Compare commits
1
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
2442441830 |
@@ -2075,7 +2075,9 @@ view would leave a wallet one click from deletion.
|
||||
artifact can be compared with it field for field. A nonce the site supplies is
|
||||
ignored: the nonce is always the account's next nonce from the node, so a site
|
||||
cannot replace one of the user's pending transactions or leave this one stuck
|
||||
behind a gap. A request that cannot be populated — unreachable node, reverting
|
||||
behind a gap. A gas limit the site supplies, as `gas` or `gasLimit`, is used
|
||||
in place of the node's estimate; a request giving both with different values
|
||||
is refused. A request that cannot be populated — unreachable node, reverting
|
||||
gas estimate — opens no window and is failed back to the site. Only one
|
||||
transaction approval exists at a time: populating fixes the nonce, so a second
|
||||
`eth_sendTransaction` arriving while one is unanswered is refused with
|
||||
|
||||
+39
-12
@@ -1,13 +1,14 @@
|
||||
// Preparation of the transaction an approval screen displays.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// A dApp's eth_sendTransaction normally fixes only `to`, `value` and `data`.
|
||||
// The nonce, the gas limit and the fees have to be filled in from the network
|
||||
// before anything can be signed, and whoever fills them in decides what the
|
||||
// user is shown. That work used to happen in the popup, after the user had
|
||||
// already approved: the numbers on the approval screen came from the popup and
|
||||
// were compared against nothing, so a compromised popup could display one fee
|
||||
// and sign another, and the ceilings in approvalVerify.js were all that stood
|
||||
// between the user and a fee that hands the validator the balance.
|
||||
// A dApp's eth_sendTransaction normally fixes `to`, `value` and `data`, and
|
||||
// sometimes the gas limit. The nonce, the fees, and the gas limit when the
|
||||
// site gives none have to be filled in from the network before anything can
|
||||
// be signed, and whoever fills them in decides what the user is shown. That
|
||||
// work used to happen in the popup, after the user had already approved: the
|
||||
// numbers on the approval screen came from the popup and were compared against
|
||||
// nothing, so a compromised popup could display one fee and sign another, and
|
||||
// the ceilings in approvalVerify.js were all that stood between the user and a
|
||||
// fee that hands the validator the balance.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// So it happens here instead, in the background, before the approval window is
|
||||
// opened. The background populates the transaction, shows that object, and
|
||||
@@ -31,6 +32,7 @@ const {
|
||||
VoidSigner,
|
||||
accessListify,
|
||||
getAddress,
|
||||
getBigInt,
|
||||
getBytes,
|
||||
hexlify,
|
||||
toQuantity,
|
||||
@@ -47,10 +49,11 @@ const {
|
||||
// minutes long, which is not a wait anyone will sit through.
|
||||
const POPULATE_TIMEOUT_MS = 20000;
|
||||
|
||||
// The request fields taken from the page. Anything else is dropped rather than
|
||||
// passed to ethers: the object is page-controlled, and a future ethers that
|
||||
// learns to carry a new transaction field must not start picking one up out of
|
||||
// it without this module knowing.
|
||||
// The request fields taken from the page, plus `gas`, which requestFrom()
|
||||
// takes as the gas limit. Anything else is dropped rather than passed to
|
||||
// ethers: the object is page-controlled, and a future ethers that learns to
|
||||
// carry a new transaction field must not start picking one up out of it
|
||||
// without this module knowing.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// The nonce is not taken from the page; it is always the account's next nonce
|
||||
// from the network. A page that chose it could replace one of the user's
|
||||
@@ -84,6 +87,16 @@ function present(v) {
|
||||
return v !== null && v !== undefined && v !== "";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Whether two quantities from the page are the same number. One that is not a
|
||||
// number matches nothing.
|
||||
function sameQuantity(a, b) {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
return getBigInt(a) === getBigInt(b);
|
||||
} catch {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// These strings reach the user through the requesting page, so they are full
|
||||
// sentences even when the tail of one came from ethers or from the node.
|
||||
function sentence(text) {
|
||||
@@ -111,6 +124,20 @@ function requestFrom(txParams, from) {
|
||||
for (const key of REQUEST_FIELDS) {
|
||||
if (present(txParams[key])) request[key] = txParams[key];
|
||||
}
|
||||
// JSON-RPC calls the gas limit `gas`, and that is the name sites send.
|
||||
// ethers only reads `gasLimit`: left as `gas` it would be dropped and an
|
||||
// estimate signed in its place.
|
||||
if (present(txParams.gas)) {
|
||||
if (
|
||||
present(request.gasLimit) &&
|
||||
!sameQuantity(request.gasLimit, txParams.gas)
|
||||
) {
|
||||
throw fail(
|
||||
"The site asked for two different gas limits for this transaction.",
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
request.gasLimit = txParams.gas;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (
|
||||
present(request.type) &&
|
||||
!ALLOWED_TX_TYPES.includes(Number(request.type))
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
|
||||
// requesting page or the RPC node can say turns it into an approval that
|
||||
// should never have been raised.
|
||||
|
||||
const { Network, Wallet } = require("ethers");
|
||||
const { Network, Transaction, Wallet, toQuantity } = require("ethers");
|
||||
const {
|
||||
prepareApprovalTx,
|
||||
serializeApprovedTx,
|
||||
@@ -138,6 +138,43 @@ describe("prepareApprovalTx", () => {
|
||||
expect(approved.maxFeePerGas).toBe("0x12a05f200");
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// `gas` is the JSON-RPC name for the gas limit and the one sites send.
|
||||
// The node would estimate 21000; the site's 200000 is what is shown and
|
||||
// what is signed.
|
||||
test("uses the gas limit a site sends as gas", async () => {
|
||||
const approved = await prepareApprovalTx(
|
||||
providerWith(),
|
||||
signer.address,
|
||||
{ ...TX_PARAMS, gas: "0x30d40" },
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(approved.gasLimit).toBe("0x30d40");
|
||||
const signed = Transaction.from(
|
||||
await signer.signTransaction({ ...approved }),
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(signed.gasLimit).toBe(200000n);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test("accepts gas and gasLimit that name the same number", async () => {
|
||||
const approved = await prepareApprovalTx(
|
||||
providerWith(),
|
||||
signer.address,
|
||||
{ ...TX_PARAMS, gas: "0x30d40", gasLimit: 200000 },
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(approved.gasLimit).toBe("0x30d40");
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test("refuses gas and gasLimit that disagree", async () => {
|
||||
await expect(
|
||||
prepareApprovalTx(providerWith(), signer.address, {
|
||||
...TX_PARAMS,
|
||||
gas: "0x30d40",
|
||||
gasLimit: "0x5208",
|
||||
}),
|
||||
).rejects.toThrow(
|
||||
"The site asked for two different gas limits for this transaction.",
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test("carries an access list the request asked for", async () => {
|
||||
const approved = await prepareApprovalTx(
|
||||
providerWith(),
|
||||
@@ -212,6 +249,15 @@ describe("prepareApprovalTx", () => {
|
||||
).rejects.toThrow(/gas limit no network this wallet supports/);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test("refuses a gas limit the site sent above the ceiling", async () => {
|
||||
await expect(
|
||||
prepareApprovalTx(providerWith(), signer.address, {
|
||||
...TX_PARAMS,
|
||||
gas: toQuantity(MAX_GAS_LIMIT + 1n),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
).rejects.toThrow(/gas limit no network this wallet supports/);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// The combined bound at population: a gas limit and a fee that are each
|
||||
// under their own ceiling but multiply to thousands of ETH is refused
|
||||
// before the approval window opens, so the user is never shown a
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -58,7 +58,6 @@ const TX_PARAMS = {
|
||||
to: RECIPIENT,
|
||||
value: "0x2386f26fc10000",
|
||||
data: "0xdeadbeef",
|
||||
gas: "0x5208",
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// The values populateTransaction() fills in when the dApp fixed none of them.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user