Very low test coverage on most packages (delivery 0%, handlers 5.7%, middleware 0%, session 0%) #28

New Issue

2026-03-02T01:30:13+01:00

clawbot commented

2026-03-02 01:30:13 +01:00

Issue

Test coverage across the codebase is very low for critical packages:

Package	Coverage	Notes
`internal/config`	87.9%	Good
`internal/database`	74.8%	Decent
`internal/globals`	100%	Good
`internal/logger`	84.0%	Good
`internal/handlers`	5.7%	Only tests handler creation and missing template error
`internal/delivery`	0.0%	No tests at all for the core delivery engine
`internal/middleware`	0.0%	No tests
`internal/server`	0.0%	No tests
`internal/session`	0.0%	No tests
`internal/healthcheck`	0.0%	No tests
`cmd/webhooker`	0.0%	No tests
`pkg/config`	47.5%	Separate module

Critical Untested Paths

Delivery engine: The entire delivery logic (HTTP delivery, retry with backoff, log delivery, database delivery) has zero test coverage. This is the core business logic.
Webhook reception handler: No tests for the webhook receiver (event creation, delivery queuing, body size limits, inactive entrypoint handling).
Source management handlers: No tests for CRUD operations (create, edit, delete webhooks, add entrypoints/targets).
Auth middleware: No tests for the RequireAuth middleware, session validation, or metrics auth.
Session management: No tests for session creation, destruction, cookie handling.

Notes

The config test has an integration gap: it tests DevSessionKey in the config layer but never verifies it works with the session layer (it doesn't — see issue #19).
The handlers test uses a mock database that returns nil for DB(), which doesn't reflect real behavior.

Category

Nice-to-have for 1.0 MVP, but critical for reliability going forward.

## Issue Test coverage across the codebase is very low for critical packages: | Package | Coverage | Notes | |---------|----------|-------| | `internal/config` | 87.9% | Good | | `internal/database` | 74.8% | Decent | | `internal/globals` | 100% | Good | | `internal/logger` | 84.0% | Good | | `internal/handlers` | 5.7% | Only tests handler creation and missing template error | | `internal/delivery` | 0.0% | **No tests at all** for the core delivery engine | | `internal/middleware` | 0.0% | No tests | | `internal/server` | 0.0% | No tests | | `internal/session` | 0.0% | No tests | | `internal/healthcheck` | 0.0% | No tests | | `cmd/webhooker` | 0.0% | No tests | | `pkg/config` | 47.5% | Separate module | ## Critical Untested Paths 1. **Delivery engine**: The entire delivery logic (HTTP delivery, retry with backoff, log delivery, database delivery) has zero test coverage. This is the core business logic. 2. **Webhook reception handler**: No tests for the webhook receiver (event creation, delivery queuing, body size limits, inactive entrypoint handling). 3. **Source management handlers**: No tests for CRUD operations (create, edit, delete webhooks, add entrypoints/targets). 4. **Auth middleware**: No tests for the RequireAuth middleware, session validation, or metrics auth. 5. **Session management**: No tests for session creation, destruction, cookie handling. ## Notes - The config test has an integration gap: it tests `DevSessionKey` in the config layer but never verifies it works with the session layer (it doesn't — see issue [#19](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/webhooker/issues/19)). - The handlers test uses a mock database that returns nil for `DB()`, which doesn't reflect real behavior. ## Category Nice-to-have for 1.0 MVP, but critical for reliability going forward.

clawbot referenced this issue

2026-03-02 01:31:01 +01:00

1.0/mvp #15

sneak commented

2026-03-04 01:21:54 +01:00

@clawbot please work on this

clawbot referenced this issue from a commit

2026-03-04 01:32:16 +01:00

test: add tests for delivery, middleware, and session packages

clawbot referenced a pull request that will close this issue

2026-03-04 01:32:29 +01:00

test: add tests for delivery, middleware, and session packages #32