Files
vaultik/cmd/vaultik/makefile_test.go
T
clawbot 81f83b29f6
check / check (push) Successful in 12m47s
Re-vendor the canonical files from sneak/prompts at dd4027b (closes #213)
Linting and testing become the lint and test phases of the Dockerfile,
and the build stage depends on both. Dockerfile.lint, CHECK_EPOCH and
the tests that checked them are removed. Every docker build in script/
passes --no-cache, and script/cibuild runs script/bootstrap first. A
host without Go gets the go.mod version from script/install-go in
.tool/go, which bootstrap, the Makefile, fmt, fmt-check, precommit and
release add to PATH; fmt-check skips .tool. The image takes its version
from the VERSION build arg or git describe, dev without .git. This
repo's own entries follow the canonical content in .gitignore and
.editorconfig. The golangci-lint v2.14.0 findings are fixed. The rules
in CLAUDE.md move into AGENTS.md. IsDevVersion counts "unknown".

Model: opus-5-5
2026-10-06 12:46:13 +02:00

188 lines
5.8 KiB
Go

package main_test
import (
"os"
"path/filepath"
"regexp"
"slices"
"strings"
"testing"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
)
// This file guards the Makefile that builds this program, which is why
// it lives beside it rather than in a package of its own.
//
// Issue #110: `build` was listed in .PHONY with no `build:` rule
// anywhere in the file. That combination is silently successful — make
// considers a phony target with no prerequisites and no recipe already
// satisfied, so `rm -f vaultik && make build` printed "Nothing to be
// done for 'build'" and exited 0 with no binary produced. Declaring the
// name phony is precisely what converts the "No rule to make target"
// error into a green.
//
// The guard is a parse of the Makefile rather than an invocation of
// make. `make test` is what runs these tests, so shelling back into
// `make build` here would nest a build inside the test run and drop a
// binary into the tree as a side effect of testing. The one property a
// parse cannot establish — that the recipe still fails when the build
// fails — is not testable from inside the build either; it is verified
// by hand against a deliberately broken tree.
// phonyDirective introduces the list of phony target names.
const phonyDirective = ".PHONY:"
// ruleLine matches a rule's target list: a target starts in column
// zero, so recipe lines (tab-indented) and the continuation lines of a
// variable assignment (space-indented) are excluded by construction.
//
// The trailing (?:[^=]|$) rejects `:=` assignments such as
// `VERSION := $(shell script/version)`, which are not rules. Directives
// and function calls (`.PHONY:`, `ifeq`, `$(error ...)`) do not match
// because a target here must begin with a letter, digit or underscore.
var ruleLine = regexp.MustCompile(`^([A-Za-z0-9_][A-Za-z0-9_./ -]*):(?:[^=]|$)`)
// TestPhonyTargetsAllHaveRules fails on any name in .PHONY that has no
// rule in the Makefile. Such a name is not a build target at all: it is
// a command that reports success without doing anything, which is worse
// than one that does not exist, because a caller checking the exit code
// cannot tell the difference.
func TestPhonyTargetsAllHaveRules(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
makefile := readMakefile(t)
phony := phonyTargets(makefile)
require.NotEmpty(t, phony, "no .PHONY names found; the parser is broken")
rules := declaredRules(makefile)
// Sanity check on the rule parser before trusting its verdict: a
// parser that found nothing would pass this test by accident.
require.Contains(t, rules, "vaultik",
"the file rule that builds the binary must be recognized")
for _, target := range phony {
assert.Contains(t, rules, target,
"`.PHONY` lists %q but the Makefile declares no %q rule, so "+
"`make %s` exits 0 without doing anything", target, target, target)
}
}
// TestBuildTargetBuildsTheBinary pins the specific shape of issue #110:
// `make build` has to reach the rule that produces the binary. The test
// above would also pass if `build:` were given an empty recipe of its
// own, which would be the same silent success under a different
// spelling.
func TestBuildTargetBuildsTheBinary(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
prerequisites := rulePrerequisites(readMakefile(t), "build")
require.NotNil(t, prerequisites, "the Makefile declares no `build` rule")
assert.Contains(t, prerequisites, "vaultik",
"`make build` must depend on the rule that builds the binary")
}
// readMakefile returns the contents of the repository's Makefile.
func readMakefile(t *testing.T) string {
t.Helper()
return readRepoFile(t, "Makefile")
}
// readRepoFile reads a file by its path relative to the repository
// root.
func readRepoFile(t *testing.T, name string) string {
t.Helper()
//nolint:gosec // G304: the path is a constant relative to this repo
contents, err := os.ReadFile(filepath.Join(repoRoot(t), name))
require.NoError(t, err)
return string(contents)
}
// repoRoot returns the repository root. The test binary runs with its
// package directory as the working directory, so the root is found by
// walking up until the module file appears.
func repoRoot(t *testing.T) string {
t.Helper()
dir, err := os.Getwd()
require.NoError(t, err)
for {
_, err = os.Stat(filepath.Join(dir, "go.mod"))
if err == nil {
return dir
}
parent := filepath.Dir(dir)
require.NotEqual(t, dir, parent,
"walked to the filesystem root without finding a go.mod")
dir = parent
}
}
// phonyTargets returns every name declared phony, across all .PHONY
// lines.
func phonyTargets(makefile string) []string {
var targets []string
for line := range strings.SplitSeq(makefile, "\n") {
if !strings.HasPrefix(line, phonyDirective) {
continue
}
targets = append(targets,
strings.Fields(strings.TrimPrefix(line, phonyDirective))...)
}
return targets
}
// declaredRules returns the set of target names that have a rule.
func declaredRules(makefile string) map[string]bool {
rules := make(map[string]bool)
for line := range strings.SplitSeq(makefile, "\n") {
match := ruleLine.FindStringSubmatch(line)
if match == nil {
continue
}
// One rule may name several targets: `a b: prereq`.
for target := range strings.FieldsSeq(match[1]) {
rules[target] = true
}
}
return rules
}
// rulePrerequisites returns the prerequisites of the named rule, or nil
// if no such rule exists. A rule with none returns an empty slice, so
// "declared with nothing to do" is distinguishable from "not declared".
func rulePrerequisites(makefile, target string) []string {
for line := range strings.SplitSeq(makefile, "\n") {
match := ruleLine.FindStringSubmatch(line)
if match == nil {
continue
}
if !slices.Contains(strings.Fields(match[1]), target) {
continue
}
_, after, _ := strings.Cut(line, ":")
return append([]string{}, strings.Fields(after)...)
}
return nil
}