Ban notes name the reputation sources that listed the client (closes #109)
check / check (push) Waiting to run

A ban's notes, in bans.json and in its alert, gain `reputation`: each
blocklist, DNSBL zone or AbuseIPDB that listed the client when the ban
was made, as its `source`, named and ordered as in the request log's
`reputation`, with AbuseIPDB's `score`. It is left out when none did.
README.md shows it in a bans.json example.

Notes now hold a list, so bans can no longer be compared with ==: the
tests compare them with reflect.DeepEqual.

Judgement call: the score is a pointer, so a score of 0, a hit while
SWWAF_ABUSEIPDB_MIN_SCORE is 0, is still written.

Model: opus-5-5
This commit was merged in pull request #114.
This commit is contained in:
2026-10-08 03:08:01 +02:00
parent a6634454cd
commit 04e66d2069
16 changed files with 243 additions and 68 deletions
+2 -1
View File
@@ -118,7 +118,8 @@ func TestObserveModeRaisesTheBanAlertsItWouldHave(t *testing.T) {
line := s.get(ipv6Client, http.StatusOK, requestlog.ActionForward)
// No ban is made, and none made permanent.
if held := server.Ledger.Snapshot(); len(held) != 1 || held[0] != attackBan ||
held := server.Ledger.Snapshot()
if len(held) != 1 || !reflect.DeepEqual(held[0], attackBan) ||
line.BanExpires != requestlog.FormatTime(attackBan.Expires) {
t.Errorf("the ledger holds %+v, and the log line gives %s, want the ban "+
"for the attack alone, as it was", held, line.BanExpires)