Files
webhooker/internal/delivery/target_database_evict_test.go
T
clawbot 71762d72d9
check / check (push) Waiting to run
Name each database target's archive for its webhook and target (closes #376)
Each database target now has its own archive file,
archive-WEBHOOKNAME-TARGETNAME-TARGETID.db, instead of one
archive-WEBHOOKID.db per webhook. delivery.ArchiveFileName builds the
name.

A change of webhook or target name renames its archive files under the
archive writer's lock, before the new name is saved, and back again if
the save fails. Webhook edits, target edits and target creation run one
at a time, so no two of them interleave. A rename never replaces a
file, and one that fails part way moves back what it moved. Deleting a
target evicts only that target's writer. Archive files are never
deleted, and nothing looks for files under the old name.

Model: opus-5-5
2026-10-02 10:47:27 +00:00

418 lines
11 KiB
Go

package delivery_test
import (
"context"
"errors"
"fmt"
"net/http"
"os"
"path/filepath"
"sync"
"testing"
"time"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
"sneak.berlin/go/webhooker/internal/database"
"sneak.berlin/go/webhooker/internal/delivery"
)
// deliverTo archives one event to a database target, leaving the
// target's writer cached with its handle open.
func deliverTo(
t *testing.T, env *archiveEnv, tgt *database.Target,
) {
t.Helper()
webhookDB := testWebhookDB(t)
event := seedEvent(t, webhookDB, `{"archived":true}`)
env.eng.ExportDeliverDatabase(
webhookDB, seedDatabaseTargetDelivery(t, webhookDB, event, tgt),
)
}
// TestEvictWebhook_ClosesAndRemovesWriter proves that evicting
// a webhook drops the archive writers of its database targets
// from the registry and closes their open handles, rather than
// leaving them alive for the process lifetime, and leaves another
// webhook's writer alone.
func TestEvictWebhook_ClosesAndRemovesWriter(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
env := setupArchiveTest(t)
first := env.seedDatabaseTarget(t, "")
second := env.addDatabaseTarget(t, first.WebhookID, "")
other := env.seedDatabaseTarget(t, "")
for _, tgt := range []*database.Target{first, second, other} {
deliverTo(t, env, tgt)
require.True(
t, env.eng.ExportArchiveHandleOpen(tgt.ID),
"the writer should hold an open handle after a write",
)
}
env.eng.EvictWebhook(first.WebhookID)
for _, tgt := range []*database.Target{first, second} {
assert.False(
t, env.eng.ExportHasArchiveWriter(tgt.ID),
"eviction should remove the registry entry",
)
assert.False(
t, env.eng.ExportArchiveHandleOpen(tgt.ID),
"eviction should close the archive handle",
)
assert.FileExists(
t, env.archivePath(tgt),
"eviction must not delete the archive file",
)
}
assert.True(
t, env.eng.ExportArchiveHandleOpen(other.ID),
"another webhook's writer must be left alone",
)
}
// TestEvictTarget_LeavesOtherTargets proves that evicting one
// database target leaves the writer of another target of the same
// webhook in place.
func TestEvictTarget_LeavesOtherTargets(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
env := setupArchiveTest(t)
doomed := env.seedDatabaseTarget(t, "")
kept := env.addDatabaseTarget(t, doomed.WebhookID, "")
deliverTo(t, env, doomed)
deliverTo(t, env, kept)
env.eng.EvictTarget(doomed.ID)
assert.False(t, env.eng.ExportHasArchiveWriter(doomed.ID))
assert.FileExists(
t, env.archivePath(doomed),
"eviction must not delete the archive file",
)
assert.True(
t, env.eng.ExportArchiveHandleOpen(kept.ID),
"the other target's writer must be left alone",
)
}
// TestEvictWebhook_UnknownWebhookIsNoOp proves eviction is safe
// for the common case of a webhook or target that never had an
// archive writer, and that repeating it does not panic.
func TestEvictWebhook_UnknownWebhookIsNoOp(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
env := setupArchiveTest(t)
assert.NotPanics(t, func() {
env.eng.EvictWebhook("no-such-webhook")
env.eng.EvictWebhook("no-such-webhook")
env.eng.EvictTarget("no-such-target")
env.eng.EvictTarget("no-such-target")
})
assert.False(
t, env.eng.ExportHasArchiveWriter("no-such-target"),
"eviction must not create a writer",
)
}
// evictTestRow builds an archive row for the eviction tests.
func evictTestRow(eventID string) delivery.ExportArchivedEvent {
return delivery.ExportArchivedEvent{
EventID: eventID,
WebhookID: "wh-evict",
Method: http.MethodPost,
Body: `{"seeded":true}`,
}
}
// TestEvictedWriter_WriteDoesNotReopenFile is the direct test of
// the evicted guard on the write path. A writer that has left
// the registry is held by nobody, so a handle it opened could
// never be closed again: it must refuse the write outright
// rather than recreate the archive behind the registry's back.
//
// The archive file is removed before the eviction, so an
// unguarded write is unmistakable — it recreates the file.
func TestEvictedWriter_WriteDoesNotReopenFile(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
path := filepath.Join(t.TempDir(), "archive-evicted.db")
w := delivery.NewExportArchiveWriter(
path, archiveTestLogger(), 0,
)
require.NoError(t, w.Write(evictTestRow("ev-1"), 0))
require.FileExists(t, path)
// The operator moves the archive away for offline retention,
// which the write path would ordinarily undo on the next
// write by recreating the file.
require.NoError(t, os.Remove(path))
w.Evict()
err := w.Write(evictTestRow("ev-2"), 0)
require.ErrorIs(
t, err, delivery.ErrExportArchiveWriterEvicted,
"an evicted writer must refuse writes",
)
assert.NoFileExists(
t, path,
"an evicted writer must not reopen (or recreate) the "+
"archive file",
)
assert.False(
t, w.HandleOpen(),
"an evicted writer must hold no handle",
)
}
// TestEvictedWriter_SweepDoesNotReopenFile is the same test for
// the sweep path: an idle sweep that reaches a writer already
// evicted underneath it must return the sentinel rather than
// reopen a file nothing owns.
func TestEvictedWriter_SweepDoesNotReopenFile(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
path := filepath.Join(t.TempDir(), "archive-evicted.db")
w := delivery.NewExportArchiveWriter(
path, archiveTestLogger(), 0,
)
require.NoError(t, w.Write(evictTestRow("ev-1"), 0))
require.FileExists(t, path)
w.Evict()
err := w.SweepExpired(time.Hour)
require.ErrorIs(
t, err, delivery.ErrExportArchiveWriterEvicted,
"an evicted writer must refuse an idle sweep",
)
assert.False(
t, w.HandleOpen(),
"a refused sweep must not leave a handle open",
)
}
// racingWrites drives a pack of goroutines writing to one
// archive writer until each is refused, so an eviction on the
// test goroutine has to take the writer's mutex away from writes
// that are already contending for it.
type racingWrites struct {
wg sync.WaitGroup
mu sync.Mutex
sawEvicted bool
otherErr error
started chan struct{}
}
// racingWriteGoroutines is how many goroutines contend for the
// writer's mutex while the eviction lands.
const racingWriteGoroutines = 4
// startRacingWrites launches the writing goroutines. Each writes
// in a loop and stops at its first error, recording whether that
// error was the eviction sentinel. The deadline is a backstop
// against a hang, not a timing assumption: the first write after
// the eviction is refused.
func startRacingWrites(
w *delivery.ExportArchiveWriter,
) *racingWrites {
r := &racingWrites{
started: make(chan struct{}, racingWriteGoroutines),
}
deadline := time.Now().Add(10 * time.Second)
r.wg.Add(racingWriteGoroutines)
for i := range racingWriteGoroutines {
go func() {
defer r.wg.Done()
first := true
for time.Now().Before(deadline) {
err := w.Write(
evictTestRow(fmt.Sprintf("ev-%d", i)), 0,
)
if first {
r.started <- struct{}{}
first = false
}
if err == nil {
continue
}
r.record(err)
return
}
}()
}
return r
}
// record classifies the error that stopped one goroutine.
func (r *racingWrites) record(err error) {
r.mu.Lock()
defer r.mu.Unlock()
if errors.Is(err, delivery.ErrExportArchiveWriterEvicted) {
r.sawEvicted = true
return
}
r.otherErr = err
}
// awaitFirstWrite blocks until at least one write has run, so
// the eviction that follows is a genuine race.
func (r *racingWrites) awaitFirstWrite() {
<-r.started
}
// wait joins the goroutines and reports whether any write was
// refused with the eviction sentinel, plus any unexpected error.
func (r *racingWrites) wait() (bool, error) {
r.wg.Wait()
r.mu.Lock()
defer r.mu.Unlock()
return r.sawEvicted, r.otherErr
}
// TestEvictWebhook_RacingWriteDoesNotReopenHandle exercises the
// interleaving the evicted flag exists for: writes already
// contending for the writer's mutex when the eviction takes it.
// The write that wins the mutex after the eviction must abandon
// its work rather than reopen the archive, leaving the writer
// permanently handle-free. Run under -race.
func TestEvictWebhook_RacingWriteDoesNotReopenHandle(
t *testing.T,
) {
t.Parallel()
env := setupArchiveTest(t)
tgt := env.seedDatabaseTarget(t, "")
// Prime the registry so the test can hold the very writer the
// eviction is about to detach.
deliverTo(t, env, tgt)
w := env.eng.ExportArchiveWriterFor(tgt.ID)
require.NotNil(t, w)
require.True(t, w.HandleOpen())
race := startRacingWrites(w)
// Evict only once writes are genuinely in flight, so the
// eviction has to contend for the writer's mutex.
race.awaitFirstWrite()
env.eng.EvictWebhook(tgt.WebhookID)
sawEvicted, otherErr := race.wait()
require.NoError(t, otherErr)
assert.True(
t, sawEvicted,
"a write after eviction must be refused",
)
assert.False(
t, w.HandleOpen(),
"no write may reopen the archive once the writer has "+
"been evicted",
)
assert.False(
t, env.eng.ExportHasArchiveWriter(tgt.ID),
"the registry entry must stay gone",
)
}
// TestEvictWebhook_LaterDeliveryRecreatesWriter proves eviction
// does not break archiving for a target that is still alive: a
// subsequent delivery gets a brand new writer from the registry.
// It says nothing about the evicted writer itself — that is what
// TestEvictedWriter_WriteDoesNotReopenFile covers.
func TestEvictWebhook_LaterDeliveryRecreatesWriter(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
env := setupArchiveTest(t)
tgt := env.seedDatabaseTarget(t, "")
deliverTo(t, env, tgt)
require.True(t, env.eng.ExportHasArchiveWriter(tgt.ID))
env.eng.EvictWebhook(tgt.WebhookID)
// A fresh delivery for the same target gets a brand new
// writer from the registry, so archiving keeps working.
deliverTo(t, env, tgt)
assert.True(
t, env.eng.ExportHasArchiveWriter(tgt.ID),
"a later delivery should recreate the writer",
)
}
// TestEngineStop_WriteAfterStopIsRefused proves the engine's stop
// closes each archive writer the way deleting its webhook does: a
// write that reaches a writer after the stop is refused, reopens
// nothing and adds no row.
func TestEngineStop_WriteAfterStopIsRefused(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
env := setupArchiveTest(t)
tgt := env.seedDatabaseTarget(t, "")
deliverTo(t, env, tgt)
w := env.eng.ExportArchiveWriterFor(tgt.ID)
require.NotNil(t, w)
require.True(t, w.HandleOpen())
require.NoError(t, env.eng.ExportStop(context.Background()))
err := w.Write(evictTestRow("ev-after-stop"), 0)
require.ErrorIs(
t, err, delivery.ErrExportArchiveWriterEvicted,
"a write after the stop must be refused",
)
assert.False(
t, w.HandleOpen(),
"a refused write must not reopen the archive",
)
assert.False(
t, env.eng.ExportHasArchiveWriter(tgt.ID),
"the stop should empty the registry",
)
count, err := countArchivedRows(w.Path())
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.Equal(
t, int64(1), count, "the refused row must not be written",
)
}