fix: a refresh asked for while another runs is no longer dropped (closes #581)

doRefreshAndRender() returned at once when a refresh was already running. An
import asks for a refresh after its address scan, so the addresses the scan
found showed 0.0000 until the next ten-second refresh.

A request made while a refresh runs now sets a flag. One more refresh runs
once the running one ends. Several requests in that time lead to one more
refresh, not several. A tick of the ten-second timer during a refresh counts
as such a request too.

Model: opus-5-5

Dockerfile

@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@ WORKDIR /app
 
 COPY script/ script/
 COPY package.json yarn.lock ./
-# yarn warns about the workspaces field in eslint and babel-plugin-istanbul; no newer release drops it.
 RUN script/bootstrap
 
 COPY . .

README.md

@@ -1473,20 +1473,21 @@ tracked.
 
 A tracked token is shown when its balance is nonzero, and any other ERC-20 when
 its balance is nonzero and it is in the bundled known-token list or has 1,000 or
-more holders. The balance list always drops a token that claims a bundled-list
+more holders. A token claiming a symbol from the bundled list from any other
-symbol from another contract address, whatever the settings. The list also drops
+contract address is always dropped, tracked or not, and so is any token claiming
-every token that claims the native asset's symbol: `"ETH"`, or any network's
+a symbol that belongs to the native asset and therefore has no legitimate
-`nativeCurrency`, such as `"SepoliaETH"`. That filter is unconditional — the
+contract at all (`"ETH"`, and every network's `nativeCurrency`, such as
-"Hide tokens with fewer than 1,000 holders" setting governs the transaction
+`"SepoliaETH"`, on every network). That filter is unconditional — the "Hide
-history and the send-screen token selector, not this list. A token's holder
+tokens with fewer than 1,000 holders" setting governs the transaction history
-count is unknown when the explorer reports none, or reports anything other than
+and the send-screen token selector, not this list. A token's holder count is
-a whole number written in digits alone, such as `1,000` or `1e3`
+unknown when the explorer reports none, or reports anything other than a whole
-(`parseHoldersCount()` in `src/shared/holders.js`). This list does not take an
+number written in digits alone, such as `1,000` or `1e3` (`parseHoldersCount()`
-unknown count as 1,000 or more, so such a token is shown only when it is on the
+in `src/shared/holders.js`). This list does not take an unknown count as 1,000
-bundled list or tracked. Every nonzero holding of a token shown is stored
+or more, so such a token is shown only when it is on the bundled list or
-exactly, however small, but a holding below 0.000001 is left out of the balance
+tracked. Every nonzero holding of a token shown is stored exactly, however
-lists, the send-screen token selector, the address total and the remove-address
+small, but a holding below 0.000001 is left out of the balance lists, the
-warning (`isBelowOneMillionth()` in `src/shared/amountDisplay.js`). The Send and
+send-screen token selector, the address total and the remove-address warning
+(`isBelowOneMillionth()` in `src/shared/amountDisplay.js`). The Send and
 confirmation screens show it when its token is the one being sent. Tracked
 tokens with a zero balance are listed as well while "Show tracked tokens with
 zero balance" is on.
@@ -2052,21 +2053,15 @@ view would leave a wallet one click from deletion.
       fee estimate and the contract and never-sent recipient checks ask that
       network's RPC endpoint, and the Etherscan label check asks that network's
       explorer
-    - "Sign & Send" (correct password) when the gas limit or a fee is over its
+    - "Sign & Send" (correct password) when the gas limit, a fee per gas or the
-      bound → nothing is signed; "The gas limit or fee the RPC endpoint quoted
+      total fee the RPC endpoint fills in at signing is over its bound in
-      for this transaction is more than this wallet will sign for, so it was not
+      `assertWithinCeilings()` (`src/shared/approvalVerify.js`) → nothing is
-      sent. Please go back and try again." in its own box, no screen change. For
+      signed; "The gas limit or fee the RPC endpoint quoted for this transaction
-      an ETH amount that Send's "Max" filled in, the gas limit and fees are
+      is more than this wallet will sign for, so it was not sent. Please go back
-      those of this screen's own fee estimate (see Amount above). For any other
+      and try again." in its own box, the same sentence for all three, no screen
-      send, the RPC endpoint fills in the gas limit and fees at signing. Just
+      change
-      before signing, `assertWithinCeilings()` (`src/shared/approvalVerify.js`)
+    - "Sign & Send" (wrong password) → "Wrong password." on the password error
-      refuses the send when any of these is over its bound:
+      line, no screen change
-        - the gas limit
-        - each fee per gas the transaction sets
-        - the total fee: the gas limit times `maxFeePerGas`, or times `gasPrice`
-          when the transaction has no `maxFeePerGas`
-    - "Sign & Send" (wrong password) → "That password is incorrect. Please try
-      again." on the password error line, no screen change
     - "Sign & Send" signs as the From address above, not as whichever address is
       selected: the two are saved separately, so the popup can reopen onto this
       screen with another address selected. When the selected wallet does not
@@ -2238,10 +2233,6 @@ view would leave a wallet one click from deletion.
       **AddressDetail**
     - "Add" with a token already tracked, a scam-listed address, or a failed
       contract lookup → flash message, no screen change
-    - "Add" with a token that the spoof rule refuses → nothing is tracked; "Not
-      added: this token fakes a known symbol." flash message, no screen change
-    - "Add", then the contract lookup answers while another screen shows, or
-      after AddToken was opened again → tracks the token, no screen change
     - "Add", then a network switch in Settings before the contract lookup
       answers → nothing is tracked; "The active network changed before the
       lookup finished, so the token was not added." flash message, no screen
@@ -2548,9 +2539,6 @@ view would leave a wallet one click from deletion.
       "Added SYMBOL" flash message (no screen change)
     - A duplicate, a scam-listed address, or a failed contract lookup → flash
       message, no screen change
-    - "Add" by contract address with a token that the spoof rule refuses →
-      nothing is tracked; "Not added: this token fakes a known symbol." flash
-      message, no screen change
     - "Add" by contract address, then a network switch in Settings before the
       lookup answers → nothing is tracked; "The active network changed before
       the lookup finished, so the token was not added." flash message, no screen

docs/README.md

@@ -380,8 +380,10 @@ but comes from an unrecognized contract, it is identified as a spoof and hidden.
 In your transaction history this is the "Hide fake tokens impersonating a known
 symbol" setting, which you can switch off; doing so also stops new entries being
 added to the fraud contract blocklist below, since detecting a spoof is what
-fills it. The send token list always applies the check. Your balance list always
+fills it. The send token list always applies the check. Your balances apply it
-applies the check too.
+too, with one exception: a token claiming the symbol "ETH" is not filtered
+there, so a fake "ETH" token can still show up in your balance list even though
+it is hidden from your transaction history and from the send token list.
 
 **Low-holder token filtering.** Tokens with fewer than 1,000 holders are hidden
 from transaction history and the send token list, and are left out of your

eslint.config.js

@@ -153,7 +153,8 @@ module.exports = [
         },
     },
 
-    // The files in script/lib/ run on plain node too, and are never bundled.
+    // The helpers the script/ entrypoints call: plain node programs too, run
+    // from a shell script rather than from yarn, and never bundled.
     {
         files: ["script/lib/**/*.js"],
         languageOptions: {

package.json

@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
     "license": "GPL-3.0",
     "private": true,
     "scripts": {
-        "test": "node script/lib/jest.js --maxWorkers=3",
+        "test": "jest --forceExit --maxWorkers=3",
-        "test:verbose": "node script/lib/jest.js --maxWorkers=3 --verbose",
+        "test:verbose": "jest --forceExit --maxWorkers=3 --verbose",
         "build": "node build.js",
         "lint": "eslint . && prettier --check .",
         "fmt": "prettier --write .",

script/bootstrap

@@ -118,7 +118,6 @@ ensure_yarn() {
     fi
 }
 
-# yarn warns about the workspaces field in eslint and babel-plugin-istanbul; no newer release drops it.
 install_js_deps() {
     if missing yarn && [ -s "$HOME/.nvm/nvm.sh" ]; then
         nvm_sh "nvm use $NODE_VERSION >/dev/null && cd \"$ROOT\" && \

script/lib/jest.js

@@ -1,40 +0,0 @@
-// Runs jest with the arguments it is given, and fails the run when jest had to
-// force-stop the worker process that ran a test file. Jest itself only prints a
-// warning when that happens, and its run still passes. The warning means a test
-// left a timer or another open handle running. The test scripts in package.json
-// run jest through this file.
-//
-// Jest runs inside this process and writes to the terminal directly, so its
-// output looks the same as a plain jest run. This file only checks each write
-// to stderr for the warning below.
-
-"use strict";
-
-// The start of the warning that jest prints on stderr after it force-stops a
-// worker process.
-const WORKER_WARNING = "A worker process has failed to exit gracefully";
-
-let forceStopped = false;
-
-const writeStderr = process.stderr.write.bind(process.stderr);
-process.stderr.write = (chunk, ...rest) => {
-    if (String(chunk).includes(WORKER_WARNING)) {
-        forceStopped = true;
-    }
-    return writeStderr(chunk, ...rest);
-};
-
-// Runs after jest has finished, as the process exits.
-process.on("exit", () => {
-    if (forceStopped) {
-        console.error(
-            "script/lib/jest.js: failing the run, because jest force-stopped " +
-                "a worker process. A test left a timer or another open " +
-                "handle running.",
-        );
-        process.exitCode = 1;
-    }
-});
-
-// Jest's own command-line program. It reads its arguments from process.argv.
-require("jest/bin/jest");

src/popup/index.js

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ function renderWalletList() {
 const pageClosed = new AbortController();
 window.addEventListener("pagehide", () => pageClosed.abort());
 
-// While a refresh runs, a request through ctx is not dropped. The request sets
+// A refresh asked for while another runs is not dropped. The request sets
 // refreshAgain, and one more refresh runs once the running one ends. Several
 // requests in that time lead to one more refresh, not several. An import asks
 // for a refresh after its address scan. A refresh already running does not
@@ -142,11 +142,13 @@ async function doRefreshAndRender() {
         });
         renderWalletList();
     } catch (e) {
-        // No caller waits for this function, so it must never reject. An
+        // Every call site fires this and walks away — the boot below, the ten
-        // unhandled rejection reports nothing. The save inside it reports its
+        // second interval, eight views through ctx, and the end of this
-        // own failure through onSaveFailure() (see src/shared/state.js); what
+        // function for one more refresh — so it must never reject: an
-        // is left here is a failed network round trip, which the next tick
+        // unhandled rejection is not a report of anything. The save
-        // retries.
+        // inside it reports its own failure through onSaveFailure() (see
+        // src/shared/state.js); what is left here is a failed network round
+        // trip, which the next tick retries.
         log.errorf("popup: background refresh failed:", e);
     } finally {
         refreshInFlight = false;
@@ -167,10 +169,7 @@ function startRefresh() {
     if (!$("view-state-recovery").classList.contains("hidden")) return;
     doRefreshAndRender();
     if (refreshTimer === null) {
-        // A tick that finds a refresh running is dropped.
+        refreshTimer = setInterval(doRefreshAndRender, 10000);
-        refreshTimer = setInterval(() => {
-            if (!refreshInFlight) return doRefreshAndRender();
-        }, 10000);
     }
 }
 

src/popup/views/addToken.js

@@ -3,15 +3,9 @@ const { getTopTokens } = require("../../shared/tokenList");
 const { state, saveState, currentNetwork } = require("../../shared/state");
 const { lookupTokenInfo } = require("../../shared/balances");
 const { isScamAddress } = require("../../shared/scamlist");
-const { isSpoofedSymbol } = require("../../shared/symbolSpoof");
 const { log } = require("../../shared/log");
 
-// Counts the times AddToken has opened. A contract lookup started before
-// AddToken was last opened changes neither the screen nor the status line.
-let addTokenScreenOpenings = 0;
-
 function show() {
-    addTokenScreenOpenings++;
     $("add-token-address").value = "";
     $("add-token-info").textContent = "";
     $("add-token-info").style.visibility = "hidden";
@@ -61,7 +55,6 @@ function init(ctx) {
         // The network the lookup asks, which Settings may switch away from
         // before it answers, as for a transaction in confirmTx.js.
         const chainId = currentNetwork().chainId;
-        const opening = addTokenScreenOpenings;
         try {
             const info = await lookupTokenInfo(
                 contractAddr,
@@ -78,15 +71,6 @@ function init(ctx) {
                 );
                 return;
             }
-            // The balance list never shows a token that the spoof rule
-            // refuses, so such a token is not tracked.
-            if (isSpoofedSymbol(info.symbol, contractAddr)) {
-                showFlash("Not added: this token fakes a known symbol.");
-                if (addTokenScreenOpenings !== opening) return;
-                infoEl.textContent = "";
-                infoEl.style.visibility = "hidden";
-                return;
-            }
             log.infof("Adding token", info.symbol, contractAddr);
             state.trackedTokens.push({
                 address: contractAddr,
@@ -96,17 +80,6 @@ function init(ctx) {
             });
             await saveState();
             ctx.doRefreshAndRender();
-            // If the lookup answers after AddToken was opened again, the
-            // token is still added, but the screen and the status line stay
-            // as they are.
-            if (addTokenScreenOpenings !== opening) return;
-            // The lookup is over, so a later Back onto AddToken shows no
-            // status.
-            infoEl.textContent = "";
-            infoEl.style.visibility = "hidden";
-            // If the lookup answers while another screen shows, the token is
-            // still added but the screen does not change.
-            if (state.currentView !== "add-token") return;
             // Pop the stack (back to address detail) and re-render it
             // so the newly added token is visible immediately.
             if (state.viewStack.length > 0) {
@@ -127,7 +100,6 @@ function init(ctx) {
                     ? detail
                     : "Could not add the token.",
             );
-            if (addTokenScreenOpenings !== opening) return;
             infoEl.textContent = "";
             infoEl.style.visibility = "hidden";
         }

src/popup/views/helpers.js

@@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ const { networkByChainId } = require("../../shared/networks");
 const { formatUsd, getPrice } = require("../../shared/prices");
 const { state, saveState, currentNetwork } = require("../../shared/state");
 const { displaySymbol } = require("../../shared/symbolDisplay");
-const { isSpoofedSymbol } = require("../../shared/symbolSpoof");
 const { walletHasRecoveryPhrase } = require("../../shared/wallet");
 const { markViewRendered } = require("../viewRouter");
 
@@ -448,9 +447,6 @@ function balanceLinesForAddress(addr, trackedTokens, showZero) {
     if (showZero && trackedTokens) {
         for (const t of trackedTokens) {
             if (seen.has(t.address.toLowerCase())) continue;
-            // A token that the spoof rule refuses has no stored balance, and
-            // gets no zero row either.
-            if (isSpoofedSymbol(t.symbol, t.address)) continue;
             html += balanceLine(
                 t.symbol,
                 0,

src/popup/views/settingsAddToken.js

@@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ const { getTopTokens } = require("../../shared/tokenList");
 const { state, saveState, currentNetwork } = require("../../shared/state");
 const { lookupTokenInfo } = require("../../shared/balances");
 const { isScamAddress } = require("../../shared/scamlist");
-const { isSpoofedSymbol } = require("../../shared/symbolSpoof");
 const { log } = require("../../shared/log");
 
 let ctx;
@@ -156,16 +155,6 @@ function init(_ctx) {
                 );
                 return;
             }
-            // The balance list never shows a token that the spoof rule
-            // refuses, so such a token is not tracked. The rule never refuses
-            // a bundled token, so the "Top tokens:" buttons and the top 100
-            // dropdown need no such check.
-            if (isSpoofedSymbol(info.symbol, addr)) {
-                showFlash("Not added: this token fakes a known symbol.");
-                infoEl.textContent = "";
-                infoEl.style.visibility = "hidden";
-                return;
-            }
             log.infof("Adding token", info.symbol, addr);
             state.trackedTokens.push({
                 address: addr,

tests/addTokenLateAnswer.test.js

@@ -1,137 +0,0 @@
-// A contract lookup on AddToken can answer after the user has left AddToken.
-// The token is still added, and the screen the user is on does not change
-// (https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/603). An answer while AddToken
-// still shows goes to AddressDetail. Driven through the real popup over a
-// stored profile.
-
-const {
-    bootPopup,
-    cleanupPopup,
-    unversionedValidProfile,
-    TOKEN_ADDRESS,
-} = require("./support/popupBoot");
-
-const TOKEN = {
-    address: TOKEN_ADDRESS,
-    symbol: "TST",
-    decimals: 18,
-    name: "Test Token",
-};
-
-// A second contract address, typed after AddToken was opened again.
-const OTHER_TOKEN_ADDRESS = "0xBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB";
-
-afterEach(() => {
-    cleanupPopup();
-});
-
-// The popup reopened onto AddressDetail, then AddToken opened from it with
-// TOKEN's contract address typed in.
-async function openAddToken() {
-    const boot = await bootPopup(
-        unversionedValidProfile({
-            currentView: "address",
-            selectedWallet: 0,
-            selectedAddress: 0,
-        }),
-    );
-    expect(boot.pageErrors).toEqual([]);
-    await boot.click("btn-add-token");
-    expect(boot.visibleViews()).toEqual(["add-token"]);
-    boot.node("add-token-address").value = TOKEN.address;
-    return boot;
-}
-
-// Presses Add with a contract lookup that answers only when the function
-// returned here is called. That function waits for Add to finish.
-function addWithPendingLookup(boot) {
-    const { lookupTokenInfo } = require("../src/shared/balances");
-    let answer;
-    lookupTokenInfo.mockImplementationOnce(
-        () =>
-            new Promise((resolve) => {
-                answer = resolve;
-            }),
-    );
-    const adding = boot.click("btn-add-token-confirm");
-    return async () => {
-        answer({
-            symbol: TOKEN.symbol,
-            decimals: TOKEN.decimals,
-            name: TOKEN.name,
-        });
-        await adding;
-    };
-}
-
-test("an answer after the user opened Settings adds the token and Settings stays", async () => {
-    const boot = await openAddToken();
-    const answerLookup = addWithPendingLookup(boot);
-    await boot.click("btn-settings");
-    expect(boot.visibleViews()).toEqual(["settings"]);
-
-    await answerLookup();
-    expect(boot.visibleViews()).toEqual(["settings"]);
-    expect(boot.storage.read("autistmask").trackedTokens).toEqual([TOKEN]);
-});
-
-test("Back from Settings onto AddToken after the lookup answered shows no lookup status", async () => {
-    const boot = await openAddToken();
-    const answerLookup = addWithPendingLookup(boot);
-    expect(boot.text("add-token-info")).toBe("Looking up token...");
-    await boot.click("btn-settings");
-    await answerLookup();
-
-    await boot.click("btn-settings-back");
-    expect(boot.visibleViews()).toEqual(["add-token"]);
-    expect(boot.text("add-token-info")).toBe("");
-    expect(boot.node("add-token-info").style.visibility).toBe("hidden");
-});
-
-test("an answer after AddToken was opened again adds the token and leaves AddToken and its status line as they are", async () => {
-    const boot = await openAddToken();
-    const answerFirstLookup = addWithPendingLookup(boot);
-    await boot.click("btn-add-token-back");
-    await boot.click("btn-add-token");
-    expect(boot.visibleViews()).toEqual(["add-token"]);
-    boot.node("add-token-address").value = OTHER_TOKEN_ADDRESS;
-    // The second lookup is never answered.
-    addWithPendingLookup(boot);
-
-    await answerFirstLookup();
-    expect(boot.visibleViews()).toEqual(["add-token"]);
-    expect(boot.text("add-token-info")).toBe("Looking up token...");
-    expect(boot.storage.read("autistmask").trackedTokens).toEqual([TOKEN]);
-});
-
-test("a lookup that fails after AddToken was opened again leaves the status line as it is", async () => {
-    const boot = await openAddToken();
-    const { lookupTokenInfo } = require("../src/shared/balances");
-    let failFirstLookup;
-    lookupTokenInfo.mockImplementationOnce(
-        () =>
-            new Promise((_, reject) => {
-                failFirstLookup = reject;
-            }),
-    );
-    const firstAdd = boot.click("btn-add-token-confirm");
-    await boot.click("btn-add-token-back");
-    await boot.click("btn-add-token");
-    boot.node("add-token-address").value = OTHER_TOKEN_ADDRESS;
-    // The second lookup is never answered.
-    addWithPendingLookup(boot);
-
-    failFirstLookup(new Error("lookup failed"));
-    await firstAdd;
-    expect(boot.text("add-token-info")).toBe("Looking up token...");
-});
-
-test("an answer while AddToken still shows goes to AddressDetail with the token listed", async () => {
-    const boot = await openAddToken();
-    const answerLookup = addWithPendingLookup(boot);
-
-    await answerLookup();
-    expect(boot.visibleViews()).toEqual(["address"]);
-    expect(boot.node("address-balances").innerHTML).toContain("TST");
-    expect(boot.storage.read("autistmask").trackedTokens).toEqual([TOKEN]);
-});

tests/addressKey.test.js

@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ function click(element) {
 
 // show() starts the fee estimate without awaiting it; this lets it settle.
 async function settle() {
-    for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) await jest.advanceTimersByTimeAsync(0);
+    for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 0));
 }
 
 // ------------------------------------------------------------ harness
@@ -188,11 +188,7 @@ let sent;
 // handler to the buttons it drew, as the browser's fresh list would have.
 let plusButton;
 
-// showFlash() starts a timer that clears the message one or two seconds later.
-// Each test here runs on fake timers and drops them in afterEach, so that timer
-// never outlives the test.
 beforeEach(() => {
-    jest.useFakeTimers();
     approvalDetails = null;
     sent = [];
     mockNode.broadcast = [];
@@ -243,7 +239,6 @@ beforeEach(() => {
 });
 
 afterEach(() => {
-    jest.useRealTimers();
     jest.restoreAllMocks();
 });
 

tests/backgroundApproval.test.js

@@ -537,18 +537,7 @@ async function settleIncludingRejections() {
     await new Promise((resolve) => setImmediate(resolve));
 }
 
-// While an approval is pending, the background starts a 20-second timer to
-// keep itself running. The timer is stubbed and never starts, so no test in
-// this file leaves it running.
-let keepRunningTimer;
-beforeEach(() => {
-    keepRunningTimer = jest
-        .spyOn(global, "setInterval")
-        .mockImplementation(() => 1);
-});
-
 afterEach(() => {
-    keepRunningTimer.mockRestore();
     delete global.chrome;
     jest.resetModules();
 });
@@ -1894,6 +1883,18 @@ describe("a closed approval window leaves the request pending", () => {
         return bg.actionPopups[bg.actionPopups.length - 1];
     }
 
+    // The timer that keeps the worker running while an approval is pending is
+    // stubbed, so no test here leaves that timer running when it ends.
+    let keepRunningTimer;
+    beforeEach(() => {
+        keepRunningTimer = jest
+            .spyOn(global, "setInterval")
+            .mockImplementation(() => 1);
+    });
+    afterEach(() => {
+        keepRunningTimer.mockRestore();
+    });
+
     test("the toolbar popup opens a closed transaction approval, and approving it there sends", async () => {
         const bg = loadBackground();
         const pending = bg.requestTx();

tests/backgroundStateIsolation.test.js

@@ -103,18 +103,7 @@ function deferred() {
     return { promise, resolve };
 }
 
-// While an approval is pending, the background starts a 20-second timer to
-// keep itself running. The timer is stubbed and never starts, so no test in
-// this file leaves it running.
-let keepRunningTimer;
-beforeEach(() => {
-    keepRunningTimer = jest
-        .spyOn(global, "setInterval")
-        .mockImplementation(() => 1);
-});
-
 afterEach(() => {
-    keepRunningTimer.mockRestore();
     delete global.chrome;
 });
 

tests/chainSwitchGate.test.js

@@ -56,18 +56,7 @@ async function settle() {
     for (let i = 0; i < 50; i++) await Promise.resolve();
 }
 
-// While an approval is pending, the background starts a 20-second timer to
-// keep itself running. The timer is stubbed and never starts, so no test in
-// this file leaves it running.
-let keepRunningTimer;
-beforeEach(() => {
-    keepRunningTimer = jest
-        .spyOn(global, "setInterval")
-        .mockImplementation(() => 1);
-});
-
 afterEach(() => {
-    keepRunningTimer.mockRestore();
     delete global.chrome;
 });
 

tests/coldWorkerChainSwitch.test.js

@@ -64,18 +64,7 @@ async function settle() {
     for (let i = 0; i < 50; i++) await Promise.resolve();
 }
 
-// While an approval is pending, the background starts a 20-second timer to
-// keep itself running. The timer is stubbed and never starts, so no test in
-// this file leaves it running.
-let keepRunningTimer;
-beforeEach(() => {
-    keepRunningTimer = jest
-        .spyOn(global, "setInterval")
-        .mockImplementation(() => 1);
-});
-
 afterEach(() => {
-    keepRunningTimer.mockRestore();
     delete global.chrome;
 });
 

tests/coldWorkerSendTransaction.test.js

@@ -76,18 +76,7 @@ async function settle() {
     for (let i = 0; i < 60; i++) await Promise.resolve();
 }
 
-// While an approval is pending, the background starts a 20-second timer to
-// keep itself running. The timer is stubbed and never starts, so no test in
-// this file leaves it running.
-let keepRunningTimer;
-beforeEach(() => {
-    keepRunningTimer = jest
-        .spyOn(global, "setInterval")
-        .mockImplementation(() => 1);
-});
-
 afterEach(() => {
-    keepRunningTimer.mockRestore();
     delete global.chrome;
 });
 

tests/connectedSitesWorkerRestart.test.js

@@ -57,18 +57,7 @@ async function settle() {
     for (let i = 0; i < 50; i++) await Promise.resolve();
 }
 
-// While an approval is pending, the background starts a 20-second timer to
-// keep itself running. The timer is stubbed and never starts, so no test in
-// this file leaves it running.
-let keepRunningTimer;
-beforeEach(() => {
-    keepRunningTimer = jest
-        .spyOn(global, "setInterval")
-        .mockImplementation(() => 1);
-});
-
 afterEach(() => {
-    keepRunningTimer.mockRestore();
     delete global.chrome;
     jest.resetModules();
 });

tests/deleteWalletLostPassword.test.js

@@ -102,17 +102,6 @@ function makeDocument() {
 
 // ------------------------------------------------------------ harness
 
-// showFlash() starts a timer that clears the message two seconds later. Each
-// test here runs on fake timers and drops them in afterEach, so that timer
-// never outlives the test.
-beforeEach(() => {
-    jest.useFakeTimers();
-});
-
-afterEach(() => {
-    jest.useRealTimers();
-});
-
 function wallet(name, secret, addresses) {
     return {
         type: "hd",

tests/refreshDuringRefresh.test.js

@@ -1,10 +1,9 @@
-// While a refresh runs, a request through ctx is not dropped. One more refresh
+// A refresh asked for while another runs is not dropped. One more refresh runs
-// runs once the running one ends, however many were asked for in that time
+// once the running one ends, however many were asked for in that time
-// (https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/581). A tick of the ten-second
+// (https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/581). Each test boots the real
-// timer that finds a refresh running is dropped. Each test boots the real popup
+// popup over a stored profile and holds the ten-second refresh open. The
-// over a stored profile and holds the ten-second refresh open. `readChain()`
+// balance stand-in writes what the chain holds onto every address, as the real
-// sets each address's balance from `CHAIN`, as the real `refreshBalances()`
+// refreshBalances() does.
-// sets it from the node.
 
 const {
     bootPopup,
@@ -46,9 +45,9 @@ async function readChain(wallets) {
     }
 }
 
-// Boots the popup over a profile with one wallet. From then on,
+// Boots the popup over a profile with one wallet. From then on, a refresh the
-// `refreshBalances()` never returns unless the test answers it. So an unwanted
+// test does not answer never returns. So a refresh that starts another on its
-// refresh is counted once and then waits, instead of starting more.
+// own is counted and stops, rather than running forever.
 async function boot() {
     const page = await bootPopup(unversionedValidProfile());
     expect(page.pageErrors).toEqual([]);
@@ -101,17 +100,7 @@ async function importPhrase(page) {
     await page.click("btn-add-wallet-confirm");
 }
 
-// Imports the private key `key` on AddWallet.
+test("addresses an import finds while a refresh runs show their balances once one more refresh returns", async () => {
-async function importKey(page, key) {
-    await page.click("btn-add-wallet-bottom");
-    await page.click("tab-privkey");
-    page.node("import-private-key").value = key;
-    page.node("add-wallet-password").value = PASSWORD;
-    page.node("add-wallet-password-confirm").value = PASSWORD;
-    await page.click("btn-add-wallet-confirm");
-}
-
-test("addresses that an import finds during a refresh show their balances once one more refresh returns", async () => {
     const { page } = await boot();
     const refresh = await holdRefresh(page);
 
@@ -127,13 +116,13 @@ test("addresses that an import finds during a refresh show their balances once o
     expect(list).toContain("<span>3.0000</span>");
 });
 
-test("several requests during a refresh lead to exactly one more refresh", async () => {
+test("several refreshes asked for while one runs lead to exactly one more", async () => {
     const { page, refreshBalances } = await boot();
     const refresh = await holdRefresh(page);
     const calls = refreshBalances.mock.calls.length;
 
-    await importKey(page, "0x" + "11".repeat(32));
+    await page.tick();
-    await importKey(page, "0x" + "22".repeat(32));
+    await page.tick();
     await importPhrase(page);
     expect(refreshBalances).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(calls);
 
@@ -142,16 +131,3 @@ test("several requests during a refresh lead to exactly one more refresh", async
 
     expect(refreshBalances).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(calls + 1);
 });
-
-test("a tick of the ten-second timer during a refresh starts no other refresh", async () => {
-    const { page, refreshBalances } = await boot();
-    const refresh = await holdRefresh(page);
-    const calls = refreshBalances.mock.calls.length;
-
-    await page.tick();
-
-    await refresh.finish();
-    await page.settle();
-
-    expect(refreshBalances).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(calls);
-});

tests/sendAmountRule.test.js

@@ -131,14 +131,10 @@ async function review(amount, token) {
 async function confirm(amount, token) {
     const txInfo = await review("0.5", token);
     confirmTx.show({ ...txInfo, amount });
-    for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) await jest.advanceTimersByTimeAsync(0);
+    for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 0));
 }
 
-// showFlash() starts a timer that clears the message two seconds later. Each
-// test here runs on fake timers and drops them in afterEach, so that timer
-// never outlives the test.
 beforeEach(() => {
-    jest.useFakeTimers();
     elements.clear();
     state.wallets = [
         {
@@ -171,10 +167,6 @@ beforeEach(() => {
     state.currentView = null;
 });
 
-afterEach(() => {
-    jest.useRealTimers();
-});
-
 describe.each([
     ["1e-3", "ETH"],
     ["1e-3", "TOK"],

tests/sendMax.test.js

@@ -277,18 +277,14 @@ async function review() {
 
 // show() starts the fee estimate without awaiting it; this lets it settle.
 async function settle() {
-    for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) await jest.advanceTimersByTimeAsync(0);
+    for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 0));
 }
 
 function canSend() {
     return !el("btn-confirm-send").disabled;
 }
 
-// showFlash() starts a timer that clears the message two seconds later. Each
-// test here runs on fake timers and drops them in afterEach, so that timer
-// never outlives the test.
 beforeEach(() => {
-    jest.useFakeTimers();
     elements.clear();
     log.errorf.mockClear();
     pageClosed = new AbortController();
@@ -301,10 +297,6 @@ beforeEach(() => {
     mockNode.broadcast = [];
 });
 
-afterEach(() => {
-    jest.useRealTimers();
-});
-
 describe("Max on an ETH send", () => {
     test("fills in the exact balance minus the fee reserve", async () => {
         await refreshWith(BALANCE_WEI);

tests/spoofedTrackedToken.test.js

@@ -1,91 +0,0 @@
-// A token that the spoof rule refuses never shows in the balance list, even
-// tracked at zero balance with "Show tracked tokens with zero balance" on, and
-// the two add-token screens refuse to track one
-// (https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/705). Driven through the real
-// popup over a stored profile.
-
-const {
-    bootPopup,
-    cleanupPopup,
-    unversionedValidProfile,
-    TOKEN_ADDRESS,
-} = require("./support/popupBoot");
-
-// Claims the symbol of the bundled USDT from another contract.
-const FAKE_USDT = {
-    address: TOKEN_ADDRESS,
-    symbol: "USDT",
-    decimals: 6,
-    name: "Tether USD",
-};
-// A symbol the bundled list does not have, so the spoof rule passes it.
-const TEST_TOKEN = {
-    address: "0xBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB",
-    symbol: "TST",
-    decimals: 18,
-    name: "Test Token",
-};
-const REFUSED_FLASH = "Not added: this token fakes a known symbol.";
-
-afterEach(() => {
-    cleanupPopup();
-});
-
-test("a fake token tracked at zero balance is not listed while zero balances are shown", async () => {
-    const boot = await bootPopup(
-        unversionedValidProfile({
-            currentView: "address",
-            selectedWallet: 0,
-            selectedAddress: 0,
-            trackedTokens: [FAKE_USDT, TEST_TOKEN],
-            showZeroBalanceTokens: true,
-        }),
-    );
-    const rows = boot.node("address-balances").innerHTML;
-    expect(rows).toContain(`data-token="${TEST_TOKEN.address.toLowerCase()}"`);
-    expect(rows).not.toContain(
-        `data-token="${FAKE_USDT.address.toLowerCase()}"`,
-    );
-});
-
-// Each screen is opened from AddressDetail by the buttons named, in order.
-describe.each([
-    [
-        "AddToken",
-        ["btn-add-token"],
-        "add-token",
-        "add-token-address",
-        "btn-add-token-confirm",
-    ],
-    [
-        "SettingsAddToken",
-        ["btn-settings", "btn-settings-add-token"],
-        "settings-addtoken",
-        "settings-addtoken-address",
-        "btn-settings-addtoken-manual",
-    ],
-])("%s", (_, opening, view, field, button) => {
-    test("refuses a fake token by contract address", async () => {
-        const boot = await bootPopup(
-            unversionedValidProfile({
-                currentView: "address",
-                selectedWallet: 0,
-                selectedAddress: 0,
-            }),
-        );
-        for (const id of opening) await boot.click(id);
-        expect(boot.visibleViews()).toEqual([view]);
-        const { lookupTokenInfo } = require("../src/shared/balances");
-        lookupTokenInfo.mockResolvedValueOnce({
-            symbol: FAKE_USDT.symbol,
-            decimals: FAKE_USDT.decimals,
-            name: FAKE_USDT.name,
-        });
-        boot.node(field).value = FAKE_USDT.address;
-
-        await boot.click(button);
-        expect(boot.text("flash-msg")).toBe(REFUSED_FLASH);
-        expect(boot.visibleViews()).toEqual([view]);
-        expect(boot.storage.read("autistmask").trackedTokens).toEqual([]);
-    });
-});

tests/walletDefects.test.js

@@ -357,11 +357,6 @@ describe("every way to a signature or the private key refuses a defective wallet
     });
 
     beforeEach(() => {
-        // showFlash() starts a timer that clears the message two seconds
-        // later. Each test here runs on fake timers and drops them in
-        // afterEach, so that timer never outlives the test.
-        jest.useFakeTimers();
-
         const broken = brokenXprvWallet();
         // A balance, so that no Send button's zero-balance refusal can stand
         // in for the defect check.
@@ -403,7 +398,6 @@ describe("every way to a signature or the private key refuses a defective wallet
     });
 
     afterEach(() => {
-        jest.useRealTimers();
         state.wallets = [];
         state.activeAddress = null;
         state.selectedWallet = null;