Ask for the new passphrase in unlocker add when the variable is set (closes #154)

With SB_UNLOCK_PASSPHRASE set, `secret unlocker add passphrase` gave the
new unlocker the passphrase in the variable without asking. It now asks
on the terminal for the new passphrase and uses the variable to unlock
the vault. With no controlling terminal the new unlocker takes the
variable's passphrase, and the output says so.

secret.ErrNoTerminal is exported so that the command can tell a missing
terminal from other failures to read, such as nothing typed or a
mismatched confirmation, which still fail the command.

The in-process tests that add a passphrase unlocker with the variable
set rely on the Docker test phase having no controlling terminal; at a
terminal they would ask.

Model: opus-5-5

internal/cli/passphrase_prompt_test.go

@@ -138,6 +138,134 @@ func TestInitWritesNoBlankLineAfterMnemonic(t *testing.T) {
 		"stderr: %q", stderr.String())
 }
 
+// TestUnlockerAddAsksForNewPassphrase is a regression test for
+// https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/secret/issues/154: with SB_UNLOCK_PASSPHRASE set,
+// `secret unlocker add passphrase` gave the new unlocker the passphrase in
+// the variable without asking. At a terminal it must ask for the new
+// passphrase there, twice, and unlock the vault with the variable, so that
+// the vault then opens with the passphrase typed. pty.Open is described
+// above TestRemoveIgnoresTerminalOnStdout.
+func TestUnlockerAddAsksForNewPassphrase(t *testing.T) {
+	t.Parallel()
+
+	const newPassphrase = "new-passphrase"
+
+	stateDir := t.TempDir()
+
+	passphrase := memguard.NewBufferFromBytes([]byte(testPassphrase))
+	defer passphrase.Destroy()
+
+	_, err := vault.CreateVault(afero.NewOsFs(), stateDir, "default",
+		testMnemonicBuffer(t), passphrase)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(t.Context(), commandWait)
+	defer cancel()
+
+	//nolint:gosec // G204: test executes the freshly built secret binary
+	cmd := exec.CommandContext(ctx, secretBinaryPath(t),
+		"unlocker", "add", "passphrase")
+	cmd.Env = []string{
+		secret.EnvStateDir + "=" + stateDir,
+		secret.EnvUnlockPassphrase + "=" + testPassphrase,
+		"PATH=" + os.Getenv("PATH"),
+		"HOME=" + os.Getenv("HOME"),
+	}
+
+	ptmx, tty, err := pty.Open()
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	defer func() { _ = ptmx.Close() }()
+
+	deadline, _ := ctx.Deadline()
+	require.NoError(t, ptmx.SetReadDeadline(deadline))
+
+	cmd.Stderr = tty
+	// Ctty is a descriptor in the new process: 2, its stderr.
+	cmd.SysProcAttr = &syscall.SysProcAttr{Setsid: true, Setctty: true, Ctty: 2}
+
+	require.NoError(t, cmd.Start())
+
+	_ = tty.Close()
+
+	var (
+		shown []byte
+		char  byte
+	)
+
+	terminal := bufio.NewReader(ptmx)
+
+	for _, prompt := range []string{
+		"Enter passphrase for unlocker: ", "Confirm passphrase: ",
+	} {
+		for !bytes.HasSuffix(shown, []byte(prompt)) {
+			char, err = terminal.ReadByte()
+			require.NoError(t, err,
+				"secret unlocker add passphrase did not ask on the terminal: %s",
+				shown)
+
+			shown = append(shown, char)
+		}
+
+		_, err = ptmx.WriteString(newPassphrase + "\n")
+		require.NoError(t, err)
+	}
+
+	// The read ends once the command has exited and so closed the terminal.
+	rest, _ := io.ReadAll(terminal)
+
+	require.NoError(t, cmd.Wait(),
+		"secret unlocker add passphrase: %s%s", shown, rest)
+
+	typed := memguard.NewBufferFromBytes([]byte(newPassphrase))
+	defer typed.Destroy()
+
+	reopened := vault.NewVault(afero.NewOsFs(), stateDir, "default")
+	reopened.UnlockPassphrase = typed
+
+	_, err = reopened.GetOrDeriveLongTermKey()
+	require.NoError(t, err, "the vault does not open with the passphrase typed")
+}
+
+// TestUnlockerAddWithoutTerminalSaysPassphraseIsVariable is a regression
+// test for https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/secret/issues/154: with no terminal to
+// ask on, `secret unlocker add passphrase` gives the new unlocker the
+// passphrase in SB_UNLOCK_PASSPHRASE, and its output must say so. The binary
+// runs in a new session, which has no terminal.
+func TestUnlockerAddWithoutTerminalSaysPassphraseIsVariable(t *testing.T) {
+	t.Parallel()
+
+	stateDir := t.TempDir()
+
+	passphrase := memguard.NewBufferFromBytes([]byte(testPassphrase))
+	defer passphrase.Destroy()
+
+	_, err := vault.CreateVault(afero.NewOsFs(), stateDir, "default",
+		testMnemonicBuffer(t), passphrase)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(t.Context(), commandWait)
+	defer cancel()
+
+	//nolint:gosec // G204: test executes the freshly built secret binary
+	cmd := exec.CommandContext(ctx, secretBinaryPath(t),
+		"unlocker", "add", "passphrase")
+	cmd.Env = []string{
+		secret.EnvStateDir + "=" + stateDir,
+		secret.EnvUnlockPassphrase + "=" + testPassphrase,
+		"PATH=" + os.Getenv("PATH"),
+		"HOME=" + os.Getenv("HOME"),
+	}
+	cmd.SysProcAttr = &syscall.SysProcAttr{Setsid: true}
+
+	output, err := cmd.CombinedOutput()
+	require.NoError(t, err, "secret unlocker add passphrase: %s", output)
+
+	assert.Contains(t, string(output), "The new unlocker takes its passphrase "+
+		"from SB_UNLOCK_PASSPHRASE, since there is no terminal to ask for a "+
+		"new one on\n")
+}
+
 // runAtTerminal runs the secret binary with args and input on stdin, in a
 // new session whose controlling terminal is a new terminal, which is also
 // its stderr: a command typed at a terminal with its input piped. pty.Open