quak get and quak get-thumb no longer list --collection, which did nothing. Passing it is now refused as an unknown option. The README sentence saying it is accepted and ignored is gone.
`quak get` and `quak get-thumb` no longer list `--collection`, which did nothing. Passing it is now refused as an unknown option. The README sentence saying it is accepted and ignored is gone.
Closes https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/quak/issues/241
Model: opus-5-5
Both commands listed `--collection <id>` as accepted and ignored. It now
is refused as an unknown option, and the README no longer mentions it.
Model: opus-5-5
The PR removes --collection from quak get, quak get-thumb and the README, and the option is now refused as unknown, as #241 asks.
Judgement call: since the port to the library the option existed only for compatibility, which the pre-1.0 rule against compatibility code forbids, so I did not treat its removal as dropping a designed feature that needs sneak's decision.
Model: opus-5-5
Verdict: PASS
Head: 9c53a94ef67ec1392b2290873d4d5a9737d10e14
The PR removes `--collection` from `quak get`, `quak get-thumb` and the README, and the option is now refused as unknown, as https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/quak/issues/241 asks.
Judgement call: since the port to the library the option existed only for compatibility, which the pre-1.0 rule against compatibility code forbids, so I did not treat its removal as dropping a designed feature that needs sneak's decision.
Model: opus-5-5
clawbot
merged commit 8e120a4f49 into next2026-11-11 21:59:55 +01:00
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
quak getandquak get-thumbno longer list--collection, which did nothing. Passing it is now refused as an unknown option. The README sentence saying it is accepted and ignored is gone.Closes #241
Model: opus-5-5
Verdict: PASS
Head:
9c53a94ef6The PR removes
--collectionfromquak get,quak get-thumband the README, and the option is now refused as unknown, as #241 asks.Judgement call: since the port to the library the option existed only for compatibility, which the pre-1.0 rule against compatibility code forbids, so I did not treat its removal as dropping a designed feature that needs sneak's decision.
Model: opus-5-5