Deploy main 5e572ce to prod (#198)
check / check (push) Waiting to run

main's tree, with next merged on 26 October, as one commit onto prod, on sneak's order.

Model: opus-5-5
Co-authored-by: clawbot <clawbot@noreply.example.org>
This commit was merged in pull request #198.
This commit is contained in:
2026-10-26 13:10:55 +01:00
committed by clawbot
parent 0c36d79131
commit 863a1d549d
104 changed files with 9647 additions and 2949 deletions
+124 -90
View File
@@ -1,112 +1,146 @@
# Responsive-layout harness
# The viewport test
Automated verification of the responsive layout that landed in #5. Run it with:
`make frontend-viewport-test` checks the page's layout at several window widths
in a real browser:
```bash
make frontend-viewport-test
```
It builds `dist/`, serves it from the same digest-pinned `nginx` image and the
same `nginx.conf` the shipping container uses, drives a digest-pinned headless
Chrome against it over CDP, and asserts on computed layout at every viewport
width derived from the app's own CSS. Screenshots land in `tmp/viewport/`
alongside a `results.json`; they are artifacts for a human to look at when
something fails, not the evidence. The assertions are the evidence.
First it runs the unit tests. Then it builds the page into `dist/`. It serves
`dist/` with the nginx image and the `configs/nginx.conf` that the Docker image
ships. Before the browser starts, it fetches `/` and `/no-such-page`, which
nginx answers with the page. Both must carry `Cache-Control: no-cache` and a
`Content-Security-Policy` header. Then it starts a headless Chrome in a
container and opens the page in it at each width. For each width it measures the
layout inside the page and checks the measurements in Node. The checks decide
pass or fail. Screenshots and a `results.json` land in `tmp/viewport/`, for a
person to look at when a check fails.
The target is deliberately outside `make check`: it needs Docker and takes
minutes, and `make test` has to stay under 20 seconds.
The test is not part of `make check`: it takes minutes, and `make test` has to
finish in under 60 seconds.
## How the widths are chosen
## The widths
Not from a list of phone models. `viewports.js` parses the `@media` conditions
out of `src/styles.css` and scans `src/main.js` and `index.html` for Tailwind
responsive prefixes, then tests every breakpoint it finds at one pixel below it,
exactly on it, and one pixel above it. A generic 375px "phone" test sails
straight past an off-by-one at a media query boundary; `max-width: 768px`
matches _at_ 768, and the sweep pins down which side of that line each layout is
on.
The breakpoints are read from the page's own files. `viewports.js` reads the
`min-width` and `max-width` conditions out of the `@media` blocks in
`web/src/styles.css`. It also looks in `web/src/main.js` and `web/index.html`
for Tailwind's responsive class prefixes, such as `md:`, and takes their
breakpoints. Each breakpoint is tested at one pixel below it, exactly on it, and
one pixel above it. Today the CSS has one breakpoint, `max-width: 768px`, and no
responsive prefix is used.
Nothing hardcodes 768. Add a second media block or start using `md:` classes and
the new breakpoint is covered without this directory being touched. The app is
desktop-first today (all narrow rules live in `max-width` blocks); a
`min-width`-only, mobile-first set is handled as its inverse, and a set that
mixes the two makes the run fail loudly rather than test the right widths with
the wrong expectation. Four further viewports are fixed anchors, each with a
stated reason: a 320px floor, a 1280px desktop baseline, and two phone-landscape
sizes straddling the breakpoint for the rotation case.
A `max-width: 768px` block matches at 768 pixels. Testing both sides of each
breakpoint catches a layout that switches one pixel too early or too late. A
second media block, or a first `md:` class, is covered without a change to this
directory.
## What it asserts
The page is desktop-first: the wide layout is the default, and every narrow rule
is in a `max-width` block. So a width is expected to show the narrow layout when
one of those blocks matches it. A page with only `min-width` blocks would be
read the other way round. A page that mixes the two kinds fails the run with a
message, because the right expectation for each width can no longer be read from
the breakpoints alone.
- **app-rendered** — enough host rows exist and enough of them show a numeric
latency. This one exists so the rest cannot pass vacuously against a blank
page.
- **no-horizontal-overflow** — `documentElement.scrollWidth` fits the layout
viewport, with the widest offending element named.
- **nothing-past-viewport-edge** — no visible element's box extends past the
viewport edge.
- **no-clipped-text** — nothing hides text behind `overflow: hidden`. Deliberate
ellipsis truncation (Tailwind's `truncate`, used on host names and URLs) is
excluded: it is a design choice, not breakage.
- **tap-targets-44px** — every interactive control is at least 44x44 CSS px on
touch viewports, _and_ each selector in the control list matched at least the
number of visible elements it declares. The second half is what stops the
check passing vacuously: with size alone, a renamed class would take its
controls out of the measured set and the check would report "all 0 controls
are at least 44x44" and pass. See below.
- **host-rows-stacked / host-rows-side-by-side** — the rows genuinely reflow.
Computed `flex-direction` _and_ the actual geometry are checked, and in the
narrow layout the info block and the sparkline must each occupy essentially
the full row width. A row that merely shrank its 420px column would fail.
- **probing-still-runs / gateway-detection-still-runs** — narrow viewports keep
probing and keep detecting the gateway. The mobile early-return path proposed
in #8 was rejected; this is what would catch it coming back.
Four more widths are fixed, each for a stated reason:
### The tap-target threshold
- 320 by 568 pixels: the narrowest width still in common use
- 667 by 375 pixels: a phone in landscape, inside the narrow layout
- 844 by 390 pixels: a large phone in landscape, in the wide layout but still a
touch device
- 1280 by 800 pixels: a desktop window
44x44 CSS px. That is the figure in Apple's Human Interface Guidelines and in
WCAG 2.2 SC 2.5.5 "Target Size (Enhanced)". WCAG 2.2 SC 2.5.8 (level AA) sets a
lower 24x24 floor, but that floor comes with a spacing exception these controls
do not qualify for — the pin buttons sit directly against the host name they
belong to.
Every width but 1280 by 800 is tested as a touch device.
## Determinism
## The checks
The browser container runs on an `--internal` docker network and has no route to
the internet, so the app's latency probes cannot reach anything real. The
harness answers them itself from a fixed delay table, with a deterministic
fraction failed outright, so the rows render a realistic spread of one-, two-
and three-digit latencies plus some unreachable rows. That spread is what the
layout has to survive; 24 identical `---` placeholders would not exercise it.
A failed check does not stop the others.
## What this cannot verify
- `app-rendered`: at least 10 WAN host rows exist, and at least 5 rows show a
number as their latency. Without this, the other checks could pass against a
blank page.
- `no-horizontal-overflow`: the document is no wider than the window. On a
failure, the widest content is named.
- `nothing-past-viewport-edge`: no visible element extends past the window's
edge.
- `no-clipped-text`: no element hides its text behind `overflow: hidden` or
`overflow: clip`. Text cut with an ellipsis is allowed: that cut is a design
choice, not a defect. Tailwind's `truncate` cuts host names and URLs that way.
- `tap-targets-44px`, on touch widths: each measured control is at least 44 by
44 CSS pixels. The controls are `#pause-btn`, `#interval-select`,
`#debug-toggle` and the `.pin-btn` in each WAN host row. The check also
demands that each selector matches enough visible elements: one of each single
control, and one pin button per WAN host row. A renamed class would otherwise
take its controls out of the measured set, and the check would pass on
nothing.
- `host-rows-stacked` or `host-rows-side-by-side`: each host row shows the
layout expected at that width. In the narrow layout, the row's
`flex-direction` is `column`, the graph sits below the host's details, and
each takes at least 90% of the row's width. In the wide layout, the direction
is `row` and the graph sits to the right of the details. A row that only
shrank its fixed 420-pixel column fails.
- `probing-still-runs`: the page sent at least one check to a target at this
width. The narrow layout must not skip the checks.
- `gateway-detection-still-runs`: the `Local Gateway` row is present at this
width, so the gateway was looked for and found. The narrow layout must not
skip that search.
Real limits, so nobody re-parks this issue as needing hardware:
### The tap-target size
- **Non-Chromium engines.** This is Chrome. iOS Safari is WebKit and cannot be
emulated by it; Safari-specific bugs (viewport units under a collapsing URL
bar, `-webkit-fill-available`, form control metrics) will not show up here.
- **Real touch input.** `hasTouch` emulation changes what the page is told, not
how a finger behaves. Gesture handling, scroll momentum, double-tap zoom and
hover-state fallbacks on touch are out of scope.
- **Physical pixel density and rendering.** `deviceScaleFactor` is set, but
subpixel antialiasing, OLED colour rendering and actual legibility at a given
physical size are not measurable here.
- **Fonts.** The container has DejaVu, not the platform's own UI monospace. Text
metrics are therefore close to, but not identical to, a real device — a layout
that fits here by a few pixels might not there.
- **On-device performance.** Canvas sparkline redraw cost, battery, and
behaviour on a slow radio are not measured.
- **Browser chrome.** The address bar, safe-area insets and notch cutouts are
not simulated.
44 by 44 CSS pixels is the figure in Apple's Human Interface Guidelines and in
WCAG 2.2 success criterion 2.5.5, "Target Size (Enhanced)". WCAG 2.2 criterion
2.5.8 sets a lower minimum of 24 by 24 pixels, with an exception that depends on
the space around a control. The pin buttons sit against the host name they
belong to, so the test keeps 44.
Everything else this issue was actually about — does the layout reflow, does
anything overflow, is content clipped, are the controls big enough — is a
function of viewport width and CSS, and is covered above.
## The browser's network
## Relation to the unit test framework (#21)
The browser container runs on an internal Docker network with no route to the
internet, so the page's checks reach no real host. The test answers them itself
from a fixed table of delays: 2, 45, 123, 456 and 780 milliseconds. Which delay
a target gets depends on its URL, and about one target in seven fails outright.
So the rows show one-, two- and three-digit latencies and some unreachable rows,
and the layout is tested against that spread. The request to
`http://192.168.1.1` is answered after 5 milliseconds, so the `Local Gateway`
row appears.
Complementary layers, not two stacks. `vitest` (#21) will exercise module-level
logic in-process with no browser. This harness exercises rendered layout in a
real engine and is the only thing here that can see a media query. Neither
replaces the other; assertions about computed styles and element geometry belong
here, assertions about functions belong in `vitest`.
At each width, the test sets the interval to 1 second and waits until at least 5
rows show a latency before it measures. The page discards its first round, so
this reaches a filled page without waiting out two rounds at 3 seconds.
## What the test cannot check
- Other browser engines. The test runs Chrome. Safari uses WebKit, and bugs that
only WebKit has do not show up here.
- Real touch input. Touch emulation changes what the page is told, not how a
finger behaves. Gestures, scroll momentum, double-tap zoom and hover states on
touch are not tested.
- Physical pixels. The device pixel ratio is set, but antialiasing, colour
rendering and legibility at a given physical size are not measured.
- Fonts. The container has DejaVu, not a phone's own monospace font. Text is
about as wide as on a real device, but not exactly. A layout that fits here by
a few pixels might not fit there.
- Performance. The cost of redrawing the graphs, battery use and behaviour on a
slow connection are not measured.
- The browser's own frame. The address bar, safe-area insets and notch cutouts
are not simulated.
## The files
- `viewports.js` derives the widths from the sources.
- `facts.js` is run inside the page and measures the layout. It only measures;
it decides nothing.
- `checks.js` turns the measurements into the pass or fail of each check, with
the numbers that decided it.
- `harness.js` connects to the browser, runs each width, writes the screenshots
and `results.json`, and prints the results. `script/frontend-viewport-test`
starts it; every input it needs arrives in the environment.
## Relation to the unit tests
The unit tests in `test/unit/` call the functions that `web/src/main.js`
exports, with no browser. `make test` runs them with Node's built-in test
runner. This test runs the built page in a real browser engine and is the only
test here that can see a media query. Neither replaces the other. Checks on
computed styles and element geometry belong here; checks on functions belong in
`test/unit/`.
+14 -13
View File
@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ export const MIN_TAP_TARGET_PX = 44;
// The controls named in the definition of done, plus the pause button.
// Each carries the smallest number of *visible* instances the page has to
// contain for the tap-target oracle to be measuring anything at all.
// contain, worked out from the facts gathered from that page, for the
// tap-target oracle to be measuring every control it should.
//
// Without those floors the check is inert: `undersized` is empty both when
// every control is large enough and when the selectors have gone stale and
@@ -24,13 +25,12 @@ export const MIN_TAP_TARGET_PX = 44;
// for all three singleton controls vanishing at once — so the floor is per
// selector, and one stale selector out of four fails the check.
export const INTERACTIVE_CONTROLS = [
{ selector: "#pause-btn", minCount: 1 },
{ selector: "#interval-select", minCount: 1 },
// One per pinnable host row. `app-rendered` already requires at least
// 10 host rows, so a count below that means the pin buttons stopped
// being rendered per row rather than that there were fewer hosts.
{ selector: ".pin-btn", minCount: 10 },
{ selector: "#debug-toggle", minCount: 1 },
{ selector: "#pause-btn", minCount: () => 1 },
{ selector: "#interval-select", minCount: () => 1 },
// One per WAN host row, so pin buttons missing from even one row fail
// the check rather than only a drop below some fixed number.
{ selector: ".pin-btn", minCount: (facts) => facts.wanRowCount },
{ selector: "#debug-toggle", minCount: () => 1 },
];
export const INTERACTIVE_SELECTORS = INTERACTIVE_CONTROLS.map(
@@ -105,8 +105,8 @@ export function evaluateChecks(facts, viewport, probes) {
// never rendered. Everything below is only meaningful if this holds.
check(
"app-rendered",
facts.rowCount >= 10 && facts.numericLatencies >= 5,
`${facts.rowCount} host rows, ${facts.numericLatencies} showing a numeric latency`,
facts.wanRowCount >= 10 && facts.numericLatencies >= 5,
`${facts.wanRowCount} WAN host rows, ${facts.numericLatencies} showing a numeric latency`,
);
const viewportWidth = Math.min(facts.innerWidth, facts.documentClientWidth);
@@ -162,7 +162,8 @@ export function evaluateChecks(facts, viewport, probes) {
seen.set(target.selector, (seen.get(target.selector) ?? 0) + 1);
}
const missing = INTERACTIVE_CONTROLS.filter(
(control) => (seen.get(control.selector) ?? 0) < control.minCount,
(control) =>
(seen.get(control.selector) ?? 0) < control.minCount(facts),
);
const undersized = facts.tapTargets.filter(
@@ -184,11 +185,11 @@ export function evaluateChecks(facts, viewport, probes) {
const detail = [];
if (missing.length > 0) {
detail.push(
"oracle is not measuring the page: " +
"oracle is not measuring every control: " +
summarise(
missing,
(c) =>
`${c.selector} matched ${seen.get(c.selector) ?? 0} visible element(s), expected at least ${c.minCount}`,
`${c.selector} matched ${seen.get(c.selector) ?? 0} visible element(s), expected at least ${c.minCount(facts)}`,
4,
),
);
+3 -1
View File
@@ -173,7 +173,9 @@ export function collectLayoutFacts(options) {
clipped,
tapTargets,
rows,
rowCount: document.querySelectorAll(".host-row").length,
// WAN host rows only: each has a pin button, and the tap-target
// check expects one per row. The local host rows have none.
wanRowCount: document.querySelectorAll("#wan-hosts .host-row").length,
numericLatencies: Array.from(
document.querySelectorAll(".latency-value"),
).filter((el) => /\d/.test(el.textContent)).length,
+9 -4
View File
@@ -16,6 +16,10 @@ import { collectLayoutFacts } from "./facts.js";
import { evaluateChecks, INTERACTIVE_SELECTORS } from "./checks.js";
import { deriveViewports } from "./viewports.js";
// page.waitForFunction and page.evaluate run the functions given them in
// the page, where these are defined.
/* global document, requestAnimationFrame */
function required(name) {
const value = process.env[name];
if (!value) {
@@ -47,7 +51,8 @@ const PROBE_DELAYS_MS = [2, 45, 123, 456, 780];
// offline row rendering is exercised too.
const UNREACHABLE_MODULUS = 7;
// The gateway candidate that "answers", so gateway detection succeeds and
// the Local Gateway row renders. Matches GATEWAY_CANDIDATES in src/main.js.
// the Local Gateway row renders. Matches GATEWAY_CANDIDATES in
// web/src/main.js.
const RESPONSIVE_GATEWAY = "http://192.168.1.1";
const sleep = (ms) => new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, ms));
@@ -62,7 +67,6 @@ function stableHash(text) {
async function connectBrowser() {
const deadline = Date.now() + BROWSER_TIMEOUT_MS;
let lastError;
for (;;) {
try {
const response = await fetch(`${CDP_URL}/json/version`);
@@ -77,9 +81,10 @@ async function connectBrowser() {
});
return { browser, version: info.Browser };
} catch (error) {
lastError = error;
if (Date.now() > deadline) {
throw new Error(`browser never came up: ${lastError}`);
throw new Error(`browser never came up: ${error}`, {
cause: error,
});
}
await sleep(250);
}
+10 -9
View File
@@ -161,26 +161,27 @@ const ANCHOR_VIEWPORTS = [
export function deriveViewports(root) {
const conditions = [
...mediaConditionsFromCss(
readFileSync(join(root, "src/styles.css"), "utf8"),
"src/styles.css",
readFileSync(join(root, "web/src/styles.css"), "utf8"),
"web/src/styles.css",
),
...mediaConditionsFromMarkup([
{
path: "src/main.js",
text: readFileSync(join(root, "src/main.js"), "utf8"),
path: "web/src/main.js",
text: readFileSync(join(root, "web/src/main.js"), "utf8"),
},
{
path: "index.html",
text: readFileSync(join(root, "index.html"), "utf8"),
path: "web/index.html",
text: readFileSync(join(root, "web/index.html"), "utf8"),
},
]),
];
if (conditions.length === 0) {
throw new Error(
"no responsive breakpoints found in src/styles.css, src/main.js or " +
"index.html — either the responsive layout was deleted or this " +
"derivation has stopped matching the sources",
"no responsive breakpoints found in web/src/styles.css, " +
"web/src/main.js or web/index.html — either the responsive " +
"layout was deleted or this derivation has stopped matching " +
"the sources",
);
}