Re-order DS record algorithms by digest type and revise warning message.

Note that 7, 4 is printed last in the status checks page but does not appear in the file, and I couldn't figure out why.
This commit is contained in:
myfirstnameispaul 2021-06-28 05:51:05 -07:00 committed by Joshua Tauberer
parent 0ba841c7b6
commit 20ccda8710
1 changed files with 5 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -619,7 +619,9 @@ def check_dnssec(domain, env, output, dns_zonefiles, is_checking_primary=False):
output.print_ok("DNSSEC 'DS' record is set correctly at registrar. (Records using algorithm other than ECDSAP256SHA256 should be removed.)")
return
else: # no record uses alg 13
output.print_warning("DNSSEC 'DS' record set at registrar is valid but should be updated to ECDSAP256SHA256 (see below).")
output.print_warning("""DNSSEC 'DS' record set at registrar is valid but should be updated to ECDSAP256SHA256 (see below).
IMPORTANT: Do not delete existing DNSSEC 'DS' records for this domain until confirmation that the new DNSSEC 'DS' record
for this domain is valid.""")
else:
if is_checking_primary:
output.print_error("""The DNSSEC 'DS' record for %s is incorrect. See further details below.""" % domain)
@ -630,7 +632,8 @@ def check_dnssec(domain, env, output, dns_zonefiles, is_checking_primary=False):
output.print_line("""Follow the instructions provided by your domain name registrar to set a DS record.
Registrars support different sorts of DS records. Use the first option that works:""")
preferred_ds_order = [(7, 1), (7, 2), (8, 4), (13, 4), (8, 1), (8, 2), (13, 1), (13, 2)] # low to high
preferred_ds_order = [(7, 1), (8, 1), (13, 1), (7, 2), (8, 4), (13, 4), (8, 2), (13, 2)] # low to high
def preferred_ds_order_func(ds_suggestion):
k = (int(ds_suggestion['alg']), int(ds_suggestion['digalg']))
if k in preferred_ds_order: