Files
secret/internal/cli/unlockers_corrupt_test.go
T
sneak a96c0eb07b
check / check (push) Failing after 2s
Ask before removing a secret, version, vault or unlocker (closes #39)
secret rm, secret version rm, secret vault remove and secret unlocker
remove ask [y/N] on a terminal, naming what they remove, and go ahead
only on y or yes. Without --force, a command whose stdin is not a
terminal fails at once. --force, now also on rm and version rm,
removes without asking; it replaces the old refusals to remove a vault
with secrets or the last unlocker without --force. The checks run and
the question is asked before the state directory lock is taken; under
the lock the checks run again, and nothing is removed if they would
ask a different question.

Model: opus-5-5
2026-10-04 14:34:55 +00:00

163 lines
5.1 KiB
Go

// Corrupt Unlocker Tests
//
// `secret unlocker select` and `secret unlocker remove` find an unlocker
// by its ID. These tests give the first unlocker, which sorts before the
// one the commands act on, metadata that is not JSON, and check that the
// commands step past it, and that it can itself be removed by its
// directory name, which `secret unlocker list` names in its warning. A
// last test checks that an unlocker whose metadata file cannot be read
// counts as the last unlocker when it is removed by its directory name.
//nolint:testpackage // white-box test of unexported internals
package cli
import (
"path/filepath"
"strings"
"testing"
"git.eeqj.de/sneak/secret/internal/vault"
"github.com/spf13/afero"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
)
// newCorruptUnlockerVault returns the two-unlocker test vault with the
// metadata of the first unlocker replaced by text that is not JSON.
func newCorruptUnlockerVault(t *testing.T) *afero.MemMapFs {
t.Helper()
fs := newListTestVault(t, 2)
require.NoError(t, afero.WriteFile(fs,
filepath.Join(testVaultDir(listTestVaultName), listTestUnlockersDirName,
listTestUnlockerDirOne, listTestMetadataFileName),
[]byte("not json"), listTestFilePerm))
return fs
}
// TestUnlockerSelectSkipsCorruptUnlocker asserts that the second unlocker
// can be selected, and that the corrupt one, having no type to be used as,
// cannot be selected by its directory name.
func TestUnlockerSelectSkipsCorruptUnlocker(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
fs := newCorruptUnlockerVault(t)
instance, _ := newTestInstance(fs)
require.NoError(t, instance.UnlockerSelect("pgp-"+listTestGPGKeyID+"B"))
current, err := afero.ReadFile(fs,
filepath.Join(testVaultDir(listTestVaultName), "current-unlocker"))
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.Equal(t, listTestUnlockerDirTwo, string(current))
err = instance.UnlockerSelect(listTestUnlockerDirOne)
require.ErrorIs(t, err, vault.ErrUnlockerNotFound)
}
// TestUnlockerRemoveWithCorruptUnlocker asserts that the second unlocker
// counts as the vault's last one, since the corrupt unlocker cannot unlock
// the vault, and that the corrupt one, removed by its directory name, does
// not. Either is removed once the user confirms.
func TestUnlockerRemoveWithCorruptUnlocker(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
tests := []struct {
name string
unlockerID string
wantLast bool
wantEntries []string
}{
{
name: "the other unlocker",
unlockerID: "pgp-" + listTestGPGKeyID + "B",
wantLast: true,
wantEntries: []string{listTestUnlockerDirOne},
},
{
name: "the corrupt unlocker by its directory name",
unlockerID: listTestUnlockerDirOne,
wantEntries: []string{listTestUnlockerDirTwo},
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
fs := newCorruptUnlockerVault(t)
writeTestSecret(t, fs, testVaultDir(listTestVaultName))
instance, cmd := newTestInstance(fs)
found, err := instance.findUnlockerToRemove(tt.unlockerID)
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.Equal(t, tt.wantLast, found.last)
instance.terminal = strings.NewReader("y\n")
require.NoError(t, instance.UnlockersRemove(tt.unlockerID, false, cmd))
assertDirEntries(t, fs,
filepath.Join(testVaultDir(listTestVaultName),
listTestUnlockersDirName),
tt.wantEntries...)
})
}
}
// TestUnlockerRemoveWithUnreadableMetadata asserts that the only unlocker
// of a vault with secrets, removed by its directory name when its metadata
// file cannot be checked for or read, counts as the vault's last unlocker,
// so the question warns that it is: listing leaves it out, but it may
// still be the vault's only working unlocker. It is then removed. The
// state directory lock refuses the failing filesystem, so the test calls
// findUnlockerToRemove and removeUnlocker, which UnlockersRemove runs to
// make its checks and, once it holds the lock, to remove the unlocker.
func TestUnlockerRemoveWithUnreadableMetadata(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
vaultDir := testVaultDir(listTestVaultName)
unlockersDir := filepath.Join(vaultDir, listTestUnlockersDirName)
failingPath := filepath.Join(unlockersDir, listTestUnlockerDirOne,
listTestMetadataFileName)
tests := []struct {
name string
wrap func(base afero.Fs) afero.Fs
}{
{
name: "checking for the file fails",
wrap: func(base afero.Fs) afero.Fs {
return &metadataStatFailFs{Fs: base, uncheckablePath: failingPath}
},
},
{
name: "reading the file fails",
wrap: func(base afero.Fs) afero.Fs {
return &metadataReadFailFs{Fs: base, unreadablePath: failingPath}
},
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
base := newListTestVault(t, 1)
writeTestSecret(t, base, vaultDir)
instance, cmd := newTestInstance(tt.wrap(base))
found, err := instance.findUnlockerToRemove(listTestUnlockerDirOne)
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.True(t, found.last)
assert.Contains(t, found.question, "the last unlocker")
require.NoError(t,
instance.removeUnlocker(listTestUnlockerDirOne, found, cmd))
assertDirEntries(t, base, unlockersDir)
})
}
}