Re-order DS record algorithms by digest type and revise warning message.
Note that 7, 4 is printed last in the status checks page but does not appear in the file, and I couldn't figure out why.
This commit is contained in:
parent
0ba841c7b6
commit
20ccda8710
|
@ -619,7 +619,9 @@ def check_dnssec(domain, env, output, dns_zonefiles, is_checking_primary=False):
|
|||
output.print_ok("DNSSEC 'DS' record is set correctly at registrar. (Records using algorithm other than ECDSAP256SHA256 should be removed.)")
|
||||
return
|
||||
else: # no record uses alg 13
|
||||
output.print_warning("DNSSEC 'DS' record set at registrar is valid but should be updated to ECDSAP256SHA256 (see below).")
|
||||
output.print_warning("""DNSSEC 'DS' record set at registrar is valid but should be updated to ECDSAP256SHA256 (see below).
|
||||
IMPORTANT: Do not delete existing DNSSEC 'DS' records for this domain until confirmation that the new DNSSEC 'DS' record
|
||||
for this domain is valid.""")
|
||||
else:
|
||||
if is_checking_primary:
|
||||
output.print_error("""The DNSSEC 'DS' record for %s is incorrect. See further details below.""" % domain)
|
||||
|
@ -630,7 +632,8 @@ def check_dnssec(domain, env, output, dns_zonefiles, is_checking_primary=False):
|
|||
|
||||
output.print_line("""Follow the instructions provided by your domain name registrar to set a DS record.
|
||||
Registrars support different sorts of DS records. Use the first option that works:""")
|
||||
preferred_ds_order = [(7, 1), (7, 2), (8, 4), (13, 4), (8, 1), (8, 2), (13, 1), (13, 2)] # low to high
|
||||
preferred_ds_order = [(7, 1), (8, 1), (13, 1), (7, 2), (8, 4), (13, 4), (8, 2), (13, 2)] # low to high
|
||||
|
||||
def preferred_ds_order_func(ds_suggestion):
|
||||
k = (int(ds_suggestion['alg']), int(ds_suggestion['digalg']))
|
||||
if k in preferred_ds_order:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue