we are going to support the routewatch ip info api via a plugin
wrong repo. this is sysadmin work specific to our site, not smallwebwaf code.
It does need review because it did more than just change a few settings and code. There were changes across many different files, so review is appropriate here.
do this now as a PR and review/rework but leave it to me to review and merge.
what is ubuntu’s snapshot service and why are we depending on it?
put a deepseek implementor on this as a trial of the model.
Why are we worrying about CONNECT? The list of verbs we need to support is just the basic REST set. Even simply GET and HEAD and POST and OPTIONS is probably sufficient for the 1.0 alpha we'll…
Acceptable: such a request does not reach the app on the default, for instance through a low limit on cookies and headers before the Core Rule Set, or the owner accepts this and the sentence…
servewaf refuses such a question, so the default passes the request.
if servewaf refuses, wouldn't the failing response go to the client? the default passing is only if servewaf is…
can we do 72 hours/500 rows, whichever is more? how much disk is that?