fix: add a Settings toggle for known-symbol spoof verification (closes #176)

The README promises all four token-spam filters "default to on but can be
individually disabled". Known-symbol spoof verification had no state flag, no
checkbox and no consulted setting: filterTransactions() applied it before any
filter setting was read, so three of the four documented filters were
configurable and the fourth was mandatory.

Adds hideSpoofedSymbols, default on, persisted and migrated so a profile
written before the setting existed loads it as on rather than undefined. The
flag is fail-safe in the pure function too: only an explicit false disables
the check, so a caller that omits the key keeps it.

Turning the setting off also stops the fraud-contract learning. That learning
is fed only by this check, and leaving it on would make the setting a no-op:
the contract it recorded would hide the very row the user asked to see, via
the fraud-contract rule that is on by default.

Scope: the setting governs the transaction history. The same check on the
balance list and the send-screen token selector stays unconditional — those
decide which tokens the user can act on, not what the history displays. The
README's user-configurable paragraph now states what each of the four
settings actually reaches, which is not uniform.

The two `current behaviour:` tests pinning the filter as undisableable are
inverted rather than deleted, and joined by coverage for the bypass, the
halted learning, the untouched sibling rules and the storage round-trip.

README.md

@@ -720,6 +720,7 @@ screen, including ExportPrivKey, falls back to Home.
     - Blockscout API: endpoint URL input + "Save" button (validated against
       `/stats` before being saved)
     - Token Spam Protection:
+        - "Hide fake tokens impersonating a known symbol" checkbox
         - "Hide tokens with fewer than 1,000 holders" checkbox
         - "Hide transactions from detected fraud contracts" checkbox
         - "Hide dust transactions below N gwei" checkbox + threshold input
@@ -1081,7 +1082,14 @@ indexes it as a real token transfer.
   a spoof and filtered from display. The fake "Ethereum" token in the attack
   above used symbol "ETH" from contract
   `0xD05339f9Ea5ab9d9F03B9d57F671d2abD1F55c82`, which does not match the known
-  WETH contract — so it would be caught by this check.
+  WETH contract — so it would be caught by this check. Detecting a spoof is also
+  what adds a contract to the fraud contract blocklist below; that is the only
+  thing that populates it. In the transaction history the check is the "Hide
+  fake tokens impersonating a known symbol" setting, on by default; with it off,
+  spoofed transfers are shown and no new blocklist entries are learned from
+  them. The same check on the balance list and on the send-screen token selector
+  is unconditional, because those decide which tokens the user can act on rather
+  than what the history displays.
 
 - **Low-holder token filtering**: Token transfers from ERC-20 contracts with
   fewer than 1,000 holders are hidden from transaction history by default.
@@ -1110,11 +1118,17 @@ indexes it as a real token transfer.
   dust while low enough to preserve any transfer a user would plausibly care
   about. The threshold is user-configurable in Settings.
 
-- **User-configurable**: All of the above filters (known symbol verification,
-  low-holder threshold, fraud contract blocklist, dust threshold) are settings
-  that default to on but can be individually disabled by the user. AutistMask is
-  designed as a sharp tool — users who understand the risks can configure the
-  wallet to show everything unfiltered, unix-style.
+- **User-configurable**: All four filters (known symbol verification, low-holder
+  threshold, fraud contract blocklist, dust threshold) are settings that default
+  to on but can be individually disabled by the user. AutistMask is designed as
+  a sharp tool — users who understand the risks can configure the wallet to show
+  everything unfiltered, unix-style. All four settings govern the transaction
+  history; what else each one reaches varies. The known-symbol check also runs
+  unconditionally on the balance list and on the send-screen token selector, and
+  the fraud contract blocklist is applied unconditionally on that selector. The
+  low-holder setting also gates the send selector, while the balance list's own
+  1,000-holder floor is unconditional (see Data Model). The dust threshold
+  applies to the transaction history alone.
 
 #### Phishing Domain Protection
 
@@ -1189,8 +1203,8 @@ Currently supported:
 
 ### Testing
 
-- [ ] Tests for mnemonic generation and address derivation
-- [ ] Tests for xpub derivation and child address generation
+- [x] Tests for mnemonic generation and address derivation
+- [x] Tests for xpub derivation and child address generation
 - [ ] Test on Firefox (Manifest V2)
 
 ### Scam List

TODO.md

@@ -44,6 +44,10 @@ undefined identifiers, which is how
 
 # Completed Steps
 
+- 2026-08-11: Known-symbol spoof verification became a Settings toggle
+  (`hideSpoofedSymbols`), on by default, governing the transaction-history
+  filter and the fraud-contract learning it feeds
+  ([#176](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/176)).
 - 2026-08-11: Policy compliance sweep — conditional verbose test rerun, local
   Tailwind binary instead of `npx`, `--frozen-lockfile` on `make install`, and
   the Makefile-only targets documented in the README
@@ -54,6 +58,9 @@ undefined identifiers, which is how
   lives only in `build.js`, and the unlisted-bundle scan hard-fails when it
   cannot enumerate `dist/`
   ([#180](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/180)).
+- 2026-08-11: Known-answer test coverage for the crypto core — BIP-39/BIP-32
+  derivation in `wallet.js` and the Argon2id vault in `vault.js`
+  ([#159](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/159)).
 - 2026-08-11: Three `README.md` claims corrected against the code — blocklist
   attribution, token-display rule, navigation model
   ([#213](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/213)).

docs/README.md

@@ -323,7 +323,11 @@ by default:
 **Known token symbol verification.** AutistMask ships a list of roughly 500
 legitimate ERC-20 tokens with their contract addresses. If a transaction or
 balance claims to involve a known symbol (like "ETH" or "USDT") but comes from
-an unrecognized contract, it is identified as a spoof and hidden.
+an unrecognized contract, it is identified as a spoof and hidden. In your
+transaction history this is the "Hide fake tokens impersonating a known symbol"
+setting, which you can switch off; doing so also stops new entries being added
+to the fraud contract blocklist below, since detecting a spoof is what fills it.
+Your balances and the send token list always apply the check.
 
 **Low-holder token filtering.** Tokens with fewer than 1,000 holders are hidden
 from transaction history and the send token list, and are left out of your

src/popup/index.html

@@ -948,6 +948,15 @@
                         transfers and prevent interaction with suspicious
                         tokens.
                     </p>
+                    <label
+                        class="text-xs flex items-center gap-1 cursor-pointer mb-2"
+                    >
+                        <input
+                            type="checkbox"
+                            id="settings-hide-spoofed-symbols"
+                        />
+                        Hide fake tokens impersonating a known symbol
+                    </label>
                     <label
                         class="text-xs flex items-center gap-1 cursor-pointer mb-2"
                     >

src/popup/views/addressDetail.js

@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ async function loadTransactions(address) {
             state.blockscoutUrl,
         );
         const result = filterTransactions(rawTxs, {
+            hideSpoofedSymbols: state.hideSpoofedSymbols,
             hideLowHolderTokens: state.hideLowHolderTokens,
             hideFraudContracts: state.hideFraudContracts,
             hideDustTransactions: state.hideDustTransactions,

src/popup/views/addressToken.js

@@ -222,6 +222,7 @@ async function loadTransactions(address, tokenId) {
             state.blockscoutUrl,
         );
         const result = filterTransactions(rawTxs, {
+            hideSpoofedSymbols: state.hideSpoofedSymbols,
             hideLowHolderTokens: state.hideLowHolderTokens,
             hideFraudContracts: state.hideFraudContracts,
             hideDustTransactions: state.hideDustTransactions,

src/popup/views/home.js

@@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ async function loadHomeTxs(ctx) {
     if (allAddresses.length === 0) return;
 
     const filters = {
+        hideSpoofedSymbols: state.hideSpoofedSymbols,
         hideLowHolderTokens: state.hideLowHolderTokens,
         hideFraudContracts: state.hideFraudContracts,
         hideDustTransactions: state.hideDustTransactions,

src/popup/views/settings.js

@@ -284,6 +284,12 @@ function init(ctx) {
         applyTheme(state.theme);
     });
 
+    $("settings-hide-spoofed-symbols").checked = state.hideSpoofedSymbols;
+    $("settings-hide-spoofed-symbols").addEventListener("change", async () => {
+        state.hideSpoofedSymbols = $("settings-hide-spoofed-symbols").checked;
+        await saveState();
+    });
+
     $("settings-hide-low-holders").checked = state.hideLowHolderTokens;
     $("settings-hide-low-holders").addEventListener("change", async () => {
         state.hideLowHolderTokens = $("settings-hide-low-holders").checked;

src/shared/state.js

@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ const DEFAULT_STATE = {
     deniedSites: {},
     rememberSiteChoice: true,
     showZeroBalanceTokens: true,
+    hideSpoofedSymbols: true,
     hideLowHolderTokens: true,
     hideFraudContracts: true,
     hideDustTransactions: true,
@@ -61,6 +62,7 @@ async function saveState() {
         deniedSites: state.deniedSites,
         rememberSiteChoice: state.rememberSiteChoice,
         showZeroBalanceTokens: state.showZeroBalanceTokens,
+        hideSpoofedSymbols: state.hideSpoofedSymbols,
         hideLowHolderTokens: state.hideLowHolderTokens,
         hideFraudContracts: state.hideFraudContracts,
         hideDustTransactions: state.hideDustTransactions,
@@ -112,6 +114,12 @@ async function loadState() {
             saved.showZeroBalanceTokens !== undefined
                 ? saved.showZeroBalanceTokens
                 : true;
+        // A profile written before this setting existed has no key for it.
+        // It is a safety filter, so absent must load as on, not as undefined.
+        state.hideSpoofedSymbols =
+            saved.hideSpoofedSymbols !== undefined
+                ? saved.hideSpoofedSymbols
+                : true;
         state.hideLowHolderTokens =
             saved.hideLowHolderTokens !== undefined
                 ? saved.hideLowHolderTokens

src/shared/transactions.js

@@ -254,10 +254,17 @@ function filterTransactions(txs, filters = {}) {
     );
     const newFraud = [];
     const filtered = [];
+    // Fail-safe, unlike the three flags below: this one is off only when the
+    // caller says so explicitly, so a caller that omits the key keeps the
+    // check rather than silently losing it.  The setting also governs the
+    // blocklist learning below, which exists only to serve this check —
+    // leaving learning on while the check is off would re-hide the very rows
+    // the user asked to see, through the fraud-contract rule.
+    const hideSpoofed = filters.hideSpoofedSymbols !== false;
 
     for (const tx of txs) {
-        // Always filter spoofed known symbols and record the fraud contract
-        if (isSpoofedSymbol(tx)) {
+        // Filter spoofed known symbols and record the fraud contract
+        if (hideSpoofed && isSpoofedSymbol(tx)) {
             if (tx.contractAddress && !fraudSet.has(tx.contractAddress)) {
                 fraudSet.add(tx.contractAddress);
                 newFraud.push(tx.contractAddress);

tests/state.test.js

@@ -102,3 +102,60 @@ describe("loadState hasWallet reconciliation", () => {
         expect(mod.state.activeAddress).toBe(ADDRESS);
     });
 });
+
+// The known-symbol spoof filter is a safety filter, so an existing profile
+// stored before the setting existed must load with it on rather than with
+// undefined, which would read as off.
+describe("hideSpoofedSymbols persistence", () => {
+    test("defaults to on with empty storage", async () => {
+        const { mod } = loadModuleWith(null);
+        await mod.loadState();
+        expect(mod.state.hideSpoofedSymbols).toBe(true);
+    });
+
+    test("a profile stored without the key loads with it on", async () => {
+        const { mod } = loadModuleWith({ wallets: oneWallet() });
+        await mod.loadState();
+        expect(mod.state.hideSpoofedSymbols).toBe(true);
+    });
+
+    test("an explicit false survives the load", async () => {
+        const { mod } = loadModuleWith({
+            wallets: oneWallet(),
+            hideSpoofedSymbols: false,
+        });
+        await mod.loadState();
+        expect(mod.state.hideSpoofedSymbols).toBe(false);
+    });
+
+    test("saveState persists the flag", async () => {
+        const { mod, set } = loadModuleWith(null);
+        mod.state.hideSpoofedSymbols = false;
+        await mod.saveState();
+        expect(set).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
+            autistmask: expect.objectContaining({ hideSpoofedSymbols: false }),
+        });
+    });
+
+    test("the flag round-trips off through save and load", async () => {
+        const first = loadModuleWith(null);
+        first.mod.state.hideSpoofedSymbols = false;
+        await first.mod.saveState();
+        const persisted = first.set.mock.calls[0][0].autistmask;
+
+        const second = loadModuleWith(persisted);
+        await second.mod.loadState();
+        expect(second.mod.state.hideSpoofedSymbols).toBe(false);
+    });
+
+    test("the flag round-trips back on through save and load", async () => {
+        const first = loadModuleWith(null);
+        first.mod.state.hideSpoofedSymbols = true;
+        await first.mod.saveState();
+        const persisted = first.set.mock.calls[0][0].autistmask;
+
+        const second = loadModuleWith(persisted);
+        await second.mod.loadState();
+        expect(second.mod.state.hideSpoofedSymbols).toBe(true);
+    });
+});

tests/transactions.test.js

@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ const ORDINARY_PEER = "0x5aa0f9f1e0a1d0e0e5c1e7ce3b7dbbe9c19f0a11";
 
 // The documented default settings (README.md:810-814, state.js:24-27).
 const DEFAULT_FILTERS = {
+    hideSpoofedSymbols: true,
     hideLowHolderTokens: true,
     hideFraudContracts: true,
     hideDustTransactions: true,
@@ -343,30 +344,112 @@ describe("known-symbol spoof verification", () => {
         expect(result.transactions).toEqual([]);
     });
 
-    // Documents current behaviour: README.md:810-814 says all four filters
-    // "default to on but can be individually disabled".  There is no setting
-    // for known-symbol verification, and filterTransactions applies it
-    // unconditionally, so it cannot be turned off.
-    test("current behaviour: spoof filtering cannot be disabled by any setting", () => {
-        const allFiltersOff = {
+    // Turning the other three filters off must not turn this one off: each
+    // filter is independent, and this is the one the README calls out as the
+    // defense against the fake "ETH" attack.
+    test("the check still runs when the other three filters are off", () => {
+        const result = filterTransactions(
+            [fakeEthTokenTransfer()],
+            filters({
                 hideLowHolderTokens: false,
                 hideFraudContracts: false,
                 hideDustTransactions: false,
                 dustThresholdGwei: 1,
-            fraudContracts: [],
-        };
-        const result = filterTransactions(
-            [fakeEthTokenTransfer()],
-            allFiltersOff,
+            }),
         );
         expect(result.transactions).toEqual([]);
         expect(result.newFraudContracts).toEqual([FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT]);
     });
 
-    test("current behaviour: spoof filtering also applies with no filters argument", () => {
+    test("spoof filtering also applies with no filters argument", () => {
         const result = filterTransactions([fakeEthTokenTransfer()]);
         expect(result.transactions).toEqual([]);
     });
+
+    // Fail-safe: unlike the other three flags, an absent hideSpoofedSymbols
+    // leaves the check ON.  A caller that forgets the key keeps the wallet's
+    // headline protection; only a user who deliberately switched the setting
+    // off sends an explicit false.
+    test("an absent hideSpoofedSymbols leaves the check on", () => {
+        const result = filterTransactions([fakeEthTokenTransfer()], {
+            fraudContracts: [],
+        });
+        expect(result.transactions).toEqual([]);
+    });
+
+    test("a truthy-but-not-true hideSpoofedSymbols leaves the check on", () => {
+        const result = filterTransactions(
+            [fakeEthTokenTransfer()],
+            filters({ hideSpoofedSymbols: undefined }),
+        );
+        expect(result.transactions).toEqual([]);
+    });
+});
+
+describe("disabling known-symbol spoof verification", () => {
+    test("the spoofed transfer is shown when hideSpoofedSymbols is false", () => {
+        const attack = fakeEthTokenTransfer();
+        const result = filterTransactions(
+            [attack],
+            filters({
+                hideSpoofedSymbols: false,
+                // The blocklist rule would otherwise hide the same row via a
+                // contract this pass had already learned.
+                hideFraudContracts: false,
+                hideLowHolderTokens: false,
+            }),
+        );
+        expect(result.transactions).toEqual([attack]);
+    });
+
+    // The blocklist is populated only by this check, so switching the check
+    // off stops the learning too.  Leaving learning on would make the setting
+    // a no-op: the contract it recorded would immediately hide the same row
+    // through the fraud-contract rule, which is on by default.
+    test("no fraud contract is learned when hideSpoofedSymbols is false", () => {
+        const result = filterTransactions(
+            [fakeEthTokenTransfer()],
+            filters({ hideSpoofedSymbols: false }),
+        );
+        expect(result.newFraudContracts).toEqual([]);
+    });
+
+    test("the setting off does not stop the other three rules", () => {
+        const dust = nativeDustTransfer();
+        const lowHolder = tokenTx({
+            symbol: NOVEL_SPAM_SYMBOL,
+            contractAddress: NOVEL_SPAM_CONTRACT,
+            holders: 0,
+        });
+        const result = filterTransactions(
+            [dust, lowHolder],
+            filters({ hideSpoofedSymbols: false }),
+        );
+        expect(result.transactions).toEqual([]);
+    });
+
+    // An already-persisted fraud contract keeps being filtered: the blocklist
+    // rule is a separate setting and is unaffected by this one.
+    test("an already-blocklisted contract is still hidden with the check off", () => {
+        const result = filterTransactions(
+            [fakeEthTokenTransfer()],
+            filters({
+                hideSpoofedSymbols: false,
+                fraudContracts: [FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT],
+            }),
+        );
+        expect(result.transactions).toEqual([]);
+        expect(result.newFraudContracts).toEqual([]);
+    });
+
+    test("a genuine transfer is unaffected by the setting either way", () => {
+        const tx = tokenTx();
+        expect(
+            filterTransactions([tx], filters({ hideSpoofedSymbols: false }))
+                .transactions,
+        ).toEqual([tx]);
+        expect(filterTransactions([tx], filters()).transactions).toEqual([tx]);
+    });
 });
 
 describe("low-holder token filtering (the 1,000-holder rule)", () => {
@@ -589,7 +672,8 @@ describe("dust threshold filtering", () => {
 });
 
 describe("filter defaults promised by the README and Settings", () => {
-    test("all three toggles default to on and the threshold to 100,000 gwei", () => {
+    test("all four toggles default to on and the threshold to 100,000 gwei", () => {
+        expect(state.hideSpoofedSymbols).toBe(true);
         expect(state.hideLowHolderTokens).toBe(true);
         expect(state.hideFraudContracts).toBe(true);
         expect(state.hideDustTransactions).toBe(true);
@@ -600,10 +684,10 @@ describe("filter defaults promised by the README and Settings", () => {
         expect(state.fraudContracts).toEqual([]);
     });
 
-    // Documents current behaviour: filterTransactions itself defaults every
-    // optional filter to off.  The "default to on" promise is satisfied by
-    // the state defaults above, which every caller passes in; the pure
-    // function makes no assumption of its own.
+    // Documents current behaviour: filterTransactions defaults the other three
+    // optional filters to off.  Their "default to on" promise is satisfied by
+    // the state defaults above, which every caller passes in.  Spoof
+    // verification is the exception and stays on unless explicitly disabled.
     test("current behaviour: with no filters argument only spoof filtering runs", () => {
         const dust = nativeDustTransfer();
         const lowHolder = tokenTx({

tests/vault.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,346 @@
+// Tests for src/shared/vault.js: the Argon2id + XSalsa20-Poly1305 encryption
+// that protects recovery phrases and private keys at rest.
+//
+// The properties that matter here are the ones whose failure is silent. A
+// vault that decrypts under the wrong password, that hands back plaintext from
+// a ciphertext an attacker edited, that reuses a nonce, or that leaves the
+// recovery phrase readable somewhere in the stored blob all look exactly like
+// a working vault from the UI. So each test below asserts a negative: the
+// thing that must not happen.
+//
+// Cost: every encrypt and decrypt runs one Argon2id pwhash at the production
+// interactive parameters, which the module hardcodes. The parameters are not
+// weakened or overridden anywhere in this file — they are pinned by the "key
+// derivation cost" tests, since they are the vault's only defence against an
+// offline attack on a stolen blob. The suite is kept inside script/test's
+// 30-second budget by sharing one encrypted fixture across the tamper cases
+// instead of re-encrypting per test.
+
+const sodium = require("libsodium-wrappers-sumo");
+const {
+    encryptWithPassword,
+    decryptWithPassword,
+} = require("../src/shared/vault");
+
+// A publicly known development phrase. Never fund it.
+const SECRET = "test test test test test test test test test test test junk";
+const PASSWORD = "correct horse battery staple";
+const WRONG_PASSWORD = "correct horse battery stapl";
+
+const SALT_BYTES = 16;
+const NONCE_BYTES = 24;
+const POLY1305_TAG_BYTES = 16;
+
+const BASE64 = /^[A-Za-z0-9+/_-]+={0,2}$/;
+
+function b64decode(s) {
+    return sodium.from_base64(s);
+}
+
+// A shallow copy with one field replaced, so the shared fixture is never
+// mutated by a tamper test.
+function withField(blob, field, value) {
+    return { ...blob, [field]: value };
+}
+
+// Flip the low bit of one byte of a base64-encoded field.
+function flipByte(b64, index) {
+    const bytes = b64decode(b64);
+    bytes[index] ^= 0x01;
+    return sodium.to_base64(bytes);
+}
+
+let vault;
+
+beforeAll(async () => {
+    await sodium.ready;
+    vault = await encryptWithPassword(SECRET, PASSWORD);
+});
+
+describe("stored blob shape", () => {
+    test("is exactly the documented { salt, nonce, ciphertext }", () => {
+        expect(Object.keys(vault).sort()).toEqual([
+            "ciphertext",
+            "nonce",
+            "salt",
+        ]);
+    });
+
+    test("every field is a base64 string", () => {
+        for (const field of ["salt", "nonce", "ciphertext"]) {
+            expect(typeof vault[field]).toBe("string");
+            expect(vault[field]).toMatch(BASE64);
+        }
+    });
+
+    test("salt and nonce are full length", () => {
+        expect(b64decode(vault.salt)).toHaveLength(SALT_BYTES);
+        expect(b64decode(vault.nonce)).toHaveLength(NONCE_BYTES);
+    });
+
+    test("ciphertext carries a Poly1305 authentication tag", () => {
+        expect(b64decode(vault.ciphertext)).toHaveLength(
+            SECRET.length + POLY1305_TAG_BYTES,
+        );
+    });
+
+    test("the blob survives JSON storage unchanged", async () => {
+        const stored = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(vault));
+
+        await expect(decryptWithPassword(stored, PASSWORD)).resolves.toBe(
+            SECRET,
+        );
+    });
+});
+
+describe("no plaintext leakage", () => {
+    test("the secret does not appear in the serialized vault", () => {
+        const serialized = JSON.stringify(vault);
+
+        expect(serialized).not.toContain(SECRET);
+        for (const word of new Set(SECRET.split(" "))) {
+            expect(serialized).not.toContain(word);
+        }
+    });
+
+    test("the ciphertext bytes do not contain the secret bytes", () => {
+        const bytes = Buffer.from(b64decode(vault.ciphertext));
+
+        expect(bytes.includes(Buffer.from(SECRET, "utf8"))).toBe(false);
+        // Not even the first word, which would betray an unencrypted prefix.
+        expect(bytes.includes(Buffer.from("test test", "utf8"))).toBe(false);
+    });
+
+    test("the password does not appear in the serialized vault", () => {
+        expect(JSON.stringify(vault)).not.toContain(PASSWORD);
+    });
+});
+
+describe("round trip", () => {
+    test("decrypts back to the original secret", async () => {
+        await expect(decryptWithPassword(vault, PASSWORD)).resolves.toBe(
+            SECRET,
+        );
+    });
+
+    test("survives a non-ASCII plaintext byte for byte", async () => {
+        const unicode = "recovery phrase é中文\u{1f600}";
+
+        const blob = await encryptWithPassword(unicode, PASSWORD);
+
+        await expect(decryptWithPassword(blob, PASSWORD)).resolves.toBe(
+            unicode,
+        );
+    });
+
+    test("an empty password still round-trips and is not a bypass", async () => {
+        const blob = await encryptWithPassword(SECRET, "");
+
+        await expect(decryptWithPassword(blob, "")).resolves.toBe(SECRET);
+        // An empty password must not act as a skeleton key on other vaults,
+        // nor may a real password open an empty-password vault.
+        await expect(decryptWithPassword(vault, "")).rejects.toThrow();
+        await expect(decryptWithPassword(blob, PASSWORD)).rejects.toThrow();
+    });
+});
+
+describe("fresh salt and nonce", () => {
+    test("two encryptions of the same plaintext differ in all three fields", async () => {
+        const second = await encryptWithPassword(SECRET, PASSWORD);
+
+        expect(second.salt).not.toBe(vault.salt);
+        expect(second.nonce).not.toBe(vault.nonce);
+        expect(second.ciphertext).not.toBe(vault.ciphertext);
+        await expect(decryptWithPassword(second, PASSWORD)).resolves.toBe(
+            SECRET,
+        );
+    });
+});
+
+describe("key derivation cost", () => {
+    // Argon2id's opslimit and memlimit are the whole of the vault's resistance
+    // to an offline attack on a stolen blob, and lowering them breaks nothing
+    // any other test here can see — the suite merely runs faster. So pin them
+    // directly, both to libsodium's INTERACTIVE constants and to the absolute
+    // values those constants must keep meaning.
+    const INTERACTIVE_OPSLIMIT = 2;
+    const INTERACTIVE_MEMLIMIT = 64 * 1024 * 1024;
+
+    test("the interactive constants still mean 2 passes over 64 MiB", () => {
+        expect(sodium.crypto_pwhash_OPSLIMIT_INTERACTIVE).toBe(
+            INTERACTIVE_OPSLIMIT,
+        );
+        expect(sodium.crypto_pwhash_MEMLIMIT_INTERACTIVE).toBe(
+            INTERACTIVE_MEMLIMIT,
+        );
+        // The floor these must never quietly be swapped for: _MIN is one pass
+        // over 8 KiB, an 8192x reduction in memory cost.
+        expect(sodium.crypto_pwhash_OPSLIMIT_MIN).toBeLessThan(
+            INTERACTIVE_OPSLIMIT,
+        );
+        expect(sodium.crypto_pwhash_MEMLIMIT_MIN).toBeLessThan(
+            INTERACTIVE_MEMLIMIT,
+        );
+    });
+
+    test("a key derived at the interactive parameters opens the vault", () => {
+        // Independent of any spy, and of the module's own code path: derive
+        // the key here from the vault's published salt at the interactive cost
+        // and open its ciphertext directly. A vault whose key came from any
+        // other opslimit, memlimit or Argon2id variant yields a different key
+        // and cannot be opened this way.
+        const key = sodium.crypto_pwhash(
+            sodium.crypto_secretbox_KEYBYTES,
+            PASSWORD,
+            b64decode(vault.salt),
+            INTERACTIVE_OPSLIMIT,
+            INTERACTIVE_MEMLIMIT,
+            sodium.crypto_pwhash_ALG_ARGON2ID13,
+        );
+        const opened = sodium.crypto_secretbox_open_easy(
+            b64decode(vault.ciphertext),
+            b64decode(vault.nonce),
+            key,
+        );
+
+        expect(sodium.to_string(opened)).toBe(SECRET);
+    });
+
+    test.each([
+        [
+            "encrypt",
+            async () => {
+                await encryptWithPassword(SECRET, PASSWORD);
+            },
+        ],
+        [
+            "decrypt",
+            async () => {
+                await decryptWithPassword(vault, PASSWORD);
+            },
+        ],
+    ])("%s derives exactly one key at the interactive cost", async (_, run) => {
+        const spy = jest.spyOn(sodium, "crypto_pwhash");
+        try {
+            await run();
+
+            expect(spy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+            const [keyBytes, , salt, opslimit, memlimit, alg] =
+                spy.mock.calls[0];
+            expect(keyBytes).toBe(sodium.crypto_secretbox_KEYBYTES);
+            expect(salt).toHaveLength(SALT_BYTES);
+            expect(opslimit).toBe(sodium.crypto_pwhash_OPSLIMIT_INTERACTIVE);
+            expect(memlimit).toBe(sodium.crypto_pwhash_MEMLIMIT_INTERACTIVE);
+            expect(alg).toBe(sodium.crypto_pwhash_ALG_ARGON2ID13);
+        } finally {
+            spy.mockRestore();
+        }
+    });
+});
+
+describe("wrong password", () => {
+    test("is rejected, and rejects cleanly", async () => {
+        // rejects.toThrow asserts a rejected promise, not a synchronous throw
+        // and not an unhandled rejection: the caller can catch this.
+        await expect(
+            decryptWithPassword(vault, WRONG_PASSWORD),
+        ).rejects.toThrow();
+    });
+
+    test("returns no plaintext, not even partially", async () => {
+        const result = await decryptWithPassword(vault, WRONG_PASSWORD).catch(
+            (err) => err,
+        );
+
+        expect(result).toBeInstanceOf(Error);
+        expect(String(result)).not.toContain("test");
+    });
+
+    test("the empty password is rejected on a password-protected vault", async () => {
+        await expect(decryptWithPassword(vault, "")).rejects.toThrow();
+    });
+});
+
+describe("tampering", () => {
+    test("a flipped ciphertext bit is rejected by the auth tag", async () => {
+        const tampered = withField(
+            vault,
+            "ciphertext",
+            flipByte(vault.ciphertext, 0),
+        );
+
+        await expect(decryptWithPassword(tampered, PASSWORD)).rejects.toThrow();
+    });
+
+    test("a flipped bit in the authentication tag itself is rejected", async () => {
+        const tagStart = b64decode(vault.ciphertext).length - 1;
+        const tampered = withField(
+            vault,
+            "ciphertext",
+            flipByte(vault.ciphertext, tagStart),
+        );
+
+        await expect(decryptWithPassword(tampered, PASSWORD)).rejects.toThrow();
+    });
+
+    test("a flipped nonce bit is rejected", async () => {
+        const tampered = withField(vault, "nonce", flipByte(vault.nonce, 0));
+
+        await expect(decryptWithPassword(tampered, PASSWORD)).rejects.toThrow();
+    });
+
+    test("a flipped salt bit is rejected", async () => {
+        const tampered = withField(vault, "salt", flipByte(vault.salt, 0));
+
+        await expect(decryptWithPassword(tampered, PASSWORD)).rejects.toThrow();
+    });
+
+    test("a truncated ciphertext is rejected", async () => {
+        const bytes = b64decode(vault.ciphertext);
+        const tampered = withField(
+            vault,
+            "ciphertext",
+            sodium.to_base64(bytes.slice(0, bytes.length - 4)),
+        );
+
+        await expect(decryptWithPassword(tampered, PASSWORD)).rejects.toThrow();
+    });
+
+    test("a ciphertext shorter than the auth tag is rejected", async () => {
+        const tampered = withField(
+            vault,
+            "ciphertext",
+            sodium.to_base64(b64decode(vault.ciphertext).slice(0, 4)),
+        );
+
+        await expect(decryptWithPassword(tampered, PASSWORD)).rejects.toThrow();
+    });
+
+    test("a truncated nonce is rejected", async () => {
+        const tampered = withField(
+            vault,
+            "nonce",
+            sodium.to_base64(b64decode(vault.nonce).slice(0, NONCE_BYTES - 1)),
+        );
+
+        await expect(decryptWithPassword(tampered, PASSWORD)).rejects.toThrow();
+    });
+
+    test("a ciphertext from another vault is rejected", async () => {
+        const other = await encryptWithPassword("a different secret", PASSWORD);
+        const spliced = withField(vault, "ciphertext", other.ciphertext);
+
+        await expect(decryptWithPassword(spliced, PASSWORD)).rejects.toThrow();
+    });
+
+    test("a missing field is rejected rather than decrypted", async () => {
+        for (const field of ["salt", "nonce", "ciphertext"]) {
+            const broken = { ...vault };
+            delete broken[field];
+
+            await expect(
+                decryptWithPassword(broken, PASSWORD),
+            ).rejects.toThrow();
+        }
+    });
+});

tests/wallet.test.js

@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
-// Tests for the DEBUG build flag as it gates mnemonic generation.
+// Tests for src/shared/wallet.js: the DEBUG build flag as it gates mnemonic
+// generation (first two describes), and HD key derivation against published
+// known-answer vectors (rest of the file).
 //
 // The modules read the __BUILD_DEBUG__ global that esbuild replaces at bundle
 // time. Under jest the global is absent, which is exactly the release-build
@@ -92,3 +94,317 @@ describe("generateMnemonic in a debug build", () => {
         );
     });
 });
+
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+// Key derivation.
+//
+// Every address below is a published constant, not something this codebase
+// produced. Asserting against what the implementation happens to return today
+// would pass just as happily with the wrong coin type, the wrong path depth or
+// a non-empty seed passphrase, all of which silently send funds to addresses
+// no other wallet can recover.
+//
+// Vector sources:
+//
+//   VECTOR_PHRASE / VECTOR_ADDRESSES / VECTOR_PRIVATE_KEYS — the standard
+//   development recovery phrase and the first three accounts it yields at
+//   m/44'/60'/0'/0/n with an empty seed passphrase, as published in the
+//   Hardhat and Ganache documentation. Publicly known; never fund it.
+//
+//   ZERO_ENTROPY_PHRASE / ZERO_ENTROPY_ADDRESS — the BIP-39 all-zero-entropy
+//   phrase (Trezor's official BIP-39 vector set, first entry) and its
+//   m/44'/60'/0'/0/0 Ethereum address with an empty seed passphrase. A second,
+//   independently published phrase so the pin is not one vector deep.
+//
+//   BIP32_VECTOR_1_XPRV — the master key of BIP-32 test vector 1
+//   (seed 000102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f).
+//
+// The two Hardhat facts cross-check each other: VECTOR_PRIVATE_KEYS[n] is the
+// published key for VECTOR_ADDRESSES[n], so addressFromPrivateKey and the HD
+// path must meet at the same address from two different directions.
+
+const { HDNodeWallet, Mnemonic, verifyMessage } = require("ethers");
+const wallet = require("../src/shared/wallet");
+const { BIP44_ETH_PATH } = require("../src/shared/constants");
+
+const VECTOR_PHRASE =
+    "test test test test test test test test test test test junk";
+
+const VECTOR_ADDRESSES = [
+    "0xf39Fd6e51aad88F6F4ce6aB8827279cffFb92266",
+    "0x70997970C51812dc3A010C7d01b50e0d17dc79C8",
+    "0x3C44CdDdB6a900fa2b585dd299e03d12FA4293BC",
+];
+
+const VECTOR_PRIVATE_KEYS = [
+    "0xac0974bec39a17e36ba4a6b4d238ff944bacb478cbed5efcae784d7bf4f2ff80",
+    "0x59c6995e998f97a5a0044966f0945389dc9e86dae88c7a8412f4603b6b78690d",
+    "0x5de4111afa1a4b94908f83103eb1f1706367c2e68ca870fc3fb9a804cdab365a",
+];
+
+const ZERO_ENTROPY_PHRASE =
+    "abandon abandon abandon abandon abandon abandon " +
+    "abandon abandon abandon abandon abandon about";
+const ZERO_ENTROPY_ADDRESS = "0x9858EfFD232B4033E47d90003D41EC34EcaEda94";
+
+const BIP32_VECTOR_1_XPRV =
+    "xprv9s21ZrQH143K3QTDL4LXw2F7HEK3wJUD2nW2nRk4stbPy6cq3jPPqji" +
+    "ChkVvvNKmPGJxWUtg6LnF5kejMRNNU3TGtRBeJgk33yuGBxrMPHi";
+
+// The master (depth-0) extended private key for a phrase, which is what the
+// import-an-xprv flow is handed. Built with ethers rather than with the module
+// under test, so hdWalletFromXprv is not being checked against itself.
+function masterXprv(phrase, passphrase = "") {
+    return HDNodeWallet.fromSeed(
+        Mnemonic.fromPhrase(phrase, passphrase).computeSeed(),
+    ).extendedKey;
+}
+
+describe("hdWalletFromMnemonic", () => {
+    test("first address matches the published vector for m/44'/60'/0'/0/0", () => {
+        expect(wallet.hdWalletFromMnemonic(VECTOR_PHRASE).firstAddress).toBe(
+            VECTOR_ADDRESSES[0],
+        );
+    });
+
+    test("second published phrase derives its published address", () => {
+        expect(
+            wallet.hdWalletFromMnemonic(ZERO_ENTROPY_PHRASE).firstAddress,
+        ).toBe(ZERO_ENTROPY_ADDRESS);
+    });
+
+    test("returns the account-level xpub, which is watch-only", () => {
+        const { xpub } = wallet.hdWalletFromMnemonic(VECTOR_PHRASE);
+
+        expect(xpub.startsWith("xpub")).toBe(true);
+        // A neutered ethers node exposes no private key at all, so accept
+        // either absent or null rather than pinning which.
+        expect(
+            HDNodeWallet.fromExtendedKey(xpub).privateKey ?? null,
+        ).toBeNull();
+        expect(wallet.isValidXprv(xpub)).toBe(false);
+    });
+
+    test("the account path is the documented BIP-44 Ethereum path", () => {
+        expect(BIP44_ETH_PATH).toBe("m/44'/60'/0'/0");
+    });
+
+    test("rejects an invalid recovery phrase rather than deriving from it", () => {
+        expect(() => wallet.hdWalletFromMnemonic("not a phrase")).toThrow();
+    });
+});
+
+describe("deriveAddressFromXpub", () => {
+    const { xpub } = wallet.hdWalletFromMnemonic(VECTOR_PHRASE);
+
+    test.each([0, 1, 2])(
+        "child %i matches the published vector address",
+        (index) => {
+            expect(wallet.deriveAddressFromXpub(xpub, index)).toBe(
+                VECTOR_ADDRESSES[index],
+            );
+        },
+    );
+
+    test("agrees with hdWalletFromMnemonic at index 0", () => {
+        expect(wallet.deriveAddressFromXpub(xpub, 0)).toBe(
+            wallet.hdWalletFromMnemonic(VECTOR_PHRASE).firstAddress,
+        );
+    });
+
+    test("rejects garbage instead of returning an address", () => {
+        expect(() =>
+            wallet.deriveAddressFromXpub("xpub-nonsense", 0),
+        ).toThrow();
+    });
+});
+
+describe("hdWalletFromMnemonic seed passphrase handling", () => {
+    // The vectors above are only reproducible with an empty BIP-39 seed
+    // passphrase. This pins that the empty string reaching
+    // HDNodeWallet.fromPhrase is load-bearing: with any passphrase applied the
+    // published address is unreachable, and a wallet derived that way could
+    // not be restored anywhere else from the phrase alone.
+    test("a non-empty seed passphrase would yield a different address", () => {
+        const withPassphrase = HDNodeWallet.fromPhrase(
+            VECTOR_PHRASE,
+            "TREZOR",
+            BIP44_ETH_PATH,
+        ).deriveChild(0).address;
+
+        expect(withPassphrase).not.toBe(VECTOR_ADDRESSES[0]);
+    });
+});
+
+describe("hdWalletFromXprv", () => {
+    // hdWalletFromMnemonic derives the absolute path "m/44'/60'/0'/0" while
+    // hdWalletFromXprv derives the relative path "44'/60'/0'/0". For a
+    // depth-0 master key the two are the same derivation; these tests pin that
+    // equivalence to a published address rather than assuming it.
+    test("master xprv for the vector phrase yields the vector address", () => {
+        expect(
+            wallet.hdWalletFromXprv(masterXprv(VECTOR_PHRASE)).firstAddress,
+        ).toBe(VECTOR_ADDRESSES[0]);
+    });
+
+    test("agrees with hdWalletFromMnemonic on xpub and address", () => {
+        const fromPhrase = wallet.hdWalletFromMnemonic(VECTOR_PHRASE);
+        const fromXprv = wallet.hdWalletFromXprv(masterXprv(VECTOR_PHRASE));
+
+        expect(fromXprv).toEqual(fromPhrase);
+    });
+
+    test("derived xpub generates the same child addresses", () => {
+        const { xpub } = wallet.hdWalletFromXprv(masterXprv(VECTOR_PHRASE));
+
+        expect(
+            [0, 1, 2].map((i) => wallet.deriveAddressFromXpub(xpub, i)),
+        ).toEqual(VECTOR_ADDRESSES);
+    });
+
+    test("accepts the BIP-32 test vector 1 master key", () => {
+        const { xpub, firstAddress } =
+            wallet.hdWalletFromXprv(BIP32_VECTOR_1_XPRV);
+
+        expect(xpub.startsWith("xpub")).toBe(true);
+        expect(firstAddress).toMatch(/^0x[0-9a-fA-F]{40}$/);
+    });
+
+    test("rejects a watch-only xpub", () => {
+        const { xpub } = wallet.hdWalletFromMnemonic(VECTOR_PHRASE);
+
+        expect(() => wallet.hdWalletFromXprv(xpub)).toThrow();
+    });
+
+    test("rejects garbage", () => {
+        expect(() => wallet.hdWalletFromXprv("nonsense")).toThrow();
+    });
+});
+
+describe("isValidXprv", () => {
+    test.each([
+        ["BIP-32 test vector 1 master key", BIP32_VECTOR_1_XPRV, true],
+        ["the empty string", "", false],
+        ["garbage", "not-a-key", false],
+        ["a bare private key", VECTOR_PRIVATE_KEYS[0], false],
+        ["a truncated xprv", BIP32_VECTOR_1_XPRV.slice(0, -6), false],
+        ["an xprv with an extra character", BIP32_VECTOR_1_XPRV + "a", false],
+    ])("%s -> %s", (_name, key, expected) => {
+        expect(wallet.isValidXprv(key)).toBe(expected);
+    });
+
+    test("a watch-only xpub is not an xprv", () => {
+        const { xpub } = wallet.hdWalletFromMnemonic(VECTOR_PHRASE);
+
+        expect(wallet.isValidXprv(xpub)).toBe(false);
+    });
+
+    // Skipped: this asserts the correct behaviour, which the code does not
+    // currently have. isValidXprv gates the paste-your-extended-private-key
+    // import in src/popup/views/addWallet.js:215, and it accepts a key with a
+    // one-character typo: ethers' HDNodeWallet.fromExtendedKey skips base58
+    // checksum verification whenever the decoded payload is the usual 82
+    // bytes, which is the whole point of that checksum. Measured on this
+    // vector: changing any one of the last 14 characters passes validation,
+    // and for 9 of those 14 positions the import silently yields a *different*
+    // wallet (e.g. 0x3F334f0a356d6B46B1d70B590E7437D77100d28D instead of
+    // 0x022b971dFF0C43305e691DEd7a14367AF19D6407) with no error shown.
+    // Tracked as https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/210; out of scope
+    // here, which is tests only. Unskip when it is fixed.
+    test.skip("rejects an extended key with a one-character typo", () => {
+        const index = BIP32_VECTOR_1_XPRV.length - 8;
+        const typo =
+            BIP32_VECTOR_1_XPRV.slice(0, index) +
+            (BIP32_VECTOR_1_XPRV[index] === "a" ? "b" : "a") +
+            BIP32_VECTOR_1_XPRV.slice(index + 1);
+
+        expect(wallet.isValidXprv(typo)).toBe(false);
+    });
+});
+
+describe("isValidMnemonic", () => {
+    test.each([
+        ["the vector phrase", VECTOR_PHRASE, true],
+        ["the BIP-39 zero-entropy phrase", ZERO_ENTROPY_PHRASE, true],
+        [
+            "a 12-word phrase with a bad checksum",
+            "abandon abandon abandon abandon abandon abandon " +
+                "abandon abandon abandon abandon abandon abandon",
+            false,
+        ],
+        ["an 11-word phrase", "abandon ".repeat(10) + "about", false],
+        ["a word outside the wordlist", VECTOR_PHRASE + " zzzzzz", false],
+        ["the empty string", "", false],
+        ["garbage", "correct horse battery staple", false],
+    ])("%s -> %s", (_name, phrase, expected) => {
+        expect(wallet.isValidMnemonic(phrase)).toBe(expected);
+    });
+});
+
+describe("addressFromPrivateKey", () => {
+    test.each([0, 1, 2])(
+        "published key %i yields its published address",
+        (index) => {
+            expect(
+                wallet.addressFromPrivateKey(VECTOR_PRIVATE_KEYS[index]),
+            ).toBe(VECTOR_ADDRESSES[index]);
+        },
+    );
+
+    test("rejects a key of the wrong length", () => {
+        expect(() => wallet.addressFromPrivateKey("0xdeadbeef")).toThrow();
+    });
+
+    test("rejects the empty string", () => {
+        expect(() => wallet.addressFromPrivateKey("")).toThrow();
+    });
+});
+
+describe("getSignerForAddress", () => {
+    test.each([0, 1, 2])("hd wallet, address index %i", (index) => {
+        const signer = wallet.getSignerForAddress(
+            { type: "hd" },
+            index,
+            VECTOR_PHRASE,
+        );
+
+        expect(signer.address).toBe(VECTOR_ADDRESSES[index]);
+        expect(signer.privateKey).toBe(VECTOR_PRIVATE_KEYS[index]);
+    });
+
+    test.each([0, 1, 2])("xprv wallet, address index %i", (index) => {
+        const signer = wallet.getSignerForAddress(
+            { type: "xprv" },
+            index,
+            masterXprv(VECTOR_PHRASE),
+        );
+
+        expect(signer.address).toBe(VECTOR_ADDRESSES[index]);
+        expect(signer.privateKey).toBe(VECTOR_PRIVATE_KEYS[index]);
+    });
+
+    test("single private key ignores the address index", () => {
+        for (const index of [0, 1, 2]) {
+            const signer = wallet.getSignerForAddress(
+                { type: "privkey" },
+                index,
+                VECTOR_PRIVATE_KEYS[1],
+            );
+
+            expect(signer.address).toBe(VECTOR_ADDRESSES[1]);
+        }
+    });
+
+    test("the returned signer signs recoverably as the expected address", async () => {
+        const signer = wallet.getSignerForAddress(
+            { type: "hd" },
+            1,
+            VECTOR_PHRASE,
+        );
+        const message = "AutistMask derivation test";
+
+        const signature = await signer.signMessage(message);
+
+        expect(verifyMessage(message, signature)).toBe(VECTOR_ADDRESSES[1]);
+    });
+});