Author SHA1 Message Date
sneak e823147193 Trigger CI on next, not only main (closes #122)
check / check (pull_request) Failing after 1s
check.yml ran only on push to main and pull_request against main. Under
the current workflow every unit is a PR based on next, and next is
pushed to on each squash-merge, so neither got a CI run; the milestone
PR from next to main was the first place a broken next would surface.
Add next to both the push and pull_request branch lists so unit PRs and
next itself are checked. The workflow is otherwise unchanged: same
pinned actions/checkout sha, same script/cibuild step. README's
Entrypoints section and TODO.md's log record where CI now runs.

Model: opus-4-8
2026-09-21 07:23:27 +00:00
4 changed files with 11 additions and 3 deletions
+2 -2
View File
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
name: check
on:
push:
branches: [main]
branches: [main, next]
pull_request:
branches: [main]
branches: [main, next]
jobs:
check:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+2
View File
@@ -716,6 +716,8 @@ them. We provide:
then the product image). Either failing fails the script. It runs the
checks in the same containers CI does, from a clean copy of the tree,
so it also catches anything that depends on host state.
`.gitea/workflows/check.yml` runs it on every push to `main` and
`next` and on every pull request against either.
It passes a fresh `--build-arg CHECK_EPOCH` to each build, unique per
invocation, which both files declare immediately above their check
+6
View File
@@ -25,6 +25,12 @@ release" is exactly the contradiction
# Completed Steps
- 2026-09-21: Made `.gitea/workflows/check.yml` run on pushes to `main`
and `next` and on pull requests against either, so unit PRs (whose
base is `next`) and `next` itself get a CI run instead of relying on a
local `make check`
([issue #122](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/vaultik/issues/122)).
- 2026-08-10: Moved every lint run into its own container, as a build
step ([issue #113](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/vaultik/issues/113)).
New root `Dockerfile.lint`, built by `script/lint`, runs
+1 -1
View File
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ specifying a path using --config or by setting VAULTIK_CONFIG to a path.`,
}
cmd.Flags().BoolVar(&opts.Cron, "cron", false,
"Run in cron mode (silent unless warning or error)")
"Run in cron mode (silent unless error)")
cmd.Flags().BoolVar(&opts.Prune, "prune", false,
"After backup, drop older snapshots of the same name and remove "+
"orphaned blobs")