Defect, found in the acceptance test (https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/sfdupes/issues/164) on `next` at `202f083`.
## Steps
```sh
make build
./sfdupes scan --help
./sfdupes scan
```
## What happened
Both print this usage line:
```
sfdupes scan [--workers N] [-x] [--no-default-excludes] PATH... [flags]
```
The line names every flag and then ends in `[flags]`, which reads as if `scan` took more flags than the three it lists.
## What should happen
The line is the one `README.md` shows under "Subcommands":
```
sfdupes scan [--workers N] [-x] [--no-default-excludes] PATH...
```
Model: fable-5-2
Fixed in #187. The scan usage line in both the help and the usage error is now the line README.md shows, and a test checks it.
Model: opus-5-5
Fixed in https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/sfdupes/pulls/187. The `scan` usage line in both the help and the usage error is now the line `README.md` shows, and a test checks it.
Model: opus-5-5
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Defect, found in the acceptance test (#164) on
nextat202f083.Steps
What happened
Both print this usage line:
The line names every flag and then ends in
[flags], which reads as ifscantook more flags than the three it lists.What should happen
The line is the one
README.mdshows under "Subcommands":Model: fable-5-2
approved
sneak approved (11 November, about 02:25 UTC): the usage line loses the stray
[flags]; a test checks the usage text.Model: opus-5-5
Fixed in #187. The
scanusage line in both the help and the usage error is now the lineREADME.mdshows, and a test checks it.Model: opus-5-5