resolver: a root server's reply marked recursion available means interception (closes #300)
check / check (push) Canceled after 0s

dnswatcher never asks for recursion and a root server never offers it,
so a reply marked recursion available from a root server's address
came from a resolver on the network answering in its place. Such a
reply is now passed over, and when every root server refused or gave
one, the lookup fails with the existing "this network intercepts DNS
queries", whether or not that resolver had the name cached. Before, a
cached name was checked against the resolver's second-hand answer.

On such a network dnswatcher and its tests fail with that error, by
design; nothing asks again another way or works around it. A live test
passes public resolvers as the root servers and expects the error.

Model: opus-5-5
This commit is contained in:
2026-10-16 08:19:27 +00:00
parent adc8131191
commit ca26499c88
5 changed files with 117 additions and 10 deletions
+11
View File
@@ -561,6 +561,17 @@ This approach ensures:
- Ability to detect split-horizon or inconsistent responses across authoritative - Ability to detect split-horizon or inconsistent responses across authoritative
servers. servers.
A root server never offers recursion, so a reply marked "recursion available"
from a root server's address came from a recursive resolver on the network
answering in its place, as on a network where a router rule, a VPN or a DNS
filter sends all DNS to one resolver. Such a reply is passed over for the next
root server. When every root server refuses a query or gives such a reply, the
lookup fails with the error "this network intercepts DNS queries". Every lookup
starts at the root servers, so on such a network every lookup fails with that
error, whether or not that resolver has the name cached, and dnswatcher's tests
fail there too. That is by design: nothing asks again another way or otherwise
works around the interception.
A watched name's records are stored as its nameservers return them, CNAME A watched name's records are stored as its nameservers return them, CNAME
included. When they return a CNAME and no address, the chain of every CNAME included. When they return a CNAME and no address, the chain of every CNAME
target they gave is followed (with a depth limit to prevent loops) to the A and target they gave is followed (with a depth limit to prevent loops) to the A and
+4
View File
@@ -19,6 +19,10 @@ milestone: https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/dnswatcher/milestone/7
# Completed Steps # Completed Steps
- 2026-10-16: a reply marked "recursion available" from a root server's address
is not used; when every root server refuses or gives one, the lookup fails
with "this network intercepts DNS queries", so on such a network dnswatcher
and its tests fail, by design (closes #300).
- 2026-10-15: a query its caller's context ends before it is sent records no - 2026-10-15: a query its caller's context ends before it is sent records no
reason about the nameserver, and a try the context's deadline cuts short is a reason about the nameserver, and a try the context's deadline cuts short is a
timeout, so a nameserver whose only failures were timeouts is `timeout`, not a timeout, so a nameserver whose only failures were timeouts is `timeout`, not a
+12 -2
View File
@@ -53,9 +53,19 @@ var (
"reply truncated and its retry over TCP failed", "reply truncated and its retry over TCP failed",
) )
// ErrRecursionAvailable is the reason a reply from a root server's
// address marked recursion available is not used. Root servers offer
// no recursion, so the reply came from something on the network
// answering in their place.
ErrRecursionAvailable = errors.New(
"reply marked recursion available, so not from a root server",
)
// ErrIntercepted is returned when every root server refused a // ErrIntercepted is returned when every root server refused a
// query. Root servers refuse no query, so the refusals came from // query or gave a reply marked recursion available. Root servers do
// something on the network answering in their place. // neither, so those replies came from something on the network
// answering in their place. On such a network dnswatcher fails with
// it, by design: nothing works around the interception.
ErrIntercepted = errors.New("this network intercepts DNS queries") ErrIntercepted = errors.New("this network intercepts DNS queries")
// ErrCNAMEDepthExceeded is returned when a CNAME chain // ErrCNAMEDepthExceeded is returned when a CNAME chain
+41 -8
View File
@@ -284,10 +284,11 @@ func shuffled(
} }
// queryServers asks servers, the servers of zone, about name in a random // queryServers asks servers, the servers of zone, about name in a random
// order until one gives a usable reply. A server that times out, refuses // order until one gives a reply it uses (see replyError). A server that
// or gives a reply that is not usable is passed over for the next. When // times out, refuses or gives a reply it does not use is passed over for
// every server refused, the error says so, and when they are the root // the next. When every server refused, the error says so. When they are
// servers it is ErrIntercepted. // the root servers and each one refused or gave a reply marked recursion
// available, the error is ErrIntercepted.
func (r *Resolver) queryServers( func (r *Resolver) queryServers(
ctx context.Context, ctx context.Context,
servers []string, servers []string,
@@ -298,6 +299,7 @@ func (r *Resolver) queryServers(
var lastErr error var lastErr error
refused := 0 refused := 0
recursionAvailable := 0
for _, ip := range shuffled(servers, rand.Shuffle) { for _, ip := range shuffled(servers, rand.Shuffle) {
if checkCtx(ctx) != nil { if checkCtx(ctx) != nil {
@@ -305,10 +307,8 @@ func (r *Resolver) queryServers(
} }
resp, err := r.queryDNS(ctx, ip, name, qtype) resp, err := r.queryDNS(ctx, ip, name, qtype)
if err == nil && !usableReply(resp, zone, name) { if err == nil {
err = fmt.Errorf( err = replyError(resp, ip, zone, name)
"query %s @%s: %w", name, ip, ErrUnusableReply,
)
} }
if err == nil { if err == nil {
@@ -319,6 +319,10 @@ func (r *Resolver) queryServers(
refused++ refused++
} }
if errors.Is(err, ErrRecursionAvailable) {
recursionAvailable++
}
lastErr = err lastErr = err
} }
@@ -329,6 +333,14 @@ func (r *Resolver) queryServers(
) )
} }
if refused+recursionAvailable == len(servers) && zone == "." {
return nil, fmt.Errorf(
"every root server refused a query for %s or gave a reply "+
"marked recursion available: %w",
name, ErrIntercepted,
)
}
if refused == len(servers) { if refused == len(servers) {
return nil, fmt.Errorf( return nil, fmt.Errorf(
"every server of %s refused a query for %s: %w", "every server of %s refused a query for %s: %w",
@@ -339,6 +351,27 @@ func (r *Resolver) queryServers(
return nil, fmt.Errorf("all servers failed: %w", lastErr) return nil, fmt.Errorf("all servers failed: %w", lastErr)
} }
// replyError returns why resp, the reply of the server at ip, one of the
// servers of zone, to a query about name, is not used, or nil when it
// is. A reply that is not usable is not used. Nor is a reply from a root
// server marked recursion available: root servers offer no recursion,
// so it came from something on the network answering in their place.
func replyError(resp *dns.Msg, ip string, zone string, name string) error {
if zone == "." && resp.RecursionAvailable {
return fmt.Errorf(
"query %s @%s: %w", name, ip, ErrRecursionAvailable,
)
}
if !usableReply(resp, zone, name) {
return fmt.Errorf(
"query %s @%s: %w", name, ip, ErrUnusableReply,
)
}
return nil
}
// isErrorReply reports whether msg is an error reply: one with any code // isErrorReply reports whether msg is an error reply: one with any code
// but NOERROR and NXDOMAIN, such as SERVFAIL, NOTIMP or FORMERR. An error // but NOERROR and NXDOMAIN, such as SERVFAIL, NOTIMP or FORMERR. An error
// reply says nothing about the name's records. // reply says nothing about the name's records.
+49
View File
@@ -850,6 +850,55 @@ func TestQueryServers_NotEveryRootServerRefused(t *testing.T) {
require.NotContains(t, err.Error(), "refused a query for") require.NotContains(t, err.Error(), "refused a query for")
} }
// TestQueryServers_RecursiveResolversAsRootServers passes public
// recursive resolvers of four operators to QueryServers as the servers
// of the root zone, as a network that sends every DNS query to a
// resolver would. Each refuses the query or gives a reply marked
// recursion available, which no root server does: SERVFAIL, or an
// answer from its cache, as 1.1.1.1 gives for com., which would be used
// if a root server gave it. Either way the error is ErrIntercepted, and
// since 1.1.1.1 and 8.8.8.8 refuse no such query, it says a reply was
// marked recursion available.
func TestQueryServers_RecursiveResolversAsRootServers(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
r := newTestResolver(t)
resolvers := []string{
"1.1.1.1", "8.8.8.8", "9.9.9.9", "208.67.222.222",
}
for _, name := range []string{"com.", "desec.io."} {
var err error
livednstest.Retry(
t,
"QueryServers(public recursive resolvers as root servers, "+
name+")",
func(ctx context.Context) error {
_, err = r.QueryServers(ctx, resolvers, ".", name, dns.TypeNS)
// When the error is another, one resolver may have given
// no reply at all, so the attempt is tried again.
if err != nil && !errors.Is(err, resolver.ErrIntercepted) {
return fmt.Errorf(
"%w: %w", livednstest.ErrNoAnswer, err,
)
}
return nil
},
)
require.ErrorIs(t, err, resolver.ErrIntercepted)
require.EqualError(
t, err,
"every root server refused a query for "+name+" or gave a "+
"reply marked recursion available: "+
"this network intercepts DNS queries",
)
}
}
func TestQueryNameserver_RecordsSorted(t *testing.T) { func TestQueryNameserver_RecordsSorted(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel() t.Parallel()