fix: eth_sign's warning and the README say what it signs (closes #409)

eth_sign is signed as an EIP-191 personal message over its data, which is
what the Ethereum JSON-RPC specification defines it to return. Its warning
on the signature prompt said the site was asking to sign a raw hash that
could drain funds, and the README said the same; neither was true. The
warning now says the site used the older eth_sign method and that the data
will be signed as a personal message, and the README's SignApproval section
says so too. Tests pin that the background reads eth_sign address first and
data second, and that the sign screen answers it with the personal message
signature over the data.

Model: opus-5-5

README.md

@@ -1645,6 +1645,12 @@ view would leave a wallet one click from deletion.
       the contract's own answer is read at signing time only to be compared with
       it, and a disagreement is a refusal rather than a preference for either
       value (`src/shared/transferAmount.js`)
+    - "Sign & Send" after the active network was switched in Settings while this
+      screen was open → nothing is signed; "The active network changed after
+      this transaction was reviewed, so it was not sent. Please go back and
+      review it again." in the errors box, no screen change. The transaction
+      carries the chain id of the network the screen was shown for, so it cannot
+      be signed for another
     - "Sign & Send" (wrong password) → "Wrong password." on the password error
       line, no screen change
     - "Back" → **Send**
@@ -2075,7 +2081,9 @@ view would leave a wallet one click from deletion.
   artifact can be compared with it field for field. A nonce the site supplies is
   ignored: the nonce is always the account's next nonce from the node, so a site
   cannot replace one of the user's pending transactions or leave this one stuck
-  behind a gap. A request that cannot be populated — unreachable node, reverting
+  behind a gap. A gas limit the site supplies, as `gas` or `gasLimit`, is used
+  in place of the node's estimate; a request giving both with different values
+  is refused. A request that cannot be populated — unreachable node, reverting
   gas estimate — opens no window and is failed back to the site. Only one
   transaction approval exists at a time: populating fixes the nonce, so a second
   `eth_sendTransaction` arriving while one is unanswered is refused with
@@ -2128,7 +2136,12 @@ view would leave a wallet one click from deletion.
       blocklist)
     - Site origin (bold, scheme and port included) + "wants you to sign a
       message"
-    - Danger warning box (shown for `eth_sign`, which signs a raw hash)
+    - Warning box, shown for `eth_sign`: "This site used the older eth_sign
+      method. The data will be signed as a personal message." An `eth_sign`
+      request names the address first and the data second. Its data is signed
+      exactly as a `personal_sign` message is, as an EIP-191 personal message,
+      which is what the Ethereum JSON-RPC specification defines `eth_sign` to
+      return.
     - Type: "Personal message" or "Typed data (EIP-712)"
     - From: color dot + full address + etherscan link
     - Message: for `personal_sign` and `eth_sign`, the text the message's bytes
@@ -2663,7 +2676,8 @@ plaintext list of anyone's domain names.
 When a dApp on a blocklisted domain requests a wallet connection, transaction
 approval, or signature, the approval popup displays a prominent red warning
 banner alerting the user. The domain checker matches exact hostnames and all
-parent domains (subdomain matching).
+parent domains (subdomain matching), and checks a hostname written with a
+trailing dot (`name.`) as `name`.
 
 #### Transaction Decoding
 

src/background/index.js

@@ -988,9 +988,8 @@ async function handleRpc(method, params, origin) {
 
         if (method === "eth_sign") {
             signParams.dangerWarning =
-                "\u26a0\ufe0f DANGER: This site is requesting to sign a raw hash. " +
-                "This can be used to sign transactions that drain your funds. " +
-                "Only proceed if you fully understand what you are signing.";
+                "This site used the older eth_sign method. " +
+                "The data will be signed as a personal message.";
         }
 
         if (findPendingApproval(origin, "sign")) {

src/popup/index.html

@@ -1716,7 +1716,10 @@
                     <div class="text-xs text-muted mb-1">
                         Address that will be shared:
                     </div>
-                    <div id="approve-address" class="text-xs mb-2"></div>
+                    <div
+                        id="approve-address"
+                        class="text-xs flex items-center mb-2"
+                    ></div>
                 </div>
                 <div class="mb-3">
                     <label

src/popup/views/approval.js

@@ -725,7 +725,7 @@ function showSignApproval(details) {
             "This message is plain text, not hex, so it cannot be signed.";
     }
 
-    // Display danger warning for eth_sign (raw hash signing)
+    // The warning the background attaches to an eth_sign request.
     const warningEl = $("approve-sign-danger-warning");
     if (warningEl) {
         if (sp.dangerWarning) {

src/popup/views/confirmTx.js

@@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ function show(txInfo) {
     feeStatus = FEE_PENDING;
     feeWei = null;
     maxSendFees = null;
+    // The network this screen is drawn for, and the only one it sends on:
+    // Settings can switch the active network while the screen is open. The
+    // wait, success and error screens label the amount by it too.
+    txInfo.chainId = currentNetwork().chainId;
 
     const isErc20 = txInfo.token !== "ETH";
     // The raw symbol is the price-table key; the capped one is what the
@@ -490,7 +494,12 @@ async function populateVerifyAndSend(connectedSigner, tx, fees = null) {
         );
         request = await contract.transfer.populateTransaction(tx.to, amount);
     }
-    const populated = await connectedSigner.populateTransaction(request);
+    // The chain id of the network the screen was drawn for: ethers refuses to
+    // populate it for a provider on any other network.
+    const populated = await connectedSigner.populateTransaction({
+        ...request,
+        chainId: tx.chainId,
+    });
     assertWithinCeilings(populated);
     return connectedSigner.sendTransaction(populated);
 }
@@ -547,6 +556,17 @@ function init(_ctx) {
             return;
         }
 
+        // Back from Settings only unhides this screen, still drawn for the
+        // network that was active when it was shown.
+        if (currentNetwork().chainId !== pendingTx.chainId) {
+            showSendError(
+                "The active network changed after this transaction was" +
+                    " reviewed, so it was not sent. Please go back and review" +
+                    " it again.",
+            );
+            return;
+        }
+
         const password = $("confirm-tx-password").value;
         if (!password) {
             showError(
@@ -575,10 +595,6 @@ function init(_ctx) {
         $("btn-confirm-send").disabled = true;
         $("btn-confirm-send").classList.add("text-muted");
 
-        // The network it is sent on. The wait, success and error screens
-        // label its amount by this, not by the network active when they draw.
-        pendingTx.chainId = currentNetwork().chainId;
-
         let tx;
         try {
             const signer = getSignerForAddress(

src/shared/approvalTx.js

@@ -1,13 +1,14 @@
 // Preparation of the transaction an approval screen displays.
 //
-// A dApp's eth_sendTransaction normally fixes only `to`, `value` and `data`.
-// The nonce, the gas limit and the fees have to be filled in from the network
-// before anything can be signed, and whoever fills them in decides what the
-// user is shown. That work used to happen in the popup, after the user had
-// already approved: the numbers on the approval screen came from the popup and
-// were compared against nothing, so a compromised popup could display one fee
-// and sign another, and the ceilings in approvalVerify.js were all that stood
-// between the user and a fee that hands the validator the balance.
+// A dApp's eth_sendTransaction normally fixes `to`, `value` and `data`, and
+// sometimes the gas limit. The nonce, the fees, and the gas limit when the
+// site gives none have to be filled in from the network before anything can
+// be signed, and whoever fills them in decides what the user is shown. That
+// work used to happen in the popup, after the user had already approved: the
+// numbers on the approval screen came from the popup and were compared against
+// nothing, so a compromised popup could display one fee and sign another, and
+// the ceilings in approvalVerify.js were all that stood between the user and a
+// fee that hands the validator the balance.
 //
 // So it happens here instead, in the background, before the approval window is
 // opened. The background populates the transaction, shows that object, and
@@ -31,6 +32,7 @@ const {
     VoidSigner,
     accessListify,
     getAddress,
+    getBigInt,
     getBytes,
     hexlify,
     toQuantity,
@@ -47,10 +49,11 @@ const {
 // minutes long, which is not a wait anyone will sit through.
 const POPULATE_TIMEOUT_MS = 20000;
 
-// The request fields taken from the page. Anything else is dropped rather than
-// passed to ethers: the object is page-controlled, and a future ethers that
-// learns to carry a new transaction field must not start picking one up out of
-// it without this module knowing.
+// The request fields taken from the page, plus `gas`, which requestFrom()
+// takes as the gas limit. Anything else is dropped rather than passed to
+// ethers: the object is page-controlled, and a future ethers that learns to
+// carry a new transaction field must not start picking one up out of it
+// without this module knowing.
 //
 // The nonce is not taken from the page; it is always the account's next nonce
 // from the network. A page that chose it could replace one of the user's
@@ -84,6 +87,16 @@ function present(v) {
     return v !== null && v !== undefined && v !== "";
 }
 
+// Whether two quantities from the page are the same number. One that is not a
+// number matches nothing.
+function sameQuantity(a, b) {
+    try {
+        return getBigInt(a) === getBigInt(b);
+    } catch {
+        return false;
+    }
+}
+
 // These strings reach the user through the requesting page, so they are full
 // sentences even when the tail of one came from ethers or from the node.
 function sentence(text) {
@@ -111,6 +124,20 @@ function requestFrom(txParams, from) {
     for (const key of REQUEST_FIELDS) {
         if (present(txParams[key])) request[key] = txParams[key];
     }
+    // JSON-RPC calls the gas limit `gas`, and that is the name sites send.
+    // ethers only reads `gasLimit`: left as `gas` it would be dropped and an
+    // estimate signed in its place.
+    if (present(txParams.gas)) {
+        if (
+            present(request.gasLimit) &&
+            !sameQuantity(request.gasLimit, txParams.gas)
+        ) {
+            throw fail(
+                "The site asked for two different gas limits for this transaction.",
+            );
+        }
+        request.gasLimit = txParams.gas;
+    }
     if (
         present(request.type) &&
         !ALLOWED_TX_TYPES.includes(Number(request.type))

src/shared/phishingDomains.js

@@ -110,11 +110,14 @@ function hashListed(hash) {
  * Generate hostname variants for subdomain matching.
  * "sub.evil.com" yields ["sub.evil.com", "evil.com"].
  *
+ * A trailing dot is dropped: "evil.com." is the fully qualified spelling of
+ * "evil.com", and the browser loads the same site from either.
+ *
  * @param {string} hostname
  * @returns {string[]}
  */
 function hostnameVariants(hostname) {
-    const h = hostname.toLowerCase();
+    const h = hostname.toLowerCase().replace(/\.$/, "");
     const variants = [h];
     const parts = h.split(".");
     // Parent domains: a.b.c.d -> b.c.d, c.d

src/shared/walletDefects.js

@@ -36,11 +36,13 @@ const DEFECTS = {
                 "derivation path beneath that key instead of from a master " +
                 "key, so the addresses listed here are not the ones that key " +
                 "produces under the standard path.",
-            "Signing and sending are disabled for this wallet. The addresses " +
-                "do descend from the extended private key you imported, so " +
-                "anything they hold is still reachable by software that " +
-                "repeats the same non-standard derivation. Check them in a " +
-                "block explorer before deciding what to do.",
+            "Signing, sending and private key export are disabled for this " +
+                "wallet. Anything these addresses hold can be reached outside " +
+                "this wallet with the extended private key you imported, if " +
+                "you kept a copy of it, or with the master extended private " +
+                "key or recovery phrase it came from, in software that " +
+                "repeats the same non-standard derivation. Check the " +
+                "addresses in a block explorer before deciding what to do.",
             "To see the addresses this key produces under the standard path, " +
                 "import the master extended private key, or the recovery " +
                 "phrase it came from, as a new wallet. Nothing here has been " +

tests/approvalTx.test.js

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 // requesting page or the RPC node can say turns it into an approval that
 // should never have been raised.
 
-const { Network, Wallet } = require("ethers");
+const { Network, Transaction, Wallet, toQuantity } = require("ethers");
 const {
     prepareApprovalTx,
     serializeApprovedTx,
@@ -138,6 +138,43 @@ describe("prepareApprovalTx", () => {
         expect(approved.maxFeePerGas).toBe("0x12a05f200");
     });
 
+    // `gas` is the JSON-RPC name for the gas limit and the one sites send.
+    // The node would estimate 21000; the site's 200000 is what is shown and
+    // what is signed.
+    test("uses the gas limit a site sends as gas", async () => {
+        const approved = await prepareApprovalTx(
+            providerWith(),
+            signer.address,
+            { ...TX_PARAMS, gas: "0x30d40" },
+        );
+        expect(approved.gasLimit).toBe("0x30d40");
+        const signed = Transaction.from(
+            await signer.signTransaction({ ...approved }),
+        );
+        expect(signed.gasLimit).toBe(200000n);
+    });
+
+    test("accepts gas and gasLimit that name the same number", async () => {
+        const approved = await prepareApprovalTx(
+            providerWith(),
+            signer.address,
+            { ...TX_PARAMS, gas: "0x30d40", gasLimit: 200000 },
+        );
+        expect(approved.gasLimit).toBe("0x30d40");
+    });
+
+    test("refuses gas and gasLimit that disagree", async () => {
+        await expect(
+            prepareApprovalTx(providerWith(), signer.address, {
+                ...TX_PARAMS,
+                gas: "0x30d40",
+                gasLimit: "0x5208",
+            }),
+        ).rejects.toThrow(
+            "The site asked for two different gas limits for this transaction.",
+        );
+    });
+
     test("carries an access list the request asked for", async () => {
         const approved = await prepareApprovalTx(
             providerWith(),
@@ -212,6 +249,15 @@ describe("prepareApprovalTx", () => {
         ).rejects.toThrow(/gas limit no network this wallet supports/);
     });
 
+    test("refuses a gas limit the site sent above the ceiling", async () => {
+        await expect(
+            prepareApprovalTx(providerWith(), signer.address, {
+                ...TX_PARAMS,
+                gas: toQuantity(MAX_GAS_LIMIT + 1n),
+            }),
+        ).rejects.toThrow(/gas limit no network this wallet supports/);
+    });
+
     // The combined bound at population: a gas limit and a fee that are each
     // under their own ceiling but multiply to thousands of ETH is refused
     // before the approval window opens, so the user is never shown a

tests/approvalVerify.test.js

@@ -58,7 +58,6 @@ const TX_PARAMS = {
     to: RECIPIENT,
     value: "0x2386f26fc10000",
     data: "0xdeadbeef",
-    gas: "0x5208",
 };
 
 // The values populateTransaction() fills in when the dApp fixed none of them.

tests/backgroundApproval.test.js

@@ -1606,6 +1606,55 @@ describe("what the approval is verified against", () => {
     });
 });
 
+// eth_sign names the address first and the data second, the reverse of
+// personal_sign, and is answered as the JSON-RPC specification defines it:
+// with an EIP-191 personal message signature over the data, the same
+// signature personal_sign returns
+// (https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/409). The signature below is
+// made by the test; that the sign screen makes the same one is tested in
+// tests/ethSign.test.js.
+describe("eth_sign", () => {
+    test("is read address first, and returns a personal message signature over the data", async () => {
+        const bg = loadBackground();
+        const page = bg.send(
+            {
+                type: "AUTISTMASK_RPC",
+                method: "eth_sign",
+                params: [signer.address, MESSAGE],
+            },
+            { origin: ORIGIN },
+        );
+        await settle();
+        const id = approvalIdIn(bg.created.map((c) => c.url));
+
+        const details = bg.send(
+            { type: "AUTISTMASK_GET_APPROVAL", id },
+            { url: bg.fromPopup.url },
+        );
+        const { signParams } = details.sendResponse.mock.calls[0][0];
+        expect(signParams).toMatchObject({
+            method: "eth_sign",
+            message: MESSAGE,
+            from: signer.address,
+        });
+        expect(signParams.dangerWarning).toBe(
+            "This site used the older eth_sign method. " +
+                "The data will be signed as a personal message.",
+        );
+
+        const signature = await signer.signMessage(
+            Buffer.from(MESSAGE.slice(2), "hex"),
+        );
+        bg.send(
+            { type: "AUTISTMASK_SIGN_RESPONSE", id, approved: true, signature },
+            { url: bg.fromPopup.url },
+        );
+        await settle();
+
+        expect(page.sendResponse).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ result: signature });
+    });
+});
+
 // The interlock must not cost the retry the approval exists to allow.
 describe("the interlock releases a failed attempt", () => {
     test("a retryable failure before the broadcast leaves the approval usable", async () => {

tests/confirmTxNetworkSwitch.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
+// A transfer is sent only on the network its confirmation screen was drawn for
+// (https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/524).
+//
+// Settings is reachable from the confirmation screen, and Back from it only
+// unhides the screen, still labelled for the network it was drawn for. Sign &
+// Send used to take the network at the moment of the click, so 1 SepoliaETH
+// reviewed on Sepolia went out as 1 ETH on mainnet once mainnet was chosen in
+// Settings in between.
+//
+// Driven through the real confirmation screen, signer and chain switch, with
+// only the node and the DOM stubbed. The stub node is on the network its
+// provider was built for, so a broadcast records the network it went to.
+
+"use strict";
+
+// The signed transactions the stub node was handed, with its network's chain id.
+const mockNode = { broadcast: [] };
+
+jest.mock("ethers", () => {
+    const actual = jest.requireActual("ethers");
+    class StubProvider {
+        constructor(url, network) {
+            this.network = network;
+        }
+        async getNetwork() {
+            return this.network;
+        }
+        async getFeeData() {
+            return {
+                maxFeePerGas: 20000000000n,
+                maxPriorityFeePerGas: 1000000000n,
+                gasPrice: 10000000000n,
+            };
+        }
+        async estimateGas() {
+            return 21000n;
+        }
+        async getCode() {
+            return "0x";
+        }
+        async getTransactionCount() {
+            return 1;
+        }
+        async lookupAddress() {
+            return null;
+        }
+        async broadcastTransaction(signed) {
+            mockNode.broadcast.push({ chainId: this.network.chainId, signed });
+            return { hash: "0x" + "ab".repeat(32) };
+        }
+    }
+    return { ...actual, JsonRpcProvider: StubProvider };
+});
+
+jest.mock("../src/shared/log", () => ({
+    log: {
+        debugf: () => {},
+        infof: () => {},
+        warnf: () => {},
+        errorf: () => {},
+    },
+    debugFetch: jest.fn(async () => ({
+        ok: true,
+        status: 200,
+        json: async () => ({ items: [] }),
+    })),
+    urlOrigin: () => "",
+    setRuntimeDebug: () => {},
+    isDebug: () => false,
+}));
+
+// The wait screen polls for a receipt; these tests stop at the broadcast.
+jest.mock("../src/popup/views/txStatus", () => ({
+    showWait: jest.fn(),
+    showError: jest.fn(),
+}));
+
+global.fetch = jest.fn(() => {
+    throw new Error("tests must not perform network requests");
+});
+
+const { makeStorageStub } = require("./support/storageStub");
+global.chrome = { storage: makeStorageStub(), runtime: { sendMessage() {} } };
+
+// A stub DOM: every id resolves to a recording element.
+const elements = new Map();
+
+function makeEl(id) {
+    const handlers = new Map();
+    return {
+        id,
+        textContent: "",
+        innerHTML: "",
+        value: "",
+        disabled: false,
+        style: {},
+        dataset: {},
+        classList: {
+            add() {},
+            remove() {},
+            toggle() {},
+            contains: () => false,
+        },
+        handlers,
+        addEventListener(name, fn) {
+            handlers.set(name, fn);
+        },
+        querySelectorAll: () => [],
+        querySelector: () => null,
+        remove() {},
+        focus() {},
+    };
+}
+
+global.document = {
+    getElementById(id) {
+        if (!elements.has(id)) elements.set(id, makeEl(id));
+        return elements.get(id);
+    },
+    createElement: (tag) => makeEl(tag),
+    body: { prepend() {}, appendChild() {} },
+    addEventListener() {},
+};
+global.navigator = { clipboard: { writeText() {} } };
+
+const { BaseWallet, Transaction, Wallet } = require("ethers");
+const { encryptWithPassword } = require("../src/shared/vault");
+const { state, loadState } = require("../src/shared/state");
+const { onChainSwitch } = require("../src/shared/chainSwitch");
+const { NETWORKS } = require("../src/shared/networks");
+const txStatus = require("../src/popup/views/txStatus");
+const confirmTx = require("../src/popup/views/confirmTx");
+
+const PRIVATE_KEY = "0x" + "11".repeat(32);
+const HOLDER = new Wallet(PRIVATE_KEY).address;
+const RECIPIENT = "0xC0FfEE0000000000000000000000000000c0fFEe";
+const PASSWORD = "correct horse battery staple";
+
+function el(id) {
+    return global.document.getElementById(id);
+}
+
+let encryptedSecret;
+let signTransaction;
+
+beforeAll(async () => {
+    await loadState();
+    encryptedSecret = await encryptWithPassword(PRIVATE_KEY, PASSWORD);
+});
+
+beforeEach(() => {
+    elements.clear();
+    mockNode.broadcast = [];
+    txStatus.showWait.mockClear();
+    txStatus.showError.mockClear();
+    signTransaction = jest.spyOn(BaseWallet.prototype, "signTransaction");
+});
+
+afterEach(() => {
+    signTransaction.mockRestore();
+});
+
+// Show the confirmation screen for 1 of the native token on `networkId`, as
+// Review on the Send screen does, with its fee estimate settled.
+async function review(networkId) {
+    await onChainSwitch(networkId);
+    state.wallets = [
+        {
+            type: "key",
+            name: "Wallet 1",
+            encryptedSecret,
+            addresses: [{ address: HOLDER, balance: "5.0" }],
+        },
+    ];
+    state.selectedWallet = 0;
+    state.selectedAddress = 0;
+    confirmTx.init({});
+    confirmTx.show({
+        from: HOLDER,
+        to: RECIPIENT,
+        ensName: null,
+        amount: "1",
+        token: "ETH",
+        balance: "5.0",
+        tokenSymbol: null,
+        tokenBalance: null,
+        tokenDecimals: null,
+        max: false,
+    });
+    for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 0));
+}
+
+async function signAndSend() {
+    el("confirm-tx-password").value = PASSWORD;
+    await el("btn-confirm-send").handlers.get("click")();
+}
+
+test("a transfer reviewed on Sepolia and sent goes out on Sepolia", async () => {
+    await review("sepolia");
+    expect(el("confirm-type").textContent).toBe("Native SepoliaETH transfer");
+    expect(el("btn-confirm-send").disabled).toBe(false);
+    await signAndSend();
+    expect(mockNode.broadcast).toHaveLength(1);
+    expect(mockNode.broadcast[0].chainId).toBe(11155111n);
+    expect(Transaction.from(mockNode.broadcast[0].signed).chainId).toBe(
+        11155111n,
+    );
+    expect(txStatus.showWait).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+});
+
+describe.each([
+    ["sepolia", "mainnet", "SepoliaETH"],
+    ["mainnet", "sepolia", "ETH"],
+])(
+    "a transfer reviewed on %s, with %s chosen in Settings before Sign & Send",
+    (reviewedOn, switchedTo, symbol) => {
+        test("is neither signed nor sent, and the screen says why", async () => {
+            await review(reviewedOn);
+            expect(el("confirm-type").textContent).toBe(
+                "Native " + symbol + " transfer",
+            );
+            // Settings' network select, then Back, which only unhides the
+            // screen as it was drawn.
+            await onChainSwitch(switchedTo);
+            await signAndSend();
+
+            expect(signTransaction).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+            expect(mockNode.broadcast).toEqual([]);
+            expect(txStatus.showWait).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+            expect(txStatus.showError).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+            expect(el("confirm-errors").style.visibility).toBe("visible");
+            expect(el("confirm-errors").innerHTML).toContain(
+                "The active network changed after this transaction was" +
+                    " reviewed, so it was not sent. Please go back and review" +
+                    " it again.",
+            );
+        });
+    },
+);
+
+// The check in the click handler tells the user; the send itself carries the
+// chain id the screen was drawn for, so a signer on another network's node
+// cannot sign it even if the network changes after that check.
+test("the send is refused by a signer on another network's node", async () => {
+    const { getProvider } = require("../src/shared/balances");
+    const signer = new Wallet(PRIVATE_KEY).connect(
+        getProvider("https://rpc.example.invalid", "mainnet"),
+    );
+    await expect(
+        confirmTx.populateVerifyAndSend(signer, {
+            token: "ETH",
+            to: RECIPIENT,
+            amount: "1",
+            chainId: NETWORKS.sepolia.chainId,
+        }),
+    ).rejects.toThrow("transaction chainId mismatch");
+    expect(signTransaction).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    expect(mockNode.broadcast).toEqual([]);
+});

tests/e2e/run.js

@@ -3857,9 +3857,6 @@ test("eth_requestAccounts approved returns the selected address (#183)", async (
             shown.toLowerCase().includes(env.expectedAddress.toLowerCase()),
             "the site prompt shows the wrong address: " + JSON.stringify(shown),
         );
-        // The text above is there even when the row is too narrow to show it
-        // all; this measures that the whole address is visible (#517).
-        await assertAddressesFit(popup, "the connection prompt");
 
         // Remembered, so the connection survives a background worker that MV3
         // terminates after 30 seconds idle. The in-memory connectedSites map

tests/ethSign.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+// The sign screen signs an eth_sign request the way it signs personal_sign: as
+// an EIP-191 personal message over the bytes of the data
+// (https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/409). Booted through the real
+// popup entry point as the approval window. The background's half, which reads
+// the address first and the data second and checks the signature, is tested in
+// tests/backgroundApproval.test.js.
+
+// Mocked so that no password has to be hashed: the stored secret decrypts to
+// the test key below.
+jest.mock("../src/shared/vault", () => ({
+    decryptWithPassword: jest.fn(),
+    encryptWithPassword: jest.fn(),
+}));
+
+const { Wallet, getBytes } = require("ethers");
+const {
+    bootPopup,
+    cleanupPopup,
+    unversionedValidProfile,
+} = require("./support/popupBoot");
+
+// A published test key, never used for real funds.
+const SIGNER_KEY =
+    "0x59c6995e998f97a5a0044966f0945389dc9e86dae88c7a8412f4603b6b78690d";
+const signer = new Wallet(SIGNER_KEY);
+// "Hello AutistMask", as the hex a page sends.
+const MESSAGE = "0x48656c6c6f204175746973744d61736b";
+const ORIGIN = "https://dapp.example";
+
+afterEach(cleanupPopup);
+
+test("the sign screen answers eth_sign with a personal message signature over the data", async () => {
+    const sent = [];
+    const page = await bootPopup(
+        unversionedValidProfile({
+            wallets: [
+                {
+                    type: "key",
+                    name: "Wallet 1",
+                    encryptedSecret: "encrypted-key",
+                    addresses: [
+                        {
+                            address: signer.address,
+                            balance: "0.0000",
+                            tokenBalances: [],
+                        },
+                    ],
+                },
+            ],
+            activeAddress: signer.address,
+            allowedSites: { [signer.address]: [ORIGIN] },
+        }),
+        {
+            search: "?approval=approval-1",
+            runtime: {
+                connect: () => ({ postMessage: () => {} }),
+                // Answered as the background answers: with the eth_sign
+                // approval this window was opened for, and by handing back
+                // the signature the popup sends.
+                sendMessage: (msg, reply) => {
+                    sent.push(msg);
+                    if (msg.type === "AUTISTMASK_GET_APPROVAL") {
+                        reply({
+                            type: "sign",
+                            origin: ORIGIN,
+                            isPhishingDomain: false,
+                            approvedFrom: signer.address,
+                            signParams: {
+                                method: "eth_sign",
+                                message: MESSAGE,
+                                from: signer.address,
+                            },
+                        });
+                    } else if (msg.type === "AUTISTMASK_SIGN_RESPONSE") {
+                        reply({ signature: msg.signature });
+                    } else {
+                        reply(undefined);
+                    }
+                },
+            },
+        },
+    );
+    globalThis.window.close = jest.fn();
+    const { decryptWithPassword } = require("../src/shared/vault");
+    decryptWithPassword.mockResolvedValue(SIGNER_KEY);
+
+    expect(page.visibleViews()).toEqual(["approve-sign"]);
+    page.node("approve-sign-password").value = "any password";
+    await page.click("btn-approve-sign");
+
+    expect(
+        sent.filter((msg) => msg.type === "AUTISTMASK_SIGN_RESPONSE"),
+    ).toEqual([
+        {
+            type: "AUTISTMASK_SIGN_RESPONSE",
+            id: "approval-1",
+            approved: true,
+            signature: await signer.signMessage(getBytes(MESSAGE)),
+        },
+    ]);
+    expect(globalThis.window.close).toHaveBeenCalled();
+});

tests/phishingDomains.test.js

@@ -89,6 +89,12 @@ describe("vendored blocklist", () => {
         expect(isPhishingDomain(LISTED[0].toUpperCase())).toBe(true);
     });
 
+    test("a hostname ending in a dot is the same host", () => {
+        expect(isPhishingDomain(LISTED[1] + ".")).toBe(true);
+        expect(isPhishingDomain("wallet." + LISTED[1] + ".")).toBe(true);
+        expect(isPhishingDomain(CLEAN[0] + ".")).toBe(false);
+    });
+
     test("returns false for an empty or missing hostname", () => {
         expect(isPhishingDomain("")).toBe(false);
         expect(isPhishingDomain(null)).toBe(false);
@@ -133,6 +139,13 @@ describe("hostnameVariants", () => {
     test("lowercases hostnames", () => {
         expect(hostnameVariants("Evil.COM")).toEqual(["evil.com"]);
     });
+
+    test("drops the trailing dot of a fully qualified hostname", () => {
+        expect(hostnameVariants("sub.evil.com.")).toEqual([
+            "sub.evil.com",
+            "evil.com",
+        ]);
+    });
 });
 
 describe("domain hashing", () => {

tests/walletDefects.test.js

@@ -153,6 +153,18 @@ describe("the explanatory copy", () => {
         expect(all).not.toMatch(/\blost\b|\bstolen\b|\bgone\b/i);
     });
 
+    // The wallet holds the imported key but will not export it, so the copy
+    // must name every key the user may hold that reaches the addresses
+    // outside it.
+    test("it names the keys that reach the addresses outside this wallet", () => {
+        const body = defect.paragraphs.join(" ");
+
+        expect(body).toMatch(/private key export are disabled/);
+        expect(body).toMatch(
+            /with the extended private key you imported, if you kept a copy of it, or with the master extended private key or recovery phrase it came from, in software that repeats the same non-standard derivation/,
+        );
+    });
+
     test("it says the wallet is not deleted and what the user can do", () => {
         const body = defect.paragraphs.join(" ");