31848922e1ab8b1a91698c1dbab29b519f9b9ac0
3 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31848922e1 |
Bound every slog line against client-chosen text (closes #176)
All checks were successful
check / check (push) Successful in 2m50s
MaxBodySize logged r.URL.Path untruncated at WARN, and routes.go registers it ahead of RequireAuth, so an unauthenticated POST /source/<8 KB>/edit with an oversize declared Content-Length wrote attacker-chosen text of attacker-chosen length into the operator's log, for the cost of a request with no body. The 2,560-byte per-line budget from #146 did not reach it: that budget lives in the access log's field capping and this is a separate slog call. The capping mechanism moves out of internal/middleware into internal/logfield so there is one budget and one implementation rather than a second ad-hoc truncation. Truncate and EncodedBytes are unchanged; the access log now spends logfield.MaxBytes where it spent maxLogFieldBytes. The sweep the issue asked for found five more call sites of the same shape, all reachable unauthenticated, all now capped: the CSRF 403 (also registered ahead of RequireAuth), the rate limiters' 429 (the per-entrypoint receiver limiter is unauthenticated), RequireAuth's own DEBUG line, the unknown-entrypoint DEBUG line on the receiver, and the failed-login DEBUG lines. DEBUG being off by default is not a bound: an operator turning it on to diagnose a flood must not thereby hand the flood an unbounded write. Every other slog call in the tree was read and judged; the PR body lists all of them, including the ones left alone and why. Two further sites arrived in next with #171 after the first sweep was written and are capped here as well: "login failure limit exceeded" in loginguard.go and "password verification capacity exhausted" in handlers/auth.go, both WARN on the unauthenticated login POST. Neither was ever wide — chi routes that POST on a static pattern, so r.URL.Path is the 12-byte constant /pages/login and each line lands near 120 bytes. They are capped because RecordLoginFailure is exported and takes any *http.Request, so the bound rests on a routing invariant nobody wrote down, and because the same message at handlers/profile.go logs no path at all. No request through the mux can widen either line, so their tests call those two entry points directly with the path a caller on a parameterised route would supply; that is what the caps defend against, and an unasserted cap is one a later edit removes for free. MaxBodySize stays ahead of RequireAuth. An oversize body should be refused before the request buys a cookie decrypt and a session load, and rejecting first is what keeps an unauthenticated flood from choosing how much session work the process does. The ordering and what it costs are now written at the registration, on maxFormBodySize. MaxAccessLogLineBytes is restated as the ceiling on every slog line carrying text an UNAUTHENTICATED client supplies, not just the access log's: each of these lines carries strictly fewer client-supplied fields than the access log does, so none can be wider. That is asserted per line under both handlers rather than argued. The claim is qualified rather than universal because three kinds of writer are outside it, and the README and the constant now name all three: lines carrying an authenticated operator's own input, which are not truncated at all (the webhook name on "webhook created" reaches 600 KB on one line from a 100 KB form field, measured; the SSRF-rejection url and the target_name lines are the same shape) and are left uncapped deliberately, since truncating the operator's own configuration echoed back costs debuggability against no adversary; the log delivery target, which exists to emit the whole event; and GORM's default logger, which prints the interpolated SQL to stdout on a record-not-found and is unbounded on the receiver and login lookups. That last one is a real defect this audit turned up and is filed separately as #178, not fixed here. Tests drive 8 KB of client-chosen text at all eight sites, through both handlers internal/logger can install and through each character they escape — including a bare C0 control, which costs six bytes on the line against the one it cost to send and is the case a raw-byte budget breaks on first. Each holds the encoded line to the ceiling and asserts the markers at the far end of the input are absent, so a value that merely happened to be short cannot pass; for the six sites a request can widen, the whole flood's output is held to what that ceiling allows. The two login lines past the username lookup, capped for uniformity rather than need, are pinned too. internal/logfield gains a test that measures the per-rune charge against what the handlers really emit over roughly 3,000 code points on each, so an undercharged rune fails a test instead of quietly falsifying the ceiling. Verified by mutation: reverting the MaxBodySize cap alone fails 28 subtests with a 16,583-byte line against the 2,560 ceiling; reverting the other five fails 70; reverting either login-throttle WARN cap fails 14, through the direct calls those caps exist for; uncapping either of the two login lines past the username lookup fails both handlers on its own, so those two are independently pinned rather than jointly; budgeting raw bytes instead of encoded ones fails 23 across three packages. |
|||
| d771fe14df |
fix: detect TLS per-request in CSRF middleware to fix login (#54)
All checks were successful
check / check (push) Successful in 1m55s
## Problem After the security hardening in PR #42, login fails with `Forbidden - invalid CSRF token` in production deployments. The CSRF middleware tied its `PlaintextHTTPRequest` wrapping and cookie `Secure` flag to the `IsDev()` environment check. This meant production mode always assumed HTTPS via gorilla/csrf's strict mode, which broke login in common deployment scenarios: 1. **Production behind a TLS-terminating reverse proxy**: gorilla/csrf assumed HTTPS but `r.TLS` was nil (the Go server receives HTTP from the proxy). Origin/Referer scheme mismatches caused `referer not supplied` or `origin invalid` errors. 2. **Production over direct HTTP** (testing/staging with prod config): the `Secure` cookie flag prevented the browser from sending the CSRF cookie back over HTTP, causing `CSRF token invalid` errors. ## Root Cause gorilla/csrf v1.7.3 defaults to HTTPS-strict mode unless `PlaintextHTTPRequest()` is called. In strict mode it: - Forces `requestURL.Scheme = "https"` for Origin/Referer comparisons - Requires a `Referer` header on POST and rejects `http://` Referer schemes - The `csrf.Secure(true)` option makes the browser refuse to send the CSRF cookie over HTTP The old code only called `PlaintextHTTPRequest()` in dev mode, leaving prod mode permanently stuck in HTTPS-strict mode regardless of the actual transport. ## Fix Detect the actual transport protocol **per-request** using: - `r.TLS != nil` — direct TLS connection to the Go server - `X-Forwarded-Proto: https` header — TLS-terminating reverse proxy Two gorilla/csrf middleware instances are maintained (one with `Secure: true`, one with `Secure: false`) since `csrf.Secure()` is a creation-time option. Both use the same signing key, so cookies are interchangeable. | Scenario | Cookie Secure | Origin/Referer Mode | |---|---|---| | Direct TLS (`r.TLS != nil`) | ✅ Secure | Strict (HTTPS scheme) | | Behind TLS proxy (`X-Forwarded-Proto: https`) | ✅ Secure | Strict (HTTPS scheme) | | Plaintext HTTP | ❌ Non-Secure | Relaxed (PlaintextHTTPRequest) | CSRF token validation (cookie + form double-submit) is always enforced regardless of mode. ## Testing - Added `TestCSRF_ProdMode_PlaintextHTTP_POSTWithValidToken` — prod mode over plaintext HTTP - Added `TestCSRF_ProdMode_BehindProxy_POSTWithValidToken` — prod mode behind TLS proxy - Added `TestCSRF_ProdMode_DirectTLS_POSTWithValidToken` — prod mode with direct TLS - Added `TestCSRF_ProdMode_PlaintextHTTP_POSTWithoutToken` — token still required - Added `TestIsClientTLS_*` — TLS detection unit tests - All existing CSRF tests pass unchanged - `docker build .` passes (includes `make check`) - Manual verification: built and ran the container in both `dev` and `prod` modes, confirmed login succeeds in both Closes #53 Co-authored-by: user <user@Mac.lan guest wan> Reviewed-on: #54 Co-authored-by: clawbot <clawbot@noreply.example.org> Co-committed-by: clawbot <clawbot@noreply.example.org> |
|||
| 60786c5019 |
feat: add CSRF protection, SSRF prevention, and login rate limiting (#42)
All checks were successful
check / check (push) Successful in 4s
## Security Hardening This PR implements three security hardening issues: ### CSRF Protection (closes #35) - Session-based CSRF tokens with cryptographically random 256-bit generation - Constant-time token comparison to prevent timing attacks - CSRF middleware applied to `/pages`, `/sources`, `/source`, and `/user` routes - Hidden `csrf_token` field added to all 12+ POST forms in templates - Excluded from `/webhook` (inbound webhook POSTs) and `/api` (stateless API) ### SSRF Prevention (closes #36) - `ValidateTargetURL()` blocks private/reserved IP ranges at target creation time - Blocked ranges: `127.0.0.0/8`, `10.0.0.0/8`, `172.16.0.0/12`, `192.168.0.0/16`, `169.254.0.0/16`, `::1`, `fc00::/7`, `fe80::/10`, plus multicast, reserved, test-net, and CGN ranges - SSRF-safe HTTP transport with custom `DialContext` in the delivery engine for defense-in-depth (prevents DNS rebinding attacks) - Only `http` and `https` schemes allowed ### Login Rate Limiting (closes #37) - Per-IP rate limiter using `golang.org/x/time/rate` - 5 attempts per minute per IP on `POST /pages/login` - GET requests (form rendering) pass through unaffected - Automatic cleanup of stale per-IP limiter entries every 5 minutes - `X-Forwarded-For` and `X-Real-IP` header support for reverse proxies ### Files Changed **New files:** - `internal/middleware/csrf.go` + tests — CSRF middleware - `internal/middleware/ratelimit.go` + tests — Login rate limiter - `internal/delivery/ssrf.go` + tests — SSRF validation + safe transport **Modified files:** - `internal/server/routes.go` — Wire CSRF and rate limit middleware - `internal/handlers/handlers.go` — Inject CSRF token into template data - `internal/handlers/source_management.go` — SSRF validation on target creation - `internal/delivery/engine.go` — SSRF-safe HTTP transport for production - All form templates — Added hidden `csrf_token` fields - `README.md` — Updated Security section and TODO checklist `docker build .` passes (lint + tests + build). Co-authored-by: clawbot <clawbot@noreply.git.eeqj.de> Co-authored-by: clawbot <clawbot@eeqj.de> Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Paul <sneak@noreply.example.org> Reviewed-on: #42 Co-authored-by: clawbot <clawbot@noreply.example.org> Co-committed-by: clawbot <clawbot@noreply.example.org> |
