sneak
937bcb7aee
All checks were successful
check / check (push) Successful in 4s
Rework against review finding B-A on the branch.
The claim was false as written. Commit 8a200be's message, the PR body and
the comments on both sides said the repurposed pinning test in
test/crypto/stream.test.ts fails if streamTagFinal() is ever made eager.
It does not: substituting
const EAGER: number = sodium.crypto_secretstream_xchacha20poly1305_TAG_FINAL;
export const streamTagFinal = (): number => EAGER;
leaves the whole suite green. Under vitest, sodium is already initialised
in the worker process by the time a source module is evaluated, so an
eager read picks up a real value there and value equality cannot see the
difference. The danger it claimed to cover is real: a direct probe of the
vendored libsodium-wrappers-sumo gives undefined before await sodium.ready
and 3 after, so an eager read would ship a library that rejects every
valid download as truncated for anyone importing it in plain Node ESM,
while make check stayed green.
Rather than drop the claim, this makes it true. A new test reproduces the
plain-Node ESM ordering that vitest hides: vi.resetModules() plus a
doMock'd stand-in sodium whose TAG_FINAL property is absent while
src/crypto/stream.ts is evaluated and appears only afterwards, exactly as
libsodium attaches its constants inside ready.then(...). A call-time read
sees the value that appeared after evaluation; a module-level read binds
undefined and the test fails. The stand-in hands back a sentinel rather
than 3, so a read that somehow reached the real library, or a return to a
hardcoded literal, fails too.
Demonstrated rather than argued: with the two-line eager variant above in
place, make test reports 1 failed | 140 passed, "expected undefined to be
42", exit 2. Restored with git checkout -- src/crypto/stream.ts, make test
reports 141 passed. The eager variant was applied with the editor and
reverted with git, not by scripted substitution.
The pinning test keeps its original job — value equality against the tag
observed on a real final chunk — and its doc comment now says only that.
The comment on the accessor in src/crypto/stream.ts names the guard test,
and records why the ordinary tests cannot see the bug on their own.