Rewrite the -count=1 note to match the current files (closes #77)

The note under the canonical Go `make test` example in `prompts/REPO_POLICIES.md` still named the cache-busting build argument that `--no-cache` replaced, and said Go's cache was baked into earlier image layers.

It now says where Go's test result cache can replay a pass: on a developer's machine, where the Makefile target runs, so `-count=1` stays on both invocations. The `test` phase of the `Dockerfile` has nothing to replay: its base image holds no result for the repo's tests and no earlier step runs one.

The first paragraph no longer says the rerun would replay a failure: Go stores only passes.

Model: opus-5-5

TODO.md

@@ -21,6 +21,17 @@ fmt-check, and commit.
 
 # Completed Steps
 
+- 2026-10-04: Rewrote the note under the canonical Go `make test` example in
+  `REPO_POLICIES.md` (issue 77), which still named the cache-busting build
+  argument that `--no-cache` replaced. It now says where Go's test result cache
+  can replay a pass: on a developer's machine, where the Makefile target runs,
+  and not in the `test` phase of the `Dockerfile`, whose base image and earlier
+  steps hold no result for the repo's tests.
+- 2026-10-04: The Makefile examples in the Go styleguide and the HTTP server
+  conventions now fall back to `dev` when `git describe` prints nothing (outside
+  a git checkout, or where git is missing or refuses the checkout), instead of
+  stamping an empty version (issue 74). The canonical `Dockerfile` already fails
+  on a `dev` version when `.git` is in the build context.
 - 2026-10-04: The canonical `.dockerignore` now also keeps out each submodule's
   `config` (issue 75). A submodule's git directory lives under `.git/modules/`,
   nested again for its own submodules, and its `config` can hold a credential

prompts/CODE_STYLEGUIDE_GO.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 title: Code Styleguide — Go
-last_modified: 2026-10-02
+last_modified: 2026-10-04
 ---
 
 1.  Try to hard wrap long lines at 77 characters or less.
@@ -51,8 +51,10 @@ last_modified: 2026-10-02
     # ?= rather than := so that a `VERSION` build argument takes precedence:
     # where a build stage invokes make, `ARG VERSION` puts it in the
     # environment and `?=` defers to it. Otherwise `git describe` runs, in a
-    # build stage on the `.git` the build context carries.
+    # build stage on the `.git` the build context carries. When it prints
-    VERSION ?= $(shell git describe --tags --always)
+    # nothing (outside a git checkout, or where git is missing or refuses the
+    # checkout), the version falls back to `dev`.
+    VERSION ?= $(or $(shell git describe --tags --always 2>/dev/null),dev)
 
     GOLDFLAGS += -X main.Version=$(VERSION)
 

prompts/GO_HTTP_SERVER_CONVENTIONS.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 title: Go HTTP Server Conventions
-last_modified: 2026-10-02
+last_modified: 2026-10-04
 ---
 
 This document defines the architectural patterns, design decisions, and
@@ -987,8 +987,10 @@ Use ldflags to inject version information at build time:
 # ?= rather than := so that a `VERSION` build argument takes precedence:
 # where a build stage invokes make, `ARG VERSION` puts it in the
 # environment and `?=` defers to it. Otherwise `git describe` runs, in a
-# build stage on the `.git` the build context carries.
+# build stage on the `.git` the build context carries. When it prints
-VERSION ?= $(shell git describe --tags --always)
+# nothing (outside a git checkout, or where git is missing or refuses the
+# checkout), the version falls back to `dev`.
+VERSION ?= $(or $(shell git describe --tags --always 2>/dev/null),dev)
 
 build:
     go build -ldflags "-X main.Version=$(VERSION)" ./cmd/httpd

prompts/REPO_POLICIES.md

@@ -317,17 +317,19 @@ style conventions are in separate documents:
     ```
 
     `-count=1` is required on both invocations: it defeats Go's test _result_
-    cache, so the target cannot report a pass it did not earn, and the rerun
+    cache, so neither run can report a stored pass in place of running the
-    reproduces a failure instead of replaying it. It leaves the build cache
+    tests. It leaves the build cache alone, so it costs the runtime of the suite
-    alone, so it costs the runtime of the suite and no recompilation.
+    and no recompilation.
 
-    Note that this is a second, independent cache, stacked below the Docker
+    That cache is Go's own, separate from Docker's layer cache. Go stores a
-    layer cache that [issue #26](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/prompts/issues/26)
+    passing result in its cache directory (`GOCACHE`), and when the same tests
-    addresses. `CHECK_EPOCH` guarantees the `RUN make test` _step_ re-executes;
+    run again on unchanged code it prints that result, marked `(cached)`,
-    it does not guarantee `go test` inside that step does any work, because the
+    without running them. That matters on a developer's machine, where this
-    `GOCACHE` baked into earlier image layers survives into the re-executed
+    target runs and the directory lasts from one run to the next. The `test`
-    step. They are two separate defects requiring two separate fixes, and a fix
+    phase of the `Dockerfile` needs no `-count=1`: its base image holds no
-    for one must not be recorded as covering the other.
+    result for this repo's tests and nothing before its `go test` step runs a
+    test, so there is nothing to replay. `--no-cache` (above) is what makes that
+    step run on an unchanged tree.
 
     Python example: