The development image copies .git into /src but left .gitea out, so in the image git saw the CI workflow as deleted: `git status` was not empty, `make build` stamped a -dirty version, and `git commit -a` would have deleted the workflow. With the .gitea line gone from .dockerignore, /src matches the commit it was built from. The comment above /keyfunc now names only the binary, as .gitignore does. Model: opus-5-5
This commit is contained in:
+1
-3
@@ -62,7 +62,5 @@
|
|||||||
**/.vscode
|
**/.vscode
|
||||||
**/*.sublime-*
|
**/*.sublime-*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# The binary `make build` writes, and the CI workflow, which is not a
|
# The binary `make build` writes.
|
||||||
# build input.
|
|
||||||
/keyfunc
|
/keyfunc
|
||||||
.gitea
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user