docs: put Sepolia in scope and write down the provider flag exception (closes #165)
check / check (push) Waiting to run
e2e / e2e-chrome (push) Waiting to run
e2e / e2e-firefox (push) Waiting to run

The README's 1.0 non-goal said Ethereum mainnet only, while Sepolia
ships as a selectable network. It now puts mainnet and Sepolia in scope
and other chains out of it.

The injected provider's flag named after the other wallet stays, as an
interface-compatibility flag many dApps check. It is now written down
as an exception to the rule against naming competitors, in the README's
Policies section and in RULES.md, and the comment beside it says so.
Neither document spells the name, so script/check-censored, which
already allows the flag only in src/content/inpage.js and its built
copies, is unchanged.

Model: opus-5-5
This commit was merged in pull request #499.
This commit is contained in:
2026-10-07 23:58:49 +02:00
parent bb60b399ec
commit ca18beb97f
4 changed files with 23 additions and 4 deletions
+5 -2
View File
@@ -2648,7 +2648,7 @@ Currently supported:
### Non-Goals for 1.0
- Multi-chain support (Ethereum mainnet only)
- Chains other than Ethereum mainnet and the Sepolia testnet
- Hardware wallet support
## TODO
@@ -2682,7 +2682,10 @@ Currently supported:
## Policies
- We don't mention "the other wallet" by name in code or documentation. We're
our own thing.
our own thing. Written exception: the injected provider in
`src/content/inpage.js` sets the flag named after the other wallet to `true`.
It is an interface-compatibility flag many dApps check, and without it the
wallet stops working on their sites.
- The README is the complete authoritative technical documentation. It's ok if
it gets big.
+4 -1
View File
@@ -118,4 +118,7 @@ contradicts either, the originals govern.
- [ ] "Address" not "account" or "derived key"
- [ ] "Password" not "encryption key" or "vault passphrase"
- [ ] Error messages are full sentences
- [ ] No competitor mentioned by name in code or documentation
- [ ] No competitor mentioned by name in code or documentation. Written
exception: the injected provider in `src/content/inpage.js` sets the flag
named after the other wallet to `true`, an interface-compatibility flag
many dApps check (README.md, Policies)
+10
View File
@@ -44,6 +44,16 @@ then continue tagging as milestones land.
# Completed Steps
- 2026-10-07: Two contradictions between the documents and the code are resolved
as ruled on [#165](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/165). The
README's 1.0 non-goal now puts Ethereum mainnet and the Sepolia testnet in
scope and other chains out of it. The injected provider's flag named after the
other wallet stays, as an interface-compatibility flag many dApps check, and
is written down as an exception to the rule against naming competitors in the
README's Policies section, in `RULES.md` and in a comment beside it in
`src/content/inpage.js`. `script/check-censored` already allows that flag only
in that file and its built copies, so it is unchanged.
- 2026-10-07: Two holes in what `tests/persistedFieldContract.test.js` checks
are closed ([#379](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/379)). The
check that every swept field is driven both truthy and falsy counts only
+4 -1
View File
@@ -99,7 +99,10 @@
const provider = {
isAutistMask: true,
isMetaMask: true, // compatibility — many dApps check this
// An interface-compatibility flag many dApps check. Kept as a written
// exception to the rule that no competitor is named in code: see
// Policies in README.md, and RULES.md.
isMetaMask: true,
chainId: currentChainId,
networkVersion: currentNetworkVersion,
selectedAddress: null,