docs: health check wording follows the code (rework for #302)
check / check (push) Canceled after 0s
check / check (push) Canceled after 0s
The README, the comments and TODO.md say the health check gives error only when every lookup in a round failed because no root server gave a usable reply, and the README drops the claim that the other failures are reported as notifications. Model: opus-5-5
This commit is contained in:
@@ -19,9 +19,10 @@ milestone: https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/dnswatcher/milestone/7
|
||||
|
||||
# Completed Steps
|
||||
|
||||
- 2026-10-18: the health check answers 503 with `status` `error` when no lookup
|
||||
in the most recent round of DNS checks got a reply from a root server, as on a
|
||||
network that intercepts DNS queries (closes #302).
|
||||
- 2026-10-18: the health check answers 503 with `status` `error` when every
|
||||
lookup in the most recent round of DNS checks failed because no root server
|
||||
gave a usable reply, as on a network that intercepts DNS queries (closes
|
||||
#302).
|
||||
- 2026-10-16: the first reply marked "recursion available" from a root server's
|
||||
address, a refusal included, stops the lookup with "this network intercepts
|
||||
DNS queries", so on a network that sends DNS to a resolver dnswatcher and its
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user