chore: run jest in two worker processes (closes #426)
check / check (push) Waiting to run
e2e / e2e-chrome (push) Waiting to run
e2e / e2e-firefox (push) Waiting to run

The test and test:verbose scripts ran jest with one worker per CPU core,
about 47 processes and 7-8 GiB per run on the shared 48-core build host.
They now pass --maxWorkers=2. One process took the suite past the
30-second cap in script/test, so two it is; the cap is unchanged.
make check, the pre-commit hook and script/cibuild all reach jest
through these scripts. The suite timings quoted in the script/test and
Dockerfile comments are updated to match.

Model: opus-5-5
This commit is contained in:
2026-10-04 11:08:41 +00:00
parent 1247c24c4d
commit 70d06dcb13
4 changed files with 22 additions and 10 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ WORKDIR /app
ENV AUTISTMASK_LINT_NATIVE=1
# script/test's default 30s bound is the host figure, against a suite that
# runs in about 8s there. In here the same suite starts on a cold jest cache
# runs in about 28s there. In here the same suite starts on a cold jest cache
# and shares the runner with the rest of the build, so 30s is marginal rather
# than a bound — it killed a healthy suite at 30.6s on a cold CI cache. 180s
# still catches a hang in three minutes and cannot be tripped by a suite that
+9
View File
@@ -45,6 +45,15 @@ but the review is broader than any of them.
# Completed Steps
- 2026-10-04: `make test` runs jest in two worker processes
([#426](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/426)). The `test` and
`test:verbose` scripts in `package.json` ran `jest --forceExit`, which starts
one worker per CPU core: about 47 processes and 7-8 GiB per run on the shared
48-core build host. They now pass `--maxWorkers=2`. One process took the suite
past the 30-second cap in `script/test`, which is unchanged; two workers stay
inside it, though on the busy build host only just. `make check`, the
pre-commit hook and `script/cibuild` all run the suite through these scripts.
- 2026-10-04: The error container on each dApp approval screen keeps its height
when an error appears
([#297](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/297)). `#approve-tx-error`
+2 -2
View File
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
"license": "GPL-3.0",
"private": true,
"scripts": {
"test": "jest --forceExit",
"test:verbose": "jest --forceExit --verbose",
"test": "jest --forceExit --maxWorkers=2",
"test:verbose": "jest --forceExit --maxWorkers=2 --verbose",
"build": "node build.js",
"lint": "eslint . && prettier --check .",
"fmt": "prettier --write .",
+10 -7
View File
@@ -1,13 +1,16 @@
#!/bin/sh
# script/test: run the test suite.
#
# The timeout bounds a hung suite; it is not a performance budget. On a
# developer host the suite finishes in about 8s and REPO_POLICIES' 30s cap is
# the bound. Inside the image the same suite also pays a cold jest cache and
# shares the runner with the rest of the build, which is not what that budget
# describes, so the Dockerfile raises the bound through
# AUTISTMASK_TEST_TIMEOUT. A cap a healthy suite can trip on a cold cache
# produces a red that means nothing, and teaches "just run it again".
# jest runs two worker processes (package.json), not one per CPU core: on a
# many-core shared host one per core took gigabytes of RAM per run.
#
# The timeout bounds a hung suite; it is not a performance budget. On the busy
# shared build host the suite takes about 28s with two workers and
# REPO_POLICIES' 30s cap is the bound. Inside the image the same suite also
# pays a cold jest cache and shares the runner with the rest of the build,
# which is not what that budget describes, so the Dockerfile raises the bound
# through AUTISTMASK_TEST_TIMEOUT. A cap a healthy suite can trip on a cold
# cache produces a red that means nothing, and teaches "just run it again".
set -eu
ROOT="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")/.." && pwd -P)"