bias those limits against the countries and AS numbers that abuse commonly comes from, so their clients get a configured percentage of the normal allowance rather than an outright block;
This is nonsensical. The idea of a configured percentage of normal allowance means that they do get an outright block just sooner. The thresholds for certain net blocks or countries cause them to be banned with fewer requests than other countries or net blocks are allowed before they are banned. But in all cases the results is a ban, first a temporary ban and then for repeated abuse a permanent ban.
> bias those limits against the countries and AS numbers that abuse commonly comes from, so their clients get a configured percentage of the normal allowance rather than an outright block;
This is nonsensical. The idea of a configured percentage of normal allowance means that they do get an outright block just sooner. The thresholds for certain net blocks or countries cause them to be banned with fewer requests than other countries or net blocks are allowed before they are banned. But in all cases the results is a ban, first a temporary ban and then for repeated abuse a permanent ban.
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
This is nonsensical. The idea of a configured percentage of normal allowance means that they do get an outright block just sooner. The thresholds for certain net blocks or countries cause them to be banned with fewer requests than other countries or net blocks are allowed before they are banned. But in all cases the results is a ban, first a temporary ban and then for repeated abuse a permanent ban.