Compare commits
25 Commits
llm-prose-
...
33fb5dde98
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
33fb5dde98 | ||
| 3a218497b8 | |||
| fd78aeb003 | |||
|
|
d173e69f85 | ||
|
|
51c394552e | ||
| 0f8efafe68 | |||
| 3d8d1c0600 | |||
| cc5d877779 | |||
| 4b64c213f8 | |||
| 777822e50e | |||
| 1c84344978 | |||
| 41005ecbe5 | |||
| eb6b11ee23 | |||
| ee4f9039f2 | |||
|
|
18173fabc6 | ||
| 68a00dc545 | |||
|
|
533e77ad34 | ||
| 492fb85500 | |||
|
|
5c02cf8bde | ||
| 3ce000178f | |||
|
|
771551baed | ||
|
|
720d6ee57c | ||
|
|
5e15d77d8e | ||
|
|
2f4f5c9cab | ||
| 7eae7dcc6c |
@@ -1,3 +1,97 @@
|
||||
# Docker matches this file with moby/patternmatcher: Go filepath.Match
|
||||
# semantics plus a `**` extension, compiled to a regexp. Plain
|
||||
# filepath.Match has no `**` at all. What follows from that: `*` does not
|
||||
# cross `/`, and a pattern without a leading `**/` is anchored at the
|
||||
# build-context root. Every depth-independent pattern therefore needs the
|
||||
# `**/` prefix — without it `config/.env` and `certs/server.key` still
|
||||
# ship while the file reads as solved.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Root-anchored entries are for paths that occur exactly once, at the
|
||||
# context root. A host-built binary is the usual case, and it must be
|
||||
# written anchored: `/myapp`, never `**/myapp`. The prefixed form also
|
||||
# matches `cmd/myapp/`, which deletes the package directory from the
|
||||
# context. In-repo agent scratch is the other case, for the same reason
|
||||
# — with the caveat recorded at that entry: anchoring is exact only
|
||||
# where agents run at the repo root, and a repo where they do not must
|
||||
# add its own entries.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Matching is case-sensitive, so `**/*.key` does not match
|
||||
# `certs/SERVER.KEY`, which is reachable on the case-insensitive
|
||||
# filesystems most laptops use. Adding an ALL-CAPS twin per pattern is
|
||||
# not the fix: it still misses `Server.Key` while reading as though case
|
||||
# were handled. Character ranges cover every spelling in one line, so
|
||||
# every secret name below is written that way — including the
|
||||
# extensionless SSH keys and `.envrc`, because on those same
|
||||
# case-insensitive filesystems direnv reads `.ENVRC` and ssh reads
|
||||
# `ID_RSA`.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# `**/*.[eE][nN][vV]` also excludes a committed env template such as
|
||||
# `example.env`. If the build genuinely needs one, re-include it with a
|
||||
# negation after the pattern: `!docs/example.env`.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Extend this file with the repo's own host-built artifacts (compiled
|
||||
# binaries, test binaries, coverage output); those are per-repo and
|
||||
# belong here because a host build otherwise drops them into the
|
||||
# context.
|
||||
|
||||
# Repository metadata: exactly one, at the context root. Excluding it
|
||||
# means `git describe` cannot run in any build stage, and it fails
|
||||
# quietly there rather than erroring, so a version embedded that way
|
||||
# comes out empty. Compute the version on the host and pass it in with
|
||||
# `--build-arg VERSION=...`; see the version rule in REPO_POLICIES.md.
|
||||
.git
|
||||
node_modules
|
||||
.DS_Store
|
||||
|
||||
# In-repo agent scratch: a directory holding a full additional checkout
|
||||
# of the repo for each in-flight agent. Anchored because it occurs
|
||||
# exactly once *where agents run at the repo root*, which is the
|
||||
# convention this file assumes; the `**/` form would also match any
|
||||
# nested directory of that name and delete it from the build.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# KNOWN GAP, and it is not hypothetical: the directory is created in the
|
||||
# agent's working directory. If agents in this repo run in
|
||||
# subdirectories — a monorepo with a per-service agent, say — then
|
||||
# `services/api/.claude/` is NOT excluded by the line below and still
|
||||
# reaches the build context and the image, which is the exposure this
|
||||
# entry exists to close. A repo in that shape adds its own anchored
|
||||
# entries (`/services/api/.claude`), or `**/.claude` after confirming no
|
||||
# legitimately named nested directory would be caught.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Not case-folded, unlike the secret patterns below: tooling creates
|
||||
# this directory in exactly one spelling, so a folded pattern would add
|
||||
# no coverage.
|
||||
.claude
|
||||
|
||||
# Environment files. `*.env` covers both the bare `.env` name (`*` matches
|
||||
# the empty string) and the `prod.env` convention.
|
||||
**/*.[eE][nN][vV]
|
||||
**/.[eE][nN][vV].*
|
||||
**/.[eE][nN][vV][rR][cC]
|
||||
|
||||
# Private keys and the bundles that carry them. Public certificates
|
||||
# (*.crt, *.cer) are deliberately absent: they are not secrets and are
|
||||
# sometimes a legitimate build input.
|
||||
**/*.[pP][eE][mM]
|
||||
**/*.[kK][eE][yY]
|
||||
**/*.[pP]12
|
||||
**/*.[pP][fF][xX]
|
||||
**/[iI][dD]_[rR][sS][aA]
|
||||
**/[iI][dD]_[dD][sS][aA]
|
||||
**/[iI][dD]_[eE][cC][dD][sS][aA]
|
||||
**/[iI][dD]_[eE][dD]25519
|
||||
|
||||
# Dependencies: restored inside the image, never copied in.
|
||||
**/node_modules
|
||||
|
||||
# OS metadata.
|
||||
**/.DS_Store
|
||||
**/Thumbs.db
|
||||
|
||||
# Editor state. Never a build input, and it churns under a developer's
|
||||
# hands, so it invalidates COPY for reasons unrelated to the source.
|
||||
**/*.swp
|
||||
**/*.swo
|
||||
**/*~
|
||||
**/*.bak
|
||||
**/.idea
|
||||
**/.vscode
|
||||
**/*.sublime-*
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ jobs:
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
# actions/checkout v4.2.2, 2026-02-22
|
||||
- uses: actions/checkout@11bd71901bbe5b1630ceea73d27597364c9af683
|
||||
- run: docker build .
|
||||
- run: script/cibuild
|
||||
|
||||
6
.gitignore
vendored
6
.gitignore
vendored
@@ -11,6 +11,12 @@ Thumbs.db
|
||||
.vscode/
|
||||
*.sublime-*
|
||||
|
||||
# Agent scratch (worktrees of this repo, created and destroyed by
|
||||
# in-flight tooling). Unanchored: .gitignore patterns already match at
|
||||
# every depth, so no prefix is wanted here. This is not a .dockerignore
|
||||
# entry and must not be given a `**/` prefix on the way into one.
|
||||
.claude/
|
||||
|
||||
# Node
|
||||
node_modules/
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
|
||||
version: "2"
|
||||
|
||||
# Config schema uses the golangci-lint v2 layout (settings live under
|
||||
# linters.settings, not top-level linters-settings) so that the
|
||||
# thresholds below are actually applied by golangci-lint >= v2.
|
||||
|
||||
run:
|
||||
timeout: 5m
|
||||
modules-download-mode: readonly
|
||||
@@ -14,19 +18,17 @@ linters:
|
||||
- wsl # Deprecated, replaced by wsl_v5
|
||||
- wrapcheck # Too verbose for internal packages
|
||||
- varnamelen # Short names like db, id are idiomatic Go
|
||||
|
||||
linters-settings:
|
||||
lll:
|
||||
line-length: 88
|
||||
funlen:
|
||||
lines: 80
|
||||
statements: 50
|
||||
cyclop:
|
||||
max-complexity: 15
|
||||
dupl:
|
||||
threshold: 100
|
||||
settings:
|
||||
lll:
|
||||
line-length: 88
|
||||
funlen:
|
||||
lines: 80
|
||||
statements: 50
|
||||
cyclop:
|
||||
max-complexity: 15
|
||||
dupl:
|
||||
threshold: 100
|
||||
|
||||
issues:
|
||||
exclude-use-default: false
|
||||
max-issues-per-linter: 0
|
||||
max-same-issues: 0
|
||||
|
||||
25
Dockerfile
25
Dockerfile
@@ -1,11 +1,28 @@
|
||||
# node 22-alpine, 2026-02-22
|
||||
FROM node@sha256:e4bf2a82ad0a4037d28035ae71529873c069b13eb0455466ae0bc13363826e34
|
||||
|
||||
RUN apk add --no-cache make
|
||||
|
||||
WORKDIR /app
|
||||
|
||||
# script/bootstrap installs all prerequisites (make via apk here; node
|
||||
# and yarn are already in the base image, so those steps are skipped).
|
||||
# Dependency manifests are copied first so the bootstrap layer is
|
||||
# cached until they change.
|
||||
COPY script/ script/
|
||||
COPY package.json yarn.lock ./
|
||||
RUN yarn install --frozen-lockfile
|
||||
RUN script/bootstrap
|
||||
|
||||
COPY . .
|
||||
|
||||
RUN make check
|
||||
# CHECK_EPOCH is a per-invocation nonce supplied by script/cibuild and
|
||||
# script/docker. Without it an unchanged tree serves this layer from
|
||||
# cache and the build reports a green it never ran. ARG is stage-scoped,
|
||||
# so it must be redeclared in every stage that runs checks. The guard
|
||||
# makes a bare `docker build .` fail loudly instead of silently reusing
|
||||
# the empty (and therefore stable) cache key. Expand the value into the
|
||||
# command so the cache miss does not depend on BuildKit's handling of an
|
||||
# unreferenced ARG. Both the guard and the check RUN reference the value,
|
||||
# so both are value-keyed: there are two independent invalidation points
|
||||
# here, not one. Keep both.
|
||||
ARG CHECK_EPOCH
|
||||
RUN [ -n "$CHECK_EPOCH" ] || exit 1
|
||||
RUN echo "check epoch: ${CHECK_EPOCH}" && make check
|
||||
|
||||
35
Makefile
35
Makefile
@@ -1,31 +1,32 @@
|
||||
.PHONY: test lint fmt fmt-check check docker hooks
|
||||
.PHONY: bootstrap setup test lint fmt fmt-check check docker hooks
|
||||
|
||||
# flags are repeated here (also in .prettierrc) so this Makefile works
|
||||
# standalone when copied as a template
|
||||
PRETTIER := yarn run prettier
|
||||
# Makefile targets are thin shims; the implementations live in script/
|
||||
# per the scripts-to-rule-them-all pattern (see the Entrypoints section
|
||||
# of README.md).
|
||||
|
||||
bootstrap:
|
||||
@script/bootstrap
|
||||
|
||||
setup:
|
||||
@script/setup
|
||||
|
||||
test:
|
||||
@echo "No tests defined."
|
||||
@script/test
|
||||
|
||||
lint:
|
||||
@echo "Linting markdown files..."
|
||||
@$(PRETTIER) --check '**/*.md' --tab-width 4 --prose-wrap always
|
||||
@script/lint
|
||||
|
||||
fmt:
|
||||
@$(PRETTIER) --write '**/*.md' --tab-width 4 --prose-wrap always
|
||||
@script/fmt
|
||||
|
||||
fmt-check:
|
||||
@$(PRETTIER) --check '**/*.md' --tab-width 4 --prose-wrap always
|
||||
@script/fmt-check
|
||||
|
||||
check: test lint fmt-check
|
||||
check:
|
||||
@script/check
|
||||
|
||||
docker:
|
||||
docker build -t prompts .
|
||||
@script/docker
|
||||
|
||||
hooks:
|
||||
@printf '#!/bin/sh\nset -e\n' > .git/hooks/pre-commit
|
||||
@if [ -f go.mod ]; then \
|
||||
printf 'go mod tidy\ngo fmt ./...\ngit diff --exit-code -- go.mod go.sum || { echo "go mod tidy changed files; please stage and retry"; exit 1; }\n' >> .git/hooks/pre-commit; \
|
||||
fi
|
||||
@printf 'make check\n' >> .git/hooks/pre-commit
|
||||
@chmod +x .git/hooks/pre-commit
|
||||
@script/install-precommit
|
||||
|
||||
35
README.md
35
README.md
@@ -102,6 +102,41 @@ cd prompts
|
||||
Prompts are stored as Markdown files in `prompts/`. Copy or reference them as
|
||||
needed in your projects.
|
||||
|
||||
## Entrypoints
|
||||
|
||||
This repository adheres to the
|
||||
[Scripts to Rule Them All](https://github.com/github/scripts-to-rule-them-all)
|
||||
standard: normalized scripts in `script/` are the entrypoints for the
|
||||
development workflow, and the Makefile targets are thin shims that call them.
|
||||
The scripts are POSIX sh (not bash) so they run in minimal containers such as
|
||||
alpine. We provide:
|
||||
|
||||
- `script/bootstrap` — install all dependencies (yarn install)
|
||||
- `script/setup` — set up the repo for development after a fresh clone: runs
|
||||
`script/bootstrap`, then `script/install-precommit`
|
||||
- `script/projectname` — output the project name (our own extension); used by
|
||||
`script/docker` for the image tag
|
||||
- `script/test` — run the test suite (no tests defined here)
|
||||
- `script/lint` — lint the markdown files with prettier
|
||||
- `script/fmt` — format all markdown files with prettier (writes)
|
||||
- `script/fmt-check` — check formatting (read-only)
|
||||
- `script/check` — run all checks: `test`, `lint`, `fmt-check` (our own
|
||||
extension)
|
||||
- `script/docker` — build the Docker image, tagged via `script/projectname`
|
||||
(byte-identical across repos); passes the same `CHECK_EPOCH` nonce as
|
||||
`script/cibuild`
|
||||
- `script/cibuild` — cd to the repo root, assign `epoch="$(date +%s%N)$$"`, then
|
||||
`docker build --build-arg CHECK_EPOCH="$epoch" .` (what CI runs; the image
|
||||
build runs `script/check`, and the per-invocation `CHECK_EPOCH` nonce is what
|
||||
stops Docker serving that check from cache on an unchanged tree — a bare
|
||||
`docker build .` fails closed on purpose)
|
||||
- `script/precommit` — run by the git pre-commit hook (our own extension); calls
|
||||
`script/check`
|
||||
- `script/install-precommit` — installs the git pre-commit hook (our own
|
||||
extension); `make hooks` shims to it
|
||||
|
||||
`make hooks` installs the pre-commit hook that runs `script/precommit`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
LLM prompts, especially development policies, benefit from version control and a
|
||||
|
||||
137
TODO.md
Normal file
137
TODO.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
|
||||
# Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
- branch (from `main`)
|
||||
- do the work in Next Step
|
||||
- move Next Step to the top of Completed Steps
|
||||
- move the top item of Future Steps into Next Step
|
||||
- commit (`TODO.md` changes in the same commit as the work)
|
||||
- merge to `main` if the branch is not protected, otherwise open a PR
|
||||
- push
|
||||
|
||||
# Status
|
||||
|
||||
pre-1.0
|
||||
|
||||
# Next Step
|
||||
|
||||
Finish the two draft prompt documents in the working tree and commit them:
|
||||
prompts/FIXUP_CLEAN.md (currently a near-empty stub) and prompts/FIXUP_REPORT.md
|
||||
(a rough draft). Write the missing content, run `make fmt` so they pass
|
||||
fmt-check, and commit.
|
||||
|
||||
# Completed Steps
|
||||
|
||||
- 2026-08-09: Made a golangci-lint result belong to the tree that asked for it.
|
||||
REPO_POLICIES.md now carries the canonical Go `script/lint`, which gives the
|
||||
linter per-checkout `GOLANGCI_LINT_CACHE` and per-checkout `TMPDIR`. The two
|
||||
are separate defects and the second is the one that gets dropped: the result
|
||||
cache is keyed on file content rather than location, so checkouts holding
|
||||
identical files serve each other's findings under the other's path, while the
|
||||
concurrency lock is `$TMPDIR/golangci-lint.lock` — host-global, independent of
|
||||
the cache, and unaffected by isolating it. Moving workers from worktrees to
|
||||
their own clones does not help either half; it only removes the foreign-path
|
||||
artefact that made the defect visible. The lock error is retried rather than
|
||||
surfaced, because it is not a result: it exits non-zero exactly as findings
|
||||
do, and reporting it as findings sends a correct branch back for rework.
|
||||
Detection is on the stderr stream and never on exit status, so a finding
|
||||
quoting the lock message in source cannot be retried away, and exhaustion
|
||||
exits 75 with a VOID message rather than passing or failing quietly.
|
||||
`--allow-serial-runners` (which keeps the guard and queues) covers the
|
||||
same-checkout overlap that `TMPDIR` scoping cannot; `--allow-parallel-runners`
|
||||
is rejected outright. The stdout and stderr capture files are per invocation
|
||||
rather than per checkout, because serialising the linter does not serialise
|
||||
the shell's redirections: two runs in one checkout — the overlap the flag
|
||||
exists to support — would otherwise truncate and read each other's output,
|
||||
which is the same defect one layer above where it was fixed. Both checklists
|
||||
gained the corresponding items, since a half-fix that sets only the cache
|
||||
reads as complete. `GOCACHE` was measured and does not need isolating.
|
||||
Verified with the snippet extracted from the committed document and executed
|
||||
as a consuming repo would adopt it, against paired controls: contamination
|
||||
reproduced on the pre-fix form and absent on the adopted one, retry engaged,
|
||||
exhaustion loud, a genuine finding still reported, and a held host lock
|
||||
failing the pre-fix script while leaving the adopted one untouched.
|
||||
- 2026-08-09: Kept in-repo agent scratch out of the Docker build context and out
|
||||
of version control. `.claude/` holds one worktree — an entire additional
|
||||
checkout of the repo — per in-flight agent, and under `COPY . .` all of it was
|
||||
reaching the image: another session's unreviewed, sometimes uncommitted work,
|
||||
inflating the context by a multiple of the repo and invalidating `COPY` for
|
||||
reasons unrelated to the repo's own content. The `.dockerignore` entry is
|
||||
root-anchored, because the directory occurs exactly once where agents run at
|
||||
the repo root and the `**/` form additionally deletes any nested directory of
|
||||
that name — with the residual gap that follows from anchoring (a monorepo
|
||||
running agents in subdirectories still ships `services/api/.claude/`) stated
|
||||
in the canonical `.dockerignore`, the policy and the existing-repo checklist,
|
||||
since consuming repos receive the files rather than the tracker; the
|
||||
`.gitignore` entry is unanchored, because `.gitignore` patterns already match
|
||||
at every depth, and each file is written to its own semantics rather than
|
||||
derived from the other. Also closed the consequence that ships broken
|
||||
silently: excluding `.git` means `git describe` cannot run in any build stage
|
||||
and yields an empty version without erroring, so `script/docker` and
|
||||
`script/cibuild` now compute the version on the host and pass
|
||||
`--build-arg VERSION`, and `REPO_POLICIES.md` states where `VERSION` comes
|
||||
from instead of leaving the reader to fill the gap with `git describe` inside
|
||||
the build. The two Go documents that carry the `GOLDFLAGS` pattern were
|
||||
corrected in the same pass, from `:=` to `?=`, since a `$(shell git describe)`
|
||||
evaluated inside a build stage is exactly the empty version this closes.
|
||||
Verified by enumerating a probe image before, after, and against the
|
||||
`**/`-prefixed form, with a positive control and the `CHECK_EPOCH` cache
|
||||
verification re-run under the changed build context.
|
||||
- 2026-08-09: Closed the secret exposure in the canonical `.dockerignore`: a
|
||||
developer's local `.env`, `*.pem` or `*.key` was reaching the Docker build
|
||||
context under `COPY . .`, invisible to every git-based check because
|
||||
`.gitignore` covers it. The patterns are written to `.dockerignore`'s own
|
||||
`moby/patternmatcher` semantics — `**/`-prefixed so they hold at every depth,
|
||||
which also fixes nested `node_modules` — rather than transplanted from
|
||||
`.gitignore`, whose unprefixed form protects only the repository root while
|
||||
reading as solved. Coverage extends past the `.env`/`.pem`/`.key` trio to the
|
||||
`prod.env` convention, `.envrc`, PKCS#12 bundles and extensionless SSH keys,
|
||||
every one of them case-folded with character ranges because matching is
|
||||
case-sensitive and an ALL-CAPS twin per pattern still misses `Server.Key`.
|
||||
`REPO_POLICIES.md` and both repo checklists now state that asymmetry and
|
||||
require verification by enumerating the image rather than by reading the
|
||||
patterns. Verified with a probe image before, against three naive forms
|
||||
(unprefixed, lowercase-only, ALL-CAPS-doubled), and after.
|
||||
- 2026-08-09: Made the pinned golangci-lint actually propagate: REPO_POLICIES.md
|
||||
now carries the canonical `script/bootstrap` snippet for Go repos, which
|
||||
installs when the installed version does not match the pin (the old
|
||||
`if missing` guard tested PATH presence only, so pins were inert on any
|
||||
provisioned machine and CI silently disagreed with local) and then re-resolves
|
||||
the binary through `PATH` and fails loudly, naming the shadowing path, when
|
||||
the install did not take effect — the failure mode the naive
|
||||
compare-then-install fix leaves behind while reporting success.
|
||||
- 2026-08-09: Fixed the false green in the canonical CI gate: `script/cibuild`
|
||||
and `script/docker` now pass a per-invocation `CHECK_EPOCH` nonce, and the
|
||||
`Dockerfile` (plus the Go multistage template in REPO_POLICIES.md, in both its
|
||||
lint and builder stages) declares `ARG CHECK_EPOCH` with a guard that makes a
|
||||
bare `docker build .` fail closed. Corrected the org-canonical text that
|
||||
asserted a successful build implies all checks pass, across every document
|
||||
carrying it: `REPO_POLICIES.md`, both repo checklists (which still told agents
|
||||
to write the pre-fix `script/cibuild` and ended on an acceptance item the
|
||||
guard makes unsatisfiable), and the Go styleguide.
|
||||
- 2026-08-07: Set the canonical `.golangci.yml` to the org-standard v2-schema
|
||||
config already deployed byte-identical across the org's Go repos (settings
|
||||
under `linters.settings` so thresholds like lll/funlen/cyclop/dupl actually
|
||||
apply under golangci-lint v2). Recorded the canonical golangci-lint version
|
||||
(v2.12.2, commit-pinned) in REPO_POLICIES.md.
|
||||
- 2026-03-20: Strengthened constructor naming and Params struct rules in the Go
|
||||
styleguide.
|
||||
- 2026-03-18: Documented fail-fast Dockerfile lint stage and conditional -v test
|
||||
rerun patterns in REPO_POLICIES.md.
|
||||
- 2026-03-11: Added HTTP service hardening policy for 1.0 releases.
|
||||
- 2026-03-10: Added policy: no build artifacts in repos.
|
||||
- 2026-03-04: Added LLM prose tells reference and copyediting checklist, then
|
||||
several self-applied revision passes.
|
||||
- 2026-02-28: Expanded the pre-1.0 schema migration rule; added clawpub
|
||||
reference.
|
||||
- 2026-02-23: Added Go style rules (no type-only packages, Stringer for
|
||||
string-based types); template repos section in README.
|
||||
- 2026-02-22: Initial policy corpus: REPO_POLICIES.md, code styleguides
|
||||
(general, Go, JS, Python), repo checklists, CI policy, hash pinning, Go HTTP
|
||||
server conventions, repo scaffolding.
|
||||
|
||||
# Future Steps
|
||||
|
||||
- Finish, format, and commit FIXUP_CLEAN.md and FIXUP_REPORT.md (the Next Step).
|
||||
- Commit this TODO.md at the repo root; it is the last missing policy file.
|
||||
- Decide the fate of untracked resume.sh: commit it or delete it.
|
||||
- Add more prompt templates for common development tasks (from README TODO).
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: Code Styleguide — Go
|
||||
last_modified: 2026-02-22
|
||||
last_modified: 2026-08-09
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
1. Try to hard wrap long lines at 77 characters or less.
|
||||
@@ -49,7 +49,20 @@ last_modified: 2026-02-22
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
```make
|
||||
VERSION := $(shell git describe --always --dirty)
|
||||
# ?= rather than := because this `$(shell git describe ...)` is only
|
||||
# correct on the host. `.dockerignore` excludes `.git`, so evaluated
|
||||
# inside a build stage it expands to the empty string without failing
|
||||
# and the binary reports no version at all. The version is computed on
|
||||
# the host by `script/docker` / `script/cibuild` and passed with
|
||||
# `--build-arg VERSION=...`. If this repo's Dockerfile compiles by
|
||||
# invoking make (`RUN make build`), `ARG VERSION` in that stage puts the
|
||||
# value in the environment and `?=` defers to it. The canonical Go
|
||||
# template in REPO_POLICIES.md instead runs `go build` directly with
|
||||
# `-ldflags "... -X main.Version=${VERSION}"`, so there this Makefile is
|
||||
# a host-only path — but it is still `?=`, because a repo that later
|
||||
# moves the build behind make must not silently start shipping an empty
|
||||
# version. See the git-describe rule in REPO_POLICIES.md.
|
||||
VERSION ?= $(shell git describe --always --dirty)
|
||||
BUILDARCH := $(shell uname -m)
|
||||
|
||||
GOLDFLAGS += -X main.Version=$(VERSION)
|
||||
@@ -101,9 +114,16 @@ last_modified: 2026-02-22
|
||||
`golangci-lint`.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Write a `Dockerfile` for every repo, even if it only runs the tests and
|
||||
linting. `docker build .` should always make sure that the code is in an
|
||||
able-to-be-compiled state, linted, and any tests run. The Docker build
|
||||
should fail if linting doesn't pass.
|
||||
linting. `script/cibuild` and `script/docker` should always make sure that
|
||||
the code is in an able-to-be-compiled state, linted, and any tests run, and
|
||||
the build should fail if linting doesn't pass. That guarantee holds only
|
||||
because those scripts pass a per-invocation `CHECK_EPOCH` build arg that
|
||||
busts the check layers out of the Docker cache; without it an unchanged tree
|
||||
serves those layers from cache and the build reports a green it never ran. A
|
||||
bare `docker build .` fails closed by design, on the `[ -n "$CHECK_EPOCH" ]`
|
||||
guard — always go through `script/cibuild` or `script/docker`. See
|
||||
[Repository Policies](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/prompts/raw/branch/main/prompts/REPO_POLICIES.md)
|
||||
for the canonical form.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Every repo must have a `Makefile`. See
|
||||
[Repository Policies](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/prompts/raw/branch/main/prompts/REPO_POLICIES.md)
|
||||
@@ -136,8 +156,15 @@ last_modified: 2026-02-22
|
||||
1. Provide a .gitignore file that ignores at least `*.log`, `*.out`, and
|
||||
`*.test` files, as well as any binaries.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Constructors should be called `New()` whenever possible. `modulename.New()`
|
||||
works great if you name the packages properly.
|
||||
1. Constructors **must** be called `New()`. `modulename.New()` works great if
|
||||
you name the packages properly. If the constructor creates an instance from
|
||||
an existing value or representation, `From<Something>()` (e.g.
|
||||
`FromBytes()`, `FromConfig()`) is also acceptable. If the package contains
|
||||
multiple types and `New()` is ambiguous, `NewThing()` is occasionally
|
||||
acceptable — but prefer restructuring packages so each type gets its own
|
||||
package and a plain `New()`. Do not invent creative constructor names like
|
||||
`Create()`, `Make()`, `Build()`, `Open()` (unless wrapping an OS resource),
|
||||
or `Init()`. If you see a constructor with a non-standard name, rename it.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Don't make packages too big. Break them up.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -149,9 +176,15 @@ last_modified: 2026-02-22
|
||||
1. Use descriptive names for modules and filenames. Avoid generic names like
|
||||
`server`. `util` is banned.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Constructors should take a Params struct if they need more than 1-2
|
||||
arguments. Positional arguments are an endless source of bugs and should be
|
||||
avoided whenever possible.
|
||||
1. Constructors **must** take a `Params` struct (or `ThingParams` when
|
||||
`NewThing()` is used), even for a single argument. Named fields in a Params
|
||||
struct are always clearer than positional arguments. Positional arguments
|
||||
for constructors are an endless source of bugs — they make call sites
|
||||
unreadable, invite wrong-order errors that the compiler can't catch when
|
||||
types coincide, and force every caller to update when a new field is added.
|
||||
The only exception is when the single argument is stupidly obvious from
|
||||
context — e.g. `featureflag.New(true)` or `thing.NewFromReader(r)`. When in
|
||||
doubt, use a Params struct.
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use `context.Context` for all functions that need it. If you don't need it,
|
||||
you can pass `context.Background()`. Anything long-running should get and
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: Existing Repo Checklist
|
||||
last_modified: 2026-02-22
|
||||
last_modified: 2026-08-09
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Use this checklist when beginning work in a repo that may not yet conform to our
|
||||
@@ -24,15 +24,57 @@ with your task.
|
||||
- [ ] `LICENSE` file exists and matches the README
|
||||
- [ ] `REPO_POLICIES.md` exists and version date is current — fetch from
|
||||
`https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/prompts/raw/branch/main/prompts/REPO_POLICIES.md`
|
||||
- [ ] `.gitignore` is comprehensive (OS, editor, language artifacts, secrets) —
|
||||
fetch from `https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/prompts/raw/branch/main/.gitignore`
|
||||
if missing
|
||||
- [ ] `.gitignore` is comprehensive (OS, editor, agent scratch, language
|
||||
artifacts, secrets) — fetch from
|
||||
`https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/prompts/raw/branch/main/.gitignore` if missing.
|
||||
An existing repo usually has a hand-written one that is never re-fetched,
|
||||
so check the entries rather than the file's presence: `.claude/` in
|
||||
particular, unanchored, so agent worktrees cannot be committed by
|
||||
accident. Do not give it a `**/` prefix — that is a `.dockerignore` form
|
||||
and is wrong here.
|
||||
- [ ] `.editorconfig` exists — fetch from
|
||||
`https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/prompts/raw/branch/main/.editorconfig`
|
||||
- [ ] `Dockerfile` and `.dockerignore` exist; Dockerfile runs `make check` as a
|
||||
build step — fetch `.dockerignore` from
|
||||
`https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/prompts/raw/branch/main/.dockerignore`
|
||||
- [ ] Gitea Actions workflow in `.gitea/workflows/` runs `docker build .` on
|
||||
- [ ] `Dockerfile` and `.dockerignore` exist (fetch `.dockerignore` from
|
||||
`https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/prompts/raw/branch/main/.dockerignore`);
|
||||
Dockerfile runs `make check` as a build step, and every stage containing a
|
||||
check-running `RUN` declares `ARG CHECK_EPOCH` with the
|
||||
`RUN [ -n "$CHECK_EPOCH" ] || exit 1` guard immediately below it — see the
|
||||
`CHECK_EPOCH` rule in `REPO_POLICIES.md`. Without them the check layer is
|
||||
served from cache on an unchanged tree and the build reports a green it
|
||||
never ran.
|
||||
- [ ] `.dockerignore` excludes the repo's own host-built artifacts (compiled
|
||||
binaries, test binaries, coverage output), written root-anchored —
|
||||
`/myapp`, never `**/myapp`, which would also match `cmd/myapp/`. An
|
||||
existing repo is where such a binary is likeliest to already be sitting in
|
||||
the build context, invisible to git.
|
||||
- [ ] `.dockerignore` excludes `.claude`, root-anchored and with no `**/`
|
||||
prefix. Agent worktrees are entire checkouts of the repo, so they inflate
|
||||
the context by a multiple of it and can copy another session's unreviewed
|
||||
work into an image layer. Confirm by enumerating the image, not by reading
|
||||
the file — `.gitignore` hides these from `git status` too.
|
||||
- [ ] **Do agents in this repo run anywhere other than the repo root?** The
|
||||
scratch directory is created in the agent's working directory, so the
|
||||
canonical anchored entry misses `services/api/.claude/` in a monorepo with
|
||||
a per-service agent — it still reaches the build context and the image. An
|
||||
existing repo is where such a layout already exists, so check it here
|
||||
rather than assuming the canonical entry covers you: add anchored entries
|
||||
for the subdirectories that have one (`/services/api/.claude`), or
|
||||
`**/.claude` once you have confirmed no legitimately named nested
|
||||
directory would be caught.
|
||||
- [ ] If the repo embeds a version in a binary, that version is computed on the
|
||||
host and passed with `--build-arg VERSION=...` by `script/docker` and
|
||||
`script/cibuild`. No stage calls `git describe`: `.dockerignore` excludes
|
||||
`.git`, so it yields an empty version without failing the build. A
|
||||
tag-derived version additionally needs `fetch-depth: 0` on the CI checkout
|
||||
step, which clones shallow and fetches no tags by default.
|
||||
- [ ] Every depth-independent pattern in `.dockerignore` carries a `**/` prefix;
|
||||
only genuinely root-anchored entries such as `.git` are unprefixed, and
|
||||
`.gitignore`'s patterns have not been transplanted unmodified.
|
||||
`.dockerignore` anchors an unprefixed pattern at the context root, so the
|
||||
transplanted form leaves `config/.env` and `certs/server.key` in the build
|
||||
context while reading as solved — see the `.dockerignore` rule in
|
||||
`REPO_POLICIES.md`.
|
||||
- [ ] Gitea Actions workflow in `.gitea/workflows/` runs `script/cibuild` on
|
||||
push — reference
|
||||
`https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/prompts/raw/branch/main/.gitea/workflows/check.yml`
|
||||
- [ ] Language-specific config:
|
||||
@@ -45,12 +87,26 @@ with your task.
|
||||
- [ ] Python: `pyproject.toml`
|
||||
- [ ] Docs/writing: `.prettierrc`, `.prettierignore` (same URLs as above)
|
||||
|
||||
# Makefile
|
||||
# Makefile and script/ Entrypoints
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `Makefile` exists in root — reference
|
||||
`https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/prompts/raw/branch/main/Makefile`
|
||||
- [ ] Has targets: `test`, `lint`, `fmt`, `fmt-check`, `check`, `docker`,
|
||||
`hooks`
|
||||
- [ ] Target implementations live in `script/` (scripts-to-rule-them-all);
|
||||
Makefile targets are thin shims calling them — model scripts at
|
||||
`https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/prompts/raw/branch/main/script/<name>`
|
||||
- [ ] `script/precommit` exists and the pre-commit hook (installed by
|
||||
`script/install-precommit`, shimmed by `make hooks`) runs it
|
||||
- [ ] README has an **Entrypoints** section documenting the `script/`
|
||||
entrypoints and linking the standard
|
||||
- [ ] Go: `script/lint` isolates golangci-lint per checkout —
|
||||
`GOLANGCI_LINT_CACHE` and `TMPDIR` both exported into `.lint-cache/`
|
||||
(which is in `.gitignore` and `.dockerignore`), `--allow-serial-runners`
|
||||
passed, and the lock error retried rather than reported as findings. Copy
|
||||
the canonical block from `REPO_POLICIES.md`. Setting only the cache is the
|
||||
common half-fix and leaves `parallel golangci-lint is running` failing
|
||||
runs red.
|
||||
- [ ] `make check` does not modify any files in the repo
|
||||
- [ ] `make test` has a 30-second timeout
|
||||
- [ ] `make test` runs real tests, not a no-op (at minimum, import/compile
|
||||
@@ -78,8 +134,25 @@ with your task.
|
||||
`internal/`, `static/`, etc.)
|
||||
- [ ] Go migrations in `internal/db/migrations/` and embedded in binary
|
||||
|
||||
# HTTP Service Hardening (if targeting 1.0 and the repo is an HTTP/web service)
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Security headers set on all responses (HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options,
|
||||
X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy)
|
||||
- [ ] Request body size limits enforced on all endpoints
|
||||
- [ ] Read/write/idle timeouts configured on the HTTP server (slowloris defense)
|
||||
- [ ] Per-handler execution time limits in place
|
||||
- [ ] Password-based auth endpoints are rate-limited
|
||||
- [ ] CSRF tokens on all state-mutating HTML forms
|
||||
- [ ] Passwords hashed with bcrypt, scrypt, or argon2
|
||||
- [ ] Session cookies use HttpOnly, Secure, and SameSite attributes
|
||||
- [ ] True client IP correctly detected behind reverse proxy (trusted proxy
|
||||
allowlist configured)
|
||||
- [ ] CORS restricted to explicit origin allowlist for authenticated endpoints
|
||||
- [ ] Error responses do not leak stack traces, SQL queries, or internal paths
|
||||
|
||||
# Final
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `make check` passes
|
||||
- [ ] `docker build` succeeds
|
||||
- [ ] `script/cibuild` succeeds (a bare `docker build .` fails closed by design,
|
||||
on the `CHECK_EPOCH` guard)
|
||||
- [ ] Commit and merge fixes before starting your actual task
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: Go HTTP Server Conventions
|
||||
last_modified: 2026-02-22
|
||||
last_modified: 2026-08-09
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
This document defines the architectural patterns, design decisions, and
|
||||
@@ -991,7 +991,14 @@ func main() {
|
||||
Use ldflags to inject version information at build time:
|
||||
|
||||
```makefile
|
||||
VERSION := $(shell git describe --tags --always)
|
||||
# ?= rather than := because this `$(shell git describe ...)` is only correct
|
||||
# on the host: `.dockerignore` excludes `.git`, so evaluated inside a build
|
||||
# stage it expands to the empty string without failing and the binary reports
|
||||
# no version. The version is computed on the host by `script/docker` /
|
||||
# `script/cibuild` and passed with `--build-arg VERSION=...`; where the build
|
||||
# stage invokes make, `ARG VERSION` puts it in the environment and `?=` defers
|
||||
# to it. See the git-describe rule in REPO_POLICIES.md.
|
||||
VERSION ?= $(shell git describe --tags --always)
|
||||
BUILDARCH := $(shell go env GOARCH)
|
||||
|
||||
build:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# LLM Prose Tells
|
||||
|
||||
Human writers occasionally use every pattern in this document. The reason they
|
||||
work as tells is that LLM output packs fifteen of them into a paragraph.
|
||||
A catalog of patterns found in LLM-generated prose.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -14,19 +13,11 @@ A negation followed by an em-dash and a reframe.
|
||||
> "It's not just a tool—it's a paradigm shift." "This isn't about
|
||||
> technology—it's about trust."
|
||||
|
||||
The single most recognizable LLM construction. Models produce this at roughly 10
|
||||
to 50x the rate of human writers. Four of them in one essay and you know what
|
||||
you're reading.
|
||||
|
||||
### Em-Dash Overuse Generally
|
||||
|
||||
Even outside the "not X but Y" pivot, models use em-dashes at far higher rates
|
||||
than human writers. They substitute em-dashes for commas, semicolons,
|
||||
parentheses, colons, and periods, often multiple times per paragraph. A human
|
||||
writer might use one or two in an entire piece for a specific parenthetical
|
||||
effect. Models scatter them everywhere because the em-dash can stand in for any
|
||||
other punctuation mark, so they default to it. More than two or three per page
|
||||
is a meaningful signal on its own.
|
||||
Even outside the "not X but Y" pivot, models substitute em-dashes for commas,
|
||||
semicolons, parentheses, colons, and periods. The em-dash can replace any other
|
||||
punctuation mark, so models default to it.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Colon Elaboration
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -34,33 +25,25 @@ A short declarative clause, then a colon, then a longer explanation.
|
||||
|
||||
> "The answer is simple: we need to rethink our approach from the ground up."
|
||||
|
||||
Models reach for this in every other paragraph. The construction is perfectly
|
||||
normal. The frequency gives it away.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Triple Construction
|
||||
|
||||
> "It's fast, it's scalable, and it's open source."
|
||||
|
||||
Three parallel items in a list, usually escalating. Always exactly three (rarely
|
||||
two, never four) with strict grammatical parallelism that human writers rarely
|
||||
bother maintaining.
|
||||
two, never four) with strict grammatical parallelism.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Staccato Burst
|
||||
|
||||
> "This matters. It always has. And it always will." "The data is clear. The
|
||||
> trend is undeniable. The conclusion is obvious."
|
||||
|
||||
Runs of very short sentences at the same cadence. Human writers use a short
|
||||
sentence for emphasis occasionally, but stacking three or four of them in a row
|
||||
at matching length creates a mechanical regularity that reads as generated.
|
||||
Runs of very short sentences at the same cadence and matching length.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Two-Clause Compound Sentence
|
||||
|
||||
Possibly the most pervasive structural tell, and easy to miss because each
|
||||
individual instance looks like normal English. The model produces sentence after
|
||||
sentence where an independent clause is followed by a comma, a conjunction
|
||||
("and," "but," "which," "because"), and a second independent clause of similar
|
||||
length. Every sentence becomes two balanced halves joined in the middle.
|
||||
An independent clause, a comma, a conjunction ("and," "but," "which,"
|
||||
"because"), and a second independent clause of similar length. Every sentence
|
||||
becomes two balanced halves.
|
||||
|
||||
> "The construction itself is perfectly normal, which is why the frequency is
|
||||
> what gives it away." "They contain zero information, and the actual point
|
||||
@@ -70,76 +53,62 @@ length. Every sentence becomes two balanced halves joined in the middle.
|
||||
|
||||
Human prose has sentences with one clause, sentences with three, sentences that
|
||||
start with a subordinate clause before reaching the main one, sentences that
|
||||
embed their complexity in the middle. When every sentence on the page has that
|
||||
same two-part structure, the rhythm becomes monotonous in a way that's hard to
|
||||
pinpoint but easy to feel.
|
||||
embed their complexity in the middle.
|
||||
|
||||
### Uniform Sentences Per Paragraph
|
||||
|
||||
Model-generated paragraphs contain between three and five sentences. This count
|
||||
holds steady across an entire piece. If the first paragraph has four sentences,
|
||||
every subsequent paragraph will too. Human writers are much more varied (a
|
||||
single sentence followed by one that runs eight or nine) because they follow the
|
||||
shape of an idea, not a template.
|
||||
Model-generated paragraphs contain between three and five sentences, a count
|
||||
that holds steady across a piece. If the first paragraph has four sentences,
|
||||
every subsequent paragraph will too.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Dramatic Fragment
|
||||
|
||||
Sentence fragments used as standalone paragraphs for emphasis, like "Full stop."
|
||||
or "Let that sink in." on their own line. Using one in an entire essay is a
|
||||
reasonable stylistic choice, but models drop them in once per section or more,
|
||||
at which point it becomes a habit rather than a deliberate decision.
|
||||
Sentence fragments used as standalone paragraphs for emphasis.
|
||||
|
||||
> "Full stop." "Let that sink in."
|
||||
|
||||
### The Pivot Paragraph
|
||||
|
||||
> "But here's where it gets interesting." "Which raises an uncomfortable truth."
|
||||
|
||||
One-sentence paragraphs that exist only to transition between ideas. They
|
||||
contain zero information. The actual point is always in the next paragraph.
|
||||
Delete every one of these and the piece reads better.
|
||||
One-sentence paragraphs that exist only to transition between ideas, containing
|
||||
zero information. The actual point is always in the next paragraph.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Parenthetical Qualifier
|
||||
|
||||
> "This is, of course, a simplification." "There are, to be fair, exceptions."
|
||||
|
||||
Parenthetical asides inserted to look thoughtful. The qualifier never changes
|
||||
the argument that follows it. Its purpose is to perform nuance, not to express a
|
||||
real reservation about what's being said.
|
||||
Parenthetical asides inserted to perform nuance without changing the argument.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Unnecessary Contrast
|
||||
|
||||
Models append a contrasting clause to statements that don't need one, tacking on
|
||||
"whereas," "as opposed to," "unlike," or "except that" to draw a comparison the
|
||||
reader could already infer.
|
||||
A contrasting clause appended to a statement that doesn't need one, using
|
||||
"whereas," "as opposed to," "unlike," or "except that."
|
||||
|
||||
> "Models write one register above where a human would, whereas human writers
|
||||
> tend to match register to context."
|
||||
|
||||
The first clause already makes the point. The contrasting clause restates it
|
||||
from the other direction. If you delete the "whereas" clause and the sentence
|
||||
still says everything it needs to, the contrast was filler.
|
||||
The contrasting clause restates what the first clause already said. If you
|
||||
delete the "whereas" clause and the sentence still says everything it needs to,
|
||||
the contrast was filler.
|
||||
|
||||
### Unnecessary Elaboration
|
||||
|
||||
Models keep going after the sentence has already made its point, tacking on
|
||||
clarifying phrases, adverbial modifiers, or restatements that add nothing.
|
||||
Models keep going after the sentence has already made its point.
|
||||
|
||||
> "A person might lean on one or two of these habits across an entire essay, but
|
||||
> LLM output will use fifteen of them per paragraph, consistently, throughout
|
||||
> the entire piece."
|
||||
|
||||
This sentence could end at "paragraph." The words after it just repeat what "per
|
||||
paragraph" already means. Models do this because they're optimizing for clarity
|
||||
at the expense of concision, and because their training rewards thoroughness.
|
||||
The result is prose that feels padded. If you can cut the last third of a
|
||||
sentence without losing any meaning, the last third shouldn't be there.
|
||||
This sentence could end at "paragraph." The words after it repeat what "per
|
||||
paragraph" already means. If you can cut the last third of a sentence without
|
||||
losing meaning, the last third shouldn't be there.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Question-Then-Answer
|
||||
|
||||
> "So what does this mean for the average user? It means everything."
|
||||
|
||||
A rhetorical question immediately followed by its own answer. Models do this two
|
||||
or three times per piece because it fakes forward momentum. A human writer might
|
||||
do it once.
|
||||
A rhetorical question immediately followed by its own answer.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -147,44 +116,38 @@ do it once.
|
||||
|
||||
### Overused Intensifiers
|
||||
|
||||
The following words appear at dramatically elevated rates in model output:
|
||||
"crucial," "vital," "robust," "comprehensive," "fundamental," "arguably,"
|
||||
"Crucial," "vital," "robust," "comprehensive," "fundamental," "arguably,"
|
||||
"straightforward," "noteworthy," "realm," "landscape," "leverage" (as a verb),
|
||||
"delve," "tapestry," "multifaceted," "nuanced" (which models apply to their own
|
||||
analysis with startling regularity), "pivotal," "unprecedented" (frequently
|
||||
applied to things with plenty of precedent), "navigate," "foster,"
|
||||
"underscores," "resonates," "embark," "streamline," and "spearhead." Three or
|
||||
more on the same page is a strong signal.
|
||||
"delve," "tapestry," "multifaceted," "nuanced" (applied to the model's own
|
||||
analysis), "pivotal," "unprecedented" (applied to things with plenty of
|
||||
precedent), "navigate," "foster," "underscores," "resonates," "embark,"
|
||||
"streamline," "spearhead."
|
||||
|
||||
### Elevated Register Drift
|
||||
|
||||
Models write one register above where a human would. "Use" becomes "utilize."
|
||||
"Start" becomes "commence." "Help" becomes "facilitate." "Show" becomes
|
||||
"demonstrate." "Try" becomes "endeavor." "Change" becomes "transform." "Make"
|
||||
becomes "craft." The tendency holds regardless of topic or audience.
|
||||
Models write one register above where a human would, replacing "use" with
|
||||
"utilize," "start" with "commence," "help" with "facilitate," "show" with
|
||||
"demonstrate," "try" with "endeavor," "change" with "transform," and "make" with
|
||||
"craft."
|
||||
|
||||
### Filler Adverbs
|
||||
|
||||
"Importantly," "essentially," "fundamentally," "ultimately," "inherently,"
|
||||
"particularly," "increasingly." Dropped in to signal that something matters,
|
||||
which is unnecessary when the writing itself already makes the importance clear.
|
||||
"particularly," "increasingly." Dropped in to signal that something matters when
|
||||
the writing itself should make the importance clear.
|
||||
|
||||
### The "Almost" Hedge
|
||||
|
||||
Models rarely commit to an unqualified statement. Instead of saying a pattern
|
||||
"always" or "never" does something, they write "almost always," "almost never,"
|
||||
"almost certainly," "almost exclusively." The word "almost" shows up at
|
||||
extraordinary density in model-generated analytical prose. It's a micro-hedge,
|
||||
less obvious than the full hedge stack but just as diagnostic when it appears
|
||||
ten or fifteen times in a single document.
|
||||
Instead of saying a pattern "always" or "never" does something, models write
|
||||
"almost always," "almost never," "almost certainly," "almost exclusively." A
|
||||
micro-hedge, less obvious than the full hedge stack.
|
||||
|
||||
### "In an era of..."
|
||||
|
||||
> "In an era of rapid technological change..."
|
||||
|
||||
A model habit as an essay opener. The model uses it to stall while it figures
|
||||
out what the actual argument is. Human writers don't begin a piece by zooming
|
||||
out to the civilizational scale before they've said anything specific.
|
||||
Used to open an essay. The model is stalling while it figures out what the
|
||||
actual argument is.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -195,24 +158,20 @@ out to the civilizational scale before they've said anything specific.
|
||||
> "While X has its drawbacks, it also offers significant benefits."
|
||||
|
||||
Every argument followed by a concession, every criticism softened. A direct
|
||||
artifact of RLHF training, which penalizes strong stances. Models reflexively
|
||||
both-sides everything even when a clear position would serve the reader better.
|
||||
artifact of RLHF training, which penalizes strong stances.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Throat-Clearing Opener
|
||||
|
||||
> "In today's rapidly evolving digital landscape, the question of data privacy
|
||||
> has never been more important."
|
||||
|
||||
The first paragraph of most model-generated essays adds no information. Delete
|
||||
it and the piece improves immediately. The actual argument starts in paragraph
|
||||
two.
|
||||
The first paragraph adds no information. Delete it and the piece improves.
|
||||
|
||||
### The False Conclusion
|
||||
|
||||
> "At the end of the day, what matters most is..." "Moving forward, we must..."
|
||||
|
||||
The high school "In conclusion,..." dressed up for a professional audience.
|
||||
Signals that the model is wrapping up without actually landing on anything.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Sycophantic Frame
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -233,15 +192,13 @@ the key considerations:"
|
||||
> cases it can potentially offer significant benefits."
|
||||
|
||||
Five hedges in one sentence ("worth noting," "while," "may not be," "in many
|
||||
cases," "can potentially"), communicating nothing. The model would rather be
|
||||
vague than risk being wrong about anything.
|
||||
cases," "can potentially"), communicating nothing.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Empathy Performance
|
||||
|
||||
> "This can be a deeply challenging experience." "Your feelings are valid."
|
||||
|
||||
Generic emotional language that could apply equally to a bad day at work or a
|
||||
natural disaster. That interchangeability is what makes it identifiable.
|
||||
Generic emotional language that could apply to anything.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -249,35 +206,28 @@ natural disaster. That interchangeability is what makes it identifiable.
|
||||
|
||||
### Symmetrical Section Length
|
||||
|
||||
If the first section of a model-generated essay runs about 150 words, every
|
||||
subsequent section will fall between 130 and 170. Human writing is much more
|
||||
uneven, with 50 words in one section and 400 in the next.
|
||||
If the first section runs about 150 words, every subsequent section will fall
|
||||
between 130 and 170.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Five-Paragraph Prison
|
||||
|
||||
Model essays follow a rigid introduction-body-conclusion arc even when nobody
|
||||
asked for one. The introduction previews the argument, the body presents 3 to 5
|
||||
points, and then the conclusion restates the thesis using slightly different
|
||||
words.
|
||||
points, the conclusion restates the thesis.
|
||||
|
||||
### Connector Addiction
|
||||
|
||||
Look at the first word of each paragraph in model output. You'll find an
|
||||
unbroken chain of transition words: "However," "Furthermore," "Moreover,"
|
||||
"Additionally," "That said," "To that end," "With that in mind," "Building on
|
||||
this." Human prose moves between ideas without announcing every transition.
|
||||
The first word of each paragraph forms an unbroken chain of transition words:
|
||||
"However," "Furthermore," "Moreover," "Additionally," "That said," "To that
|
||||
end," "With that in mind," "Building on this."
|
||||
|
||||
### Absence of Mess
|
||||
|
||||
Model prose doesn't contradict itself mid-paragraph and then catch the
|
||||
contradiction. It doesn't go on a tangent and have to walk it back, use an
|
||||
obscure idiom without explaining it, make a joke that risks falling flat, leave
|
||||
a thought genuinely unfinished, or keep a sentence the writer liked the sound of
|
||||
even though it doesn't quite work.
|
||||
|
||||
Human writing does all of those things regularly. That total absence of rough
|
||||
patches and false starts is one of the strongest signals that text was
|
||||
machine-generated.
|
||||
contradiction, go on a tangent and have to walk it back, use an obscure idiom
|
||||
without explaining it, make a joke that risks falling flat, leave a thought
|
||||
genuinely unfinished, or keep a sentence the writer liked the sound of even
|
||||
though it doesn't quite work.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -287,45 +237,27 @@ machine-generated.
|
||||
|
||||
> "This has implications far beyond just the tech industry."
|
||||
|
||||
Zooming out to claim broader significance without substantiating it. The model
|
||||
has learned that essays are supposed to gesture at big ideas, so it gestures.
|
||||
Nothing concrete is behind the gesture.
|
||||
Zooming out to claim broader significance without substantiating it.
|
||||
|
||||
### "It's important to note that..."
|
||||
|
||||
This phrase and its variants ("it's worth noting," "it bears mentioning," "it
|
||||
should be noted") appear at absurd rates in model output. They function as
|
||||
verbal tics before a qualification the model believes someone expects.
|
||||
should be noted") function as verbal tics before a qualification the model
|
||||
believes someone expects.
|
||||
|
||||
### The Metaphor Crutch
|
||||
|
||||
Models rely on a small, predictable set of metaphors ("double-edged sword," "tip
|
||||
Models rely on a small, predictable set of metaphors: "double-edged sword," "tip
|
||||
of the iceberg," "north star," "building blocks," "elephant in the room,"
|
||||
"perfect storm," "game-changer") and reach for them with unusual regularity
|
||||
across every topic. The pool is noticeably smaller than what human writers draw
|
||||
from.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## How to Actually Spot It
|
||||
|
||||
No single pattern on this list proves anything by itself. Humans use em-dashes.
|
||||
Humans write "crucial." Humans ask rhetorical questions.
|
||||
|
||||
What gives it away is how many of these show up at once. Model output will hit
|
||||
10 to 20 of these patterns per page. Human writing might trigger 2 or 3,
|
||||
distributed unevenly, mixed with idiosyncratic constructions no model would
|
||||
produce. When every paragraph on the page reads like it came from the same
|
||||
careful, balanced, slightly formal, structurally predictable process, it was
|
||||
generated by one.
|
||||
"perfect storm," "game-changer."
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Copyediting Checklist: Removing LLM Tells
|
||||
|
||||
Follow this checklist when editing any document to remove machine-generated
|
||||
patterns. Go through the entire list for every piece. Do at least two full
|
||||
passes, because fixing one pattern often introduces another.
|
||||
patterns. Do at least two full passes, because fixing one pattern often
|
||||
introduces another.
|
||||
|
||||
### Pass 1: Word-Level Cleanup
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -339,8 +271,7 @@ passes, because fixing one pattern often introduces another.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Search for filler adverbs ("importantly," "essentially," "fundamentally,"
|
||||
"ultimately," "inherently," "particularly," "increasingly") and delete every
|
||||
instance where the sentence still makes sense without it. That will be most
|
||||
of them.
|
||||
instance where the sentence still makes sense without it.
|
||||
|
||||
3. Look for elevated register drift ("utilize," "commence," "facilitate,"
|
||||
"demonstrate," "endeavor," "transform," "craft" and similar) and replace with
|
||||
@@ -348,7 +279,6 @@ passes, because fixing one pattern often introduces another.
|
||||
|
||||
4. Search for "it's important to note," "it's worth noting," "it bears
|
||||
mentioning," and "it should be noted" and delete the phrase in every case.
|
||||
The sentence that follows always stands on its own.
|
||||
|
||||
5. Search for the stock metaphors ("double-edged sword," "tip of the iceberg,"
|
||||
"north star," "building blocks," "elephant in the room," "perfect storm,"
|
||||
@@ -357,101 +287,114 @@ passes, because fixing one pattern often introduces another.
|
||||
|
||||
6. Search for "almost" used as a hedge ("almost always," "almost never," "almost
|
||||
certainly," "almost exclusively") and decide in each case whether to commit
|
||||
to the unqualified claim or to drop the sentence entirely. If the claim needs
|
||||
"almost" to be true, it might not be worth making.
|
||||
to the unqualified claim or to drop the sentence entirely.
|
||||
|
||||
7. Search for em-dashes and replace each one with the punctuation mark that
|
||||
would normally be used in that position (comma, semicolon, colon, period, or
|
||||
parentheses). If you can't identify which one it should be, the sentence
|
||||
needs to be restructured.
|
||||
|
||||
8. Remove redundant adjectives. For each adjective, ask whether the sentence
|
||||
changes meaning without it. "A single paragraph" means the same as "a
|
||||
paragraph." "An entire essay" means the same as "an essay." If the adjective
|
||||
doesn't change the meaning, cut it.
|
||||
|
||||
9. Remove unnecessary trailing clauses. Read the end of each sentence and ask
|
||||
whether the last clause restates what the sentence already said. If so, end
|
||||
the sentence earlier.
|
||||
|
||||
### Pass 2: Sentence-Level Restructuring
|
||||
|
||||
8. Find every em-dash pivot ("not X...but Y," "not just X...Y," "more than
|
||||
X...Y") and rewrite it as two separate clauses or a single sentence that
|
||||
makes the point without the negation-then-correction structure.
|
||||
10. Find every em-dash pivot ("not X—but Y," "not just X—Y," "more than X—Y")
|
||||
and rewrite it as two separate clauses or a single sentence that makes the
|
||||
point without the negation-then-correction structure.
|
||||
|
||||
9. Find every colon elaboration and check whether it's doing real work. If the
|
||||
clause before the colon could be deleted without losing meaning, rewrite the
|
||||
sentence to start with the substance that comes after the colon.
|
||||
11. Find every colon elaboration and check whether it's doing real work. If the
|
||||
clause before the colon could be deleted without losing meaning, rewrite the
|
||||
sentence to start with the substance that comes after the colon.
|
||||
|
||||
10. Find every triple construction (three parallel items in a row) and either
|
||||
12. Find every triple construction (three parallel items in a row) and either
|
||||
reduce it to two, expand it to four or more, or break the parallelism so the
|
||||
items don't share the same grammatical structure.
|
||||
|
||||
11. Find every staccato burst (three or more short sentences in a row at similar
|
||||
13. Find every staccato burst (three or more short sentences in a row at similar
|
||||
length) and combine at least two of them into a longer sentence, or vary
|
||||
their lengths so they don't land at the same cadence.
|
||||
|
||||
12. Find every unnecessary contrast ("whereas," "as opposed to," "unlike," "as
|
||||
14. Find every unnecessary contrast ("whereas," "as opposed to," "unlike," "as
|
||||
compared to," "except that") and check whether the contrasting clause adds
|
||||
information not already obvious from the main clause. If the sentence says
|
||||
the same thing twice from two directions, delete the contrast.
|
||||
|
||||
13. Check for the two-clause compound sentence pattern. If most sentences in a
|
||||
passage follow the "\[clause\], \[conjunction\] \[clause\]" structure,
|
||||
rewrite some of them. Break a few into two sentences. Start some with a
|
||||
subordinate clause. Embed a relative clause in the middle of one instead of
|
||||
appending it at the end. The goal is variety in sentence shape, not just
|
||||
sentence length.
|
||||
15. Check for the two-clause compound sentence pattern. If most sentences in a
|
||||
passage follow the "\[clause\], \[conjunction\] \[clause\]" structure, first
|
||||
try removing the conjunction and second clause entirely, since it's often
|
||||
redundant. If the second clause does carry meaning, break it into its own
|
||||
sentence, start the sentence with a subordinate clause, or embed a relative
|
||||
clause in the middle instead of appending it at the end.
|
||||
|
||||
14. Find every rhetorical question that is immediately followed by its own
|
||||
16. Find every rhetorical question that is immediately followed by its own
|
||||
answer and rewrite the passage as a direct statement.
|
||||
|
||||
15. Find every sentence fragment being used as its own paragraph and either
|
||||
delete it or expand it into a complete sentence that adds actual
|
||||
information.
|
||||
17. Find every sentence fragment being used as its own paragraph and either
|
||||
delete it or expand it into a complete sentence that adds information.
|
||||
|
||||
16. Check for unnecessary elaboration at the end of sentences. Read the last
|
||||
clause or phrase of each sentence and ask whether the sentence would lose
|
||||
any meaning without it. If not, cut it.
|
||||
18. Check for unnecessary elaboration. Read every clause, phrase, and adjective
|
||||
in each sentence and ask whether the sentence loses meaning without it. If
|
||||
you can cut it and the sentence still says the same thing, cut it.
|
||||
|
||||
17. Find every pivot paragraph ("But here's where it gets interesting." and
|
||||
similar) and delete it. The paragraph after it always contains the actual
|
||||
point.
|
||||
19. Check each pair of adjacent sentences to see if they can be merged into one
|
||||
sentence cleanly. If a sentence just continues the thought of the previous
|
||||
one, combine them using a participle, a relative clause, or by folding the
|
||||
second into the first. Don't merge if the result would create a two-clause
|
||||
compound.
|
||||
|
||||
20. Find every pivot paragraph ("But here's where it gets interesting." and
|
||||
similar) and delete it.
|
||||
|
||||
### Pass 3: Paragraph and Section-Level Review
|
||||
|
||||
18. Check paragraph lengths across the piece and verify they actually vary. If
|
||||
21. Review the last sentence of each paragraph. If it restates the point the
|
||||
paragraph already made, delete it.
|
||||
|
||||
22. Check paragraph lengths across the piece and verify they actually vary. If
|
||||
most paragraphs have between three and five sentences, rewrite some to be
|
||||
one or two sentences and let others run to six or seven.
|
||||
|
||||
19. Check section lengths for suspicious uniformity. If every section is roughly
|
||||
23. Check section lengths for suspicious uniformity. If every section is roughly
|
||||
the same word count, combine some shorter ones or split a longer one
|
||||
unevenly.
|
||||
|
||||
20. Check the first word of every paragraph for chains of connectors ("However,"
|
||||
24. Check the first word of every paragraph for chains of connectors ("However,"
|
||||
"Furthermore," "Moreover," "Additionally," "That said"). If more than two
|
||||
transition words start consecutive paragraphs, rewrite those openings to
|
||||
start with their subject.
|
||||
|
||||
21. Check whether every argument is followed by a concession or qualifier. If
|
||||
25. Check whether every argument is followed by a concession or qualifier. If
|
||||
the piece both-sides every point, pick a side on at least some of them and
|
||||
cut the hedging.
|
||||
|
||||
22. Read the first paragraph and ask whether deleting it would improve the
|
||||
26. Read the first paragraph and ask whether deleting it would improve the
|
||||
piece. If it's scene-setting that previews the argument, delete it and start
|
||||
with paragraph two.
|
||||
|
||||
23. Read the last paragraph and check whether it restates the thesis or uses a
|
||||
27. Read the last paragraph and check whether it restates the thesis or uses a
|
||||
phrase like "at the end of the day" or "moving forward." If so, either
|
||||
delete it or rewrite it to say something the piece hasn't said yet.
|
||||
|
||||
### Pass 4: Overall Texture
|
||||
|
||||
24. Read the piece aloud and listen for passages that sound too smooth, too
|
||||
28. Read the piece aloud and listen for passages that sound too smooth, too
|
||||
even, or too predictable. Human prose has rough patches. If there aren't
|
||||
any, the piece still reads as machine output.
|
||||
|
||||
25. Check that the piece contains at least a few constructions that feel
|
||||
29. Check that the piece contains at least a few constructions that feel
|
||||
idiosyncratic: a sentence with unusual word order, a parenthetical that goes
|
||||
on a bit long, an aside only loosely connected to the main point, a word
|
||||
choice that's specific and unexpected. If every sentence is clean and
|
||||
correct and unremarkable, it will still read as generated.
|
||||
choice that's specific and unexpected.
|
||||
|
||||
26. Verify that you haven't introduced new patterns while fixing the original
|
||||
ones. This happens constantly. Run the entire checklist again from the top
|
||||
on the revised version.
|
||||
30. Verify that you haven't introduced new patterns while fixing the original
|
||||
ones. Run the entire checklist again from the top on the revised version.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -498,16 +441,9 @@ roughly like this:
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **model:** _(rewrites entire document without em-dashes while describing
|
||||
> em-dash overuse)_
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **human:** now run the checklist methodically on each paragraph
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **model:** _(finds staccato burst in the section about triple constructions, a
|
||||
> triple in the section about absence of mess, two-clause compounds everywhere,
|
||||
> and "almost" hedges in its own prose about em-dash overuse)_
|
||||
|
||||
The human compared this process to the deleted scene in Terminator 2 where John
|
||||
Connor switches the T-800's CPU to learning mode. The model compared it to a
|
||||
physician trying to heal itself. Both are accurate.
|
||||
|
||||
This document has been through eight editing passes and it still has tells in
|
||||
it.
|
||||
This document has been through ten editing passes and it still has tells in it.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: New Repo Checklist
|
||||
last_modified: 2026-02-22
|
||||
last_modified: 2026-08-09
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Use this checklist when creating a new repository from scratch. Follow the steps
|
||||
@@ -35,7 +35,11 @@ Template files can be fetched from:
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `.gitignore` — fetch from
|
||||
`https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/prompts/raw/branch/main/.gitignore`, extend for
|
||||
language-specific artifacts
|
||||
language-specific artifacts. Extensions are written to `.gitignore`'s own
|
||||
semantics, where an unanchored pattern already matches at every depth:
|
||||
never add a `**/` prefix here, which is a `.dockerignore` form. The
|
||||
canonical file already carries `.claude/` so agent worktrees cannot be
|
||||
committed by accident.
|
||||
- [ ] `.editorconfig` — fetch from
|
||||
`https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/prompts/raw/branch/main/.editorconfig`
|
||||
- [ ] `Makefile` — fetch from
|
||||
@@ -52,12 +56,34 @@ Template files can be fetched from:
|
||||
`https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/prompts/raw/branch/main/prompts/REPO_POLICIES.md`
|
||||
- [ ] `Dockerfile` and `.dockerignore` — fetch `.dockerignore` from
|
||||
`https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/prompts/raw/branch/main/.dockerignore`
|
||||
- All Dockerfiles must run `make check` as a build step
|
||||
- Extend `.dockerignore` with the repo's own host-built artifacts, giving
|
||||
every depth-independent pattern a `**/` prefix — but write a repo-root
|
||||
binary anchored, `/myapp` and never `**/myapp`, which would also match
|
||||
`cmd/myapp/` and delete the package directory. Do not transplant
|
||||
`.gitignore`'s patterns: `.dockerignore` anchors an unprefixed pattern at
|
||||
the context root, so the copied form leaves `config/.env` in the build
|
||||
context while reading as solved. See the `.dockerignore` rule in
|
||||
`REPO_POLICIES.md`. The canonical file's `.claude` entry is anchored for
|
||||
the same reason as a repo-root binary; leave it that way, but note it only
|
||||
covers agents running at the repo root — if this repo will run them in
|
||||
subdirectories, `services/api/.claude/` is not excluded and needs its own
|
||||
anchored entry.
|
||||
- If the image embeds a version in a binary, the version is computed on the
|
||||
host and passed with `--build-arg VERSION=...`. `ARG VERSION=dev` is
|
||||
declared in the stage that compiles, and **no stage calls `git describe`**
|
||||
— `.dockerignore` excludes `.git`, so it yields an empty version without
|
||||
failing the build.
|
||||
- All Dockerfiles must run `make check` as a build step, and every stage
|
||||
containing a check-running `RUN` must declare `ARG CHECK_EPOCH` with the
|
||||
`RUN [ -n "$CHECK_EPOCH" ] || exit 1` guard immediately below it — see the
|
||||
`CHECK_EPOCH` rule in `REPO_POLICIES.md`. Without them the check layer is
|
||||
served from cache on an unchanged tree and the build reports a green it
|
||||
never ran.
|
||||
- Server: also builds and runs the application
|
||||
- Non-server: brings up dev environment and runs `make check`
|
||||
- Image pinned by sha256 hash with version/date comment
|
||||
- [ ] Gitea Actions workflow at `.gitea/workflows/check.yml` that runs
|
||||
`docker build .` on push — reference
|
||||
`script/cibuild` on push — reference
|
||||
`https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/prompts/raw/branch/main/.gitea/workflows/check.yml`
|
||||
- [ ] Language-specific:
|
||||
- [ ] Go: `go mod init sneak.berlin/go/<name>`, `.golangci.yml` (fetch from
|
||||
@@ -65,15 +91,72 @@ Template files can be fetched from:
|
||||
- [ ] JS: `yarn init`, `yarn add --dev prettier`
|
||||
- [ ] Python: `pyproject.toml`
|
||||
|
||||
## Configure Makefile
|
||||
## Configure script/ Entrypoints and Makefile
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `make test` — runs real tests, not a no-op (30-second timeout)
|
||||
- [ ] `make lint` — runs linter
|
||||
- [ ] `make fmt` — formats code (writes)
|
||||
- [ ] `make fmt-check` — checks formatting (read-only)
|
||||
- [ ] `make check` — prereqs: `test`, `lint`, `fmt-check`; must not modify files
|
||||
- [ ] `make docker` — builds Docker image
|
||||
- [ ] `make hooks` — installs pre-commit hook
|
||||
Implementations live in `script/` (scripts-to-rule-them-all); Makefile targets
|
||||
are thin shims calling them. Model scripts:
|
||||
`https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/prompts/raw/branch/main/script/<name>`
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] scripts are POSIX sh (`#!/bin/sh`, `set -eu`, no bashisms) so they run on
|
||||
alpine images without bash
|
||||
- [ ] `script/bootstrap` / `make bootstrap` — installs all dependencies,
|
||||
idempotently, assuming nothing (pkg manager detection nix/apt/brew/apk;
|
||||
node used if present, else pinned version via nvm from a hash-verified
|
||||
archive; pinned yarn via corepack); Dockerfile runs it instead of inline
|
||||
installs
|
||||
- [ ] `script/setup` / `make setup` — readies a fresh clone: runs `bootstrap`,
|
||||
then `install-precommit`, plus repo-specific init
|
||||
- [ ] `script/test` / `make test` — runs real tests, not a no-op (30-second
|
||||
timeout)
|
||||
- [ ] `script/lint` / `make lint` — runs linter
|
||||
- [ ] Go: exports `GOLANGCI_LINT_CACHE` **and** `TMPDIR` into a
|
||||
`.lint-cache/` directory inside the checkout, above any
|
||||
container-versus-host branch so every path that reaches the linter
|
||||
gets them; passes `--allow-serial-runners` (never
|
||||
`--allow-parallel-runners`); retries on
|
||||
`parallel golangci-lint is running` detected on **stderr** and exits
|
||||
75 with a VOID message on exhaustion. Copy the canonical block from
|
||||
`REPO_POLICIES.md` rather than writing your own: a version that sets
|
||||
only the cache leaves the false-red half live, and one that detects
|
||||
the collision by exit status can retry a real finding away.
|
||||
- [ ] Go: `.lint-cache/` is in both `.gitignore` and `.dockerignore`
|
||||
- [ ] `script/fmt` / `make fmt` — formats code (writes)
|
||||
- [ ] `script/fmt-check` / `make fmt-check` — checks formatting (read-only)
|
||||
- [ ] `script/check` / `make check` — runs `test`, `lint`, `fmt-check`; must not
|
||||
modify files
|
||||
- [ ] `script/projectname` — outputs the project name (used by `script/docker`
|
||||
for the image tag)
|
||||
- [ ] `script/docker` / `make docker` — builds Docker image, tagged via
|
||||
`script/projectname` (byte-identical across repos); carries the same three
|
||||
version lines as `script/cibuild` below, and passes
|
||||
`--build-arg CHECK_EPOCH="$epoch"` and `--build-arg VERSION="$version"`
|
||||
- [ ] `script/cibuild` — cd to repo root, then, each on its own line:
|
||||
|
||||
```sh
|
||||
epoch="$(date +%s%N)$$"
|
||||
version="$(git describe --tags --always --dirty 2>/dev/null || true)"
|
||||
[ -n "$version" ] || version="unknown"
|
||||
docker build \
|
||||
--build-arg CHECK_EPOCH="$epoch" \
|
||||
--build-arg VERSION="$version" \
|
||||
.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
(what CI runs). Both build args are mandatory, and both assignments must be
|
||||
on their own line: a failing command substitution inside an argument does
|
||||
not trip `set -e`, so the inline form degrades silently to an empty
|
||||
constant. The `[ -n "$version" ]` line is a live check that fires on an
|
||||
export with no `.git` and on a repo with no commits — keep it, and do not
|
||||
collapse it into `|| echo unknown`, which makes it unreachable. See the
|
||||
`CHECK_EPOCH` and git-describe rules in `REPO_POLICIES.md` for why each
|
||||
element is load-bearing. A bare `docker build .` fails closed by design.
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `script/precommit` — called by the pre-commit hook; runs `script/check`
|
||||
- [ ] `script/install-precommit` — installs the pre-commit hook that runs
|
||||
`script/precommit`
|
||||
- [ ] `make hooks` — shims to `script/install-precommit`
|
||||
- [ ] README **Entrypoints** section documents the scripts and links the
|
||||
standard
|
||||
|
||||
# 4. Verify
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
136
script/bootstrap
Executable file
136
script/bootstrap
Executable file
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
|
||||
#!/bin/sh
|
||||
# script/bootstrap: install all dependencies needed to build and develop
|
||||
# this repo. Idempotent: every install is guarded by a check so already
|
||||
# installed tools are skipped. Base tooling comes from nix, apt, brew,
|
||||
# or apk (detected in that order); assumes nothing is present. Node is
|
||||
# used directly if installed; otherwise it is installed at a pinned
|
||||
# version via nvm (installing nvm itself first, from a hash-verified
|
||||
# release archive, never curl | sh).
|
||||
set -eu
|
||||
|
||||
ROOT="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")/.." && pwd -P)"
|
||||
|
||||
# Pinned versions, 2026-07-06
|
||||
NODE_VERSION="22.17.0"
|
||||
NVM_VERSION="0.40.3"
|
||||
# sha256 of https://github.com/nvm-sh/nvm/archive/refs/tags/v0.40.3.tar.gz
|
||||
NVM_SHA256="5f4d6aaa04a177dc93c985e31dbc411ab6b8c6e1e21d8015dbc1372625fcd1d0"
|
||||
YARN_VERSION="1.22.22"
|
||||
|
||||
PKGMGR=""
|
||||
SUDO=""
|
||||
|
||||
detect_pkgmgr() {
|
||||
[ -n "$PKGMGR" ] && return 0
|
||||
if command -v nix-env >/dev/null 2>&1; then
|
||||
PKGMGR="nix"
|
||||
elif command -v apt-get >/dev/null 2>&1; then
|
||||
PKGMGR="apt"
|
||||
elif command -v brew >/dev/null 2>&1; then
|
||||
PKGMGR="brew"
|
||||
elif command -v apk >/dev/null 2>&1; then
|
||||
PKGMGR="apk"
|
||||
else
|
||||
echo "bootstrap: no supported package manager (nix, apt, brew, apk)" >&2
|
||||
exit 1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
if [ "$PKGMGR" = "apt" ]; then
|
||||
export DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive
|
||||
if [ "$(id -u)" != "0" ]; then
|
||||
SUDO="sudo"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
fi
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# pkg_install <nix-attr> <apt-pkg> <brew-formula> <apk-pkg>
|
||||
pkg_install() {
|
||||
detect_pkgmgr
|
||||
case "$PKGMGR" in
|
||||
nix) nix-env -iA "nixpkgs.$1" ;;
|
||||
apt) $SUDO env DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive apt-get install -y "$2" ;;
|
||||
brew) brew install "$3" ;;
|
||||
apk) apk add --no-cache "$4" ;;
|
||||
esac
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
missing() {
|
||||
! command -v "$1" >/dev/null 2>&1
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# verify_sha256 <file> <expected-hash>
|
||||
verify_sha256() {
|
||||
if command -v sha256sum >/dev/null 2>&1; then
|
||||
actual="$(sha256sum "$1" | cut -d' ' -f1)"
|
||||
else
|
||||
actual="$(shasum -a 256 "$1" | cut -d' ' -f1)"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
if [ "$actual" != "$2" ]; then
|
||||
echo "bootstrap: sha256 mismatch for $1" >&2
|
||||
echo " expected: $2" >&2
|
||||
echo " actual: $actual" >&2
|
||||
exit 1
|
||||
fi
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# nvm is a bash script; run a command in a bash with nvm loaded
|
||||
nvm_sh() {
|
||||
bash -c ". \"\$HOME/.nvm/nvm.sh\" && $*"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ensure_nvm() {
|
||||
[ -s "$HOME/.nvm/nvm.sh" ] && return 0
|
||||
# nvm prerequisites; nvm itself requires bash
|
||||
if missing bash; then pkg_install bash bash bash bash; fi
|
||||
if missing curl; then pkg_install curl curl curl curl; fi
|
||||
if missing git; then pkg_install git git git git; fi
|
||||
tmp="$(mktemp -d)"
|
||||
curl -fsSL -o "$tmp/nvm.tar.gz" \
|
||||
"https://github.com/nvm-sh/nvm/archive/refs/tags/v${NVM_VERSION}.tar.gz"
|
||||
verify_sha256 "$tmp/nvm.tar.gz" "$NVM_SHA256"
|
||||
mkdir -p "$HOME/.nvm"
|
||||
tar -xzf "$tmp/nvm.tar.gz" -C "$HOME/.nvm" --strip-components=1
|
||||
rm -rf "$tmp"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ensure_node() {
|
||||
if ! missing node; then return 0; fi
|
||||
ensure_nvm
|
||||
nvm_sh "nvm install $NODE_VERSION"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ensure_yarn() {
|
||||
if ! missing yarn; then return 0; fi
|
||||
if ! missing corepack; then
|
||||
corepack enable
|
||||
corepack prepare "yarn@$YARN_VERSION" --activate
|
||||
elif [ -s "$HOME/.nvm/nvm.sh" ]; then
|
||||
nvm_sh "nvm use $NODE_VERSION >/dev/null && corepack enable && \
|
||||
corepack prepare yarn@$YARN_VERSION --activate"
|
||||
else
|
||||
npm install -g "yarn@$YARN_VERSION"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
install_js_deps() {
|
||||
if missing yarn && [ -s "$HOME/.nvm/nvm.sh" ]; then
|
||||
nvm_sh "nvm use $NODE_VERSION >/dev/null && cd \"$ROOT\" && \
|
||||
yarn install --frozen-lockfile"
|
||||
else
|
||||
yarn install --frozen-lockfile
|
||||
fi
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
main() {
|
||||
cd "$ROOT"
|
||||
|
||||
if missing make; then pkg_install gnumake make make make; fi
|
||||
if missing git; then pkg_install git git git git; fi
|
||||
|
||||
ensure_node
|
||||
ensure_yarn
|
||||
install_js_deps
|
||||
|
||||
echo "bootstrap complete"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
main "$@"
|
||||
14
script/check
Executable file
14
script/check
Executable file
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
|
||||
#!/bin/sh
|
||||
# script/check: run all checks (test, lint, fmt-check). Our own
|
||||
# extension to scripts-to-rule-them-all. Must not modify any files.
|
||||
set -eu
|
||||
|
||||
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd -P)"
|
||||
|
||||
main() {
|
||||
"$SCRIPT_DIR/test"
|
||||
"$SCRIPT_DIR/lint"
|
||||
"$SCRIPT_DIR/fmt-check"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
main "$@"
|
||||
33
script/cibuild
Executable file
33
script/cibuild
Executable file
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
|
||||
#!/bin/sh
|
||||
# script/cibuild: run the CI build. The Dockerfile runs script/check, but
|
||||
# that only proves anything because CHECK_EPOCH is a fresh nonce on every
|
||||
# invocation: without it Docker serves the check layer from cache on an
|
||||
# unchanged tree and the build exits 0 without running the suite.
|
||||
set -eu
|
||||
|
||||
ROOT="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")/.." && pwd -P)"
|
||||
|
||||
main() {
|
||||
cd "$ROOT"
|
||||
# Assign on its own line: a failing command substitution inside an
|
||||
# argument does not trip `set -e`, which would silently degrade the
|
||||
# nonce to an empty constant. `$$` is required because busybox `date`
|
||||
# drops %N without erroring.
|
||||
epoch="$(date +%s%N)$$"
|
||||
# VERSION must be computed here, on the host: .dockerignore excludes
|
||||
# .git, so `git describe` cannot run in any build stage and fails
|
||||
# quietly there rather than erroring. Same own-line discipline as the
|
||||
# epoch. `|| true` keeps a failing describe from tripping `set -e`
|
||||
# and leaves the value empty; the guard below is then the single
|
||||
# place the fallback is applied, and it does fire — on an export with
|
||||
# no .git, or a repo with no commits yet. `unknown` is visibly wrong
|
||||
# in a binary in a way that an empty version is not.
|
||||
version="$(git describe --tags --always --dirty 2>/dev/null || true)"
|
||||
[ -n "$version" ] || version="unknown"
|
||||
docker build \
|
||||
--build-arg CHECK_EPOCH="$epoch" \
|
||||
--build-arg VERSION="$version" \
|
||||
.
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
main "$@"
|
||||
35
script/docker
Executable file
35
script/docker
Executable file
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
||||
#!/bin/sh
|
||||
# script/docker: build the Docker image tagged with the project name.
|
||||
# Identical in all repos; the tag comes from script/projectname. The
|
||||
# Dockerfile's checks only actually run because CHECK_EPOCH is a fresh
|
||||
# nonce on every invocation; without it a warm cache turns this into a
|
||||
# green that proves nothing.
|
||||
set -eu
|
||||
|
||||
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd -P)"
|
||||
ROOT="$(cd "$SCRIPT_DIR/.." && pwd -P)"
|
||||
|
||||
main() {
|
||||
cd "$ROOT"
|
||||
# Assign on its own line: a failing command substitution inside an
|
||||
# argument does not trip `set -e`, which would silently degrade the
|
||||
# nonce to an empty constant. `$$` is required because busybox `date`
|
||||
# drops %N without erroring.
|
||||
epoch="$(date +%s%N)$$"
|
||||
# VERSION must be computed here, on the host: .dockerignore excludes
|
||||
# .git, so `git describe` cannot run in any build stage and fails
|
||||
# quietly there rather than erroring. Same own-line discipline as the
|
||||
# epoch. `|| true` keeps a failing describe from tripping `set -e`
|
||||
# and leaves the value empty; the guard below is then the single
|
||||
# place the fallback is applied, and it does fire — on an export with
|
||||
# no .git, or a repo with no commits yet. `unknown` is visibly wrong
|
||||
# in a binary in a way that an empty version is not.
|
||||
version="$(git describe --tags --always --dirty 2>/dev/null || true)"
|
||||
[ -n "$version" ] || version="unknown"
|
||||
docker build \
|
||||
--build-arg CHECK_EPOCH="$epoch" \
|
||||
--build-arg VERSION="$version" \
|
||||
-t "$("$SCRIPT_DIR/projectname")" .
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
main "$@"
|
||||
12
script/fmt
Executable file
12
script/fmt
Executable file
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||
#!/bin/sh
|
||||
# script/fmt: format all files (writes).
|
||||
set -eu
|
||||
|
||||
ROOT="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")/.." && pwd -P)"
|
||||
|
||||
main() {
|
||||
cd "$ROOT"
|
||||
yarn run prettier --write '**/*.md' --tab-width 4 --prose-wrap always
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
main "$@"
|
||||
12
script/fmt-check
Executable file
12
script/fmt-check
Executable file
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||
#!/bin/sh
|
||||
# script/fmt-check: check formatting (read-only).
|
||||
set -eu
|
||||
|
||||
ROOT="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")/.." && pwd -P)"
|
||||
|
||||
main() {
|
||||
cd "$ROOT"
|
||||
yarn run prettier --check '**/*.md' --tab-width 4 --prose-wrap always
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
main "$@"
|
||||
16
script/install-precommit
Executable file
16
script/install-precommit
Executable file
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
|
||||
#!/bin/sh
|
||||
# script/install-precommit: install the git pre-commit hook that runs
|
||||
# script/precommit. Our own extension to scripts-to-rule-them-all.
|
||||
set -eu
|
||||
|
||||
ROOT="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")/.." && pwd -P)"
|
||||
|
||||
main() {
|
||||
cd "$ROOT"
|
||||
hook=".git/hooks/pre-commit"
|
||||
printf '#!/bin/sh\nset -e\nscript/precommit\n' > .git/hooks/pre-commit
|
||||
chmod +x .git/hooks/pre-commit
|
||||
echo "pre-commit hook installed: runs script/precommit"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
main "$@"
|
||||
13
script/lint
Executable file
13
script/lint
Executable file
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
||||
#!/bin/sh
|
||||
# script/lint: run the linter.
|
||||
set -eu
|
||||
|
||||
ROOT="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")/.." && pwd -P)"
|
||||
|
||||
main() {
|
||||
cd "$ROOT"
|
||||
echo "Linting markdown files..."
|
||||
yarn run prettier --check '**/*.md' --tab-width 4 --prose-wrap always
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
main "$@"
|
||||
12
script/precommit
Executable file
12
script/precommit
Executable file
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||
#!/bin/sh
|
||||
# script/precommit: run by the git pre-commit hook; fails the commit if
|
||||
# checks fail. Our own extension to scripts-to-rule-them-all.
|
||||
set -eu
|
||||
|
||||
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd -P)"
|
||||
|
||||
main() {
|
||||
"$SCRIPT_DIR/check"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
main "$@"
|
||||
12
script/projectname
Executable file
12
script/projectname
Executable file
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||
#!/bin/sh
|
||||
# script/projectname: output the name of this project. Our own
|
||||
# extension to scripts-to-rule-them-all. Other scripts that need the
|
||||
# name (e.g. script/docker) call this, so they can stay identical
|
||||
# across all repos.
|
||||
set -eu
|
||||
|
||||
main() {
|
||||
echo "prompts"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
main "$@"
|
||||
13
script/setup
Executable file
13
script/setup
Executable file
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
||||
#!/bin/sh
|
||||
# script/setup: set up the repo for development after a fresh clone:
|
||||
# installs dependencies and the git pre-commit hook.
|
||||
set -eu
|
||||
|
||||
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd -P)"
|
||||
|
||||
main() {
|
||||
"$SCRIPT_DIR/bootstrap"
|
||||
"$SCRIPT_DIR/install-precommit"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
main "$@"
|
||||
12
script/test
Executable file
12
script/test
Executable file
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||
#!/bin/sh
|
||||
# script/test: run the test suite.
|
||||
set -eu
|
||||
|
||||
ROOT="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")/.." && pwd -P)"
|
||||
|
||||
main() {
|
||||
cd "$ROOT"
|
||||
echo "No tests defined."
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
main "$@"
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user