sneak/vaultik
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 23 Pull Requests 8 Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Add regression test for CompressStream double-close fix (#28) #35

New Issue
Open
opened 2026-02-16 06:08:39 +01:00 by clawbot · 0 comments
clawbot commented 2026-02-16 06:08:39 +01:00
Collaborator
Copy Link

PR #33 fixed the double-close bug in CompressStream (issue #28), but no regression test was added to prevent reintroduction.

A test should exercise CompressStream (and CompressData) to verify that the close logic works correctly without panics or errors.

See: #33 (comment)

PR #33 fixed the double-close bug in `CompressStream` (issue #28), but no regression test was added to prevent reintroduction. A test should exercise `CompressStream` (and `CompressData`) to verify that the close logic works correctly without panics or errors. See: https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/vaultik/pulls/33#issuecomment-3071
sneak was assigned by clawbot 2026-02-16 06:08:39 +01:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
No items
No Label
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
sneak
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: sneak/vaultik#35
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?