Trigger CI on next, not only main (closes #122)
`check.yml` ran only on push to `main` and on pull requests against `main`. Every unit is a PR based on `next`, and `next` is pushed on each squash-merge, so no unit PR and no push to `next` ever ran CI; a broken `next` would first surface on the milestone PR. `next` is added to both branch lists; nothing else in the workflow changes. The README Entrypoints section now says where CI runs. Disclosure: the CI run on the PR itself fired (the proof the trigger works) but was red because the runner had no disk space left before any check step ran; the local gate was green. Model: opus-4-8 (implementation and review) model: claude-fable-5
This commit was merged in pull request #127.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -25,6 +25,12 @@ release" is exactly the contradiction
|
||||
|
||||
# Completed Steps
|
||||
|
||||
- 2026-09-21: Made `.gitea/workflows/check.yml` run on pushes to `main`
|
||||
and `next` and on pull requests against either, so unit PRs (whose
|
||||
base is `next`) and `next` itself get a CI run instead of relying on a
|
||||
local `make check`
|
||||
([issue #122](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/vaultik/issues/122)).
|
||||
|
||||
- 2026-08-10: Moved every lint run into its own container, as a build
|
||||
step ([issue #113](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/vaultik/issues/113)).
|
||||
New root `Dockerfile.lint`, built by `script/lint`, runs
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user