Files
AutistMask/tests/symbolSpoof.test.js
clawbot c755a5e944
All checks were successful
check / check (push) Successful in 33s
fix: a shared ticker no longer hides one of its two real tokens (closes #276)
Seven bundled tokens were filtered as spoofs at their own address, so a user
holding FRAX, TON, REUSD, EURE, MSUSD, MUSD or JPYC could not see or spend the
one the wallet happened not to pick.

The known-symbol table is derived from the bundled token list, first-wins in
market-cap order, so a symbol that appears twice silently condemned its second
contract. Both are real tokens from the same fetch and neither is stale --
three pairs are one issuer's old and new contract, four are unrelated issuers
sharing a ticker. Picking a winner would have been guessing, and dropping the
ambiguous symbols would have ended spoof filtering for those tickers entirely.

The table now maps a symbol to the set of addresses that legitimately bear it.
A contract outside the set is still a spoof, so the check is not weakened: a
third contract bearing any of the seven shared tickers is refused, and that is
tested. The filter decides what is fake, not what is worth holding, so a legacy
contract stays in the set -- it still holds real balances.

A test walks the whole bundled list asserting no token is filtered at its own
address, which is the guard whose absence let this ship.
2026-08-12 13:31:55 +02:00

694 lines
28 KiB
JavaScript

// Tests for the known-symbol spoof rule (src/shared/symbolSpoof.js) and for
// its application on all three surfaces that show tokens: the transaction
// history, the Send token selector, and the balance list.
//
// Issue #235: the three surfaces disagreed about what a `null` entry in
// KNOWN_SYMBOLS means. The history and the selector read it as "no contract
// may bear this symbol" and filtered a fake `ETH` ERC-20; the balance list
// read it as "no comparison is possible" and listed the fake token next to
// the user's real ETH, which is where a user forms their belief about what
// they own. The rule now lives in one module, so a fourth surface cannot
// reintroduce a fourth reading, and these tests assert the same attack on
// each surface.
//
// Nothing here touches the network: global.fetch is a throwing stub and the
// only fetch path in the modules under test (debugFetch, from
// src/shared/log) is mocked at the module boundary.
// The RPC provider is replaced so that refreshBalances can be driven end to
// end: the native balance it reports must survive a balance list in which
// every ERC-20 row is a fake ETH. Everything else in ethers is the real
// module, including the formatters the assertions depend on.
jest.mock("ethers", () => {
const actual = jest.requireActual("ethers");
class StubProvider {
async getBalance() {
return 1234500000000000000n;
}
async lookupAddress() {
return null;
}
}
return {
...actual,
JsonRpcProvider: StubProvider,
Network: { from: () => ({}) },
};
});
jest.mock("../src/shared/log", () => ({
log: {
debugf: () => {},
infof: () => {},
warnf: () => {},
errorf: () => {},
},
debugFetch: jest.fn(),
setRuntimeDebug: () => {},
isDebug: () => false,
}));
global.fetch = jest.fn(() => {
throw new Error("tests must not perform network requests");
});
global.chrome = {
storage: { local: { get: async () => ({}), set: async () => {} } },
};
const { isSpoofedSymbol } = require("../src/shared/symbolSpoof");
const { TOKENS, KNOWN_SYMBOLS } = require("../src/shared/tokenList");
const { filterTransactions } = require("../src/shared/transactions");
const {
fetchTokenBalances,
refreshBalances,
} = require("../src/shared/balances");
const { renderSendTokenSelect } = require("../src/popup/views/send");
const { state } = require("../src/shared/state");
const { debugFetch } = require("../src/shared/log");
// The fake "Ethereum" token with symbol "ETH" from the attack documented in
// README.md, given a holder count high enough to clear every other filter so
// that only the known-symbol rule can catch it.
const FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT = "0xd05339f9ea5ab9d9f03b9d57f671d2abd1f55c82";
const HOLDER = "0x66133e8ea0f5d1d612d2502a968757d1048c214a";
const USDC_CONTRACT = "0xa0b86991c6218b36c1d19d4a2e9eb0ce3606eb48";
const WETH_CONTRACT = "0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2";
const BLOCKSCOUT = "https://eth.blockscout.com/api/v2";
describe("the shared rule", () => {
test('"ETH" is still the null-mapped symbol these tests assume', () => {
expect(KNOWN_SYMBOLS.get("ETH")).toBeNull();
});
test("a contract bearing a null-mapped symbol is a spoof", () => {
expect(isSpoofedSymbol("ETH", FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(true);
});
test("even a genuine contract may not bear a null-mapped symbol", () => {
expect(isSpoofedSymbol("ETH", WETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(true);
});
test("the native asset carries no contract and is never a spoof", () => {
expect(isSpoofedSymbol("ETH", null)).toBe(false);
expect(isSpoofedSymbol("ETH", undefined)).toBe(false);
expect(isSpoofedSymbol("ETH", "")).toBe(false);
});
// The native exemption is "has no contract address", not "the symbol is
// ETH". A second null-mapped symbol added to the table later inherits
// both halves of the rule without any call site being revisited.
test("a newly null-mapped symbol behaves the same way", () => {
const added = !KNOWN_SYMBOLS.has("XTZTEST");
KNOWN_SYMBOLS.set("XTZTEST", null);
try {
expect(isSpoofedSymbol("XTZTEST", FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(true);
expect(isSpoofedSymbol("XTZTEST", null)).toBe(false);
} finally {
if (added) KNOWN_SYMBOLS.delete("XTZTEST");
}
});
test("a known symbol from its own contract is not a spoof", () => {
expect(isSpoofedSymbol("USDC", USDC_CONTRACT)).toBe(false);
expect(isSpoofedSymbol("usdc", USDC_CONTRACT.toUpperCase())).toBe(
false,
);
});
test("a known symbol from another contract is a spoof", () => {
expect(isSpoofedSymbol("USDC", FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(true);
});
test("a symbol that is not in the table is not judged here", () => {
expect(isSpoofedSymbol("SPAMTKN", FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(false);
});
});
// Issue #260: the symbol is whatever the ERC-20 contract returns, and HTML
// collapses leading and trailing whitespace, so a token calling itself
// `" ETH "` reaches the user's eye as `ETH` while missing a raw
// KNOWN_SYMBOLS lookup. Normalizing inside the shared rule fixes all three
// surfaces at once, which is what consolidating the rule bought.
//
// Every character under test here is built from its code point rather than
// pasted in: most of them are invisible, and an invisible character in a
// test file is unreviewable.
const cp = (...codes) => String.fromCodePoint(...codes);
const NBSP = cp(0x00a0); // no-break space
const FIGURE_SPACE = cp(0x2007);
const IDEOGRAPHIC_SPACE = cp(0x3000);
const ZWSP = cp(0x200b); // zero-width space
const BOM = cp(0xfeff); // zero-width no-break space
const WORD_JOINER = cp(0x2060);
const SOFT_HYPHEN = cp(0x00ad);
const LRM = cp(0x200e); // left-to-right mark
const RLO = cp(0x202e); // right-to-left override
const HANGUL_FILLER = cp(0x3164);
const CHOSEONG_FILLER = cp(0x115f);
const VS16 = cp(0xfe0f); // variation selector-16
const VS1 = cp(0xfe00); // variation selector-1
const NEL = cp(0x0085); // next line, a C1 control
const DEL = cp(0x007f);
const FULLWIDTH_ETH = cp(0xff25, 0xff34, 0xff28);
const FULLWIDTH_USDC = cp(0xff55, 0xff53, 0xff44, 0xff43); // lowercase
const CYRILLIC_CAPITAL_IE = cp(0x0415);
describe("the shared rule: symbols that render as a known symbol", () => {
test("ASCII padding does not buy a pass", () => {
expect(isSpoofedSymbol(" ETH ", FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(true);
expect(isSpoofedSymbol("\tETH\n", FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(true);
expect(isSpoofedSymbol(" usdc ", FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(true);
});
test("non-breaking and other Unicode spaces do not either", () => {
expect(isSpoofedSymbol(NBSP + "ETH" + NBSP, FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(
true,
);
expect(
isSpoofedSymbol(
FIGURE_SPACE + "ETH" + IDEOGRAPHIC_SPACE,
FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT,
),
).toBe(true);
});
// These render as nothing at all, in any position, so they are removed
// wherever they sit rather than only at the ends.
test("zero-width characters are stripped wherever they sit", () => {
expect(isSpoofedSymbol("E" + ZWSP + "TH", FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(
true,
);
expect(isSpoofedSymbol(BOM + "ETH", FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(true);
expect(
isSpoofedSymbol("ET" + WORD_JOINER + "H", FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT),
).toBe(true);
expect(
isSpoofedSymbol("E" + SOFT_HYPHEN + "TH", FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT),
).toBe(true);
});
// An LRM is invisible and, in all-Latin text, moves nothing: dropping it
// leaves exactly the string the user saw.
test("an invisible bidi mark does not hide a known symbol", () => {
expect(isSpoofedSymbol(LRM + "ETH", FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(true);
});
// Invisibility is not confined to \p{Cf}. A Hangul filler is Lo and a
// variation selector is Mn, yet each of these four measures 32.00px in
// the repo's pinned e2e Chromium at 16px sans-serif — exactly the width
// of a plain `ETH` — so each reaches the user's eye as `ETH`. They are
// caught by \p{Default_Ignorable_Code_Point}, not by \p{Cf}.
test("invisible non-format characters are stripped too", () => {
expect(isSpoofedSymbol(HANGUL_FILLER + "ETH", FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(
true,
);
expect(
isSpoofedSymbol(CHOSEONG_FILLER + "ETH", FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT),
).toBe(true);
expect(isSpoofedSymbol("ETH" + VS16, FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(true);
expect(isSpoofedSymbol("E" + VS1 + "TH", FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(true);
});
// Nor is it confined to the Unicode classes. U+007F is a control (Cc)
// and is not default-ignorable, so neither class reaches it, but it
// measures 32.00px in the same browser — it paints nothing, so a
// symbol carrying it reaches the eye as `ETH`. It is named on its own
// in the strip for exactly that reason.
test("U+007F paints nothing and is stripped", () => {
expect(isSpoofedSymbol(DEL + "ETH", FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(true);
});
// The other side of the boundary, which is not the class boundary but
// the visibility one: the remaining C0 and C1 controls render as a
// visible 48.00px box in the same browser, so a symbol carrying one
// does not look like `ETH` and must not be judged a spoof. Widening
// the strip to \p{Cc} — the obvious over-correction once U+007F is in
// it — fails this test.
test("visible control characters do not make a symbol a spoof", () => {
expect(isSpoofedSymbol(NEL + "ETH", FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(false);
expect(isSpoofedSymbol(cp(0x0001) + "ETH", FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(
false,
);
expect(isSpoofedSymbol(cp(0x0090) + "ETH", FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(
false,
);
});
test("compatibility forms fold onto the symbol they imitate", () => {
expect(isSpoofedSymbol(FULLWIDTH_ETH, FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(true);
expect(isSpoofedSymbol(FULLWIDTH_USDC, FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(true);
});
// The two knowingly open classes, asserted here so that the boundary is
// a fact in the suite and not a claim in a PR body. A Cyrillic capital
// Ie is a distinct letter rather than a compatibility variant, so NFKC
// leaves it alone; and a right-to-left override reverses the rendering
// of what follows it, which dropping the control character does not
// undo. Closing either needs a confusables table or a bidi resolver,
// and both are a separate change from this one.
test("a Cyrillic homoglyph is knowingly still not caught", () => {
expect(
isSpoofedSymbol(CYRILLIC_CAPITAL_IE + "TH", FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT),
).toBe(false);
});
test("a bidi-reordered symbol is knowingly still not caught", () => {
expect(isSpoofedSymbol(RLO + "HTE", FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(false);
});
// Normalization does not reach the native-asset exemption, which turns
// on the absence of a contract address and never on the symbol.
test("a padded symbol with no contract is still not a spoof", () => {
expect(isSpoofedSymbol(" ETH ", null)).toBe(false);
expect(isSpoofedSymbol(NBSP + "ETH", "")).toBe(false);
});
test("a genuine contract still bears its own padded symbol", () => {
expect(isSpoofedSymbol(" USDC ", USDC_CONTRACT)).toBe(false);
expect(isSpoofedSymbol(ZWSP + "WETH", WETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(false);
});
// Normalization must not invent a match. Interior ASCII whitespace is
// left alone: `E T H` renders as `E T H`, not as `ETH`, so folding it
// would filter a token no user could confuse with the native asset.
test("a symbol that renders differently is not judged a spoof", () => {
expect(isSpoofedSymbol("E T H", FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(false);
expect(isSpoofedSymbol("ETH2", FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(false);
expect(isSpoofedSymbol("MY ETH", FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(false);
});
// The false-positive question, answered against the shipped data rather
// than by assertion: no bundled symbol carries whitespace or a
// non-ASCII character, so the normalization cannot newly filter one.
// The character class starts at `!` rather than at the space so that it
// asserts the claim it stands for — `[ -~]` would admit an interior
// space and let a whitespace-bearing entry through the guard.
test("no bundled symbol is touched by the normalization", () => {
for (const [symbol, addresses] of KNOWN_SYMBOLS) {
expect(symbol).toBe(symbol.trim());
expect(symbol).toMatch(/^[!-~]+$/);
if (addresses === null) continue;
for (const address of addresses) {
expect(isSpoofedSymbol(symbol, address)).toBe(false);
}
}
});
});
// Issue #276: the guard that was missing. The suite walked KNOWN_SYMBOLS,
// which is built from TOKENS, so it could only ever assert that the table
// agrees with itself. Seven symbols appear twice in the bundled list at two
// different real contracts, and the table kept whichever came first, so the
// other seven contracts — tokens in our own shipped list, at their own
// addresses — were judged spoofs and hidden from the balance list, the
// history and the send selector. That is the over-filtering direction: it
// hides a holding the user cannot then spend.
//
// This walk is over TOKENS, the data the wallet actually ships, so it fails
// whenever a bundled token would be filtered at its own address no matter
// which side of the table the mistake is on.
describe("the shipped token list", () => {
test("no bundled token is filtered at its own address", () => {
const filtered = TOKENS.filter((t) =>
isSpoofedSymbol(t.symbol, t.address),
).map((t) => t.symbol + " @ " + t.address);
expect(filtered).toEqual([]);
});
// The third failure mode the issue asks about: a symbol whose table entry
// names an address that is in neither the table nor the list would be a
// contract we vouch for and do not ship. There is none, and the table is
// built from the list, so this asserts the derivation has not acquired a
// hand-written entry.
test("every address the table vouches for is a bundled token", () => {
const bundled = new Set(TOKENS.map((t) => t.address.toLowerCase()));
for (const [symbol, addresses] of KNOWN_SYMBOLS) {
if (addresses === null) continue;
expect(addresses.size).toBeGreaterThan(0);
for (const address of addresses) {
expect(address).toBe(address.toLowerCase());
expect(bundled.has(address)).toBe(true);
// And it is the token that actually reports that symbol.
const token = TOKENS.find(
(t) => t.address.toLowerCase() === address,
);
expect(token.symbol.toUpperCase()).toBe(symbol);
}
}
});
// Both contracts behind a shared ticker must pass, from either side: a
// rule that admits only the one the table happens to visit first is the
// bug, not the fix.
test("both contracts behind a shared ticker are admitted", () => {
const bySymbol = new Map();
for (const t of TOKENS) {
const upper = t.symbol.toUpperCase();
if (!bySymbol.has(upper)) bySymbol.set(upper, []);
bySymbol.get(upper).push(t);
}
const shared = [...bySymbol].filter(([, list]) => list.length > 1);
// The shared tickers are a fact about the shipped data; if a future
// list has none, this test would silently assert nothing.
expect(shared.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
for (const [, list] of shared) {
for (const t of list) {
expect(isSpoofedSymbol(t.symbol, t.address)).toBe(false);
}
}
});
// The seven from issue #276, named so that the reconciliation is a fact
// in the suite: each is two real contracts from the same source fetch,
// and the table now holds both rather than the one that came first.
test("the seven shared tickers each name both bundled contracts", () => {
const expected = {
TON: [
"0x582d872a1b094fc48f5de31d3b73f2d9be47def1", // Toncoin
"0x2be5e8c109e2197d077d13a82daead6a9b3433c5", // Tokamak Network
],
FRAX: [
"0x853d955acef822db058eb8505911ed77f175b99e", // Legacy Frax Dollar
"0x3432b6a60d23ca0dfca7761b7ab56459d9c964d0", // Frax (prev. FXS)
],
REUSD: [
"0x5086bf358635b81d8c47c66d1c8b9e567db70c72", // Re Protocol reUSD
"0x57ab1e0003f623289cd798b1824be09a793e4bec", // Resupply USD
],
EURE: [
"0x39b8b6385416f4ca36a20319f70d28621895279d", // Monerium EUR emoney
"0x3231cb76718cdef2155fc47b5286d82e6eda273f", // Monerium EUR emoney [OLD]
],
MSUSD: [
"0x4ba01f22827018b4772cd326c7627fb4956a7c00", // Main Street USD
"0xab5eb14c09d416f0ac63661e57edb7aecdb9befa", // Metronome Synth USD
],
MUSD: [
"0xaca92e438df0b2401ff60da7e4337b687a2435da", // MetaMask USD
"0xdd468a1ddc392dcdbef6db6e34e89aa338f9f186", // Mezo USD
],
JPYC: [
"0x431d5dff03120afa4bdf332c61a6e1766ef37bdb", // JPY Coin
"0x2370f9d504c7a6e775bf6e14b3f12846b594cd53", // JPY Coin v1
],
};
for (const [symbol, addresses] of Object.entries(expected)) {
expect([...KNOWN_SYMBOLS.get(symbol)].sort()).toEqual(
[...addresses].sort(),
);
for (const address of addresses) {
expect(isSpoofedSymbol(symbol, address)).toBe(false);
}
}
});
// The other direction, on the same symbols: widening the table to hold
// every bundled address for a ticker must not turn it into a pass for
// any other contract.
test("a shared ticker from a third contract is still a spoof", () => {
const bySymbol = new Map();
for (const t of TOKENS) {
const upper = t.symbol.toUpperCase();
if (!bySymbol.has(upper)) bySymbol.set(upper, []);
bySymbol.get(upper).push(t);
}
for (const [symbol, list] of bySymbol) {
if (list.length < 2) continue;
expect(isSpoofedSymbol(symbol, FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(true);
}
});
});
describe("surface 1: the transaction history", () => {
function fakeEthTransfer() {
return {
hash: "0x" + "1".repeat(64),
symbol: "ETH",
contractAddress: FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT,
holders: 900000,
valueGwei: null,
isContractCall: false,
};
}
test("a fake ETH token transfer is filtered", () => {
const result = filterTransactions([fakeEthTransfer()], {
hideSpoofedSymbols: true,
hideFraudContracts: true,
hideLowHolderTokens: true,
hideDustTransactions: true,
dustThresholdGwei: 100000,
});
expect(result.transactions).toEqual([]);
});
// Issue #260 on this surface: the same transfer with a padded symbol.
test("a padded fake ETH token transfer is filtered too", () => {
const padded = { ...fakeEthTransfer(), symbol: " ETH " };
const result = filterTransactions([padded], {
hideSpoofedSymbols: true,
hideFraudContracts: true,
hideLowHolderTokens: true,
hideDustTransactions: true,
dustThresholdGwei: 100000,
});
expect(result.transactions).toEqual([]);
// The contract is learned as fraudulent, exactly as for the
// unpadded symbol: the padding must not cost the blocklist entry.
expect(result.newFraudContracts).toEqual([FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT]);
});
test("a real native ETH transfer survives", () => {
const native = {
hash: "0x" + "2".repeat(64),
symbol: "ETH",
contractAddress: null,
holders: null,
valueGwei: 5000000,
isContractCall: false,
};
const result = filterTransactions([native], {
hideSpoofedSymbols: true,
hideFraudContracts: true,
hideLowHolderTokens: true,
hideDustTransactions: true,
dustThresholdGwei: 100000,
});
expect(result.transactions).toEqual([native]);
});
});
describe("surface 2: the Send token selector", () => {
let select;
function render(tokenBalances) {
select = { innerHTML: "", children: [] };
select.appendChild = (child) => select.children.push(child);
globalThis.document = {
getElementById: (id) => (id === "send-token" ? select : null),
createElement: () => ({ value: "", textContent: "" }),
};
renderSendTokenSelect({
address: "0x" + "a".repeat(40),
tokenBalances,
});
}
beforeEach(() => {
state.fraudContracts = [];
state.hideLowHolderTokens = true;
});
test("a fake ETH token is not selectable", () => {
render([
{
address: FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT,
symbol: "ETH",
decimals: 18,
balance: "0.005",
holders: 900000,
},
]);
expect(select.children).toEqual([]);
});
// Issue #260 on this surface: the option text is rendered into HTML,
// which collapses the padding, so an unfiltered padded token would sit
// in the selector reading exactly `ETH`.
test("a padded fake ETH token is not selectable either", () => {
render([
{
address: FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT,
symbol: " ETH ",
decimals: 18,
balance: "0.005",
holders: 900000,
},
]);
expect(select.children).toEqual([]);
});
test("a genuine token with a padded symbol stays selectable", () => {
render([
{
address: USDC_CONTRACT,
symbol: " USDC ",
decimals: 6,
balance: "12.5",
holders: 900000,
},
]);
expect(select.children).toHaveLength(1);
expect(select.children[0].value).toBe(USDC_CONTRACT);
});
test("native ETH remains the always-present option", () => {
render([]);
expect(select.innerHTML).toBe('<option value="ETH">ETH</option>');
});
});
describe("surface 3: the balance list", () => {
function respondWith(items) {
debugFetch.mockImplementation(async () => ({
ok: true,
status: 200,
statusText: "OK",
json: async () => items,
}));
}
function fakeEthItem(overrides = {}) {
return {
value: "5000000000000000",
token: {
type: "ERC-20",
address_hash: FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT,
symbol: "ETH",
name: "Ethereum",
decimals: "18",
holders_count: "900000",
...overrides,
},
};
}
beforeEach(() => {
debugFetch.mockReset();
});
// The bug in issue #235: this token cleared the balance list's own
// 1,000-holder floor and was listed as a holding named ETH.
test("a fake ETH token clearing the holder floor is filtered", async () => {
respondWith([fakeEthItem()]);
expect(await fetchTokenBalances(HOLDER, BLOCKSCOUT, [])).toEqual([]);
});
test("tracking the fake token manually does not admit it either", async () => {
respondWith([fakeEthItem({ holders_count: "0" })]);
const balances = await fetchTokenBalances(HOLDER, BLOCKSCOUT, [
{ address: FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT },
]);
expect(balances).toEqual([]);
});
// Issue #260 on this surface: the balance list is where the user forms
// their belief about what they own, and it renders the symbol into HTML.
test("a padded fake ETH token is filtered too", async () => {
respondWith([fakeEthItem({ symbol: " ETH " })]);
expect(await fetchTokenBalances(HOLDER, BLOCKSCOUT, [])).toEqual([]);
});
test("a fake ETH token padded with a no-break space is filtered", async () => {
respondWith([fakeEthItem({ symbol: NBSP + "ETH" + NBSP })]);
expect(await fetchTokenBalances(HOLDER, BLOCKSCOUT, [])).toEqual([]);
});
// The false-positive direction on the surface that matters most: a real
// holding whose symbol happens to carry padding is still listed, and the
// list still shows the symbol the token actually reports.
test("a genuine token with a padded symbol is not newly filtered", async () => {
respondWith([
fakeEthItem({
address_hash: USDC_CONTRACT,
symbol: " USDC ",
name: "USD Coin",
decimals: "6",
}),
]);
const balances = await fetchTokenBalances(HOLDER, BLOCKSCOUT, []);
expect(balances).toHaveLength(1);
expect(balances[0].symbol).toBe(" USDC ");
});
test("a genuine token keeps its place in the list", async () => {
respondWith([
fakeEthItem({
address_hash: USDC_CONTRACT,
symbol: "USDC",
name: "USD Coin",
decimals: "6",
}),
]);
const balances = await fetchTokenBalances(HOLDER, BLOCKSCOUT, []);
expect(balances).toHaveLength(1);
expect(balances[0].symbol).toBe("USDC");
});
// The trap in this change: the user's real ETH balance is not an ERC-20
// and is fetched over RPC in refreshBalances, so it never passes through
// this loop at all. An explorer row that is not an ERC-20 is dropped
// before the symbol rule is consulted.
test("a non-ERC-20 row claiming ETH never reaches the symbol rule", async () => {
respondWith([fakeEthItem({ type: "ERC-721" })]);
expect(await fetchTokenBalances(HOLDER, BLOCKSCOUT, [])).toEqual([]);
});
// The adjacent finding from the same review as issue #260: the type gate
// compared exactly, so an explorer that ever varied the casing would
// silently drop a real holding before any filter ran. The comparison is
// now case-insensitive, which changes nothing about which types are
// admitted.
test("a differently-cased ERC-20 type still lists a real holding", async () => {
respondWith([
fakeEthItem({
type: "erc-20",
address_hash: USDC_CONTRACT,
symbol: "USDC",
name: "USD Coin",
decimals: "6",
}),
]);
const balances = await fetchTokenBalances(HOLDER, BLOCKSCOUT, []);
expect(balances).toHaveLength(1);
expect(balances[0].symbol).toBe("USDC");
});
test("case insensitivity does not admit another token type", async () => {
respondWith([fakeEthItem({ type: "erc-721" })]);
expect(await fetchTokenBalances(HOLDER, BLOCKSCOUT, [])).toEqual([]);
respondWith([fakeEthItem({ type: "ERC-20-EXTRA" })]);
expect(await fetchTokenBalances(HOLDER, BLOCKSCOUT, [])).toEqual([]);
});
// The money test: the user holds real ETH and has been airdropped a fake
// ETH ERC-20. The fake is gone from the list of tokens; the real balance
// is exactly what the node reported.
test("the real native ETH balance survives a fake ETH airdrop", async () => {
respondWith([fakeEthItem()]);
const addr = { address: HOLDER };
await refreshBalances(
[{ addresses: [addr] }],
"https://rpc.example.invalid",
BLOCKSCOUT,
[],
);
expect(addr.balance).toBe("1.2345");
expect(addr.tokenBalances).toEqual([]);
});
test("no test in this file performed a network request", () => {
expect(global.fetch).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});