Two consequences of the unknown-scale handling settled in #349, raised by its final review (#367 (comment)). Both pre-existing text or unreconciled paths rather than defects that PR introduced.
1. Two consecutive screens disagree
updateSendBalance() (src/popup/views/send.js:166) was not reconciled with the resolution that landed. For a token whose explorer decimals disagree across addresses, the Send screen shows Current balance: 5.0 NOVEL and the confirmation screen it leads directly to says unknown (NOVEL).
Each is individually defensible — the Send figure matches the balance list, which is deliberate — but a user moving between two consecutive screens sees the same holding described two ways, which is exactly what the repo's Display Consistency rule exists to prevent.
2. The fee error promises a retry that cannot work
src/popup/index.html:697 reads "The network fee could not be estimated… Please go back and try again." When the cause is a missing token scale, no amount of going back and retrying can clear it — the estimate fails for a reason the user cannot act on. Pre-existing string; it is now reachable in a state where it is actively misleading.
Not in milestone 1.0.0: both are wording and consistency, the path is fail-closed, and nothing is misstated about an amount.
Definition of done
The Send screen and the confirmation screen describe an unknown-scale holding the same way.
The fee-unknown message names the real cause when the scale is missing, and does not promise a retry that cannot help.
Test on the disagreement fixture (two addresses reporting different decimals for the same token), asserting both screens and the message. Fails against current head — state the mutation and observed result.
make check green.
Two consequences of the unknown-scale handling settled in https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/349, raised by its final review (https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/pulls/367#issuecomment-69395). Both pre-existing text or unreconciled paths rather than defects that PR introduced.
## 1. Two consecutive screens disagree
`updateSendBalance()` (`src/popup/views/send.js:166`) was not reconciled with the resolution that landed. For a token whose explorer `decimals` disagree across addresses, the Send screen shows `Current balance: 5.0 NOVEL` and the confirmation screen it leads directly to says `unknown (NOVEL)`.
Each is individually defensible — the Send figure matches the balance list, which is deliberate — but a user moving between two consecutive screens sees the same holding described two ways, which is exactly what the repo's Display Consistency rule exists to prevent.
## 2. The fee error promises a retry that cannot work
`src/popup/index.html:697` reads "The network fee could not be estimated… Please go back and try again." When the cause is a missing token scale, no amount of going back and retrying can clear it — the estimate fails for a reason the user cannot act on. Pre-existing string; it is now reachable in a state where it is actively misleading.
Not in milestone 1.0.0: both are wording and consistency, the path is fail-closed, and nothing is misstated about an amount.
## Definition of done
- [ ] The Send screen and the confirmation screen describe an unknown-scale holding the same way.
- [ ] The fee-unknown message names the real cause when the scale is missing, and does not promise a retry that cannot help.
- [ ] Test on the disagreement fixture (two addresses reporting different `decimals` for the same token), asserting both screens and the message. Fails against current head — state the mutation and observed result.
- [ ] `make check` green.
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Two consequences of the unknown-scale handling settled in #349, raised by its final review (#367 (comment)). Both pre-existing text or unreconciled paths rather than defects that PR introduced.
1. Two consecutive screens disagree
updateSendBalance()(src/popup/views/send.js:166) was not reconciled with the resolution that landed. For a token whose explorerdecimalsdisagree across addresses, the Send screen showsCurrent balance: 5.0 NOVELand the confirmation screen it leads directly to saysunknown (NOVEL).Each is individually defensible — the Send figure matches the balance list, which is deliberate — but a user moving between two consecutive screens sees the same holding described two ways, which is exactly what the repo's Display Consistency rule exists to prevent.
2. The fee error promises a retry that cannot work
src/popup/index.html:697reads "The network fee could not be estimated… Please go back and try again." When the cause is a missing token scale, no amount of going back and retrying can clear it — the estimate fails for a reason the user cannot act on. Pre-existing string; it is now reachable in a state where it is actively misleading.Not in milestone 1.0.0: both are wording and consistency, the path is fail-closed, and nothing is misstated about an amount.
Definition of done
decimalsfor the same token), asserting both screens and the message. Fails against current head — state the mutation and observed result.make checkgreen.