Files
netwatch/test/viewport/facts.js
T
clawbot 14eb376d79
check / check (push) Failing after 1s
test: automated responsive-layout harness (closes #13)
`make frontend-viewport-test` builds `dist/`, serves it from the same
digest-pinned nginx image and nginx.conf the shipping container uses, and
drives a digest-pinned headless Chrome over CDP. Viewport widths are derived
from the app's own @media breakpoints rather than a list of phone models: each
breakpoint is tested one pixel below, on, and above, plus four anchor
viewports. Assertions are on computed layout — horizontal overflow, off-screen
elements, clipped text, 44x44 tap targets, host-row reflow — not screenshots,
and each check declares the minimum elements it must find so a stale selector
fails instead of passing blind against a page it is not measuring. Kept out of
`make check`: it needs Docker and takes minutes. Proven able to fail before
being trusted.

Model: opus-4-8
2026-09-21 18:29:20 +02:00

185 lines
7.5 KiB
JavaScript

// Layout facts collected from inside the page.
//
// This function is serialised and evaluated in the browser, so it must be
// entirely self-contained: no imports, no closures over module scope. It
// only *measures*; every pass/fail decision is made back in node by
// checks.js, so failures can be reported with real numbers attached.
export function collectLayoutFacts(options) {
const describe = (el) => {
const id = el.id ? "#" + el.id : "";
const classes =
typeof el.className === "string" && el.className.trim()
? "." + el.className.trim().split(/\s+/).slice(0, 3).join(".")
: "";
return el.tagName.toLowerCase() + id + classes;
};
const round = (n) => Math.round(n * 10) / 10;
// Overflow propagates up every ancestor, so a single wide element
// reports as body, #app, the row, and so on. Depth lets the report
// name the deepest — that is, the actual — offender.
const depthOf = (el) => {
let depth = 0;
for (let node = el.parentElement; node; node = node.parentElement) {
depth++;
}
return depth;
};
const isVisible = (el) => {
const style = getComputedStyle(el);
if (style.display === "none") return false;
if (style.visibility === "hidden") return false;
const rect = el.getBoundingClientRect();
return rect.width > 0 && rect.height > 0;
};
const innerWidth = window.innerWidth;
const clientWidth = document.documentElement.clientWidth;
// Under mobile emulation Chrome lets window.innerWidth *grow* to the
// width of overflowing content, exactly as a phone zooms out to fit a
// too-wide page. Measuring against it would therefore hide the
// overflow it is supposed to expose: at a 320px device width a page
// that spills to 350 reports innerWidth 350 and looks clean. Every
// comparison below is against the layout viewport instead.
const viewportWidth = Math.min(innerWidth, clientWidth);
const elements = Array.from(document.querySelectorAll("body *"));
// Elements sticking out past the right (or left) edge of the viewport.
// The document-level scrollWidth check says *that* the page overflows;
// this says *what* is doing it.
const overflowing = [];
// Elements clipping their own text. Deliberate ellipsis truncation
// (Tailwind's `truncate`) is opt-in and excluded: it is a design
// choice, not breakage.
const clipped = [];
// Elements whose content spills out of their own box without being
// clipped, past the right edge of the viewport. A block element is
// only ever as wide as its container, so text overflowing it has no
// element rect of its own to catch — but it is exactly what drags
// documentElement.scrollWidth past the viewport width, so without
// this the page-level overflow failure has nothing to point at.
const contentOverflowing = [];
for (const el of elements) {
if (!isVisible(el)) continue;
const rect = el.getBoundingClientRect();
if (rect.right > viewportWidth + 1 || rect.left < -1) {
overflowing.push({
el: describe(el),
depth: depthOf(el),
left: round(rect.left),
right: round(rect.right),
});
}
const style = getComputedStyle(el);
const clips =
style.overflowX === "hidden" || style.overflowX === "clip";
const ellipsis = style.textOverflow === "ellipsis";
const hasText = el.textContent.trim().length > 0;
const spills =
el.clientWidth > 0 && el.scrollWidth > el.clientWidth + 1;
if (clips && !ellipsis && hasText && spills) {
clipped.push({
el: describe(el),
scrollWidth: el.scrollWidth,
clientWidth: el.clientWidth,
});
}
if (
!clips &&
spills &&
rect.left + el.scrollWidth > viewportWidth + 1
) {
contentOverflowing.push({
el: describe(el),
depth: depthOf(el),
scrollWidth: el.scrollWidth,
clientWidth: el.clientWidth,
reach: round(rect.left + el.scrollWidth),
});
}
}
// Interactive controls. The measured target is the nearest thing that
// is genuinely tappable — for a checkbox that is the <label> wrapping
// it, which is larger than the box itself and is what a finger hits.
const tapTargets = [];
for (const selector of options.interactiveSelectors) {
for (const el of document.querySelectorAll(selector)) {
if (!isVisible(el)) continue;
const target = el.closest("button, a, label, select") || el;
const rect = target.getBoundingClientRect();
tapTargets.push({
selector,
el: describe(target),
width: round(rect.width),
height: round(rect.height),
});
}
}
// Host rows. The question is not "did it get narrower" but "did it
// reflow": the info block and the sparkline must end up stacked
// vertically and full width in the narrow layout, and side by side in
// the wide one. Both the computed flex-direction and the actual
// geometry are recorded so a row that claims to be a column but is
// still laid out side by side cannot slip through.
const rows = [];
for (const row of document.querySelectorAll(".host-row")) {
const inner = row.firstElementChild;
if (!inner) continue;
const sparkline = inner.querySelector(".sparkline-container");
const info = sparkline ? sparkline.previousElementSibling : null;
if (!sparkline || !info) continue;
const innerStyle = getComputedStyle(inner);
const innerRect = inner.getBoundingClientRect();
const infoRect = info.getBoundingClientRect();
const sparkRect = sparkline.getBoundingClientRect();
rows.push({
index: row.dataset.index,
flexDirection: innerStyle.flexDirection,
containerWidth: round(innerRect.width),
info: {
left: round(infoRect.left),
right: round(infoRect.right),
bottom: round(infoRect.bottom),
width: round(infoRect.width),
},
sparkline: {
left: round(sparkRect.left),
top: round(sparkRect.top),
width: round(sparkRect.width),
},
});
}
const localRows = Array.from(
document.querySelectorAll("#local-hosts .host-row"),
);
return {
innerWidth,
// innerWidth includes any classic scrollbar, clientWidth does not.
// Reported separately so the overflow check can hold itself to the
// narrower of the two rather than to whichever one is more
// forgiving.
documentClientWidth: document.documentElement.clientWidth,
documentScrollWidth: document.documentElement.scrollWidth,
overflowing,
contentOverflowing,
clipped,
tapTargets,
rows,
rowCount: document.querySelectorAll(".host-row").length,
numericLatencies: Array.from(
document.querySelectorAll(".latency-value"),
).filter((el) => /\d/.test(el.textContent)).length,
gatewayDetected: localRows.some((row) =>
row.textContent.includes("Local Gateway"),
),
};
}