Created wiki page through web user interface.
This commit is contained in:
parent
4f6f302244
commit
7e81d51b0b
|
@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||||
|
#summary Won't xargs do the same?.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
= Introduction =
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
It is suggested that the command 'xargs' that is often found on unix-like systems by default does exactly the same as PPSS does when used with the -p option.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In it's most basic form, this is true to some extend. Xargs processes items and keeps an x number of jobs running in parallel. I think that there may be cases that xargs is sufficient for your task at hand.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
`$ touch 10 15 20 25 30 35 40`
|
||||||
|
`$ ls -1 | xargs -n1 -P 4 sleep`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The additional value of PPSS is that it:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* provides logging (for free)
|
||||||
|
* provides a progress indicator
|
||||||
|
* is simpler to use (my own opinion)
|
||||||
|
* does not process items that already have been processed if interrupted.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
However, use the tool that best fits the job at hand.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue