-in and then a permit of 5,000 DAI
-  to the router. When a permit's amount stands and the step that sets the input
-  side spends a token other than the permit's, or one the decoder does not know,
-  that step's amount gets lines of its own, unless it states no amount and the
-  user pays it none of its input token. Each take the total does not count gives
-  three lines after the `Amount` line (after `Token In` when there is none): one
-  of a token other than `Token In`; one of `Token In` after an amount that is
-  not a quantity (a V4 open delta, `ALREADY_PAID`, which keep their wording on
-  the `Amount` line, or no stated amount, as of a V4 exact-out step); and one
-  whose amount the decoder does not know. When there is no `Amount` line, each
-  take the total counts gets them too, so that every amount the decoder reads is
-  shown: the amount the step that sets the input side states, when it is a
-  quantity and the user pays that step (a V2 or V3 step whose `payerIsUser` is
-  true, a V4 step the user pays some of its input token, or a `WRAP_ETH`, whose
-  ETH comes from the transaction's value), and each later take of `Token In`
-  added to it. A step that sets the input side and is paid from the router takes
-  nothing from the user's wallet and gets none. A `PERMIT2_PERMIT` the decoder
-  cannot read, then V3 exact-ins of 600 USDT and 400 DAI paid by the user, give
-  lines for both amounts. When the step that sets the input side states no
-  amount, the user pays it some of its input token, and there is no `Amount`
-  line, that step gets them too whenever another take's lines give a figure, or
-  a `PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM` of its token gives one, on the lines below or, into
-  the router, on its `Paid to` line, so that figure cannot read as all that
-  leaves. When it states no amount and the user pays it none of its input token,
-  as when the router pays it, that step takes none of that token from the user's
-  wallet and never gets them, with a permit or without. They come in step order,
-  except that the step that sets the input side comes first when it has them,
-  followed, when there is no `Amount` line, by the other takes the total counts:
-  `Moved from the sender`, its amount, worded as the `Amount` line words one, or
-  `Unknown (could not be decoded)` when the decoder does not know it;
-  `Token moved`, giving the token's address as the `Token In` line does; and
-  `Moved to`, which reads `The swap step that spends it`. A token the decoder
-  does not know gives the `Moved from the sender` line alone. A step may also
-  take from the user's wallet what the decoder did not read: a V4 step whose
-  input or one of whose `SETTLE`s or `SETTLE_ALL`s it cannot read, which the
-  router still runs; a V2 or V3 exact-in or exact-out step or a
-  `PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM` whose input it cannot read, such as a V3 step whose
-  path is shorter than one token address or has bytes after its last hop; every
-  `PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM_BATCH`; every `EXECUTE_SUB_PLAN`, wherever it stands;
-  and every step it fails on. Each such step gives one `Moved from the sender`
-  line among those, reading `Unknown (could not be decoded)`. That line, or any
-  line for a token the decoder does not know, leaves no `Amount` line, whose
-  figure might be too low, and such a step before a `PERMIT2_PERMIT` keeps the
-  permit's amount from standing. Then each `PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM` but one into
-  the router, in step order, gives three lines: `Moved from the sender`, the
-  amount it moves, for example `1000000.0000 USDT`; `Token moved`, giving the
-  token's address as the `Token In` line does; and `Moved to`, which reads
+  rest taken to another address, reads `5000.0000 USDT`. A later step that pays
+  an ERC-20 token from the router takes none of that token from the user's
+  wallet. A V2 exact-in whose `amountIn` is `ALREADY_PAID` takes nothing either.
+  A V4 `SETTLE` of ETH paid from the router still takes from the user's wallet,
+  since the router holds the transaction's value. When the decoder does not know
+  the amount of such a `SETTLE`, as for `CONTRACT_BALANCE`, that `SETTLE` counts
+  as a later step's take. When an earlier step left ETH in the router, that ETH
+  may pay part of a `SETTLE` of ETH paid from the router. That `SETTLE` then
+  gets lines of its own, with `Up to` before its amount. A later take of
+  `Token In` that only the user's wallet pays is added to the total while both
+  are quantities: a V3 exact-in of 600 USDT and a V2 exact-in of 400 USDT, both
+  paid by the user, read `1000.0000 USDT`. When the decoder does not know a
+  take's amount, the total is not known and there is no `Amount` line. A
+  `PERMIT2_PERMIT` names `Token In` only when its amount, `Unlimited` included,
+  stands as the `Amount` figure in place of the total, which it does only in the
+  plain shape of Uniswap's own routes: it comes before the step that sets the
+  input side, it is the only `PERMIT2_PERMIT` in the transaction and there is no
+  `PERMIT2_PERMIT_BATCH`, its spender is the router, the router may not let it
+  fail, no step before it takes its token, a `PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM` of it
+  included, or a token the decoder does not know, and the decoder reads every
+  step after it in full. Permit2 then lets the router take no more of the token
+  than that amount, so the permit covers every take of it. A step before the
+  permit takes under whatever allowance the router already had, so it may take
+  more than the permit's amount, which would then read lower than what leaves
+  the user's wallet: a `PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM` of 2,000 USDT into the router,
+  then a permit of 600 USDT to the router and a V3 exact-in of 2,000 USDT paid
+  from the router, read `Amount 2000.0000 USDT`. A later permit or batch may
+  raise what Permit2 lets the router take, and so may a step the decoder does
+  not read in full: a command the decoder does not read (listed at the end of
+  this section), a step whose input it cannot read, in whole or in part, and a
+  step it fails on. Every other `PERMIT2_PERMIT`, before the step that sets the
+  input side or after it, leaves `Token In` and the `Amount` line as they read
+  with no permit, unless it lets a spender other than the router take `Token In`
+  (see below): a permit of 5,000 DAI to another address and then a V3 exact-in
+  of 600 USDT read `Swap USDT → USDC` with `Amount 600.0000 USDT`, and so do
+  that exact-in and then a permit of 5,000 DAI to the router. A permit on the
+  zero address never stands as the `Amount` figure, because Permit2 has no
+  allowance of ETH. When a permit's amount stands and the step that sets the
+  input side spends a token other than the permit's, or one the decoder does not
+  know, that step's amount gets lines of its own, unless it states no amount and
+  the user pays it none of its input token. Each take the total does not count
+  gives three lines after the `Amount` line (after `Token In` when there is
+  none): one of a token other than `Token In`; one of `Token In` after an amount
+  that is not a quantity (a V4 open delta, `ALREADY_PAID`, which keep their
+  wording on the `Amount` line, or no stated amount, as of a V4 exact-out step);
+  an ETH take whose line reads `Up to` (see above); and one whose amount the
+  decoder does not know. When there is no `Amount` line, each take the total
+  counts gets them too, so that every amount the decoder reads is shown: the
+  amount the step that sets the input side states, when it is a quantity and the
+  user pays that step (a V2 or V3 step whose `payerIsUser` is true, a V4 step
+  the user pays some of its input token, or a `WRAP_ETH`, whose ETH comes from
+  the transaction's value), and each later take of `Token In` added to it. A
+  step that sets the input side gets none when the user pays it none of its
+  input token. A `PERMIT2_PERMIT` the decoder cannot read, then V3 exact-ins of
+  600 USDT and 400 DAI paid by the user, give lines for both amounts. When the
+  step that sets the input side states no amount, the user pays it some of its
+  input token, and there is no `Amount` line, that step gets them too whenever
+  another take's lines give a figure, or a `PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM` of its token
+  gives one, on the lines below or, into the router, on its `Paid to` line, so
+  that figure cannot read as all that leaves. When it states no amount and the
+  user pays it none of its input token, that step never gets them, with a permit
+  or without. They come in step order, except that the step that sets the input
+  side comes first when it has them, followed, when there is no `Amount` line,
+  by the other takes the total counts: `Moved from the sender`, its amount,
+  worded as the `Amount` line words one, or `Unknown (could not be decoded)`
+  when the decoder does not know it; `Token moved`, giving the token's address
+  as the `Token In` line does; and `Moved to`, which reads
+  `The swap step that spends it`. A token the decoder does not know gives the
+  `Moved from the sender` line alone. A step may also take from the user's
+  wallet what the decoder did not read: a V4 step whose input or one of whose
+  `SETTLE`s or `SETTLE_ALL`s it cannot read, which the router still runs; a V2
+  or V3 exact-in or exact-out step or a `PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM` whose input it
+  cannot read, such as a V3 step whose path is shorter than one token address or
+  has bytes after its last hop; every `PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM_BATCH`; every
+  `EXECUTE_SUB_PLAN`, wherever it stands; and every step it fails on. Each such
+  step gives one `Moved from the sender` line among those, reading
+  `Unknown (could not be decoded)`. That line, or any line for a token the
+  decoder does not know, leaves no `Amount` line, whose figure might be too low,
+  and such a step before a `PERMIT2_PERMIT` keeps the permit's amount from
+  standing. Then each `PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM` but one into the router, in step
+  order, gives three lines: `Moved from the sender`, the amount it moves, for
+  example `1000000.0000 USDT`; `Token moved`, giving the token's address as the
+  `Token In` line does; and `Moved to`, which reads
   `The V2 pair the next swap spends` for a hop and `The sender` for `address(1)`
   on every router but `UniversalRouterV1`, and otherwise gives the address. A
   move into the router needs none of them, because its `Paid to` line and
   `Token moved into the router` line already give the amount, the token and
-  where it goes, and so its amount is shown once. Every `PERMIT2_PERMIT` whose
-  amount does not stand as the `Amount` figure, before the step that sets the
-  input side or after it, gives three lines, in step order, after those for each
-  `PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM`: `Permit2 allowance`, its amount, for example
+  where it goes, and so its amount is shown once. For a move of the zero
+  address, `Moved from the sender` gives the amount in base units and
+  `Token moved` gives the zero address. For such a move into the router, the
+  `Paid to` line gives the amount in base units and
+  `Token moved into the router` gives the zero address. Every `PERMIT2_PERMIT`
+  whose amount does not stand as the `Amount` figure, before the step that sets
+  the input side or after it, gives three lines, in step order, after those for
+  each `PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM`: `Permit2 allowance`, its amount, for example
   `5000.0000 DAI`, or `Unlimited` for Permit2's maximum; `Allowance token`,
   giving the token's address as the `Token In` line does; and
   `Allowance spender`, the address it lets take the token. Only a permit whose
   amount stands gives none: the `Amount` line gives its amount, `Token In` its
   token, and its spender is the router. Each allowance a `PERMIT2_PERMIT_BATCH`
   grants, one for each token it names, all for its one spender, gives the same
-  three lines, in step order with those of each `PERMIT2_PERMIT`. A
-  `PERMIT2_PERMIT` or `PERMIT2_PERMIT_BATCH` whose input the decoder cannot
-  read, such as one whose token or spender word has a nonzero top byte, may let
-  any spender take any amount of any token: it gives one `Permit2 allowance`
-  line alone, reading `Unknown (could not be decoded)`. These lines change no
-  `Paid to` line: a permit or batch pays nobody. But code that a step runs, such
-  as a V4 pool's hook or a token's own code, can call a spender other than the
-  router, which can then take up to its allowance from the user's wallet before
-  the transaction ends. So an allowance to any spender but the router, or a
-  permit or batch the decoder cannot read, makes the minimum read
-  `Min. paid out`, and when its token is `Token In`, or the decoder does not
-  know its token or `Token In`, it leaves no `Amount` line, whose figure might
-  be too low: a permit of 5,000 USDT to another address and then a V3 exact-in
-  of 600 USDT read with no `Amount` line, and the 600 USDT gets lines of its
-  own. A step goes unread when its recipient does not decode as an address, when
-  it is a V3 swap step whose path is shorter than one token address or has bytes
-  after its last hop, or when it is a command the decoder does not read: every
-  command other than `PERMIT2_PERMIT`, `PERMIT2_PERMIT_BATCH`,
-  `PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM`, `V2_SWAP_EXACT_IN`, `V2_SWAP_EXACT_OUT`,
-  `V3_SWAP_EXACT_IN`, `V3_SWAP_EXACT_OUT`, `V4_SWAP`, `SWEEP`, `TRANSFER`,
-  `PAY_PORTION`, `PAY_PORTION_FULL_PRECISION`, `ACROSS_V4_DEPOSIT_V3`,
-  `WRAP_ETH`, `UNWRAP_WETH` and `BALANCE_CHECK_ERC20`
-  (`PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM_BATCH`, `EXECUTE_SUB_PLAN` and the NFT commands among
-  them), or a type its release names no command for.
+  three lines, in step order with those of each `PERMIT2_PERMIT`. For an
+  allowance of the zero address, `Permit2 allowance` gives the amount in base
+  units and `Allowance token` gives the zero address. A `PERMIT2_PERMIT` or
+  `PERMIT2_PERMIT_BATCH` whose input the decoder cannot read, such as one whose
+  token or spender word has a nonzero top byte, may let any spender take any
+  amount of any token: it gives one `Permit2 allowance` line alone, reading
+  `Unknown (could not be decoded)`. These lines change no `Paid to` line: a
+  permit or batch pays nobody. But code that a step runs, such as a V4 pool's
+  hook or a token's own code, can call a spender other than the router, which
+  can then take up to its allowance from the user's wallet before the
+  transaction ends. So an allowance to any spender but the router, or a permit
+  or batch the decoder cannot read, makes the minimum read `Min. paid out`, and
+  when its token is `Token In`, or the decoder does not know its token or
+  `Token In`, it leaves no `Amount` line, whose figure might be too low: a
+  permit of 5,000 USDT to another address and then a V3 exact-in of 600 USDT
+  read with no `Amount` line, and the 600 USDT gets lines of its own. A step
+  goes unread when its recipient does not decode as an address, when it is a V3
+  swap step whose path is shorter than one token address or has bytes after its
+  last hop, or when it is a command the decoder does not read: every command
+  other than `PERMIT2_PERMIT`, `PERMIT2_PERMIT_BATCH`, `PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM`,
+  `V2_SWAP_EXACT_IN`, `V2_SWAP_EXACT_OUT`, `V3_SWAP_EXACT_IN`,
+  `V3_SWAP_EXACT_OUT`, `V4_SWAP`, `SWEEP`, `TRANSFER`, `PAY_PORTION`,
+  `PAY_PORTION_FULL_PRECISION`, `ACROSS_V4_DEPOSIT_V3`, `WRAP_ETH`,
+  `UNWRAP_WETH` and `BALANCE_CHECK_ERC20` (`PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM_BATCH`,
+  `EXECUTE_SUB_PLAN` and the NFT commands among them), or a type its release
+  names no command for.
 
 ### Non-Goals Forever
 

src/popup/views/settings.js

@@ -44,6 +44,17 @@ let ctx;
 let versionClickCount = 0;
 let versionClickTimer = null;
 
+// The network that Settings was last drawn for. A follow of a switch saved
+// elsewhere sets `state` to the new network first. Settings is drawn again only
+// once the follow's write returns. So both "Save" buttons take this network,
+// not the one in `state`.
+let shownNetwork = null;
+
+// Each endpoint "Save" counts its taps here, under the field that it stores. A
+// tap stores its URL and shows a flash message only while it is the latest tap
+// of its "Save".
+const saveTaps = { rpcUrl: 0, blockscoutUrl: 0 };
+
 // One row per site origin, however many addresses it appears under, each with
 // an [x] that hands it to onRemove.
 function renderSiteList(containerId, origins, onRemove) {
@@ -199,6 +210,7 @@ function renderWalletListSettings() {
 }
 
 function show() {
+    shownNetwork = currentNetwork();
     $("settings-rpc").value = state.rpcUrl;
     $("settings-blockscout").value = state.blockscoutUrl;
     $("settings-network").value = state.networkId;
@@ -306,6 +318,7 @@ function showNewSettings() {
         state.checkRecipientsOnEtherscan;
     if (state.currentView === "settings") {
         markViewRendered("settings");
+        shownNetwork = currentNetwork();
         $("settings-network").value = state.networkId;
         $("settings-rpc").value = state.rpcUrl;
         $("settings-blockscout").value = state.blockscoutUrl;
@@ -319,17 +332,70 @@ function showNewSettings() {
     updateDebugBanner(state.currentView);
 }
 
+// Saves `url` as `field` ("rpcUrl" or "blockscoutUrl") of the network
+// `networkId`, the one that Settings showed when the user tapped "Save". The
+// URL is set in `state` inside the save, holding the lock. So the page cannot
+// follow a switch saved elsewhere (followStoredSettings() in
+// src/popup/index.js) between setting the URL and writing it. If the active
+// network is no longer `networkId`, on this page or in the stored record,
+// nothing is saved. The flash message then says that the network changed.
+//
+// The save writes only the fields that differ from what this page last saved.
+// Another page may have stored a different URL since then. So `url` is set in
+// the stored record too. "Saved." then means that the stored record holds
+// `url`.
+//
+// `input` is the id of the input that the user typed `url` in. When another
+// page changes the network, "Use Blockscout" or "Check recipients on
+// Etherscan", this page draws Settings again. A redraw during the endpoint
+// check puts the URL from `state` back in the input. So if the input no longer
+// shows `url`, nothing is saved. The flash message then says that the URL was
+// changed during the check. The save compares the input and sets `url` in
+// `state` in one step. So a redraw after the comparison shows `url`.
+//
+// `tap` is the number of the "Save" tap that checked `url`. If the user taps
+// the same "Save" again before this save holds the lock, nothing is stored. If
+// the user taps the same "Save" again before the write ends, no flash message
+// is shown.
+async function saveEndpoint(field, input, url, networkId, tap) {
+    let refused = false;
+    let inputChanged = false;
+    await saveState((stored) => {
+        if (saveTaps[field] !== tap) return false;
+        refused =
+            state.networkId !== networkId || stored.networkId !== networkId;
+        inputChanged = $(input).value.trim() !== url;
+        if (refused || inputChanged) return false;
+        state[field] = url;
+        stored[field] = url;
+    });
+    if (saveTaps[field] !== tap) return;
+    if (refused) {
+        showFlash("The URL was not saved because the network changed.");
+    } else if (inputChanged) {
+        showFlash(
+            "The URL was not saved because it was changed during the check.",
+        );
+    } else {
+        showFlash("Saved.");
+    }
+}
+
 function init(_ctx) {
     ctx = _ctx;
     deleteWallet.init(ctx);
     showPhrase.init();
 
     $("btn-save-rpc").addEventListener("click", async () => {
+        saveTaps.rpcUrl++;
+        const tap = saveTaps.rpcUrl;
         const url = $("settings-rpc").value.trim();
         if (!url) {
             showFlash("Please enter an RPC URL.");
             return;
         }
+        // The URL is for the network that Settings shows when "Save" is tapped.
+        const net = shownNetwork;
         showFlash("Testing endpoint...");
         try {
             const resp = await debugFetch(url, {
@@ -343,12 +409,13 @@ function init(_ctx) {
                 }),
             });
             const json = await resp.json();
+            // The user has tapped this "Save" again since the check began.
+            if (tap !== saveTaps.rpcUrl) return;
             if (json.error) {
                 log.errorf("RPC validation error:", json.error);
                 showFlash("Endpoint returned an error.");
                 return;
             }
-            const net = currentNetwork();
             if (json.result !== net.chainId) {
                 showFlash("Wrong network: expected " + net.name + ".");
                 return;
@@ -357,6 +424,7 @@ function init(_ctx) {
             // Cancelled by the popup closing, not failed: see pageClosed in
             // src/popup/index.js.
             if (ctx.pageClosed.aborted) return;
+            if (tap !== saveTaps.rpcUrl) return;
             // Not the error's message: fetch puts the whole URL, password and
             // key included, in the message of the error it throws for a URL
             // with a user name and password or one it cannot parse.
@@ -364,34 +432,41 @@ function init(_ctx) {
             showFlash("Could not reach endpoint.");
             return;
         }
-        state.rpcUrl = url;
-        await saveState();
-        showFlash("Saved.");
+        await saveEndpoint("rpcUrl", "settings-rpc", url, net.id, tap);
     });
 
     $("btn-save-blockscout").addEventListener("click", async () => {
+        saveTaps.blockscoutUrl++;
+        const tap = saveTaps.blockscoutUrl;
         const url = $("settings-blockscout").value.trim();
         if (!url) {
             showFlash("Please enter a Blockscout API URL.");
             return;
         }
+        const net = shownNetwork;
         showFlash("Testing endpoint...");
         try {
             const resp = await debugFetch(url + "/stats");
+            if (tap !== saveTaps.blockscoutUrl) return;
             if (!resp.ok) {
                 showFlash("Endpoint returned HTTP " + resp.status + ".");
                 return;
             }
         } catch {
             if (ctx.pageClosed.aborted) return;
+            if (tap !== saveTaps.blockscoutUrl) return;
             // Not the error's message, as for the RPC check above.
             log.errorf("Blockscout validation failed:", urlOrigin(url));
             showFlash("Could not reach endpoint.");
             return;
         }
-        state.blockscoutUrl = url;
-        await saveState();
-        showFlash("Saved.");
+        await saveEndpoint(
+            "blockscoutUrl",
+            "settings-blockscout",
+            url,
+            net.id,
+            tap,
+        );
     });
 
     // Each change is made inside the save, holding the lock. So

src/popup/views/transactionDetail.js

@@ -311,10 +311,21 @@ function populateOnChainDetails(txData, chainId) {
     }
 }
 
+// Whether TransactionDetail still holds the transaction with `txHash` on
+// `chainId`. Opening another transaction replaces the one TransactionDetail
+// holds. A visit to Settings does not.
+function holdsTransaction(txHash, chainId) {
+    const tx = state.viewData.tx;
+    return tx?.hash === txHash && tx?.chainId === chainId;
+}
+
 // Reads the block, network details and calldata from Blockscout, and decodes
 // the calldata. While the stored "Use Blockscout" is off, Blockscout is not
 // asked. An answer that lands after the setting went off is dropped
 // (src/shared/storedSettings.js). Either way none of them is shown.
+//
+// Blockscout can answer after the user has opened another transaction. That
+// answer is dropped.
 async function loadFullTxDetails(txHash, chainId) {
     if (!(await storedSettingIsOn("useBlockscout"))) return;
     const section = $("tx-detail-calldata-section");
@@ -333,6 +344,7 @@ async function loadFullTxDetails(txHash, chainId) {
         if (!resp.ok) return;
         const txData = await resp.json();
         if (!(await storedSettingIsOn("useBlockscout"))) return;
+        if (!holdsTransaction(txHash, chainId)) return;
 
         // Populate on-chain detail fields (block, nonce, gas, fee)
         populateOnChainDetails(txData, chainId);

src/shared/chainSwitch.js

@@ -47,12 +47,30 @@ function clearPopupCaches() {
 // lock, so it is never switched while a follow of a switch saved elsewhere
 // waits for the lock (followStoredSettings() in src/popup/index.js): that
 // follow runs first, and this switch is made after it.
+//
+// The save writes only the fields that differ from what this page last saved.
+// When this page last saved a balance of "0", clearing that balance is no
+// change. So the switch also resets these fields in the stored record:
+//
+// - every address's balance and token balances;
+// - the time of the last balance refresh.
+//
+// A balance that the background or another page stored since this page's last
+// save is then not kept under the new network
+// (https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/653).
 async function onChainSwitch(newNetworkId) {
     const { state, saveState } = require("./state");
     let net = null;
-    await saveState(() => {
+    await saveState((stored) => {
         if (state.networkId === newNetworkId) return false;
         net = applyChainSwitchFields(state, newNetworkId);
+        stored.lastBalanceRefresh = 0;
+        for (const wallet of stored.wallets) {
+            for (const addr of wallet.addresses) {
+                addr.balance = "0";
+                addr.tokenBalances = [];
+            }
+        }
         clearPopupCaches();
     });
     return net;

src/shared/state.js

@@ -591,8 +591,10 @@ function reportSaveFailure(err) {
 //
 // `beforeWrite`, when given, is called inside the lock with the stored record
 // as just read, before this page's state is compared against it. It may change
-// `state`, and this save writes that change. When it returns false, nothing is
-// written; any other return lets the save go ahead.
+// `state`, and this save writes that change. It may also change the stored
+// record. A field that this page did not change is then written as
+// `beforeWrite` left it. When it returns false, nothing is written; any other
+// return lets the save go ahead.
 function saveState(beforeWrite) {
     const turn = withLock("autistmask", () => saveStateOnce(beforeWrite));
     // Every failed save is reported, whether or not the caller awaited this

src/shared/uniswap.js

@@ -479,6 +479,17 @@ function tokenInfo(address, sources) {
     };
 }
 
+// The token of a Permit2 allowance or of a PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM, in the
+// shape tokenInfo() gives. Permit2 has no allowance of ETH and moves no ETH.
+// The zero address there reads as a token nothing knows: its amount in base
+// units, and the zero address as its token.
+function permit2TokenInfo(address, sources) {
+    if (address === "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000") {
+        return { symbol: null, decimals: null, address };
+    }
+    return tokenInfo(address, sources);
+}
+
 // A swap amount line. With a scale it is the token quantity; with none it is
 // the base-unit integer with the unknown scale stated, the same refusal the
 // ERC-20 amount line makes, so the screen has one way of saying it. `display`
@@ -497,16 +508,18 @@ function amountText(raw, info) {
 
 // The line giving a moved token, or the token of a permit, under `label`, in
 // the shape of the Token In line, so the screens show it as they show that
-// one. ETH has no address.
-function tokenMovedLine(label, token, sources) {
-    const info = tokenInfo(token, sources);
+// one. `info` is what tokenInfo() or permit2TokenInfo() gives for the token.
+// ETH has no address.
+function tokenMovedLine(label, info) {
     if (!present(info.address)) {
         return { label, value: info.symbol };
     }
     return {
         label,
-        value: info.symbol ? info.symbol + " (" + token + ")" : token,
-        address: token,
+        value: info.symbol
+            ? info.symbol + " (" + info.address + ")"
+            : info.address,
+        address: info.address,
         isToken: true,
     };
 }
@@ -1240,9 +1253,10 @@ function decode(data, toAddress, chainId, sources, fromAddress) {
         let inputEstablished = false;
         // Whether the user pays the step that set the input side: a V2 or V3
         // swap step with `payerIsUser` true, a V4 step the user pays some of
-        // its input currency (see decodeV4Swap()), or a WRAP_ETH, whose ETH
-        // comes from the transaction's value. A step paid from the router
-        // takes nothing from the sender.
+        // its input currency (see paidByUser in the loop), or a WRAP_ETH,
+        // whose ETH comes from the transaction's value. A step that pays an
+        // ERC-20 token from the router takes none of that token from the
+        // sender.
         let inputPaidByUser = false;
         // The last PERMIT2_PERMIT this decoder read before a step set the
         // input side, or null (see permitStands after the loop).
@@ -1338,7 +1352,9 @@ function decode(data, toAddress, chainId, sources, fromAddress) {
         // What the steps take from the sender beyond the amount of the step
         // that sets the input side, as { token, amount }, in step order.
         // After the loop each joins the Amount line or gets lines of its own
-        // (see permitStands).
+        // (see permitStands). A take with `atMost` set may take less than
+        // `amount`: it never joins the Amount line, and its line reads
+        // "Up to" and the amount.
         const userPaid = [];
         // A swap step the user pays for (`payerIsUser` true) takes `amount`
         // of `token` from the sender. A V2 exact-in of ALREADY_PAID takes
@@ -1613,13 +1629,13 @@ function decode(data, toAddress, chainId, sources, fromAddress) {
                     } else {
                         // The router passes this check whenever the owner
                         // holds at least minBalance, so a zero one guarantees
-                        // nothing and does not replace a minimum an earlier
-                        // step stated. A check the router lets fail guarantees
-                        // nothing either, so it is read as a zero one. Any
+                        // nothing. A check the router lets fail guarantees
+                        // nothing either, so it is read as a zero one. A zero
+                        // check sets neither Token Out nor the minimum. Any
                         // other minBalance sets the output side as a swap
-                        // does. It pays nobody.
+                        // does. The check pays nobody.
                         const minBalance = allowedToFail ? 0n : b.minBalance;
-                        if (!(minBalance === 0n && present(minOutput))) {
+                        if (minBalance !== 0n) {
                             setOutput(i, b.token, minBalance, []);
                         }
                         keepsRouterWeth = true;
@@ -1815,6 +1831,41 @@ function decode(data, toAddress, chainId, sources, fromAddress) {
                 } else if (command === "V4_SWAP") {
                     const v4 = decodeV4Swap(inputs[i]);
                     const inputSetBefore = inputEstablished;
+                    // V4Router pays a SETTLE of ETH from the router's own
+                    // ETH, whichever payer the SETTLE names. The router holds
+                    // the transaction's value, and any ETH an earlier step
+                    // left it (see heldByRouter). So the user also pays a
+                    // SETTLE of ETH that names the router as payer. The user
+                    // pays all of its amount when the router holds no other
+                    // ETH, and up to its amount otherwise. CONTRACT_BALANCE
+                    // pays all the router holds, an amount the calldata does
+                    // not state.
+                    const routerHeldEth = heldByRouter.has(
+                        "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
+                    );
+                    const ethFromRouter = (v4?.settledFromRouter ?? [])
+                        .filter(
+                            (s) =>
+                                s.currency ===
+                                "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
+                        )
+                        .map((s) => ({
+                            currency: s.currency,
+                            amount:
+                                s.amount === CONTRACT_BALANCE ? null : s.amount,
+                        }));
+                    // What the user pays the step: what decodeV4Swap() says,
+                    // and the ETH of each SETTLE from the router of a known
+                    // amount when the router holds no other ETH.
+                    const paidByUser = v4
+                        ? v4.paidByUser.concat(
+                              routerHeldEth
+                                  ? []
+                                  : ethFromRouter.filter((s) =>
+                                        present(s.amount),
+                                    ),
+                          )
+                        : [];
                     if (v4) {
                         // Each SETTLE paid from the router spends the amount
                         // decodeV4Swap() says it pays.
@@ -1845,10 +1896,10 @@ function decode(data, toAddress, chainId, sources, fromAddress) {
                         commandNames[i] += " (could not be decoded)";
                     }
                     // The step's amount, if it sets the input side: what the
-                    // user pays it of its input currency (see
-                    // decodeV4Swap()), or, when the user pays none of it,
-                    // what its swap actions spend of it, whoever pays that.
-                    const paidIn = v4?.paidByUser.find(
+                    // user pays it of its input currency, or, when the user
+                    // pays none of it, what its swap actions spend of it,
+                    // whoever pays that.
+                    const paidIn = paidByUser.find(
                         (p) => p.currency === v4.tokenIn,
                     );
                     const amountIn = paidIn ? paidIn.amount : v4?.amountIn;
@@ -1902,10 +1953,24 @@ function decode(data, toAddress, chainId, sources, fromAddress) {
                     // router still runs it.
                     const setInputHere = inputEstablished && !inputSetBefore;
                     if (setInputHere) inputPaidByUser = paidIn !== undefined;
-                    if (v4) {
-                        for (const p of v4.paidByUser) {
-                            if (setInputHere && p === paidIn) continue;
-                            addUserPaid(p.currency, p.amount);
+                    for (const p of paidByUser) {
+                        if (setInputHere && p === paidIn) continue;
+                        addUserPaid(p.currency, p.amount);
+                    }
+                    // A SETTLE of ETH from the router that `paidByUser` leaves
+                    // out is a take of its own, even on the step that sets
+                    // the input side. Either this decoder does not know its
+                    // amount, or ETH an earlier step left in the router may
+                    // pay part of that amount (see userPaid).
+                    for (const p of ethFromRouter) {
+                        if (!present(p.amount)) {
+                            addUserPaid(p.currency, null);
+                        } else if (routerHeldEth) {
+                            userPaid.push({
+                                token: p.currency,
+                                amount: p.amount,
+                                atMost: true,
+                            });
                         }
                     }
                     if (!v4 || v4.settleUnread) {
@@ -2013,10 +2078,10 @@ function decode(data, toAddress, chainId, sources, fromAddress) {
         // The total is what the steps take of Token In: the amount of the
         // step that set the input side, with each later take of that token
         // added to it while both are quantities. A take that cannot be added,
-        // being of another token or coming after an amount that is not a
-        // quantity (a V4 open delta, ALREADY_PAID, or none stated), gets
-        // lines of its own. One whose amount is not known also leaves the
-        // total unknown, with no figure.
+        // being of another token, coming after an amount that is not a
+        // quantity (a V4 open delta, ALREADY_PAID, or none stated), or having
+        // `atMost` set, gets lines of its own. One whose amount is not known
+        // also leaves the total unknown, with no figure.
         //
         // A PERMIT2_PERMIT names Token In only when its amount stands as the
         // Amount figure in place of the total, which it does only in the
@@ -2032,12 +2097,14 @@ function decode(data, toAddress, chainId, sources, fromAddress) {
         // it may take more. A later permit or batch, or a later step this
         // decoder did not read, may raise what Permit2 lets the router take.
         // Every other PERMIT2_PERMIT leaves Token In and the Amount line as
-        // they read with no permit, and gets lines of its own below. A step
-        // that may take from the sender what this decoder did not read leaves
-        // no figure, permit or not (see spentUnread()), and so do a permit
-        // or batch whose input it cannot read (see permitUnread()) and an
-        // allowance of Token In to another spender (see toAnotherSpender). An
-        // EXECUTE_SUB_PLAN step leaves both sides unknown (below).
+        // they read with no permit, and gets lines of its own below. A permit
+        // on the zero address never stands as the Amount figure, because
+        // Permit2 has no allowance of ETH. A step that may take from the
+        // sender what this decoder did not read leaves no figure, permit or
+        // not (see spentUnread()), and so do a permit or batch whose input it
+        // cannot read (see permitUnread()) and an allowance of Token In to
+        // another spender (see toAnotherSpender). An EXECUTE_SUB_PLAN step
+        // leaves both sides unknown (below).
         const stepCommands = Array.from(
             commandsBytes,
             (b) => commands[b & commandTypeMask],
@@ -2047,6 +2114,7 @@ function decode(data, toAddress, chainId, sources, fromAddress) {
             stepCommands.filter((c) => c === "PERMIT2_PERMIT").length === 1 &&
             !stepCommands.includes("PERMIT2_PERMIT_BATCH") &&
             sameAddress(permit.spender, toAddress) &&
+            permit.token !== "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000" &&
             !permit.allowedToFail &&
             permit.beforeEveryTake &&
             !stepsUnread.some((step) => step > permit.step);
@@ -2057,14 +2125,14 @@ function decode(data, toAddress, chainId, sources, fromAddress) {
         let total = null;
         // The takes from the sender that `total` adds up, each a quantity, as
         // { token, amount }. When there is no Amount line, each gets lines of
-        // its own (see below). The amount of a step that set the input side
-        // and is paid from the router counts in `total` but is not among them.
+        // its own (see below). The amount of the step that set the input side
+        // counts in `total` whoever pays that step. That amount is among them
+        // only when the user pays the step (see inputPaidByUser).
         const inTotal = [];
         // Whether the step that set the input side counts as a take from the
         // sender, which may get lines of its own. The amount it stated counts
         // whoever pays it. Stating none, it counts only when the user pays it
-        // some of its input token: paid from the router, it takes nothing
-        // from the sender.
+        // some of its input token.
         const hasFirstTake =
             inputEstablished && (present(inputAmount) || inputPaidByUser);
         // The take of the step that set the input side, when the total
@@ -2090,7 +2158,8 @@ function decode(data, toAddress, chainId, sources, fromAddress) {
             if (
                 ofTokenIn &&
                 typeof total === "bigint" &&
-                typeof t.amount === "bigint"
+                typeof t.amount === "bigint" &&
+                !t.atMost
             ) {
                 total += t.amount;
                 inTotal.push(t);
@@ -2193,8 +2262,9 @@ function decode(data, toAddress, chainId, sources, fromAddress) {
         // V2's already-paid zero, neither of which is a quantity at all (see
         // OPEN_DELTA and ALREADY_PAID), and an unbounded permit. Those two
         // tests come first — the sentinels are not bigints and cannot be
-        // compared with one.
-        const spentText = (amount, info) => {
+        // compared with one. `atMost` marks an amount that is only the most a
+        // take may be (see userPaid).
+        const spentText = (amount, info, atMost) => {
             if (amount === OPEN_DELTA) {
                 return { raw: OPEN_DELTA_AMOUNT, display: OPEN_DELTA_AMOUNT };
             }
@@ -2207,7 +2277,7 @@ function decode(data, toAddress, chainId, sources, fromAddress) {
             if (amount >= MAX_UINT160) {
                 return { raw: "Unlimited", display: "Unlimited" };
             }
-            if (hasV2OrV3ExactOut) {
+            if (hasV2OrV3ExactOut || atMost) {
                 // A V2 or V3 exact-out swap spends at most this figure,
                 // whichever steps gave it (an amountInMax, the WRAP_ETH of a
                 // swap paid in ETH, a permit, or several steps' total), so it
@@ -2234,17 +2304,19 @@ function decode(data, toAddress, chainId, sources, fromAddress) {
         // A null token in `spentFromSender`, a step this decoder did not read
         // or a token it does not know, and an allowance to another spender
         // that may be of Token In, leave no Amount figure, which may then be
-        // too low. With no Amount line, each take the total adds up gets
-        // lines of its own, first, so that every amount this decoder read is
-        // shown.
+        // too low. An allowance of the zero address is never one of Token In,
+        // because Permit2 has no allowance of ETH. With no Amount line, each
+        // take the total adds up gets lines of its own, first, so that every
+        // amount this decoder read is shown.
         if (
             present(inputAmount) &&
             spentFromSender.every((s) => present(s.token)) &&
             toAnotherSpender.every(
                 (p) =>
-                    present(p.token) &&
-                    present(inputToken) &&
-                    !sameAddress(p.token, inputToken),
+                    p.token === "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000" ||
+                    (present(p.token) &&
+                        present(inputToken) &&
+                        !sameAddress(p.token, inputToken)),
             )
         ) {
             const amount = spentText(inputAmount, inInfo);
@@ -2265,11 +2337,14 @@ function decode(data, toAddress, chainId, sources, fromAddress) {
             details.push({
                 label: "Moved from the sender",
                 value: present(s.amount)
-                    ? spentText(s.amount, tokenInfo(s.token, sources)).display
+                    ? spentText(s.amount, tokenInfo(s.token, sources), s.atMost)
+                          .display
                     : UNDECODED_CURRENCY,
             });
             if (present(s.token)) {
-                details.push(tokenMovedLine("Token moved", s.token, sources));
+                details.push(
+                    tokenMovedLine("Token moved", tokenInfo(s.token, sources)),
+                );
                 details.push({
                     label: "Moved to",
                     value: "The swap step that spends it",
@@ -2280,12 +2355,12 @@ function decode(data, toAddress, chainId, sources, fromAddress) {
         // What each PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM moves: its amount, its token and
         // where it goes, an address on a line of its own.
         for (const m of movedFromSender) {
+            const info = permit2TokenInfo(m.token, sources);
             details.push({
                 label: "Moved from the sender",
-                value: amountText(m.amount, tokenInfo(m.token, sources))
-                    .display,
+                value: amountText(m.amount, info).display,
             });
-            details.push(tokenMovedLine("Token moved", m.token, sources));
+            details.push(tokenMovedLine("Token moved", info));
             details.push(
                 present(m.to)
                     ? { label: "Moved to", value: m.to }
@@ -2315,15 +2390,15 @@ function decode(data, toAddress, chainId, sources, fromAddress) {
                 });
                 continue;
             }
+            const info = permit2TokenInfo(p.token, sources);
             details.push({
                 label: "Permit2 allowance",
                 value:
                     p.amount >= MAX_UINT160
                         ? "Unlimited"
-                        : amountText(p.amount, tokenInfo(p.token, sources))
-                              .display,
+                        : amountText(p.amount, info).display,
             });
-            details.push(tokenMovedLine("Allowance token", p.token, sources));
+            details.push(tokenMovedLine("Allowance token", info));
             details.push({
                 label: "Allowance spender",
                 value: p.spender,
@@ -2381,7 +2456,7 @@ function decode(data, toAddress, chainId, sources, fromAddress) {
             paidTo.push({ label: "Paid to", value: PAID_TO_BRIDGE });
         }
         for (const m of movedIntoRouter) {
-            const info = tokenInfo(m.token, sources);
+            const info = permit2TokenInfo(m.token, sources);
             paidTo.push({
                 label: "Paid to",
                 value:
@@ -2389,9 +2464,7 @@ function decode(data, toAddress, chainId, sources, fromAddress) {
                     amountText(m.amount, info).display +
                     " from the sender (later steps may not spend all of it)",
             });
-            paidTo.push(
-                tokenMovedLine("Token moved into the router", m.token, sources),
-            );
+            paidTo.push(tokenMovedLine("Token moved into the router", info));
         }
         if (outputHeld) {
             paidTo.push({ label: "Paid to", value: STAYS_IN_ROUTER });
@@ -2408,8 +2481,7 @@ function decode(data, toAddress, chainId, sources, fromAddress) {
             paidTo.push(
                 tokenMovedLine(
                     "Token moved into the router",
-                    getAddress(token),
-                    sources,
+                    tokenInfo(getAddress(token), sources),
                 ),
             );
         }

tests/balanceRefreshNetworkSwitch.test.js

@@ -6,6 +6,10 @@
 // approved a site's request, which changes only the stored record. Driven
 // through the real popup over a stored profile on Ethereum Mainnet. The same
 // refresh in the background is in tests/backgroundStateIsolation.test.js.
+//
+// The last test covers a balance refresh by the background that is saved while
+// a switch in Settings waits for the lock
+// (https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/653).
 
 const {
     bootPopup,
@@ -159,3 +163,50 @@ test("a refresh that returns after the background switched the network writes no
 
     expectNothingStored(page);
 });
+
+// The background's refresh saves Ethereum Mainnet's balances while the switch
+// in Settings waits for the lock. This page last saved a balance of "0" and no
+// token balances, the values that the switch sets.
+test("a background refresh saved while a switch in Settings waits for the lock leaves none of its balances stored", async () => {
+    const profile = unversionedValidProfile();
+    profile.wallets[0].addresses[0].balance = "0";
+    const page = await bootPopup(profile);
+    expect(page.pageErrors).toEqual([]);
+    const background = require("../src/background/state");
+    await page.click("btn-settings");
+
+    // The background takes the lock first and holds it until the test calls
+    // `letGo()`. It then saves balances as backgroundRefresh() in
+    // src/background/index.js does.
+    let letGo;
+    const refreshSave = background.updateState(async (fresh) => {
+        await new Promise((resolve) => {
+            letGo = resolve;
+        });
+        fresh.wallets[0].addresses[0].balance = "7.0";
+        fresh.wallets[0].addresses[0].tokenBalances = [
+            {
+                address: TOKEN_ADDRESS,
+                name: "Test Token",
+                symbol: "TST",
+                decimals: 18,
+                balance: "5.0",
+                holders: null,
+            },
+        ];
+        fresh.lastBalanceRefresh = Date.now();
+    });
+    await page.settle();
+
+    const select = page.node("settings-network");
+    select.value = "sepolia";
+    const switching = Promise.all(select.listeners.change.map((fn) => fn()));
+    await page.settle();
+
+    letGo();
+    await refreshSave;
+    await switching;
+    await page.settle();
+
+    expectNothingStored(page);
+});

tests/popupFollowsNetworkSwitch.test.js

@@ -253,6 +253,271 @@ test("a switch back in Settings after a follow whose write failed is stored", as
     expect(told.at(-1).chainId).toBe(NETWORKS.mainnet.chainId);
 });
 
+// The user saves an endpoint URL in Settings on Ethereum Mainnet. Before the
+// URL is stored, the background saves a switch to Sepolia. Another write holds
+// the lock, so the popup's follow of that switch and the URL's save both wait
+// for the lock. Either may take it first. The URL is stored for neither
+// network. The flash message says that the network changed.
+test.each([
+    { button: "btn-save-rpc", field: "settings-rpc", first: "follow" },
+    { button: "btn-save-rpc", field: "settings-rpc", first: "save" },
+    {
+        button: "btn-save-blockscout",
+        field: "settings-blockscout",
+        first: "follow",
+    },
+    {
+        button: "btn-save-blockscout",
+        field: "settings-blockscout",
+        first: "save",
+    },
+])(
+    "$button saves nothing when the network changes before the URL is stored ($first first)",
+    async ({ button, field, first }) => {
+        const page = await bootOnAddress();
+        await page.click("btn-settings");
+        // This answer passes both endpoint checks. The RPC check reads
+        // Ethereum Mainnet's chain id from it. The Blockscout check reads `ok`.
+        globalThis.fetch.mockResolvedValue({
+            ok: true,
+            json: async () => ({ result: NETWORKS.mainnet.chainId }),
+        });
+        const url = "https://own-node.example.invalid";
+
+        let releaseLock;
+        const lockHeld = navigator.locks.request(
+            "autistmask",
+            () =>
+                new Promise((resolve) => {
+                    releaseLock = resolve;
+                }),
+        );
+        // The click handler runs until its save waits for the lock.
+        const tapSave = async () => {
+            page.node(field).value = url;
+            const saving = page.node(button).listeners.click.map((fn) => fn());
+            await page.settle();
+            return saving;
+        };
+        let saving;
+        if (first === "save") saving = await tapSave();
+        await backgroundSwitch(page, "sepolia");
+        if (first === "follow") saving = await tapSave();
+        releaseLock();
+        await lockHeld;
+        await Promise.all(saving);
+        await page.settle();
+
+        const { state } = require("../src/shared/state");
+        expect(state.networkId).toBe("sepolia");
+        expect(JSON.stringify(page.storage.read("autistmask"))).not.toContain(
+            url,
+        );
+        expect(page.text("flash-msg")).toBe(
+            "The URL was not saved because the network changed.",
+        );
+    },
+);
+
+// The popup's follow of the background's switch to Sepolia has set `state` to
+// Sepolia. The follow's write has not returned yet, so Settings still shows
+// Ethereum Mainnet. The user taps "Save" there. The URL is for Ethereum
+// Mainnet, so the save stores the URL for neither network.
+test.each([
+    { button: "btn-save-rpc", field: "settings-rpc" },
+    { button: "btn-save-blockscout", field: "settings-blockscout" },
+])(
+    "$button saves nothing when tapped while the follow's write waits",
+    async ({ button, field }) => {
+        const page = await bootOnAddress();
+        await page.click("btn-settings");
+        // This answer passes both endpoint checks on Ethereum Mainnet.
+        globalThis.fetch.mockResolvedValue({
+            ok: true,
+            json: async () => ({ result: NETWORKS.mainnet.chainId }),
+        });
+        const url = "https://own-node.example.invalid";
+
+        const { set } = page.storage.local;
+        const write = set.getMockImplementation();
+        let releaseWrite;
+        const writeHeld = new Promise((resolve) => {
+            releaseWrite = resolve;
+        });
+        // The background's write lands; the next, the follow's, waits.
+        set.mockImplementationOnce(write).mockImplementationOnce(
+            async (items) => {
+                await writeHeld;
+                await write(items);
+            },
+        );
+        await backgroundSwitch(page, "sepolia");
+        const { state } = require("../src/shared/state");
+        expect(state.networkId).toBe("sepolia");
+        expect(page.value("settings-network")).toBe("mainnet");
+
+        page.node(field).value = url;
+        const saving = page.node(button).listeners.click.map((fn) => fn());
+        await page.settle();
+        releaseWrite();
+        await Promise.all(saving);
+        await page.settle();
+
+        expect(JSON.stringify(page.storage.read("autistmask"))).not.toContain(
+            url,
+        );
+        expect(page.text("flash-msg")).toBe(
+            "The URL was not saved because the network changed.",
+        );
+    },
+);
+
+// The user taps the RPC "Save" on Ethereum Mainnet. While the check waits for
+// the node's answer, the popup follows the background's switch to Sepolia. The
+// node answers with Sepolia's chain id. So the check refuses the node for
+// Ethereum Mainnet, and nothing is stored.
+test("the RPC check compares the answer with the network at the tap", async () => {
+    const page = await bootOnAddress();
+    await page.click("btn-settings");
+    let answer;
+    globalThis.fetch.mockReturnValue(
+        new Promise((resolve) => {
+            answer = resolve;
+        }),
+    );
+    const url = "https://sepolia-node.example.invalid";
+
+    page.node("settings-rpc").value = url;
+    const saving = page.node("btn-save-rpc").listeners.click.map((fn) => fn());
+    await page.settle();
+    await backgroundSwitch(page, "sepolia");
+    const { state } = require("../src/shared/state");
+    expect(state.networkId).toBe("sepolia");
+    answer({ json: async () => ({ result: NETWORKS.sepolia.chainId }) });
+    await Promise.all(saving);
+    await page.settle();
+
+    expect(JSON.stringify(page.storage.read("autistmask"))).not.toContain(url);
+    expect(page.text("flash-msg")).toBe(
+        "Wrong network: expected Ethereum Mainnet.",
+    );
+});
+
+// The user taps the Blockscout "Save" on Ethereum Mainnet. While the check
+// waits for Blockscout's answer, the popup follows the background's switch to
+// Sepolia. The URL is for Ethereum Mainnet, so nothing is stored.
+test("the Blockscout save is for the network at the tap", async () => {
+    const page = await bootOnAddress();
+    await page.click("btn-settings");
+    let answer;
+    globalThis.fetch.mockReturnValue(
+        new Promise((resolve) => {
+            answer = resolve;
+        }),
+    );
+    const url = "https://own-explorer.example.invalid/api/v2";
+
+    page.node("settings-blockscout").value = url;
+    const saving = page
+        .node("btn-save-blockscout")
+        .listeners.click.map((fn) => fn());
+    await page.settle();
+    await backgroundSwitch(page, "sepolia");
+    expect(page.value("settings-network")).toBe("sepolia");
+    answer({ ok: true });
+    await Promise.all(saving);
+    await page.settle();
+
+    expect(JSON.stringify(page.storage.read("autistmask"))).not.toContain(url);
+    expect(page.text("flash-msg")).toBe(
+        "The URL was not saved because the network changed.",
+    );
+});
+
+// Settings is open when the network changes to Sepolia. The popup follows the
+// background's switch, or the user picks Sepolia in the network selector. Each
+// "Save" after the switch stores its URL for Sepolia.
+test.each([
+    ["a follow", (page) => backgroundSwitch(page, "sepolia")],
+    [
+        "the network selector",
+        async (page) => {
+            const select = page.node("settings-network");
+            select.value = "sepolia";
+            for (const fn of select.listeners.change) await fn();
+            await page.settle();
+        },
+    ],
+])(
+    "after a switch to Sepolia by %s, Settings saves each URL for Sepolia",
+    async (_how, switchToSepolia) => {
+        const page = await bootOnAddress();
+        await page.click("btn-settings");
+        await switchToSepolia(page);
+        // This answer passes both endpoint checks on Sepolia. The RPC check
+        // reads Sepolia's chain id from it. The Blockscout check reads `ok`.
+        globalThis.fetch.mockResolvedValue({
+            ok: true,
+            json: async () => ({ result: NETWORKS.sepolia.chainId }),
+        });
+        const rpcUrl = "https://own-node.example.invalid";
+        const blockscoutUrl = "https://own-explorer.example.invalid/api/v2";
+
+        page.node("settings-rpc").value = rpcUrl;
+        await page.click("btn-save-rpc");
+        expect(page.text("flash-msg")).toBe("Saved.");
+        page.node("settings-blockscout").value = blockscoutUrl;
+        await page.click("btn-save-blockscout");
+        expect(page.text("flash-msg")).toBe("Saved.");
+
+        const stored = page.storage.read("autistmask");
+        expect(stored.networkId).toBe("sepolia");
+        expect(stored.rpcUrl).toBe(rpcUrl);
+        expect(stored.blockscoutUrl).toBe(blockscoutUrl);
+    },
+);
+
+// The user picks Sepolia in Settings, but the switch's write fails. The page is
+// then on Sepolia, while Settings was last drawn for Ethereum Mainnet. A "Save"
+// after the failed switch stores nothing for either network.
+test.each([
+    { button: "btn-save-rpc", field: "settings-rpc" },
+    { button: "btn-save-blockscout", field: "settings-blockscout" },
+])(
+    "$button saves nothing after a switch in Settings whose write failed",
+    async ({ button, field }) => {
+        const page = await bootOnAddress();
+        await page.click("btn-settings");
+        page.storage.local.set.mockRejectedValueOnce(
+            new Error("quota exceeded"),
+        );
+        const select = page.node("settings-network");
+        select.value = "sepolia";
+        for (const fn of select.listeners.change) {
+            await expect(fn()).rejects.toThrow("quota exceeded");
+        }
+        await page.settle();
+        const { state } = require("../src/shared/state");
+        expect(state.networkId).toBe("sepolia");
+        // This answer passes both endpoint checks on Ethereum Mainnet.
+        globalThis.fetch.mockResolvedValue({
+            ok: true,
+            json: async () => ({ result: NETWORKS.mainnet.chainId }),
+        });
+        const url = "https://own-node.example.invalid";
+
+        page.node(field).value = url;
+        await page.click(button);
+
+        expect(JSON.stringify(page.storage.read("autistmask"))).not.toContain(
+            url,
+        );
+        expect(page.text("flash-msg")).toBe(
+            "The URL was not saved because the network changed.",
+        );
+    },
+);
+
 // Such as one a newer build wrote, which this build cannot read. Nothing reads
 // or writes the stored record for it: the popup's next save finds it, as
 // before.

tests/settingsEndpointSave.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
+// Another page stores a different RPC or Blockscout URL for the same network.
+// Then the user taps "Save" in Settings on this page, on the URL that this page
+// loaded. The URL on screen is stored, and the flash message reads "Saved."
+// (https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/688). Driven through the real
+// popup over a stored profile on Ethereum Mainnet.
+
+const {
+    bootPopup,
+    cleanupPopup,
+    unversionedValidProfile,
+} = require("./support/popupBoot");
+const { NETWORKS } = require("../src/shared/networks");
+
+afterEach(() => {
+    cleanupPopup();
+});
+
+test.each([
+    { button: "btn-save-rpc", input: "settings-rpc", field: "rpcUrl" },
+    {
+        button: "btn-save-blockscout",
+        input: "settings-blockscout",
+        field: "blockscoutUrl",
+    },
+])(
+    "$button stores the URL on screen after another page stored a different one",
+    async ({ button, input, field }) => {
+        const page = await bootPopup(unversionedValidProfile());
+        await page.click("btn-settings");
+        const url = page.value(input);
+        // This write sends this page no storage change event.
+        page.storage.write("autistmask", {
+            ...page.storage.read("autistmask"),
+            [field]: "https://other-page.example.invalid",
+        });
+        // This answer passes both endpoint checks on Ethereum Mainnet. The RPC
+        // check reads Ethereum Mainnet's chain id from it. The Blockscout check
+        // reads `ok`.
+        globalThis.fetch.mockResolvedValue({
+            ok: true,
+            json: async () => ({ result: NETWORKS.mainnet.chainId }),
+        });
+
+        await page.click(button);
+
+        expect(page.storage.read("autistmask")[field]).toBe(url);
+        expect(page.text("flash-msg")).toBe("Saved.");
+    },
+);
+
+// The user types a URL in Settings and taps "Save". While the check waits for
+// the endpoint's answer, another page turns "Use Blockscout" on. This page
+// follows that change and draws Settings again, with the stored URL in the
+// input. The check then passes. The typed URL is not stored. The flash message
+// says that the URL was changed during the check
+// (https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/695).
+test.each([
+    { button: "btn-save-rpc", input: "settings-rpc", field: "rpcUrl" },
+    {
+        button: "btn-save-blockscout",
+        input: "settings-blockscout",
+        field: "blockscoutUrl",
+    },
+])(
+    "$button stores nothing when Settings is drawn again during the check",
+    async ({ button, input, field }) => {
+        const page = await bootPopup(unversionedValidProfile());
+        await page.click("btn-settings");
+        const storedUrl = page.value(input);
+        let answer;
+        globalThis.fetch.mockReturnValue(
+            new Promise((resolve) => {
+                answer = resolve;
+            }),
+        );
+
+        page.node(input).value = "https://typed.example.invalid";
+        const saving = page.node(button).listeners.click.map((fn) => fn());
+        await page.settle();
+        // The browser announces this write to this page.
+        await page.storage.local.set({
+            autistmask: {
+                ...page.storage.read("autistmask"),
+                useBlockscout: true,
+            },
+        });
+        await page.settle();
+        expect(page.node("settings-use-blockscout").checked).toBe(true);
+        // This answer passes both endpoint checks on Ethereum Mainnet.
+        answer({
+            ok: true,
+            json: async () => ({ result: NETWORKS.mainnet.chainId }),
+        });
+        await Promise.all(saving);
+        await page.settle();
+
+        expect(page.storage.read("autistmask")[field]).toBe(storedUrl);
+        expect(page.value(input)).toBe(storedUrl);
+        expect(page.text("flash-msg")).toBe(
+            "The URL was not saved because it was changed during the check.",
+        );
+    },
+);
+
+// As above, but another write holds the lock. So this page's follow of the
+// change to "Use Blockscout" waits for the lock. The endpoint answers while the
+// input still shows the typed URL. The save then asks for the lock, after the
+// follow did. So the follow draws Settings again before the save compares the
+// input.
+test.each([
+    { button: "btn-save-rpc", input: "settings-rpc", field: "rpcUrl" },
+    {
+        button: "btn-save-blockscout",
+        input: "settings-blockscout",
+        field: "blockscoutUrl",
+    },
+])(
+    "$button stores nothing when Settings is drawn again while the save waits for the lock",
+    async ({ button, input, field }) => {
+        const page = await bootPopup(unversionedValidProfile());
+        await page.click("btn-settings");
+        const storedUrl = page.value(input);
+        let answer;
+        globalThis.fetch.mockReturnValue(
+            new Promise((resolve) => {
+                answer = resolve;
+            }),
+        );
+        const typedUrl = "https://typed.example.invalid";
+
+        page.node(input).value = typedUrl;
+        const saving = page.node(button).listeners.click.map((fn) => fn());
+        await page.settle();
+        let releaseLock;
+        const lockHeld = navigator.locks.request(
+            "autistmask",
+            () =>
+                new Promise((resolve) => {
+                    releaseLock = resolve;
+                }),
+        );
+        // The browser announces this write to this page.
+        await page.storage.local.set({
+            autistmask: {
+                ...page.storage.read("autistmask"),
+                useBlockscout: true,
+            },
+        });
+        await page.settle();
+        // This answer passes both endpoint checks on Ethereum Mainnet.
+        answer({
+            ok: true,
+            json: async () => ({ result: NETWORKS.mainnet.chainId }),
+        });
+        await page.settle();
+        expect(page.value(input)).toBe(typedUrl);
+        releaseLock();
+        await lockHeld;
+        await Promise.all(saving);
+        await page.settle();
+
+        expect(page.node("settings-use-blockscout").checked).toBe(true);
+        expect(page.storage.read("autistmask")[field]).toBe(storedUrl);
+        expect(page.value(input)).toBe(storedUrl);
+        expect(page.text("flash-msg")).toBe(
+            "The URL was not saved because it was changed during the check.",
+        );
+    },
+);
+
+// This answer passes both endpoint checks on Ethereum Mainnet.
+const PASSING_ANSWER = {
+    ok: true,
+    json: async () => ({ result: NETWORKS.mainnet.chainId }),
+};
+
+// Both endpoint checks read this answer as an error. The RPC check reads the
+// answer's `error`. The Blockscout check reads the answer's `ok`.
+const ERROR_ANSWER = {
+    ok: false,
+    status: 500,
+    json: async () => ({ error: { code: -32603, message: "Internal error" } }),
+};
+
+// The user types a URL in Settings and taps "Save". Before the endpoint answers,
+// the user types a second URL and taps "Save" again. The second check passes
+// first. The second URL is stored, and the flash message reads "Saved.". The
+// first check then ends in one of three ways:
+//
+// - It passes.
+// - It fails, because fetch cannot reach the endpoint.
+// - It gets an answer that holds an error.
+//
+// None of the three changes the stored URL or the flash message
+// (https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/698).
+test.each([
+    {
+        button: "btn-save-rpc",
+        input: "settings-rpc",
+        field: "rpcUrl",
+        first: "passes",
+    },
+    {
+        button: "btn-save-rpc",
+        input: "settings-rpc",
+        field: "rpcUrl",
+        first: "fails",
+    },
+    {
+        button: "btn-save-rpc",
+        input: "settings-rpc",
+        field: "rpcUrl",
+        first: "answers with an error",
+    },
+    {
+        button: "btn-save-blockscout",
+        input: "settings-blockscout",
+        field: "blockscoutUrl",
+        first: "passes",
+    },
+    {
+        button: "btn-save-blockscout",
+        input: "settings-blockscout",
+        field: "blockscoutUrl",
+        first: "fails",
+    },
+    {
+        button: "btn-save-blockscout",
+        input: "settings-blockscout",
+        field: "blockscoutUrl",
+        first: "answers with an error",
+    },
+])(
+    "$button keeps the second tap's result when the first check $first last",
+    async ({ button, input, field, first }) => {
+        const page = await bootPopup(unversionedValidProfile());
+        await page.click("btn-settings");
+        const checks = [];
+        globalThis.fetch.mockImplementation(
+            () =>
+                new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
+                    checks.push({ resolve, reject });
+                }),
+        );
+        const secondUrl = "https://second.example.invalid";
+
+        page.node(input).value = "https://first.example.invalid";
+        const firstTap = page.node(button).listeners.click.map((fn) => fn());
+        await page.settle();
+        page.node(input).value = secondUrl;
+        const secondTap = page.node(button).listeners.click.map((fn) => fn());
+        await page.settle();
+        checks[1].resolve(PASSING_ANSWER);
+        await Promise.all(secondTap);
+        await page.settle();
+        expect(page.text("flash-msg")).toBe("Saved.");
+        if (first === "passes") {
+            checks[0].resolve(PASSING_ANSWER);
+        } else if (first === "answers with an error") {
+            checks[0].resolve(ERROR_ANSWER);
+        } else {
+            // fetch rejects when it cannot reach the endpoint.
+            checks[0].reject(new TypeError("Failed to fetch"));
+        }
+        await Promise.all(firstTap);
+        await page.settle();
+
+        expect(checks).toHaveLength(2);
+        expect(page.storage.read("autistmask")[field]).toBe(secondUrl);
+        expect(page.text("flash-msg")).toBe("Saved.");
+    },
+);
+
+// The user types a URL in Settings and taps "Save". Another write holds the
+// lock. So the save waits for the lock once the check passes. The user then
+// taps "Save" again on the same URL. When the lock is free, the first save
+// stores nothing and shows no flash message. The second check then passes, and
+// the second save stores the URL.
+test.each([
+    { button: "btn-save-rpc", input: "settings-rpc", field: "rpcUrl" },
+    {
+        button: "btn-save-blockscout",
+        input: "settings-blockscout",
+        field: "blockscoutUrl",
+    },
+])(
+    "$button stores nothing for an earlier tap still waiting for the lock",
+    async ({ button, input, field }) => {
+        const page = await bootPopup(unversionedValidProfile());
+        await page.click("btn-settings");
+        const storedUrl = page.value(input);
+        const checks = [];
+        globalThis.fetch.mockImplementation(
+            () =>
+                new Promise((resolve) => {
+                    checks.push(resolve);
+                }),
+        );
+        const typedUrl = "https://typed.example.invalid";
+
+        page.node(input).value = typedUrl;
+        const firstTap = page.node(button).listeners.click.map((fn) => fn());
+        await page.settle();
+        let releaseLock;
+        const lockHeld = navigator.locks.request(
+            "autistmask",
+            () =>
+                new Promise((resolve) => {
+                    releaseLock = resolve;
+                }),
+        );
+        checks[0](PASSING_ANSWER);
+        await page.settle();
+        const secondTap = page.node(button).listeners.click.map((fn) => fn());
+        await page.settle();
+        releaseLock();
+        await lockHeld;
+        await Promise.all(firstTap);
+        await page.settle();
+
+        expect(page.storage.read("autistmask")[field]).toBe(storedUrl);
+        expect(page.text("flash-msg")).toBe("Testing endpoint...");
+
+        checks[1](PASSING_ANSWER);
+        await Promise.all(secondTap);
+        await page.settle();
+
+        expect(checks).toHaveLength(2);
+        expect(page.storage.read("autistmask")[field]).toBe(typedUrl);
+        expect(page.text("flash-msg")).toBe("Saved.");
+    },
+);

tests/trackedTokensPerNetwork.test.js

@@ -177,6 +177,78 @@ test("a token added by contract address on Sepolia is tracked on Sepolia only",
     expect(onSepolia).not.toContain("DAI");
 });
 
+// Another popup page tracks DAI on Ethereum Mainnet after this page's last
+// save. The switch's save writes only the token lists that this page changed.
+// So DAI stays in `trackedTokens`, the active network's list.
+test("a token another page tracked before a switch in Settings stays in trackedTokens", async () => {
+    const boot = await bootPopup(unversionedValidProfile());
+    expect(boot.pageErrors).toEqual([]);
+    boot.storage.write("autistmask", {
+        ...boot.storage.read("autistmask"),
+        trackedTokens: [MAINNET_TOKEN],
+    });
+
+    await boot.click("btn-settings");
+    await chooseNetwork(boot, "sepolia");
+
+    const stored = boot.storage.read("autistmask");
+    expect(stored.networkId).toBe("sepolia");
+    expect(stored.trackedTokens).toEqual([MAINNET_TOKEN]);
+    expect(stored.networkTrackedTokens.mainnet).toEqual([]);
+});
+
+// The contract lookup on SettingsAddToken answers on Ethereum Mainnet while the
+// switch to Sepolia waits for the lock. The page adds the token to Ethereum
+// Mainnet's list. The switch then keeps that list for Ethereum Mainnet.
+test("a token added while a switch in Settings waits for the lock stays tracked on Ethereum Mainnet", async () => {
+    const boot = await bootOnAddToken("mainnet");
+    expect(boot.pageErrors).toEqual([]);
+    const { lookupTokenInfo } = require("../src/shared/balances");
+    let answer;
+    lookupTokenInfo.mockImplementationOnce(
+        () =>
+            new Promise((resolve) => {
+                answer = resolve;
+            }),
+    );
+    boot.node("settings-addtoken-address").value = NEW_TOKEN_ADDRESS;
+    const adding = boot.click("btn-settings-addtoken-manual");
+    await boot.click("btn-settings");
+
+    // Another write holds the lock, so the switch's save waits for it.
+    let releaseLock;
+    const lockHeld = navigator.locks.request(
+        "autistmask",
+        () =>
+            new Promise((resolve) => {
+                releaseLock = resolve;
+            }),
+    );
+    const select = boot.node("settings-network");
+    select.value = "sepolia";
+    const switching = Promise.all(select.listeners.change.map((fn) => fn()));
+    await boot.settle();
+
+    answer({ symbol: "NEW", decimals: 18, name: "New Token" });
+    await boot.settle();
+    releaseLock();
+    await lockHeld;
+    await switching;
+    await adding;
+
+    const stored = boot.storage.read("autistmask");
+    expect(stored.networkId).toBe("sepolia");
+    expect(stored.trackedTokens).toEqual([]);
+    expect(stored.networkTrackedTokens.mainnet).toEqual([
+        {
+            address: NEW_TOKEN_ADDRESS,
+            symbol: "NEW",
+            decimals: 18,
+            name: "New Token",
+        },
+    ]);
+});
+
 describe("Back after a switch from the Settings gear", () => {
     test("SettingsAddToken no longer offers the common tokens", async () => {
         const boot = await bootOnAddToken("mainnet");

tests/transactionDetailLateAnswer.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
+// TransactionDetail shows only details that Blockscout gave for the
+// transaction on screen (https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/675).
+//
+// The screen asks Blockscout for its transaction and does not wait for the
+// answer. So the user can press Back and open another transaction before
+// Blockscout answers for the first. The first answer must then fill nothing on
+// the second transaction's screen. An answer that lands while Settings is up
+// must still fill TransactionDetail.
+//
+// Driven through the real popup over a stored profile
+// (tests/support/popupBoot.js). Each transaction is opened as a history screen
+// opens it: the current screen is pushed, then transactionDetail.show() draws
+// the transaction.
+
+"use strict";
+
+const {
+    bootPopup,
+    cleanupPopup,
+    unversionedValidProfile,
+    ADDRESS,
+} = require("./support/popupBoot");
+
+const MAINNET_BLOCKSCOUT = "https://eth.blockscout.com/api/v2";
+const SEPOLIA_BLOCKSCOUT = "https://eth-sepolia.blockscout.com/api/v2";
+const RECIPIENT = "0x2222222222222222222222222222222222222222";
+
+// A history entry for a send of 1 `symbol` from ADDRESS to RECIPIENT, on the
+// network with `chainId`.
+function historyEntry(hash, chainId, symbol) {
+    return {
+        hash,
+        from: ADDRESS,
+        to: RECIPIENT,
+        value: "1.0000",
+        exactValue: "1.0",
+        symbol,
+        timestamp: 1790000000,
+        isError: false,
+        direction: "sent",
+        directionLabel: "Sent",
+        contractAddress: null,
+        chainId,
+    };
+}
+
+const FIRST = historyEntry("0x" + "aa".repeat(32), "0x1", "ETH");
+const SECOND = historyEntry("0x" + "bb".repeat(32), "0x1", "ETH");
+// A transaction on Sepolia with the same hash as FIRST.
+const FIRST_ON_SEPOLIA = historyEntry(FIRST.hash, "0xaa36a7", "SepoliaETH");
+
+// The URL that asks Blockscout for `entry`, on the network it was sent on.
+function requestUrl(entry) {
+    const blockscout =
+        entry.chainId === "0x1" ? MAINNET_BLOCKSCOUT : SEPOLIA_BLOCKSCOUT;
+    return blockscout + "/transactions/" + entry.hash;
+}
+
+// What Blockscout reports for each transaction, by the URL that asks for it.
+const ANSWERS = {
+    [requestUrl(FIRST)]: {
+        block_number: 21000001,
+        nonce: 4441,
+        fee: { value: "21000000000000" },
+        raw_input: "0x11111111",
+        method: "firstMethod",
+    },
+    [requestUrl(SECOND)]: {
+        block_number: 21000002,
+        nonce: 4442,
+        fee: { value: "42000000000000" },
+        raw_input: "0x22222222",
+        method: "secondMethod",
+    },
+    [requestUrl(FIRST_ON_SEPOLIA)]: {
+        block_number: 21000003,
+        nonce: 4443,
+        fee: { value: "63000000000000" },
+        raw_input: "0x33333333",
+        method: "sepoliaMethod",
+    },
+};
+
+// The text each answer puts on screen: its block, nonce, fee, method name and
+// raw data. No text from one answer appears in another.
+const FIRST_SHOWN = [
+    "21000001",
+    "4441",
+    "0.000021 ETH",
+    "firstMethod",
+    "0x11111111",
+];
+const SECOND_SHOWN = [
+    "21000002",
+    "4442",
+    "0.000042 ETH",
+    "secondMethod",
+    "0x22222222",
+];
+const FIRST_ON_SEPOLIA_SHOWN = [
+    "21000003",
+    "4443",
+    "0.000063 SepoliaETH",
+    "sepoliaMethod",
+    "0x33333333",
+];
+
+// Everything drawn in the fields that Blockscout's answer fills.
+function drawnDetails(page) {
+    return [
+        "tx-detail-block",
+        "tx-detail-nonce",
+        "tx-detail-fee",
+        "tx-detail-calldata-action",
+        "tx-detail-rawdata",
+    ]
+        .map((id) => page.node(id).innerHTML + page.node(id).textContent)
+        .join("\n");
+}
+
+// Opens `entry` on TransactionDetail, as a history screen does.
+function open(entry) {
+    require("../src/popup/views/helpers").pushCurrentView();
+    require("../src/popup/views/transactionDetail").show(entry);
+}
+
+// The URLs of every request to Blockscout so far, in order.
+function requestedUrls() {
+    return globalThis.fetch.mock.calls.map(([url]) => url);
+}
+
+// Boots the popup on Home with "Use Blockscout" on. Blockscout answers every
+// request at once from ANSWERS, except the request for `held`. Returns the
+// page and answer(), which lets the answer for `held` land.
+async function bootWithHeldRequest(held) {
+    const page = await bootPopup(
+        unversionedValidProfile({ useBlockscout: true }),
+    );
+    let answer;
+    const heldAnswer = new Promise((resolve) => {
+        answer = resolve;
+    });
+    globalThis.fetch = jest.fn(async (url) => {
+        if (url === requestUrl(held)) await heldAnswer;
+        return { ok: true, status: 200, json: async () => ANSWERS[url] };
+    });
+    return { page, answer: () => answer() };
+}
+
+// The user opens `first`, whose request to Blockscout is held. Then the user
+// presses Back and opens `second`. Then the answer for `first` lands. Returns
+// the page.
+async function firstAnswerLandsOnSecond(first, second) {
+    const { page, answer } = await bootWithHeldRequest(first);
+    open(first);
+    await page.settle();
+    await page.click("btn-tx-back");
+    expect(page.visibleViews()).toEqual(["main"]);
+    open(second);
+    await page.settle();
+    expect(requestedUrls()).toEqual([requestUrl(first), requestUrl(second)]);
+    answer();
+    await page.settle();
+    expect(page.visibleViews()).toEqual(["transaction"]);
+    return page;
+}
+
+afterEach(() => {
+    cleanupPopup();
+});
+
+test("an answer for the first transaction that lands on the second one's screen fills nothing", async () => {
+    const page = await firstAnswerLandsOnSecond(FIRST, SECOND);
+
+    const drawn = drawnDetails(page);
+    for (const text of SECOND_SHOWN) expect(drawn).toContain(text);
+    for (const text of FIRST_SHOWN) expect(drawn).not.toContain(text);
+});
+
+test("an answer for a hash on mainnet that lands on the same hash's screen on Sepolia fills nothing", async () => {
+    const page = await firstAnswerLandsOnSecond(FIRST, FIRST_ON_SEPOLIA);
+
+    const drawn = drawnDetails(page);
+    for (const text of FIRST_ON_SEPOLIA_SHOWN) expect(drawn).toContain(text);
+    for (const text of FIRST_SHOWN) expect(drawn).not.toContain(text);
+});
+
+test("an answer that lands while Settings is up still fills TransactionDetail", async () => {
+    const { page, answer } = await bootWithHeldRequest(FIRST);
+    open(FIRST);
+    await page.settle();
+    await page.click("btn-settings");
+    expect(page.visibleViews()).toEqual(["settings"]);
+    answer();
+    await page.settle();
+    await page.click("btn-settings");
+
+    expect(page.visibleViews()).toEqual(["transaction"]);
+    expect(requestedUrls()).toEqual([requestUrl(FIRST)]);
+    const drawn = drawnDetails(page);
+    for (const text of FIRST_SHOWN) expect(drawn).toContain(text);
+});

tests/uniswap.test.js

@@ -3310,6 +3310,334 @@ describe("uniswap decoder", () => {
 
             expect(detail(result, "Amount").value).toBe("Up to 1000.0000 USDT");
         });
+
+        // https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/660 — Permit2 has no
+        // allowance of ETH, so a permit on the zero address reads as one on a
+        // token nothing knows. On next at 53551c6 such a permit's Allowance
+        // token line read ETH. A permit of 1 wei of the zero address before a
+        // V4 step of 5 ETH made the Amount line read 0.000000000000000001 ETH.
+        // With that permit to another spender and a SETTLE the router pays, no
+        // line gave the 5 ETH.
+        describe("a permit on the zero address", () => {
+            const FIVE_ETH = 5000000000000000000n;
+            // The lines of a permit of `amount` base units of the zero
+            // address for `spender`.
+            const zeroAddressLines = (amount, spender) => [
+                [
+                    "Permit2 allowance",
+                    amount + " base units (decimals unknown)",
+                ],
+                ["Allowance token", ZERO_ADDR],
+                ["Allowance spender", getAddress(spender)],
+            ];
+            // A V4 swap of 5 ETH for USDC. The user pays its SETTLE when
+            // `payerIsUser` is true; otherwise the router pays it from the
+            // transaction's value.
+            const v4FiveEth = (payerIsUser) =>
+                encodeV4Swap(
+                    new Uint8Array([
+                        V4_SWAP_EXACT_IN_SINGLE_ID,
+                        V4_SETTLE_ID,
+                        V4_TAKE_ALL_ID,
+                    ]),
+                    [
+                        encodeV4ExactInSingle(
+                            ZERO_ADDR,
+                            USDC_ADDR,
+                            FIVE_ETH,
+                            1n,
+                        ),
+                        settle(ZERO_ADDR, FIVE_ETH, payerIsUser),
+                        encodeV4TakeAll(USDC_ADDR, 1n),
+                    ],
+                );
+
+            test("a PERMIT2_PERMIT on the zero address names the address", () => {
+                const result = decodeSteps(
+                    [0x00, 0x0a],
+                    [
+                        V3_600,
+                        encodePermit2(
+                            ZERO_ADDR,
+                            1000000000000000000n,
+                            ROUTER_ADDR,
+                        ),
+                    ],
+                );
+                expect(linesBetweenTokens(result)).toEqual([
+                    ["Amount", "600.0000 USDT"],
+                    ...zeroAddressLines("1000000000000000000", ROUTER_ADDR),
+                ]);
+                expect(detail(result, "Allowance token").address).toBe(
+                    ZERO_ADDR,
+                );
+            });
+
+            test("a PERMIT2_PERMIT_BATCH entry on the zero address names the address", () => {
+                const result = decodeSteps(
+                    [0x03, 0x00],
+                    [
+                        encodePermit2Batch(
+                            [
+                                [USDT_ADDR, USDT_600],
+                                [ZERO_ADDR, 1000000000000000000n],
+                            ],
+                            ROUTER_ADDR,
+                        ),
+                        V3_600,
+                    ],
+                );
+                expect(linesBetweenTokens(result)).toEqual([
+                    ["Amount", "600.0000 USDT"],
+                    ...USDT_600_LINES,
+                    ...zeroAddressLines("1000000000000000000", ROUTER_ADDR),
+                ]);
+            });
+
+            test("a PERMIT2_PERMIT of 1 wei of the zero address, then a V4 step of 5 ETH the user settles, shows the 5 ETH", () => {
+                const result = decodeSteps(
+                    [0x0a, 0x10],
+                    [
+                        encodePermit2(ZERO_ADDR, 1n, ROUTER_ADDR),
+                        v4FiveEth(true),
+                    ],
+                );
+                expect(detail(result, "Token In").value).toBe("ETH (native)");
+                expect(linesBetweenTokens(result)).toEqual([
+                    ["Amount", "5.0000 ETH"],
+                    ...zeroAddressLines("1", ROUTER_ADDR),
+                ]);
+            });
+
+            test("a PERMIT2_PERMIT of 1 wei of the zero address to another spender, then a V4 step of 5 ETH the router settles, shows the 5 ETH", () => {
+                const result = decodeSteps(
+                    [0x0a, 0x10],
+                    [
+                        encodePermit2(ZERO_ADDR, 1n, OTHER_ADDR),
+                        v4FiveEth(false),
+                    ],
+                );
+                expect(detail(result, "Token In").value).toBe("ETH (native)");
+                expect(linesBetweenTokens(result)).toEqual([
+                    ["Amount", "5.0000 ETH"],
+                    ...zeroAddressLines("1", OTHER_ADDR),
+                ]);
+            });
+
+            test("a PERMIT2_PERMIT_BATCH entry of 1 wei of the zero address to another spender, then a V4 step of 5 ETH the router settles, shows the 5 ETH", () => {
+                const result = decodeSteps(
+                    [0x03, 0x10],
+                    [
+                        encodePermit2Batch([[ZERO_ADDR, 1n]], OTHER_ADDR),
+                        v4FiveEth(false),
+                    ],
+                );
+                expect(detail(result, "Token In").value).toBe("ETH (native)");
+                expect(linesBetweenTokens(result)).toEqual([
+                    ["Amount", "5.0000 ETH"],
+                    ...zeroAddressLines("1", OTHER_ADDR),
+                ]);
+            });
+        });
+
+        // https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/685 — Permit2 moves no
+        // ETH, so a PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM of the zero address reads as a move
+        // of a token nothing knows. On next at ec6b6b5 its lines read ETH,
+        // with an ETH figure.
+        describe("a PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM of the zero address", () => {
+            const MOVED_AMOUNT =
+                "1000000000000000000 base units (decimals unknown)";
+
+            test("to another address names the address", () => {
+                const result = decodeSteps(
+                    [0x00, 0x02],
+                    [V3_600, transfer(ZERO_ADDR, OTHER_ADDR, ONE_WETH)],
+                );
+                expect(linesBetweenTokens(result)).toEqual([
+                    ["Amount", "600.0000 USDT"],
+                    ["Moved from the sender", MOVED_AMOUNT],
+                    ["Token moved", ZERO_ADDR],
+                    ["Moved to", OTHER_ADDR],
+                ]);
+                expect(detail(result, "Token moved").address).toBe(ZERO_ADDR);
+            });
+
+            test("into the router names the address", () => {
+                const result = decodeSteps(
+                    [0x02, 0x00],
+                    [transfer(ZERO_ADDR, ROUTER_ADDR, ONE_WETH), V3_600],
+                );
+                expect(detail(result, "Paid to").value).toBe(
+                    "The router, " +
+                        MOVED_AMOUNT +
+                        " from the sender (later steps may not spend all of it)",
+                );
+                expect(detail(result, "Token moved into the router")).toEqual({
+                    label: "Token moved into the router",
+                    value: ZERO_ADDR,
+                    address: ZERO_ADDR,
+                    isToken: true,
+                });
+            });
+
+            // The V4 step's SETTLE names the user as payer and states no
+            // amount. The step's lines say that the ETH amount is not known.
+            test("after a V4 exact-out step of ETH, also shows that the ETH amount is not known", () => {
+                const v4EthExactOut = encodeV4Swap(
+                    new Uint8Array([
+                        V4_SWAP_EXACT_OUT_SINGLE_ID,
+                        V4_SETTLE_ID,
+                        V4_TAKE_ALL_ID,
+                    ]),
+                    [
+                        encodeV4ExactOutSingle(
+                            ZERO_ADDR,
+                            USDC_ADDR,
+                            590000000n,
+                            ONE_WETH,
+                        ),
+                        encodeV4Settle(ZERO_ADDR),
+                        encodeV4TakeAll(USDC_ADDR, 0n),
+                    ],
+                );
+                const result = decodeSteps(
+                    [0x10, 0x02],
+                    [v4EthExactOut, transfer(ZERO_ADDR, OTHER_ADDR, ONE_WETH)],
+                );
+                expect(detail(result, "Token In").value).toBe("ETH (native)");
+                expect(linesBetweenTokens(result)).toEqual([
+                    ["Moved from the sender", UNDECODED],
+                    ["Token moved", "ETH"],
+                    ["Moved to", "The swap step that spends it"],
+                    ["Moved from the sender", MOVED_AMOUNT],
+                    ["Token moved", ZERO_ADDR],
+                    ["Moved to", OTHER_ADDR],
+                ]);
+            });
+        });
+
+        // https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/682 — V4 pays a SETTLE
+        // of ETH from the router's own ETH, whichever payer the SETTLE names,
+        // and the router holds the transaction's value. On next at 36b2002 a
+        // SETTLE of 1 ETH that names the router as payer gave no ETH line.
+        describe("a V4 SETTLE of ETH that names the router as payer", () => {
+            const ONE_ETH = 1000000000000000000n;
+            // A V4 swap of `amount` of ETH for USDC. The SETTLE names the
+            // router as payer.
+            const v4EthFromRouter = (amount) =>
+                encodeV4Swap(
+                    new Uint8Array([
+                        V4_SWAP_EXACT_IN_SINGLE_ID,
+                        V4_SETTLE_ID,
+                        V4_TAKE_ALL_ID,
+                    ]),
+                    [
+                        encodeV4ExactInSingle(ZERO_ADDR, USDC_ADDR, amount, 1n),
+                        settle(ZERO_ADDR, amount, false),
+                        encodeV4TakeAll(USDC_ADDR, 1n),
+                    ],
+                );
+
+            test("after a V3 exact-in of 600 USDT, shows the 1 ETH moved from the sender", () => {
+                const result = decodeSteps(
+                    [0x00, 0x10],
+                    [V3_600, v4EthFromRouter(ONE_ETH)],
+                );
+                expect(linesBetweenTokens(result)).toEqual([
+                    ["Amount", "600.0000 USDT"],
+                    ["Moved from the sender", "1.0000 ETH"],
+                    ["Token moved", "ETH"],
+                    ["Moved to", "The swap step that spends it"],
+                ]);
+            });
+
+            // The UNWRAP_WETH leaves ETH in the router. The SETTLE may spend
+            // that ETH before the transaction's value.
+            test("after an UNWRAP_WETH into the router, shows at most 1 ETH moved from the sender", () => {
+                const result = decodeSteps(
+                    [0x00, 0x0c, 0x10],
+                    [
+                        encodeV3SwapExactIn(ROUTER_ADDR, USDT_600, 1n, [
+                            USDT_ADDR,
+                            WETH_ADDR,
+                        ]),
+                        encodeWrapEth(ROUTER_ADDR, 0n), // UNWRAP_WETH, same encoding
+                        v4EthFromRouter(ONE_ETH),
+                    ],
+                );
+                expect(linesBetweenTokens(result)).toEqual([
+                    ["Amount", "600.0000 USDT"],
+                    ["Moved from the sender", "Up to 1.0000 ETH"],
+                    ["Token moved", "ETH"],
+                    ["Moved to", "The swap step that spends it"],
+                ]);
+            });
+
+            test("after a WRAP_ETH of 0.5 ETH, adds the SETTLE's 0.5 ETH to the Amount line", () => {
+                const result = decodeSteps(
+                    [0x0b, 0x10],
+                    [
+                        encodeWrapEth(ROUTER_ADDR, ONE_ETH / 2n),
+                        v4EthFromRouter(ONE_ETH / 2n),
+                    ],
+                );
+                expect(linesBetweenTokens(result)).toEqual([
+                    ["Amount", "1.0000 ETH"],
+                ]);
+            });
+
+            // The WRAP_ETH sets Token In to ETH, and the UNWRAP_WETH leaves
+            // ETH in the router. The SETTLE may spend that ETH before the
+            // transaction's value, so its 1 ETH never joins the Amount line.
+            test("after a WRAP_ETH and an UNWRAP_WETH into the router, keeps the Amount line and shows at most 1 ETH moved from the sender", () => {
+                const result = decodeSteps(
+                    [0x0b, 0x0c, 0x10],
+                    [
+                        encodeWrapEth(ROUTER_ADDR, ONE_ETH / 2n),
+                        encodeWrapEth(ROUTER_ADDR, 0n), // UNWRAP_WETH, same encoding
+                        v4EthFromRouter(ONE_ETH),
+                    ],
+                );
+                expect(linesBetweenTokens(result)).toEqual([
+                    ["Amount", "0.5000 ETH"],
+                    ["Moved from the sender", "Up to 1.0000 ETH"],
+                    ["Token moved", "ETH"],
+                    ["Moved to", "The swap step that spends it"],
+                ]);
+            });
+
+            // A SETTLE of CONTRACT_BALANCE pays all the router holds, an
+            // amount the calldata does not state.
+            test("of CONTRACT_BALANCE, on the step that sets the input side, shows an unknown amount moved from the sender", () => {
+                const result = decodeSteps(
+                    [0x10],
+                    [
+                        encodeV4Swap(
+                            new Uint8Array([
+                                V4_SWAP_EXACT_IN_SINGLE_ID,
+                                V4_SETTLE_ID,
+                                V4_TAKE_ALL_ID,
+                            ]),
+                            [
+                                encodeV4ExactInSingle(
+                                    ZERO_ADDR,
+                                    USDC_ADDR,
+                                    ONE_ETH,
+                                    1n,
+                                ),
+                                settle(ZERO_ADDR, 2n ** 255n, false), // CONTRACT_BALANCE
+                                encodeV4TakeAll(USDC_ADDR, 1n),
+                            ],
+                        ),
+                    ],
+                );
+                expect(linesBetweenTokens(result)).toEqual([
+                    ["Moved from the sender", UNDECODED],
+                    ["Token moved", "ETH"],
+                    ["Moved to", "The swap step that spends it"],
+                ]);
+            });
+        });
     });
 
     // https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/359 — the output half, in
@@ -4052,10 +4380,9 @@ describe("uniswap decoder", () => {
         expect(detail(result, "Min. received").value).toBe("2.0000 USDC");
     });
 
-    // With no minimum stated before it, a zero balance check is what sets the
-    // output side, and it guarantees nothing. No step pays anyone, so the
-    // minimum is not said to be received.
-    test("a zero balance check with no earlier minimum states no minimum", () => {
+    // A zero balance check sets neither Token Out nor the minimum. The route
+    // pays only the WRAP_ETH's WETH, to the router, where it stays.
+    test("a zero balance check after a WRAP_ETH into the router names no output token and no minimum", () => {
         const data = buildExecute(
             solidityPacked(["uint8", "uint8"], [0x0b, 0x0e]),
             [
@@ -4068,9 +4395,16 @@ describe("uniswap decoder", () => {
         const result = uniswap.decode(data, ROUTER_ADDR, "0x1", {}, USER_ADDR);
         expect(result).not.toBeNull();
 
-        expect(detail(result, "Token Out").value).toContain("USDT");
-        expect(detail(result, "Min. paid out").value).toBe(
-            "None (no minimum guaranteed)",
+        expect(detail(result, "Token Out").value).toBe(
+            "Unknown (not named in the calldata)",
+        );
+        expect(detail(result, "Min. paid out")).toBeUndefined();
+        expect(detail(result, "Min. received")).toBeUndefined();
+        expect(detail(result, "Paid to").value).toBe(
+            "The router, where it stays (no later step pays it out)",
+        );
+        expect(detail(result, "Token moved into the router").address).toBe(
+            WETH_ADDR,
         );
     });
 

tests/uniswapRecipient.test.js

@@ -688,6 +688,62 @@ describe("an UNWRAP_WETH makes the output ETH only when the router holds it", ()
         ]);
     });
 
+    // The same route, then a balance check of the sender's USDC with a zero
+    // minimum. The check guarantees nothing, so Token Out stays ETH
+    // (https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/649).
+    test("the same route, then a zero balance check of USDC, still reads as ETH with no minimum", () => {
+        const result = decode(
+            execute(
+                v4Swap(
+                    SWAP_USDT_FOR_WETH,
+                    SETTLE_USDT,
+                    take(WETH, MSG_SENDER, (ONE_WETH * 6n) / 10n),
+                    take(WETH, ADDRESS_THIS),
+                ),
+                unwrapWeth(MSG_SENDER),
+                balanceCheck(USDC, 0n),
+            ),
+        );
+        expect(result.name).toBe("Swap USDT → ETH");
+        expect(detail(result, "Token Out").value).toBe("ETH");
+        expect(labels(result)).toEqual([
+            "Protocol",
+            "Token In",
+            "Amount",
+            "Token Out",
+            "Steps",
+            "Deadline",
+        ]);
+    });
+
+    // A PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM moves the sender's WETH into the router. An
+    // UNWRAP_WETH pays that WETH to the user as ETH. A zero balance check of
+    // USDC sets neither Token Out nor the minimum, before the UNWRAP_WETH or
+    // after it (https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/649).
+    test.each([
+        {
+            kind: "before the UNWRAP_WETH",
+            steps: [balanceCheck(USDC, 0n), unwrapWeth(MSG_SENDER)],
+        },
+        {
+            kind: "after the UNWRAP_WETH",
+            steps: [unwrapWeth(MSG_SENDER), balanceCheck(USDC, 0n)],
+        },
+    ])(
+        "WETH moved into the router and unwrapped, with a zero balance check of USDC $kind, reads as ETH with no minimum",
+        ({ steps }) => {
+            const result = decode(
+                execute(
+                    permit2TransferFrom(WETH, ADDRESS_THIS, ONE_WETH),
+                    ...steps,
+                ),
+            );
+            expect(detail(result, "Token Out").value).toBe("ETH");
+            expect(detail(result, "Min. received")).toBeUndefined();
+            expect(detail(result, "Min. paid out")).toBeUndefined();
+        },
+    );
+
     // A TAKE the decoder cannot read may pay part of the WETH to the user.
     test("one V4 step paying WETH to the router beside a TAKE that cannot be read, then an UNWRAP_WETH, reads as ETH with no minimum", () => {
         const result = decode(
@@ -1661,9 +1717,18 @@ describe("any token left in the router is not received", () => {
             ),
             min: "1990.0000 USDC",
         },
-        {
-            kind: "a swap paying WETH to the router, an UNWRAP_WETH into the router, then a V4 swap settling all the ETH from the router",
-            data: execute(
+    ])("$kind reads as a swap paid to the user", ({ data, min }) => {
+        const result = decode(data);
+        expect(labels(result)).toEqual(PAID_TO_USER);
+        expect(detail(result, "Min. received").value).toBe(min);
+    });
+
+    // https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/682 — the SETTLE spends all
+    // the router's ETH, the transaction's value included, so the sender pays
+    // an amount the calldata does not state.
+    test("a swap paying WETH to the router, an UNWRAP_WETH into the router, then a V4 swap settling all the ETH from the router reads as a swap paid to the user", () => {
+        const result = decode(
+            execute(
                 swapToWeth(ADDRESS_THIS),
                 unwrapWeth(ADDRESS_THIS),
                 v4Swap(
@@ -1672,12 +1737,23 @@ describe("any token left in the router is not received", () => {
                     takeAll(USDC),
                 ),
             ),
-            min: "1990.0000 USDC",
-        },
-    ])("$kind reads as a swap paid to the user", ({ data, min }) => {
-        const result = decode(data);
-        expect(labels(result)).toEqual(PAID_TO_USER);
-        expect(detail(result, "Min. received").value).toBe(min);
+        );
+        expect(labels(result)).toEqual([
+            "Protocol",
+            "Token In",
+            "Amount",
+            "Moved from the sender",
+            "Token moved",
+            "Moved to",
+            "Token Out",
+            "Min. received",
+            "Steps",
+            "Deadline",
+        ]);
+        expect(detail(result, "Moved from the sender").value).toBe(
+            "Unknown (could not be decoded)",
+        );
+        expect(detail(result, "Min. received").value).toBe("1990.0000 USDC");
     });
 });
 
@@ -2800,17 +2876,16 @@ describe("the allow-revert flag", () => {
         },
     );
 
-    test("a BALANCE_CHECK_ERC20 with the flag, and no minimum before it, states none", () => {
+    test("a BALANCE_CHECK_ERC20 with the flag, and no minimum before it, names no output token and no minimum", () => {
         const check = balanceCheck(WETH, ONE_WETH);
         expect(detail(decode(execute(check)), "Min. paid out").value).toBe(
             "1.0000 WETH",
         );
 
         const withFlag = decode(execute(flagged(check)));
-        expect(detail(withFlag, "Token Out").address).toBe(WETH);
-        expect(detail(withFlag, "Min. paid out").value).toBe(
-            "None (no minimum guaranteed)",
-        );
+        expect(detail(withFlag, "Token Out").value).toBe(UNNAMED);
+        expect(detail(withFlag, "Min. paid out")).toBeUndefined();
+        expect(detail(withFlag, "Min. received")).toBeUndefined();
     });
 
     // Only the routers from UniversalRouterV2 on let a PERMIT2_PERMIT fail.