test: cover every verify-build failure mode from make check (closes #227)

script/verify-build is the build-integrity guard and nothing in make check
tested it. Three separate reviews of it each found a fresh vacuous pass --
the grep exit-2 conflation, the discarded find status, the line-delimited
walk -- and each was caught by someone building a tree by hand.

script/test-verify-build makes that battery a target. It builds a fixture
tree under mktemp -d holding script/verify-build as a symlink to the real
script: verify-build takes its ROOT from dirname "$0"/.., so it runs against
the fixture's dist/ and never touches the repo's build output, and the
symlink rather than a copy is what makes a break in the real script fail
here. Its own mktemp is pointed inside the work dir, so a run leaves nothing
behind. Each of the 18 cases asserts the exit status AND a substring of the
message, because a guard that fails for the wrong reason is itself a defect.

The obstacle was that the CI image declares no USER, so CI runs as root, and
root is not subject to file permissions: a chmod 000 case passes vacuously
there while passing honestly on a developer machine. The harness therefore
proves its runner before counting the three permission-dependent cases -- a
mode-644 file and script/verify-build itself must be readable through it, a
mode-000 file must not be -- and drops to uid 65534 via setpriv or runuser
when running as root, both present in the pinned base image. If no candidate
passes the probes the cases are skipped, named in a banner, and the final
line says SKIPPED AND NOT PROVEN rather than passed. A green run cannot mean
"the permission cases did not run" without saying so.

README.md

@@ -88,13 +88,21 @@ provide:
 - `script/lint` — run the linter
 - `script/fmt` — format all files (writes)
 - `script/fmt-check` — check formatting (read-only)
-- `script/check` — run test, lint, and fmt-check
+- `script/check` — run test, test-verify-build, lint, and fmt-check
 - `script/verify-build` — assert the compiled `DEBUG` state of the bundles in
   `dist/`: every bundle containing `src/shared/constants.js` must have `DEBUG`
   off, or on when `AUTISTMASK_DEBUG=1`. Run automatically at the end of
   `make build` and `make build-debug`; fails loudly rather than passing if it
   cannot determine a bundle's state. Not part of `make check`, which does not
   depend on build artifacts existing.
+- `script/test-verify-build` — exercise every failure mode of
+  `script/verify-build` against a fixture tree in a temp dir, asserting the exit
+  status and the message of each. Part of `make check`; it reads no build
+  artifacts and writes nothing under `dist/`. The cases that depend on file
+  permissions cannot mean anything for a process that is not subject to them, so
+  the harness proves its runner against a mode-000 file before counting them,
+  dropping to an unprivileged user when run as root; if it cannot, it skips
+  those cases and says so in a banner rather than passing them.
 - `script/docker` — build the Docker image tagged via `script/projectname`
 - `script/cibuild` — CI entrypoint: plain `docker build .`
 - `script/precommit` — run by the git pre-commit hook; runs `script/check`
@@ -123,16 +131,17 @@ unavailable). The suite lives in `tests/e2e/` and is driven by
 `playwright-core`, whose version must stay matched to the container's Playwright
 version — the browsers ship inside the image.
 
-It covers popup load, wallet creation through the UI, the Add Token screen, the
+It covers popup load, WebAssembly compilation under the shipped CSP (see
-transaction detail screen for an ERC-20 transfer, and the recovery phrase screen
+[Content Security Policy](#content-security-policy)), wallet creation through
-— which wallet types are offered it, that it holds nothing before the password
+the UI, the Add Token screen, the transaction detail screen for an ERC-20
-is accepted, that a wrong password reveals nothing, that leaving it by either
+transfer, and the recovery phrase screen — which wallet types are offered it,
-route wipes it — including a leave taken while the decrypt is still running —
+that it holds nothing before the password is accepted, that a wrong password
-and that reopening the popup does not land on it. All outbound network is
+reveals nothing, that leaving it by either route wipes it — including a leave
-intercepted at the browser level and served from fixtures in
+taken while the decrypt is still running — and that reopening the popup does not
-`tests/e2e/network.js`, so the run is deterministic and fully offline;
+land on it. All outbound network is intercepted at the browser level and served
-unrecognised outbound requests are reported as failures rather than silently
+from fixtures in `tests/e2e/network.js`, so the run is deterministic and fully
-allowed.
+offline; unrecognised outbound requests are reported as failures rather than
+silently allowed.
 
 That reporting has one bound worth knowing. Observation ends when the browser
 context is torn down, and nothing can watch traffic after that, so the run keeps
@@ -435,7 +444,11 @@ The core hierarchy is **Wallets → Addresses**:
       multi-address behavior as an HD wallet, including the "+" button and the
       address scan on import, but imported from an extended private key rather
       than a recovery phrase. It therefore has no recovery phrase to display or
-      back up.
+      back up. Only a master key may be imported; an xprv wallet already in
+      storage that was imported from a non-master key is detected from the depth
+      of its stored `xpub` by `src/shared/walletDefects.js`, explained in the
+      wallet list, and blocked from signing, sending and private-key export. It
+      is never deleted or rewritten.
 - An **address** holds ETH and ERC-20 tokens.
 - The user can have multiple wallets, each with multiple addresses (HD) or a
   single address (key).
@@ -486,6 +499,14 @@ ExportPrivKey and ShowRecoveryPhrase — are deliberately absent from that list,
 so the popup can never reopen onto one of them with no password prompt in front
 of it.
 
+Every screen that holds secret material in the page registers a cleanup with
+`onViewLeave()` (`src/popup/views/helpers.js`), which `showView()` runs on every
+exit from that screen rather than only on its "Back" button, so nothing secret
+survives in a hidden view once the user has navigated away by any route. That
+covers the revealed private key and recovery phrase, the recovery phrase,
+private key or extended private key entered on AddWallet, and the password typed
+on ConfirmTx, DeleteWallet, ApproveTx and ApproveSign.
+
 #### Welcome (`welcome`)
 
 - **When**: No wallets exist yet (`state.hasWallet` is false). This is the root
@@ -596,10 +617,15 @@ of it.
     - "Reveal" (correct password) → decrypts the wallet secret, derives this
       address's key, hides the password input and shows the key (no screen
       change)
-    - "Reveal" (wrong password) → "Wrong password." on the error line, nothing
+    - "Reveal" (wrong password) → full-sentence error on the error line, nothing
-      revealed
+      revealed (no screen change)
-    - "Back" → clears the key and password from the DOM, then → previous screen
+    - "Back" → previous screen (AddressDetail)
-      (AddressDetail)
+- **Secret handling**: nothing is decrypted, no key is derived, and nothing is
+  written into the page until the password is accepted; the key is never stored
+  in state, and it is wiped from the page whenever the screen is left by any
+  route, including the Settings gear. A decrypt still running when the screen is
+  left is discarded rather than written. The screen is not restorable, so
+  reopening the popup lands on Home rather than back on the key.
 
 #### AddressToken (`address-token`)
 
@@ -688,10 +714,23 @@ of it.
     - To: color dot + full address + etherscan link
     - Transaction hash: full hash (tap to copy) + etherscan link
     - Count-up timer: "Waiting for confirmation... Ns"
-- **Behavior**: Polls `getTransactionReceipt` every 10 seconds.
+- **Behavior**: Polls `getTransactionReceipt` every 10 seconds. The wait is
+  persisted: closing and reopening the popup resumes the poll, with the elapsed
+  counter and the timeout deadline still measured from the original broadcast. A
+  lookup that fails is retried on the next tick rather than counted as a missing
+  receipt, because a failed lookup says nothing about the transaction; but six
+  failures in a row (60 seconds at the poll cadence) end the wait, so an RPC
+  that never answers cannot leave it running indefinitely. Any lookup that
+  answers resets that count.
 - **Transitions**:
     - Receipt found → **SuccessTx**
-    - 60 seconds without confirmation → **ErrorTx** (timeout message)
+    - A lookup that answers "no receipt" 60 seconds or more after broadcast →
+      **ErrorTx** (timeout message)
+    - Six consecutive failed lookups → **ErrorTx**, with a message naming the
+      unreachable network and pointing at the RPC URL in Settings. This is a
+      different fact from the timeout — the chain was never asked — and says so
+    - Exactly one outcome: a receipt found on the tick that crosses the deadline
+      wins, and no outcome can be rendered over another
 
 #### SuccessTx (`success-tx`)
 
@@ -1068,6 +1107,36 @@ battle-tested.
 Exceptions require explicit authorization in a code comment referencing this
 policy, but as of now there are none.
 
+### Content Security Policy
+
+Both manifests declare the same policy for extension pages —
+`script-src 'self' 'wasm-unsafe-eval'; object-src 'self'` — as an object under
+`content_security_policy.extension_pages` in `manifest/chrome.json` (MV3) and as
+a bare string in `manifest/firefox.json` (MV2).
+
+`'wasm-unsafe-eval'` is there for one reason: libsodium. It ships a WebAssembly
+build and a `wasm2js` translation of it in one file, tries WASM first, and
+silently falls back to the translation if instantiation throws. Under a plain
+`script-src 'self'` the fallback was taken on every popup load, announced by
+nothing but an uncaught `CompileError`. Measured on the same Argon2id parameters
+the vault uses (`OPSLIMIT_INTERACTIVE`, `MEMLIMIT_INTERACTIVE`), WASM derives a
+key in 141-198ms and `wasm2js` in 3204-3660ms. The work factor is identical — it
+is set by the ops and memory parameters, not by wall time — so the fallback
+bought nothing and cost about three and a half seconds on every operation that
+asks for the password, which is every signature.
+
+The keyword permits compiling WebAssembly and nothing else: not `eval()` of
+strings, not inline script, not remote script. Using it requires already
+executing script in an extension page, which is complete compromise on its own.
+`'unsafe-eval'` is a different proposition and is not granted.
+
+The grant is pinned in both directions. `tests/manifest.test.js` asserts the
+exact token set in both manifests, so dropping `'wasm-unsafe-eval'` (a silent
+20x regression on the key derivation) and adding anything beyond it both fail
+`make check`. `tests/vaultBackend.test.js` asserts the unit tests run the WASM
+backend, and `make test-e2e` compiles a WebAssembly module inside the real popup
+under the real manifest.
+
 ### DEBUG Mode Policy
 
 The `DEBUG` constant in the popup JS enables a red "DEBUG / INSECURE" banner and

TODO.md

@@ -44,6 +44,33 @@ undefined identifiers, which is how
 
 # Completed Steps
 
+- 2026-08-12: `script/verify-build`'s failure modes are now a committed target,
+  `script/test-verify-build`, run by `make check`. It asserts the exit status
+  and the message of every case against a fixture tree in a temp dir, and drops
+  privileges (proving the runner against a mode-000 file first) for the cases
+  that only mean something when file permissions are in force
+  ([#227](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/227)).
+- 2026-08-12: WaitTx lifecycle: a receipt and the 60-second timeout can no
+  longer both render on one tick, no timer or in-flight lookup outlives its
+  wait, a failed receipt lookup no longer counts as a timeout (but six in a row
+  end the wait, reported as an unreachable network rather than as a timeout),
+  and the wait now resumes after a popup close
+  ([#155](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/155)).
+- 2026-08-12: The private key export screen now wipes the key from the page
+  whenever it is left by any route, and a decrypt still in flight when the
+  screen is left is discarded instead of written; the same `onViewLeave()`
+  cleanup was extended to every other screen holding secret material in the DOM
+  (AddWallet, ConfirmTx, DeleteWallet, ApproveTx, ApproveSign)
+  ([#221](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/221)).
+- 2026-08-12: An xprv wallet already in storage that was imported from a
+  non-master key is detected from the depth of its stored `xpub`, explained in
+  the wallet list, and blocked from signing, sending and private-key export
+  instead of throwing on the send screen
+  ([#234](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/234)).
+- 2026-08-12: An unreported `holders_count` is now parsed as `null` rather than
+  `0`, so the low-holder rule declines to judge an unknown count instead of
+  hiding a legitimate token as spam, in both the transaction history and the
+  Send token selector ([#230](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/230)).
 - 2026-08-12: Bundled token list documentation no longer states a count. The
   four "top 250" claims in `README.md` and the "roughly 500" claim in
   `docs/README.md` are replaced with a description of how the list is actually
@@ -51,6 +78,11 @@ undefined identifiers, which is how
   Ethereum mainnet ERC-20s — with `TOKENS` in `src/shared/tokenList.js` named as
   the authoritative set
   ([#239](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/239)).
+- 2026-08-11: libsodium runs on WebAssembly in the shipped builds —
+  `'wasm-unsafe-eval'` added to both manifest CSPs after measuring the wasm2js
+  fallback at 20x the Argon2id cost, pinned in both directions by
+  `tests/manifest.test.js` and observed in the real popup by the e2e suite
+  ([#182](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/182)).
 - 2026-08-11: Known-symbol spoof verification became a Settings toggle
   (`hideSpoofedSymbols`), on by default, governing the transaction-history
   filter and the fraud-contract learning it feeds

manifest/chrome.json

@@ -5,6 +5,9 @@
     "description": "Minimal Ethereum wallet for Chrome",
     "permissions": ["storage", "activeTab", "alarms"],
     "host_permissions": ["<all_urls>"],
+    "content_security_policy": {
+        "extension_pages": "script-src 'self' 'wasm-unsafe-eval'; object-src 'self'"
+    },
     "action": {
         "default_popup": "src/popup/index.html"
     },

manifest/firefox.json

@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
     "version": "0.1.0",
     "description": "Minimal Ethereum wallet for Firefox",
     "permissions": ["storage", "activeTab", "alarms", "<all_urls>"],
+    "content_security_policy": "script-src 'self' 'wasm-unsafe-eval'; object-src 'self'",
     "browser_action": {
         "default_popup": "src/popup/index.html"
     },

script/check

@@ -1,12 +1,13 @@
 #!/bin/sh
-# script/check: run all checks (test, lint, fmt-check). Our own
+# script/check: run all checks (test, test-verify-build, lint, fmt-check).
-# extension to scripts-to-rule-them-all. Must not modify any files.
+# Our own extension to scripts-to-rule-them-all. Must not modify any files.
 set -eu
 
 SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd -P)"
 
 main() {
     "$SCRIPT_DIR/test"
+    "$SCRIPT_DIR/test-verify-build"
     "$SCRIPT_DIR/lint"
     "$SCRIPT_DIR/fmt-check"
 }

script/test-verify-build

@@ -0,0 +1,444 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# script/test-verify-build: exercise every failure mode of
+# script/verify-build. Our own extension to scripts-to-rule-them-all, run
+# from script/check so make check covers it.
+#
+# Why this exists: verify-build is the build-integrity guard, and three
+# separate reviews of it each found a fresh vacuous pass — the grep exit-2
+# conflation, the discarded find status, the line-delimited walk. Every one
+# was caught by someone building a tree by hand, because nothing in make check
+# could catch it. This is that hand battery, committed and automated.
+#
+# Each case asserts the exit status AND a substring of the message. A guard
+# that fails for the wrong reason (right status, different fault) is itself a
+# defect, so matching the status alone would not be a test of anything.
+#
+# The fixture is a temp tree containing script/verify-build as a SYMLINK to
+# the real script: verify-build takes its ROOT from dirname "$0"/.., so it
+# operates on the fixture's dist/ and never reads or writes the repo's build
+# output. The symlink rather than a copy is what makes a deliberate break in
+# the real script fail here.
+set -eu
+
+ROOT="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")/.." && pwd -P)"
+VERIFY_BUILD="$ROOT/script/verify-build"
+
+MARKER_ON="autistmask-build-debug=on"
+MARKER_OFF="autistmask-build-debug=off"
+
+NEWLINE='
+'
+
+PASSED=0
+FAILED=0
+SKIPPED=0
+SKIPPED_NAMES=""
+
+# The command prefix that runs the permission-dependent cases as a user who
+# is actually subject to file permissions, and whether those cases can run at
+# all. Both are decided by probe_permission_runner, never assumed.
+UNPRIV=""
+PERM_ENABLED=no
+PERM_HOW=""
+
+WORK=""
+
+cleanup() {
+    [ -n "$WORK" ] || return 0
+    # The cases chmod 000 files and directories on purpose.
+    chmod -R u+rwX "$WORK" 2>/dev/null || true
+    rm -rf "$WORK"
+}
+trap cleanup EXIT INT TERM
+
+WORK="$(mktemp -d "${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/autistmask-test-verify-build.XXXXXX")"
+FIXTURE="$WORK/fixture"
+
+# verify-build mktemps its dist/ listing under TMPDIR. Pointing that inside
+# our work dir keeps the run leaving no residue, and keeps it writable for the
+# unprivileged user the permission cases run as.
+TMPDIR="$WORK/tmp"
+export TMPDIR
+mkdir -p "$TMPDIR"
+chmod 1777 "$TMPDIR"
+chmod 755 "$WORK"
+
+# --- fixture ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+# A stand-in for an emitted bundle: some text plus one marker literal, which
+# is all verify-build reads out of the real thing.
+write_bundle() {
+    printf 'var a=1;/* %s */\nvar b=2;\n' "$2" >"$1"
+}
+
+# A dist/ shaped like a real build: two listed bundles under different
+# browsers, an unlisted subtree to make unwalkable, and unlisted files that
+# carry no marker and must not be objected to.
+build_fixture() {
+    chmod -R u+rwX "$FIXTURE" 2>/dev/null || true
+    rm -rf "$FIXTURE"
+
+    mkdir -p "$FIXTURE/script"
+    ln -s "$VERIFY_BUILD" "$FIXTURE/script/verify-build"
+
+    mkdir -p "$FIXTURE/dist/chrome/src/popup" \
+        "$FIXTURE/dist/chrome/src/content" \
+        "$FIXTURE/dist/firefox/src/popup"
+
+    write_bundle "$FIXTURE/dist/chrome/src/popup/index.js" "$MARKER_OFF"
+    write_bundle "$FIXTURE/dist/firefox/src/popup/index.js" "$MARKER_OFF"
+    printf 'body{color:#000}\n' >"$FIXTURE/dist/styles.css"
+    printf 'var c=3;\n' >"$FIXTURE/dist/chrome/src/content/content.js"
+
+    {
+        echo "dist/chrome/src/popup/index.js"
+        echo "dist/firefox/src/popup/index.js"
+    } >"$FIXTURE/dist/constants-bundles.txt"
+
+    # Readable and traversable by the unprivileged user the permission cases
+    # run as, before those cases take that away again on purpose.
+    chmod -R a+rX "$FIXTURE"
+}
+
+# --- permission runner ------------------------------------------------------
+
+# Run a command through the current unprivileged runner. Unquoted on purpose:
+# UNPRIV is a command prefix that has to word-split.
+run_unpriv() {
+    # shellcheck disable=SC2086
+    $UNPRIV "$@"
+}
+
+# Decide whether the permission-dependent cases can run, and prove it rather
+# than assuming it.
+#
+# The problem: the CI image declares no USER, so CI runs as root, and root is
+# not subject to file permissions — chmod 000 stops neither find nor grep. A
+# permission case run as root passes vacuously, which is worse than no case at
+# all because it reads as coverage.
+#
+# So the runner is validated with two probes before any permission case is
+# counted:
+#
+#   - a mode-644 file MUST be readable through it. If not, the runner itself
+#     is broken (missing helper, no such user, sandbox), and every case run
+#     through it would fail for the wrong reason.
+#   - a mode-000 file MUST NOT be readable through it. If it is, permissions
+#     are not in force and the cases would pass without proving anything.
+#
+# Unprivileged: the runner is empty and both probes are about this process,
+# which is the honest answer. Root: setpriv and runuser are tried, both
+# present in the pinned CI base image. Only when no candidate passes both
+# probes are the cases skipped, and a skipped run says so unmistakably.
+probe_permission_runner() {
+    _probe="$WORK/probe"
+    mkdir -p "$_probe"
+    printf 'readable\n' >"$_probe/public"
+    printf 'secret\n' >"$_probe/private"
+    chmod 755 "$_probe"
+    chmod 644 "$_probe/public"
+    chmod 000 "$_probe/private"
+
+    if [ "$(id -u)" -eq 0 ]; then
+        _candidates="setpriv|setpriv --reuid=65534 --regid=65534 --clear-groups --
+runuser|runuser -u nobody --"
+    else
+        _candidates="direct|"
+    fi
+
+    _tried=""
+    _saved_ifs="$IFS"
+    IFS="$NEWLINE"
+    for _line in $_candidates; do
+        IFS="$_saved_ifs"
+        _label="${_line%%|*}"
+        _cmd="${_line#*|}"
+        _tried="${_tried:+$_tried, }$_label"
+
+        if [ -n "$_cmd" ]; then
+            _bin="${_cmd%% *}"
+            command -v "$_bin" >/dev/null 2>&1 || continue
+        fi
+
+        UNPRIV="$_cmd"
+        # Broken or unusable runner: the cases would fail for the wrong
+        # reason. Reaching the script under test is part of usable.
+        run_unpriv cat "$_probe/public" >/dev/null 2>&1 || continue
+        run_unpriv cat "$VERIFY_BUILD" >/dev/null 2>&1 || continue
+        # Permissions not in force through this runner: the cases would pass
+        # without testing anything.
+        if run_unpriv cat "$_probe/private" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+            continue
+        fi
+
+        PERM_ENABLED=yes
+        PERM_HOW="$_label"
+        IFS="$_saved_ifs"
+        return 0
+    done
+    IFS="$_saved_ifs"
+
+    UNPRIV=""
+    PERM_ENABLED=no
+    PERM_HOW="$_tried"
+}
+
+# --- case runner ------------------------------------------------------------
+
+# check_case <name> <perm:yes|no> <mode:release|debug> <status> <text> <setup>
+#
+# Rebuilds the fixture, applies <setup> inside it, runs verify-build, and
+# requires both the exit status and the message. <perm> marks a case that only
+# means anything when file permissions are in force.
+check_case() {
+    _name="$1"
+    _perm="$2"
+    _mode="$3"
+    _want_status="$4"
+    _want_text="$5"
+    _setup="$6"
+
+    if [ "$_perm" = yes ] && [ "$PERM_ENABLED" != yes ]; then
+        SKIPPED=$((SKIPPED + 1))
+        SKIPPED_NAMES="$SKIPPED_NAMES##   - $_name$NEWLINE"
+        echo "  SKIP (permissions not in force): $_name"
+        return 0
+    fi
+
+    build_fixture
+    if ! (cd "$FIXTURE" && "$_setup") >/dev/null 2>&1; then
+        FAILED=$((FAILED + 1))
+        echo "  FAIL: $_name"
+        echo "    the case's own setup failed, so nothing was tested."
+        return 0
+    fi
+
+    if [ "$_mode" = debug ]; then
+        _debug=1
+    else
+        _debug=""
+    fi
+
+    # Exported rather than set as a command prefix: run_unpriv is a function,
+    # and an assignment prefixed to a function call is not portable.
+    AUTISTMASK_DEBUG="$_debug"
+    export AUTISTMASK_DEBUG
+
+    _status=0
+    if [ "$_perm" = yes ]; then
+        _out="$(run_unpriv "$FIXTURE/script/verify-build" 2>&1)" || _status=$?
+    else
+        _out="$("$FIXTURE/script/verify-build" 2>&1)" || _status=$?
+    fi
+
+    _ok=yes
+    _why=""
+
+    if [ "$_status" -ne "$_want_status" ]; then
+        _ok=no
+        _why="exit status $_status, wanted $_want_status"
+    fi
+
+    # Same discipline verify-build itself applies to grep: 0 and 1 are
+    # answers, anything else is not, and must not be read as "no match".
+    _g=0
+    printf '%s\n' "$_out" | grep -q -F -e "$_want_text" || _g=$?
+    case "$_g" in
+    0) ;;
+    1)
+        _ok=no
+        _why="${_why:+$_why; }message did not contain: $_want_text"
+        ;;
+    *)
+        _ok=no
+        _why="${_why:+$_why; }grep exited $_g matching the message, so the
+      message was never checked"
+        ;;
+    esac
+
+    if [ "$_ok" = yes ]; then
+        PASSED=$((PASSED + 1))
+        echo "  ok: $_name"
+        return 0
+    fi
+
+    FAILED=$((FAILED + 1))
+    echo "  FAIL: $_name"
+    echo "    $_why"
+    echo "    --- verify-build output ---"
+    printf '%s\n' "$_out" | sed 's/^/    /'
+    echo "    --- end output ---"
+}
+
+# --- cases ------------------------------------------------------------------
+#
+# Each runs with the fixture as its working directory.
+
+c_control() { :; }
+
+c_trailing_space() {
+    cp dist/chrome/src/popup/index.js "dist/chrome/src/popup/index.js "
+}
+
+c_embedded_newline() {
+    cp dist/chrome/src/popup/index.js "dist/chrome/src/popup/index.js$NEWLINE"
+}
+
+c_dist_symlink() {
+    mv dist dist.real
+    ln -s dist.real dist
+}
+
+c_unwalkable_subtree() { chmod 000 dist/chrome/src/content; }
+
+c_dangling_symlink() {
+    ln -s /nonexistent-target-for-test-verify-build dist/chrome/dangling.js
+}
+
+c_dir_symlink() { ln -s src dist/chrome/link-to-dir; }
+
+c_alias_symlink() { ln -s popup/index.js dist/chrome/src/aliased.js; }
+
+c_manifest_missing() { rm dist/constants-bundles.txt; }
+
+c_manifest_empty() { : >dist/constants-bundles.txt; }
+
+c_manifest_unreadable() { chmod 000 dist/constants-bundles.txt; }
+
+c_bundle_missing() { rm dist/chrome/src/popup/index.js; }
+
+c_bundle_empty() { : >dist/chrome/src/popup/index.js; }
+
+c_bundle_unreadable() { chmod 000 dist/chrome/src/popup/index.js; }
+
+c_unlisted_extension() {
+    cp dist/chrome/src/popup/index.js dist/chrome/src/popup/extra.mjs
+}
+
+c_no_marker() { printf 'var d=4;\n' >dist/chrome/src/popup/index.js; }
+
+c_both_markers() {
+    printf '/* %s */\n' "$MARKER_ON" >>dist/chrome/src/popup/index.js
+}
+
+run_cases() {
+    check_case "control: untouched dist passes" \
+        no release 0 "2 bundle(s) verified $MARKER_OFF" c_control
+
+    check_case "unlisted marker-carrying file, trailing space in name" \
+        no release 1 "carries a debug marker but is absent from" \
+        c_trailing_space
+
+    check_case "unlisted marker-carrying file, newline in name" \
+        no release 1 "carries a debug marker but is absent from" \
+        c_embedded_newline
+
+    check_case "dist/ replaced by a symlink" \
+        no release 1 "dist is a symlink, not a directory." c_dist_symlink
+
+    check_case "unwalkable subtree under dist/" \
+        yes release 1 "enumerating dist/, so part of the tree" \
+        c_unwalkable_subtree
+
+    check_case "dangling symlink under dist/" \
+        no release 1 \
+        "reading dist/chrome/dangling.js, so the file could not be" \
+        c_dangling_symlink
+
+    check_case "symlink to a directory under dist/" \
+        no release 1 \
+        "reading dist/chrome/link-to-dir, so the file could not be" \
+        c_dir_symlink
+
+    check_case "symlink to a listed bundle under an unlisted path" \
+        no release 1 \
+        "dist/chrome/src/aliased.js carries a debug marker but is absent" \
+        c_alias_symlink
+
+    check_case "manifest missing" \
+        no release 1 "dist/constants-bundles.txt is missing." \
+        c_manifest_missing
+
+    check_case "manifest empty" \
+        no release 1 "is empty, so no emitted bundle was found to contain" \
+        c_manifest_empty
+
+    check_case "manifest unreadable" \
+        yes release 1 "is not readable, so nothing was inspected." \
+        c_manifest_unreadable
+
+    check_case "listed bundle missing" \
+        no release 1 \
+        "lists dist/chrome/src/popup/index.js, which does not exist." \
+        c_bundle_missing
+
+    check_case "listed bundle empty" \
+        no release 1 "which is empty. An empty bundle" c_bundle_empty
+
+    check_case "listed bundle unreadable" \
+        yes release 1 \
+        "reading dist/chrome/src/popup/index.js, so the file could not be" \
+        c_bundle_unreadable
+
+    check_case "unlisted extension carrying a marker" \
+        no release 1 \
+        "dist/chrome/src/popup/extra.mjs carries a debug marker but is" \
+        c_unlisted_extension
+
+    check_case "listed bundle carries no marker" \
+        no release 1 "carries no debug marker, so its DEBUG state cannot be" \
+        c_no_marker
+
+    check_case "listed bundle carries both markers" \
+        no release 1 "carries both debug markers, so DEBUG was not resolved" \
+        c_both_markers
+
+    check_case "wrong marker for the requested mode" \
+        no debug 1 "is $MARKER_OFF but this build expects $MARKER_ON" \
+        c_control
+}
+
+# --- main --------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+main() {
+    cd "$ROOT"
+
+    [ -x "$VERIFY_BUILD" ] || {
+        echo "test-verify-build: $VERIFY_BUILD is missing or not executable" >&2
+        exit 1
+    }
+
+    echo "Testing script/verify-build failure modes..."
+    probe_permission_runner
+    if [ "$PERM_ENABLED" = yes ]; then
+        echo "  permission cases: enabled (runner: $PERM_HOW, proved against" \
+            "a mode-000 file)"
+    fi
+
+    run_cases
+
+    if [ "$FAILED" -ne 0 ]; then
+        echo "test-verify-build: $FAILED case(s) FAILED," \
+            "$PASSED passed, $SKIPPED skipped" >&2
+        exit 1
+    fi
+
+    if [ "$SKIPPED" -ne 0 ]; then
+        cat <<EOF
+################################################################################
+## WARNING: $SKIPPED PERMISSION CASE(S) DID NOT RUN, AND THIS RUN DOES NOT
+## PROVE THEM. This process is uid $(id -u), and no runner subject to file
+## permissions was available. Tried: $PERM_HOW.
+## Under root, chmod 000 stops neither find nor grep, so these cases would
+## have passed without testing anything. They were skipped, not counted:
+$SKIPPED_NAMES################################################################################
+EOF
+        echo "test-verify-build: $PASSED case(s) passed," \
+            "$SKIPPED SKIPPED AND NOT PROVEN (see the warning above)"
+        return 0
+    fi
+
+    echo "test-verify-build: $PASSED case(s) passed"
+}
+
+main "$@"

src/popup/index.js

@@ -165,6 +165,12 @@ function restoreView() {
                 fallbackView();
             }
             break;
+        case "wait-tx":
+            // Resumes the receipt poll from the persisted broadcast time.
+            if (!txStatus.restoreWait()) {
+                fallbackView();
+            }
+            break;
         case "success-tx":
             if (state.viewData && state.viewData.hash) {
                 txStatus.renderSuccess();

src/popup/restorableViews.js

@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ const RESTORABLE_VIEWS = new Set([
     "settings-addtoken",
     "confirm-tx",
     "transaction",
+    "wait-tx",
     "success-tx",
     "error-tx",
 ]);

src/popup/views/addWallet.js

@@ -1,4 +1,11 @@
-const { $, showView, showFlash, goBack, clearViewStack } = require("./helpers");
+const {
+    $,
+    showView,
+    showFlash,
+    goBack,
+    clearViewStack,
+    onViewLeave,
+} = require("./helpers");
 const {
     generateMnemonic,
     hdWalletFromMnemonic,
@@ -66,13 +73,23 @@ function switchMode(mode) {
     $("add-wallet-password-hint").textContent = PASSWORD_HINTS[mode];
 }
 
-function show() {
+// Wipe the secret material this screen holds in the DOM: a generated or
+// pasted recovery phrase, an imported private key or extended private key,
+// and the password that would encrypt them. Registered as the view-leave
+// handler as well as run on entry, so none of it survives in the hidden
+// view after the user navigates away by any route, including the Settings
+// gear and the import itself.
+function clear() {
     $("wallet-mnemonic").value = "";
     $("import-private-key").value = "";
     $("import-xprv-key").value = "";
     $("add-wallet-password").value = "";
     $("add-wallet-password-confirm").value = "";
     $("add-wallet-phrase-warning").style.visibility = "hidden";
+}
+
+function show() {
+    clear();
     switchMode("mnemonic");
     showView("add-wallet");
 }
@@ -288,6 +305,8 @@ async function importXprvKey(ctx) {
 }
 
 function init(ctx) {
+    onViewLeave("add-wallet", clear);
+
     // Tab click handlers
     $("tab-mnemonic").addEventListener("click", () => switchMode("mnemonic"));
     $("tab-privkey").addEventListener("click", () => switchMode("privkey"));

src/popup/views/addressDetail.js

@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ const {
     $,
     showView,
     showFlash,
-    flashCopyFeedback,
     balanceLinesForAddress,
     addressDotHtml,
     addressTitle,
@@ -27,8 +26,17 @@ const {
 } = require("./send");
 const { log } = require("../../shared/log");
 const makeBlockie = require("ethereum-blockies-base64");
-const { decryptWithPassword } = require("../../shared/vault");
+const exportPrivkey = require("./exportPrivkey");
-const { getSignerForAddress } = require("../../shared/wallet");
+const { walletDefect } = require("../../shared/walletDefects");
+
+// The defect of the wallet the selected address belongs to, or null. Both the
+// send and the private-key export path check it before asking for a password,
+// so a wallet that cannot derive its keys says so instead of failing after the
+// user has typed one in.
+function selectedWalletDefect() {
+    if (state.selectedWallet === null) return null;
+    return walletDefect(state.wallets[state.selectedWallet]);
+}
 
 let ctx;
 
@@ -254,6 +262,11 @@ function init(_ctx) {
     });
 
     $("btn-send").addEventListener("click", () => {
+        const defect = selectedWalletDefect();
+        if (defect) {
+            showFlash(defect.shortMessage);
+            return;
+        }
         const addr =
             state.wallets[state.selectedWallet].addresses[
                 state.selectedAddress
@@ -298,81 +311,20 @@ function init(_ctx) {
     $("btn-export-privkey").addEventListener("click", () => {
         moreDropdown.classList.add("hidden");
         moreBtn.classList.remove("bg-fg", "text-bg");
-        pushCurrentView();
+        // There is no private key to export for an address this wallet
-        const wallet = state.wallets[state.selectedWallet];
+        // cannot derive. Without this the export screen would take a
-        const addr = wallet.addresses[state.selectedAddress];
+        // password and then report it as wrong.
-        const blockieEl = $("export-privkey-jazzicon");
+        const defect = selectedWalletDefect();
-        blockieEl.innerHTML = "";
+        if (defect) {
-        const bImg = document.createElement("img");
+            showFlash(defect.shortMessage);
-        bImg.src = makeBlockie(addr.address);
-        bImg.width = 48;
-        bImg.height = 48;
-        bImg.style.imageRendering = "pixelated";
-        bImg.style.borderRadius = "50%";
-        blockieEl.appendChild(bImg);
-        $("export-privkey-title").textContent =
-            wallet.name + " \u2014 Address " + (state.selectedAddress + 1);
-        const exportAddrContainer = $("export-privkey-dot").parentElement;
-        exportAddrContainer.innerHTML = renderAddressHtml(addr.address);
-        attachCopyHandlers(exportAddrContainer);
-        $("export-privkey-password").value = "";
-        $("export-privkey-flash").textContent = "";
-        $("export-privkey-flash").style.visibility = "hidden";
-        $("export-privkey-password-section").classList.remove("hidden");
-        $("export-privkey-result").classList.add("hidden");
-        $("export-privkey-value").textContent = "";
-        showView("export-privkey");
-    });
-
-    $("btn-export-privkey-confirm").addEventListener("click", async () => {
-        const password = $("export-privkey-password").value;
-        if (!password) {
-            $("export-privkey-flash").textContent = "Password is required.";
-            $("export-privkey-flash").style.visibility = "visible";
             return;
         }
-        const btn = $("btn-export-privkey-confirm");
+        // No pushCurrentView() here: exportPrivkey.show() can return
-        btn.disabled = true;
+        // without navigating, so it does its own push.
-        btn.classList.add("text-muted");
+        exportPrivkey.show(state.selectedWallet, state.selectedAddress);
-        const wallet = state.wallets[state.selectedWallet];
-        try {
-            const secret = await decryptWithPassword(
-                wallet.encryptedSecret,
-                password,
-            );
-            const signer = getSignerForAddress(
-                wallet,
-                state.selectedAddress,
-                secret,
-            );
-            const privateKey = signer.privateKey;
-            $("export-privkey-password-section").classList.add("hidden");
-            $("export-privkey-value").textContent = privateKey;
-            $("export-privkey-result").classList.remove("hidden");
-            $("export-privkey-flash").style.visibility = "hidden";
-        } catch {
-            $("export-privkey-flash").textContent = "Wrong password.";
-            $("export-privkey-flash").style.visibility = "visible";
-        } finally {
-            btn.disabled = false;
-            btn.classList.remove("text-muted");
-        }
     });
 
-    $("export-privkey-value").addEventListener("click", () => {
+    exportPrivkey.init();
-        const key = $("export-privkey-value").textContent;
-        if (key) {
-            navigator.clipboard.writeText(key);
-            showFlash("Copied!");
-            flashCopyFeedback($("export-privkey-value"));
-        }
-    });
-
-    $("btn-export-privkey-back").addEventListener("click", () => {
-        $("export-privkey-value").textContent = "";
-        $("export-privkey-password").value = "";
-        goBack();
-    });
 }
 
 module.exports = { init, show };

src/popup/views/addressToken.js

@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ const {
 } = require("./send");
 const { log } = require("../../shared/log");
 const makeBlockie = require("ethereum-blockies-base64");
+const { walletDefect } = require("../../shared/walletDefects");
 
 let ctx;
 
@@ -338,6 +339,11 @@ function init(_ctx) {
     });
 
     $("btn-address-token-send").addEventListener("click", () => {
+        const defect = walletDefect(state.wallets[state.selectedWallet]);
+        if (defect) {
+            showFlash(defect.shortMessage);
+            return;
+        }
         const addr =
             state.wallets[state.selectedWallet].addresses[
                 state.selectedAddress

src/popup/views/approval.js

@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ const {
     hideError,
     renderAddressHtml,
     attachCopyHandlers,
+    onViewLeave,
 } = require("./helpers");
 const { state, saveState, currentNetwork } = require("../../shared/state");
 const {
@@ -21,6 +22,7 @@ const { ERC20_ABI } = require("../../shared/constants");
 const { TOKEN_BY_ADDRESS } = require("../../shared/tokenList");
 const { decryptWithPassword } = require("../../shared/vault");
 const { getSignerForAddress } = require("../../shared/wallet");
+const { walletDefect } = require("../../shared/walletDefects");
 const { getProvider } = require("../../shared/balances");
 const txStatus = require("./txStatus");
 const uniswap = require("../../shared/uniswap");
@@ -280,6 +282,7 @@ function showTxApproval(details) {
 
     showView("approve-tx");
     attachCopyHandlers("view-approve-tx");
+    gateOnWalletDefect("approve-tx-error", "btn-approve-tx");
 }
 
 function decodeHexMessage(hex) {
@@ -379,6 +382,7 @@ function showSignApproval(details) {
 
     showView("approve-sign");
     attachCopyHandlers("view-approve-sign");
+    gateOnWalletDefect("approve-sign-error", "btn-approve-sign");
 }
 
 function show(id) {
@@ -431,6 +435,20 @@ function setSignButtonBusy(busy) {
     $("btn-approve-sign").classList.toggle("text-muted", busy);
 }
 
+// Say so on the approval screen itself, and disable the approve button, when
+// the active address belongs to a wallet whose keys cannot be derived. Without
+// this the screen would take a password and fail after deriving it. Reject
+// stays available; the wallet is not touched. Returns true when it gated.
+function gateOnWalletDefect(errorId, buttonId) {
+    const active = findActiveWallet();
+    const defect = active ? walletDefect(active.wallet) : null;
+    if (!defect) return false;
+    showError(errorId, defect.shortMessage);
+    $(buttonId).disabled = true;
+    $(buttonId).classList.add("text-muted");
+    return true;
+}
+
 // Locate the wallet and the address index owning the currently active
 // address. Returns null when no wallet holds it.
 function findActiveWallet() {
@@ -444,7 +462,24 @@ function findActiveWallet() {
     return null;
 }
 
+// Drop the password from the DOM when either approval screen is left. The
+// approval window navigates on after a signature — approve-tx goes to the
+// wait screen — and the password must not sit in the hidden view for the
+// life of that window.
+function clearTxPassword() {
+    $("approve-tx-password").value = "";
+    hideError("approve-tx-error");
+}
+
+function clearSignPassword() {
+    $("approve-sign-password").value = "";
+    hideError("approve-sign-error");
+}
+
 function init(ctx) {
+    onViewLeave("approve-tx", clearTxPassword);
+    onViewLeave("approve-sign", clearSignPassword);
+
     $("approve-remember").addEventListener("change", async () => {
         state.rememberSiteChoice = $("approve-remember").checked;
         await saveState();
@@ -492,6 +527,14 @@ function init(ctx) {
             return;
         }
 
+        const defect = walletDefect(active.wallet);
+        if (defect) {
+            password = null;
+            showError("approve-tx-error", defect.shortMessage);
+            setTxButtonBusy(false);
+            return;
+        }
+
         // Decrypt here, in the popup. The password must never cross the
         // extension messaging boundary; only the signed transaction does.
         let decryptedSecret;
@@ -583,6 +626,14 @@ function init(ctx) {
             return;
         }
 
+        const defect = walletDefect(active.wallet);
+        if (defect) {
+            password = null;
+            showError("approve-sign-error", defect.shortMessage);
+            setSignButtonBusy(false);
+            return;
+        }
+
         // Decrypt here, in the popup. The password must never cross the
         // extension messaging boundary; only the signature does.
         let decryptedSecret;

src/popup/views/confirmTx.js

@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ const {
     renderAddressHtml,
     attachCopyHandlers,
     goBack,
+    onViewLeave,
 } = require("./helpers");
 const { state, currentNetwork } = require("../../shared/state");
 const { getSignerForAddress } = require("../../shared/wallet");
@@ -390,7 +391,17 @@ async function checkRecipientHistory(txInfo) {
     }
 }
 
+// Drop the password from the DOM. Registered as the view-leave handler so
+// it does not sit in the hidden view once the screen navigates on — to the
+// wait screen after a send, or anywhere else the user goes.
+function clearPassword() {
+    $("confirm-tx-password").value = "";
+    hideError("confirm-tx-password-error");
+}
+
 function init(ctx) {
+    onViewLeave("confirm-tx", clearPassword);
+
     $("btn-confirm-send").addEventListener("click", async () => {
         const password = $("confirm-tx-password").value;
         if (!password) {

src/popup/views/deleteWallet.js

@@ -1,4 +1,11 @@
-const { $, showView, showFlash, goBack, clearViewStack } = require("./helpers");
+const {
+    $,
+    showView,
+    showFlash,
+    goBack,
+    clearViewStack,
+    onViewLeave,
+} = require("./helpers");
 const { state, saveState } = require("../../shared/state");
 const { decryptWithPassword } = require("../../shared/vault");
 const {
@@ -9,22 +16,34 @@ const {
 let deleteWalletIndex = null;
 let ctx = null;
 
+// Drop the password from the DOM and the wallet selection from the
+// closure. Registered as the view-leave handler as well as run on entry,
+// so the typed password does not sit in the hidden view after the user
+// navigates away by any route, including the Settings gear.
+function clear() {
+    deleteWalletIndex = null;
+    $("delete-wallet-password").value = "";
+    $("delete-wallet-flash").textContent = "";
+    $("delete-wallet-flash").style.visibility = "hidden";
+}
+
 function show(walletIdx) {
+    clear();
     deleteWalletIndex = walletIdx;
     const wallet = state.wallets[walletIdx];
     $("delete-wallet-name").textContent =
         wallet.name || "Wallet " + (walletIdx + 1);
-    $("delete-wallet-password").value = "";
-    $("delete-wallet-flash").textContent = "";
-    $("delete-wallet-flash").style.visibility = "hidden";
     showView("delete-wallet-confirm");
 }
 
 function init(_ctx) {
     ctx = _ctx;
 
+    onViewLeave("delete-wallet-confirm", clear);
+
+    // No wipe here: goBack() routes through showView(), which runs the
+    // leave hook.
     $("btn-delete-wallet-back").addEventListener("click", () => {
-        deleteWalletIndex = null;
         goBack();
     });
 

src/popup/views/exportPrivkey.js

@@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
+// Private key export for a single address.
+//
+// The key controls the address outright — anyone holding it can move every
+// token in it, from any device, forever — so this screen is handled under
+// the same rules as the recovery phrase screen (./showPhrase.js):
+//
+//   1. Nothing is decrypted, no key is derived, and nothing is written into
+//      the DOM until decryptWithPassword has accepted the password.
+//   2. Leaving the screen by any path wipes it, via the onViewLeave hook,
+//      and a decrypt still in flight when that happens is discarded
+//      instead of written (revealGeneration).
+//   3. The key never reaches the logger. This module deliberately does not
+//      import src/shared/log.js.
+//
+// The key is also never assigned to `state`, so it cannot be persisted to
+// extension storage, and "export-privkey" is excluded from RESTORABLE_VIEWS
+// so the popup can never reopen onto it.
+
+const {
+    $,
+    showView,
+    showFlash,
+    flashCopyFeedback,
+    goBack,
+    onViewLeave,
+    pushCurrentView,
+    renderAddressHtml,
+    attachCopyHandlers,
+} = require("./helpers");
+const { state } = require("../../shared/state");
+const { decryptWithPassword } = require("../../shared/vault");
+const { getSignerForAddress } = require("../../shared/wallet");
+const makeBlockie = require("ethereum-blockies-base64");
+
+const VIEW = "export-privkey";
+
+let walletIndex = null;
+let addressIndex = null;
+
+// Bumped by every clear(), which is what leaving the screen runs. reveal()
+// captures it before awaiting the decrypt and refuses to touch the DOM if
+// it has moved: a decrypt still in flight when the screen is left would
+// otherwise write the key *after* the wipe, with nothing scheduled to wipe
+// it again, leaving it in the hidden view for the life of the popup.
+let revealGeneration = 0;
+
+// True only if the reveal that captured `generation` is still the live one:
+// the screen has not been left, cleared, or re-entered for another address
+// since it started.
+function isCurrentReveal(generation) {
+    return (
+        generation === revealGeneration &&
+        walletIndex !== null &&
+        addressIndex !== null &&
+        state.currentView === VIEW
+    );
+}
+
+function fail(message) {
+    $("export-privkey-flash").textContent = message;
+    $("export-privkey-flash").style.visibility = "visible";
+}
+
+// Wipe every trace of the key and drop the address selection. Safe to call
+// when nothing was ever revealed, and safe to call twice.
+function clear() {
+    walletIndex = null;
+    addressIndex = null;
+    revealGeneration += 1;
+    $("export-privkey-value").textContent = "";
+    $("export-privkey-password").value = "";
+    $("export-privkey-result").classList.add("hidden");
+    $("export-privkey-password-section").classList.remove("hidden");
+    $("export-privkey-flash").textContent = "";
+    $("export-privkey-flash").style.visibility = "hidden";
+}
+
+function show(walletIdx, addrIdx) {
+    const wallet = state.wallets[walletIdx];
+    const addr = wallet && wallet.addresses[addrIdx];
+    if (!addr) {
+        showFlash("That address is no longer available.");
+        return;
+    }
+    clear();
+    walletIndex = walletIdx;
+    addressIndex = addrIdx;
+
+    const blockieEl = $("export-privkey-jazzicon");
+    blockieEl.innerHTML = "";
+    const img = document.createElement("img");
+    img.src = makeBlockie(addr.address);
+    img.width = 48;
+    img.height = 48;
+    img.style.imageRendering = "pixelated";
+    img.style.borderRadius = "50%";
+    blockieEl.appendChild(img);
+
+    $("export-privkey-title").textContent =
+        wallet.name + " — Address " + (addrIdx + 1);
+    const addrContainer = $("export-privkey-dot").parentElement;
+    addrContainer.innerHTML = renderAddressHtml(addr.address);
+    attachCopyHandlers(addrContainer);
+
+    // Pushed here rather than by the caller: this function can return
+    // without navigating, and a push that happened anyway would leave an
+    // entry on the stack that no screen transition matches.
+    pushCurrentView();
+    showView(VIEW);
+}
+
+async function reveal() {
+    const password = $("export-privkey-password").value;
+    if (!password) {
+        fail("Password is required.");
+        return;
+    }
+    if (walletIndex === null) {
+        fail("No address is selected.");
+        return;
+    }
+    const wallet = state.wallets[walletIndex];
+
+    const btn = $("btn-export-privkey-confirm");
+    btn.disabled = true;
+    btn.classList.add("text-muted");
+    const generation = revealGeneration;
+    try {
+        const secret = await decryptWithPassword(
+            wallet.encryptedSecret,
+            password,
+        );
+        // The only suspension point in this view, and the gate on the only
+        // place a secret is written: if the screen was left while the
+        // decrypt ran, the wipe has already happened, so the key is not
+        // even derived, let alone written.
+        if (!isCurrentReveal(generation)) return;
+        const signer = getSignerForAddress(wallet, addressIndex, secret);
+        $("export-privkey-password").value = "";
+        $("export-privkey-password-section").classList.add("hidden");
+        $("export-privkey-value").textContent = signer.privateKey;
+        $("export-privkey-result").classList.remove("hidden");
+        $("export-privkey-flash").textContent = "";
+        $("export-privkey-flash").style.visibility = "hidden";
+    } catch {
+        if (!isCurrentReveal(generation)) return;
+        fail("That password is not correct. Please try again.");
+    } finally {
+        btn.disabled = false;
+        btn.classList.remove("text-muted");
+    }
+}
+
+function init() {
+    onViewLeave(VIEW, clear);
+
+    // No wipe here: goBack() routes through showView(), which runs the
+    // leave hook. A per-button wipe would only cover this one path.
+    $("btn-export-privkey-back").addEventListener("click", () => {
+        goBack();
+    });
+
+    $("btn-export-privkey-confirm").addEventListener("click", reveal);
+
+    $("export-privkey-value").addEventListener("click", () => {
+        const key = $("export-privkey-value").textContent;
+        if (!key) return;
+        navigator.clipboard.writeText(key);
+        showFlash("Copied!");
+        flashCopyFeedback($("export-privkey-value"));
+    });
+}
+
+module.exports = { init, show };

src/popup/views/home.js

@@ -21,6 +21,10 @@ const {
     resetSendValidation,
 } = require("./send");
 const { deriveAddressFromXpub } = require("../../shared/wallet");
+const {
+    walletDefect,
+    walletDefectHtml,
+} = require("../../shared/walletDefects");
 const {
     formatUsd,
     getPrice,
@@ -214,25 +218,23 @@ async function loadHomeTxs(ctx) {
     }
 }
 
-function render(ctx) {
+// The wallet list markup. Pure: it reads state and returns a string, so the
-    const container = $("wallet-list");
+// list can be asserted on without a DOM.
-    if (state.wallets.length === 0) {
+function walletListHtml() {
-        container.innerHTML =
-            '<p class="text-muted py-2">No wallets yet. Add one to get started.</p>';
-        renderTotalValue();
-        renderActiveAddress();
-        return;
-    }
-
     let html = "";
     state.wallets.forEach((wallet, wi) => {
+        const defect = walletDefect(wallet);
         html += `<div>`;
         html += `<div class="flex justify-between items-center bg-section py-1 px-2" style="margin:0 -0.5rem">`;
         html += `<span class="font-bold cursor-pointer wallet-name underline decoration-dashed" data-wallet="${wi}">${wallet.name}</span>`;
-        if (wallet.type === "hd" || wallet.type === "xprv") {
+        // No "+" on a defective wallet: deriving another address from that
+        // xpub would only add one more address the key does not produce
+        // under the standard path.
+        if (!defect && (wallet.type === "hd" || wallet.type === "xprv")) {
             html += `<button class="btn-add-address border border-border px-1 hover:bg-fg hover:text-bg cursor-pointer text-xs" data-wallet="${wi}" title="Add another address to this wallet">+</button>`;
         }
         html += `</div>`;
+        html += walletDefectHtml(wallet);
 
         wallet.addresses.forEach((addr, ai) => {
             html += `<div class="address-row py-1 border-b border-border-light cursor-pointer hover:bg-hover" data-wallet="${wi}" data-address="${ai}">`;
@@ -260,7 +262,20 @@ function render(ctx) {
 
         html += `</div>`;
     });
-    container.innerHTML = html;
+    return html;
+}
+
+function render(ctx) {
+    const container = $("wallet-list");
+    if (state.wallets.length === 0) {
+        container.innerHTML =
+            '<p class="text-muted py-2">No wallets yet. Add one to get started.</p>';
+        renderTotalValue();
+        renderActiveAddress();
+        return;
+    }
+
+    container.innerHTML = walletListHtml();
 
     container.querySelectorAll(".address-row").forEach((row) => {
         row.addEventListener("click", async () => {
@@ -348,6 +363,13 @@ function render(ctx) {
     loadHomeTxs(ctx);
 }
 
+// The defect of the wallet the selected address belongs to, or null. Call
+// after selectActiveAddress().
+function selectedWalletDefect() {
+    if (state.selectedWallet === null) return null;
+    return walletDefect(state.wallets[state.selectedWallet]);
+}
+
 function selectActiveAddress() {
     for (let wi = 0; wi < state.wallets.length; wi++) {
         for (let ai = 0; ai < state.wallets[wi].addresses.length; ai++) {
@@ -371,6 +393,13 @@ function init(ctx) {
             showFlash("No active address selected.");
             return;
         }
+        // Before the balance check and before any password is asked for: this
+        // wallet cannot sign at all, so the send screen is a dead end.
+        const defect = selectedWalletDefect();
+        if (defect) {
+            showFlash(defect.shortMessage);
+            return;
+        }
         const addr = currentAddress();
         if (!addr.balance || parseFloat(addr.balance) === 0) {
             showFlash("Cannot send \u2014 zero balance.");
@@ -396,4 +425,4 @@ function init(ctx) {
     });
 }
 
-module.exports = { init, render };
+module.exports = { init, render, walletListHtml };

src/popup/views/send.js

@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ const { state, currentAddress } = require("../../shared/state");
 let ctx;
 const { getProvider } = require("../../shared/balances");
 const { KNOWN_SYMBOLS, resolveSymbol } = require("../../shared/tokenList");
+const { isLowHolderCount } = require("../../shared/holders");
 const { getAddress } = require("ethers");
 
 const ZERO_ADDRESS = "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000";
@@ -132,7 +133,10 @@ function renderSendTokenSelect(addr) {
     for (const t of addr.tokenBalances || []) {
         if (isSpoofedToken(t)) continue;
         if (fraudSet.has(t.address.toLowerCase())) continue;
-        if (state.hideLowHolderTokens && (t.holders || 0) < 1000) continue;
+        // An unknown holder count does not withhold a token the user holds:
+        // only a count the explorer actually reported as below the threshold
+        // does.  Otherwise a missing field makes a real asset unspendable.
+        if (state.hideLowHolderTokens && isLowHolderCount(t.holders)) continue;
         const opt = document.createElement("option");
         opt.value = t.address;
         opt.textContent = t.symbol;

src/popup/views/txStatus.js

@@ -16,11 +16,36 @@ const { state, saveState, currentNetwork } = require("../../shared/state");
 const { getProvider } = require("../../shared/balances");
 const { log } = require("../../shared/log");
 
+// Receipt poll cadence and the deadline after which the wait is reported as
+// a timeout. Both are documented in the WaitTx section of README.md.
+const POLL_INTERVAL_MS = 10000;
+const TIMEOUT_MS = 60000;
+
+// How many receipt lookups may fail in a row before the wait is ended and
+// the failure reported. A lookup that throws says nothing about the
+// transaction, so one must not end the wait — but an RPC that never answers
+// (a mistyped URL in settings is the ordinary case) must not leave the wait
+// running forever either, least of all a persisted one that every popup
+// open would resume. Six is 60 seconds at the poll cadence: the same
+// patience the confirmation deadline gets. Any lookup that answers, with a
+// receipt or with null, resets the count.
+const MAX_CONSECUTIVE_LOOKUP_FAILURES = 6;
+
 let ctx;
 let elapsedTimer = null;
 let pollTimer = null;
 
-function clearTimers() {
+// Identifies the wait currently on screen. Bumped by endWait(), so a timer
+// callback or an in-flight receipt lookup that outlives its wait can tell
+// that it is stale and leave the current view alone. Without it, a receipt
+// resolving after the wait has ended renders over whatever view replaced it.
+let waitId = 0;
+
+// End the wait on screen: stop its timers and invalidate its pending async
+// work. Called on receipt, on timeout, when a new wait starts, and when the
+// user navigates away.
+function endWait() {
+    waitId++;
     if (elapsedTimer) {
         clearInterval(elapsedTimer);
         elapsedTimer = null;
@@ -47,8 +72,13 @@ function blockNumberHtml(blockNumber) {
     return copyableHtml(num) + etherscanLinkHtml(link);
 }
 
-function showWait(txInfo, txHash) {
+// Render the wait view and start polling for the receipt. broadcastTime is
-    clearTimers();
+// when the transaction was broadcast, which is what the elapsed counter and
+// the timeout deadline are both measured from; pollNow runs one lookup
+// immediately instead of waiting a full poll interval.
+function startWait(txInfo, txHash, broadcastTime, pollNow) {
+    endWait();
+    const id = waitId;
 
     const symbol = txInfo.token === "ETH" ? "ETH" : txInfo.tokenSymbol || "?";
     $("wait-tx-summary").textContent = txInfo.amount + " " + symbol;
@@ -56,41 +86,130 @@ function showWait(txInfo, txHash) {
     $("wait-tx-hash").innerHTML = txHashHtml(txHash);
     attachCopyHandlers("view-wait-tx");
 
-    const broadcastTime = Date.now();
+    // Persisted so closing and reopening the popup resumes this wait
-    $("wait-tx-status").textContent = "Waiting for confirmation... 0s";
+    // instead of silently abandoning it.
+    state.viewData = {
+        pendingWait: {
+            txInfo: txInfo,
+            hash: txHash,
+            broadcastTime: broadcastTime,
+        },
+    };
 
-    elapsedTimer = setInterval(() => {
+    function renderElapsed() {
         const elapsed = Math.floor((Date.now() - broadcastTime) / 1000);
         $("wait-tx-status").textContent =
             "Waiting for confirmation... " + elapsed + "s";
+    }
+    renderElapsed();
+
+    elapsedTimer = setInterval(() => {
+        if (id !== waitId) return;
+        renderElapsed();
     }, 1000);
 
     const provider = getProvider(state.rpcUrl);
-    pollTimer = setInterval(async () => {
+    let consecutiveFailures = 0;
+
+    async function poll() {
+        if (id !== waitId) return;
+        let receipt = null;
+        let answered = true;
         try {
-            const receipt = await provider.getTransactionReceipt(txHash);
+            receipt = await provider.getTransactionReceipt(txHash);
-            if (receipt) {
-                showSuccess(txInfo, txHash, receipt.blockNumber);
-            }
         } catch (e) {
+            // A thrown lookup means "no answer this tick", not "no
+            // receipt": the RPC failed, the chain said nothing. Declaring
+            // the timeout off it would report a confirmed transaction as
+            // failed — which matters most on a resumed wait, where the
+            // first poll is already past the deadline.
+            answered = false;
             log.errorf("poll receipt failed:", e.message);
         }
-
+        // The lookup is async: the wait may have ended while it was in
-        const elapsed = Math.floor((Date.now() - broadcastTime) / 1000);
+        // flight, in which case this result must not touch the view.
-        if (elapsed >= 60) {
+        if (id !== waitId) return;
+        // Exactly one outcome per wait. A receipt wins even on the tick
+        // that crosses the deadline, because the transaction did confirm.
+        if (receipt) {
+            showSuccess(txInfo, txHash, receipt.blockNumber);
+            return;
+        }
+        if (!answered) {
+            consecutiveFailures++;
+            // The failure is the user's news, and it is a different fact
+            // from "the transaction did not confirm" — the chain was never
+            // asked. Ending the wait here is what keeps it bounded and
+            // gives the user a Done button to leave by.
+            if (consecutiveFailures >= MAX_CONSECUTIVE_LOOKUP_FAILURES) {
+                showError(
+                    txInfo,
+                    txHash,
+                    "The network could not be reached to check this transaction — " +
+                        MAX_CONSECUTIVE_LOOKUP_FAILURES +
+                        " lookups failed in a row. Check the RPC URL in Settings. The transaction may still have confirmed — check Etherscan.",
+                );
+            }
+            // Otherwise keep polling: the next tick may answer.
+            return;
+        }
+        consecutiveFailures = 0;
+        if (Date.now() - broadcastTime >= TIMEOUT_MS) {
             showError(
                 txInfo,
                 txHash,
                 "Transaction was not confirmed within 60 seconds. It may still confirm later \u2014 check Etherscan.",
             );
         }
-    }, 10000);
+    }
+
+    pollTimer = setInterval(poll, POLL_INTERVAL_MS);
 
     showView("wait-tx");
+
+    if (pollNow) poll();
+}
+
+function showWait(txInfo, txHash) {
+    startWait(txInfo, txHash, Date.now(), false);
+}
+
+// Resume a wait persisted by a previous popup session. The deadline still
+// runs from the original broadcast, so a wait that has already outlived it
+// resolves on the immediate first poll rather than restarting the clock.
+// Returns false when there is nothing resumable to resume. Every field
+// startWait() goes on to use is validated, not just the presence of the
+// containers: txInfo.to reaches addressTitle(), which calls
+// address.toLowerCase(), and txInfo.amount is rendered into the summary, so
+// an object merely missing one of them throws a TypeError out of
+// restoreView() — which init() does not guard, skipping the rest of popup
+// init and leaving wait-tx on screen with no back control. A non-numeric
+// broadcastTime leaves an unexitable wait counting "NaNs". txInfo.token and
+// txInfo.tokenSymbol are deliberately unchecked: they are compared and
+// coalesced rather than dereferenced, and tokenSymbol is null for ETH.
+function restoreWait() {
+    const d = state.viewData;
+    if (!d || !d.pendingWait) return false;
+    const w = d.pendingWait;
+    if (!w.hash) return false;
+    // typeof [] is "object", so an array passes an object check.
+    const info = w.txInfo;
+    if (!info || typeof info !== "object" || Array.isArray(info)) return false;
+    // A string is the whole requirement: the empty string is what a
+    // contract-deployment approval persists (approval.js writes `to: toAddr
+    // || ""`), and both fields render harmlessly when empty, so refusing it
+    // would abandon a wait the live path itself created.
+    if (typeof info.to !== "string") return false;
+    if (typeof info.amount !== "string") return false;
+    if (typeof w.broadcastTime !== "number" || !isFinite(w.broadcastTime)) {
+        return false;
+    }
+    startWait(w.txInfo, w.hash, w.broadcastTime, true);
+    return true;
 }
 
 function showSuccess(txInfo, txHash, blockNumber) {
-    clearTimers();
+    endWait();
 
     const symbol = txInfo.token === "ETH" ? "ETH" : txInfo.tokenSymbol || "?";
     state.viewData = {
@@ -182,7 +301,7 @@ function renderSuccess() {
 }
 
 function showError(txInfo, txHash, message) {
-    clearTimers();
+    endWait();
 
     const symbol = txInfo.token === "ETH" ? "ETH" : txInfo.tokenSymbol || "?";
     state.viewData = {
@@ -218,6 +337,9 @@ function isApprovalPopup() {
 }
 
 function navigateBack() {
+    // Nothing should still be polling by now, but leaving a view is the
+    // point at which its timers must be gone.
+    endWait();
     if (isApprovalPopup()) {
         window.close();
         return;
@@ -242,4 +364,12 @@ function init(_ctx) {
     $("btn-error-tx-done").addEventListener("click", navigateBack);
 }
 
-module.exports = { init, showWait, showError, renderSuccess, renderError };
+module.exports = {
+    init,
+    showWait,
+    restoreWait,
+    endWait,
+    showError,
+    renderSuccess,
+    renderError,
+};

src/shared/balances.js

@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ const { ERC20_ABI } = require("./constants");
 const { log, debugFetch } = require("./log");
 const { deriveAddressFromXpub } = require("./wallet");
 const { KNOWN_SYMBOLS, TOKEN_BY_ADDRESS } = require("./tokenList");
+const { LOW_HOLDER_THRESHOLD, parseHoldersCount } = require("./holders");
 
 // Use a static network to skip auto-detection (which can fail and cause
 // "could not coalesce error" on some RPC endpoints like Cloudflare).
@@ -70,10 +71,20 @@ async function fetchTokenBalances(address, blockscoutUrl, trackedTokens) {
             if (bal === "0.0") continue;
 
             const tokenAddr = (item.token.address_hash || "").toLowerCase();
-            const holders = parseInt(item.token.holders_count || "0", 10);
+            // null means the explorer reported no count, which is not the
+            // same as a count of zero.  This gate is not the low-holder
+            // display filter: it has no user-facing off switch and governs
+            // the whole balance list, so it stays strict and admits a token
+            // only on a reported count — an unreported one is no evidence.
+            // A legitimate token still reaches the list through the known
+            // token list or by the user tracking it, and the null is carried
+            // through to the views, where the two low-holder filters treat
+            // an unknown count as "do not judge" rather than as zero.
+            const holders = parseHoldersCount(item.token.holders_count);
             const isKnown = TOKEN_BY_ADDRESS.has(tokenAddr);
             const isTracked = trackedSet.has(tokenAddr);
-            const hasEnoughHolders = holders >= 1000;
+            const hasEnoughHolders =
+                holders !== null && holders >= LOW_HOLDER_THRESHOLD;
 
             // Skip spam tokens the user never asked to see
             if (!isKnown && !isTracked && !hasEnoughHolders) continue;
@@ -278,6 +289,7 @@ async function scanForAddresses(xpub, rpcUrl, gapLimit = 5) {
 }
 
 module.exports = {
+    fetchTokenBalances,
     refreshBalances,
     lookupTokenInfo,
     getProvider,

src/shared/holders.js

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+// Holder counts, and the one rule that decides whether a count is "low".
+//
+// The block explorer's holders_count is optional: it is absent on a token it
+// has only just indexed, and it goes missing on a degraded or changed API.
+// Absent means the count is unknown.  It does not mean the token has no
+// holders, and collapsing the two hides a token the user really holds as if
+// it were spam.  Every call site reads the count through here so the
+// distinction cannot be lost again in one place while holding in the others.
+
+const LOW_HOLDER_THRESHOLD = 1000;
+
+// Parse an explorer-supplied holders_count into a number, or null when the
+// explorer did not report one.  Anything unparseable is unknown too: a count
+// we cannot read is not a count of zero.
+function parseHoldersCount(raw) {
+    if (raw === null || raw === undefined || raw === "") return null;
+    const n = parseInt(raw, 10);
+    return Number.isFinite(n) ? n : null;
+}
+
+// True only for a token the explorer reported as having fewer holders than
+// the threshold.  An unknown count is never low: showing a spam token the
+// user can see is unusual costs less than hiding an asset they own.
+function isLowHolderCount(holders) {
+    return holders != null && holders < LOW_HOLDER_THRESHOLD;
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+    LOW_HOLDER_THRESHOLD,
+    parseHoldersCount,
+    isLowHolderCount,
+};

src/shared/transactions.js

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 const { formatEther, formatUnits } = require("ethers");
 const { log, debugFetch } = require("./log");
 const { KNOWN_SYMBOLS, TOKEN_BY_ADDRESS } = require("./tokenList");
+const { parseHoldersCount, isLowHolderCount } = require("./holders");
 
 // Ethereum addresses are case-insensitive: EIP-55 mixed case is a checksum
 // over the address, not part of its identity.  Every address comparison in
@@ -116,7 +117,10 @@ function parseTokenTransfer(tt, addrLower) {
         contractAddress: normalizeAddress(
             tt.token?.address_hash || tt.token?.address || "",
         ),
-        holders: parseInt(tt.token?.holders_count || "0", 10),
+        // null when the explorer reported no count: unknown, not zero.  The
+        // low-holder filter declines to judge a null, so a legitimate token
+        // is not hidden because a field went missing upstream.
+        holders: parseHoldersCount(tt.token?.holders_count),
     };
 }
 
@@ -292,12 +296,13 @@ function filterTransactions(txs, filters = {}) {
             continue;
         }
 
-        // Filter low-holder tokens (<1000) if setting is on
+        // Filter low-holder tokens (<1000) if setting is on.  A token whose
+        // holder count the explorer did not report is kept: only a reported
+        // count below the threshold is "low".
         if (
             filters.hideLowHolderTokens &&
             tx.contractAddress &&
-            tx.holders !== null &&
+            isLowHolderCount(tx.holders)
-            tx.holders < 1000
         ) {
             continue;
         }

src/shared/vault.js

@@ -1,14 +1,80 @@
 // Vault: password-based encryption of secrets using libsodium.
 // Uses Argon2id for key derivation and XSalsa20-Poly1305 for encryption.
 // All crypto operations are delegated to libsodium — no raw primitives.
+//
+// Backend: WebAssembly, deliberately (#182).
+//
+// libsodium ships one file containing both a WebAssembly build and a
+// wasm2js ("asm.js") translation of it. It tries WASM first and, if
+// instantiation throws, silently swaps in the translation. An extension
+// CSP of plain script-src 'self' refuses WASM, so every popup load used
+// to take that fallback — announced by nothing but an uncaught
+// CompileError in the console.
+//
+// Measured here, same Argon2id parameters (OPSLIMIT_INTERACTIVE,
+// MEMLIMIT_INTERACTIVE = 2 passes over 64MiB), node 22 on this machine:
+// WASM 141-198ms per derivation, wasm2js 3204-3660ms. The work factor is
+// identical either way — it is set by the ops/mem parameters, not by wall
+// time — so the fallback bought no security, it only made every password
+// operation take three and a half seconds, and the wallet asks for the
+// password on every signature.
+//
+// So both manifests declare 'wasm-unsafe-eval' for extension pages. That
+// keyword permits compiling WebAssembly and nothing else: not eval() of
+// strings, not inline script, not remote script. Reaching it requires
+// already executing script in the extension page, which is total
+// compromise on its own. 'unsafe-eval' would be a different matter and is
+// not granted. tests/manifest.test.js pins both policies to exactly
+// "'self' 'wasm-unsafe-eval'" so neither the grant nor the surrounding
+// strictness can drift unnoticed.
+//
+// The fallback still exists, and a wallet that refuses to decrypt is
+// worse than a slow one, so it is not disabled — it is made loud:
+// cryptoBackend() reports which backend this realm can run, ensureReady()
+// logs an error if it is not WASM, tests/vaultBackend.test.js asserts the
+// unit tests exercise the WASM backend, and the end-to-end suite asserts
+// it in the real popup under the real manifest.
 
 const sodium = require("libsodium-wrappers-sumo");
+const { log } = require("./log");
+
+// An empty WebAssembly module: the 8-byte magic number and version header,
+// no sections. Compiling it asks the cheapest possible form of the only
+// question that matters here — may this realm compile WebAssembly at all —
+// which is exactly what a CSP without 'wasm-unsafe-eval' refuses, and
+// exactly what decides which backend libsodium ends up on.
+const EMPTY_WASM_MODULE = new Uint8Array([
+    0x00, 0x61, 0x73, 0x6d, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
+]);
+
+// "wasm" or "asmjs": whether this realm may compile WebAssembly, which is
+// what decides libsodium's backend when the CSP is the reason it cannot —
+// the case this codebase guards. It probes the realm, not libsodium, so a
+// fallback taken for some other reason (allocation failure, corrupt module)
+// would not be caught here; tests/vaultBackend.test.js checks libsodium's
+// own marker directly.
+async function cryptoBackend() {
+    try {
+        await WebAssembly.compile(EMPTY_WASM_MODULE);
+        return "wasm";
+    } catch (_) {
+        return "asmjs";
+    }
+}
 
 let ready = false;
 
 async function ensureReady() {
     if (!ready) {
         await sodium.ready;
+        if ((await cryptoBackend()) !== "wasm") {
+            log.errorf(
+                "libsodium is running on the wasm2js fallback: this realm " +
+                    "refuses to compile WebAssembly, so every password " +
+                    "derivation costs roughly 20x what it should. See the " +
+                    "backend note in src/shared/vault.js.",
+            );
+        }
         ready = true;
     }
 }
@@ -59,4 +125,4 @@ async function decryptWithPassword(encrypted, password) {
     return sodium.to_string(plaintext);
 }
 
-module.exports = { encryptWithPassword, decryptWithPassword };
+module.exports = { cryptoBackend, decryptWithPassword, encryptWithPassword };

src/shared/wallet.js

@@ -120,9 +120,24 @@ function getSignerForAddress(walletData, addrIndex, decryptedSecret) {
         return node.deriveChild(addrIndex);
     }
     if (walletData.type === "xprv") {
-        const node =
+        // Checked here rather than through masterXprvOrThrow so the message
-            masterXprvOrThrow(decryptedSecret).derivePath(BIP44_ETH_PATH);
+        // fits the situation: nobody is importing anything at signing time,
-        return node.deriveChild(addrIndex);
+        // and this wallet is already in storage. src/shared/walletDefects.js
+        // catches it at list-render time; this is the backstop behind that.
+        const node = parseExtendedKey(decryptedSecret);
+        if (!node || !node.privateKey) {
+            throw new Error(
+                "This wallet's stored key is not a valid extended private " +
+                    "key, so it cannot sign.",
+            );
+        }
+        if (node.depth !== MASTER_DEPTH) {
+            throw new Error(
+                "This wallet was imported from an extended private key that " +
+                    "is not a master key, so it cannot sign.",
+            );
+        }
+        return node.derivePath(BIP44_ETH_PATH).deriveChild(addrIndex);
     }
     return new Wallet(decryptedSecret);
 }
@@ -142,6 +157,7 @@ function walletHasRecoveryPhrase(walletData) {
 
 module.exports = {
     generateMnemonic,
+    parseExtendedKey,
     deriveAddressFromXpub,
     hdWalletFromMnemonic,
     hdWalletFromXprv,

src/shared/walletDefects.js

@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+// Wallets already in stored state whose key cannot be used, and the copy that
+// explains them.
+//
+// Refusing a non-master extended private key at import time does nothing for a
+// wallet imported before that refusal existed. Such a wallet is detected here,
+// at wallet-list render time, so the user meets the explanation on the list
+// screen rather than an exception on the send screen. Nothing here modifies or
+// removes a wallet: the record is the user's data.
+
+const { parseExtendedKey } = require("./wallet");
+
+const NON_MASTER_XPRV = "non-master-xprv";
+
+// An "xprv" wallet stores the neutered BIP-44 Ethereum node, four levels below
+// the key that was imported: the current import path derives the absolute
+// m/44'/60'/0'/0 from a depth-0 key, and the pre-#210 path derived the same
+// four levels as a relative path beneath whatever depth it was given. A master
+// import therefore stores a depth-4 xpub and a depth-d import stores depth
+// d + 4, which makes the stored xpub an exact read on the imported key's
+// depth — and it is readable without the password, unlike the key itself.
+const BIP44_ETH_XPUB_DEPTH = 4;
+
+const DEFECTS = {
+    [NON_MASTER_XPRV]: {
+        id: NON_MASTER_XPRV,
+        heading: "This wallet's addresses were derived incorrectly.",
+        paragraphs: [
+            "This wallet was imported from an extended private key that is " +
+                "not a master key. An earlier version applied the Ethereum " +
+                "derivation path beneath that key instead of from a master " +
+                "key, so the addresses listed here are not the ones that key " +
+                "produces under the standard path.",
+            "Signing and sending are disabled for this wallet. The addresses " +
+                "do descend from the extended private key you imported, so " +
+                "anything they hold is still reachable by software that " +
+                "repeats the same non-standard derivation. Check them in a " +
+                "block explorer before deciding what to do.",
+            "To see the addresses this key produces under the standard path, " +
+                "import the master extended private key, or the recovery " +
+                "phrase it came from, as a new wallet. Nothing here has been " +
+                "changed or removed, and this wallet stays until you delete " +
+                "it yourself.",
+        ],
+        // One sentence for the places that have room for one: the flash on a
+        // blocked Send, the inline error on the approval screens.
+        shortMessage:
+            "This wallet cannot sign, because it was imported from an " +
+            "extended private key that is not a master key. The wallet list " +
+            "explains what happened.",
+    },
+};
+
+// The defect record for a wallet, or null if there is nothing wrong with it
+// that this module can see. Read-only.
+//
+// A wallet whose xpub will not parse gets null rather than a defect: there is
+// no basis in that case to tell the user their key was not a master key, and a
+// wrong explanation is worse than none.
+function walletDefect(walletData) {
+    if (!walletData || walletData.type !== "xprv") return null;
+    const node = parseExtendedKey(walletData.xpub);
+    if (!node) return null;
+    if (node.depth === BIP44_ETH_XPUB_DEPTH) return null;
+    return DEFECTS[NON_MASTER_XPRV];
+}
+
+// The notice block for the wallet list, or "" for a wallet with no defect.
+// The copy is fixed text from this module, so it needs no escaping.
+function walletDefectHtml(walletData) {
+    const defect = walletDefect(walletData);
+    if (!defect) return "";
+    let html =
+        '<div class="border border-red-500 border-dashed p-2 my-1 text-xs text-red-500">';
+    html += `<div class="font-bold mb-1">${defect.heading}</div>`;
+    for (const p of defect.paragraphs) {
+        html += `<p class="mb-1">${p}</p>`;
+    }
+    html += "</div>";
+    return html;
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+    NON_MASTER_XPRV,
+    walletDefect,
+    walletDefectHtml,
+};

tests/e2e/harness.js

@@ -22,18 +22,12 @@ const EXT_PATH = path.join(REPO_ROOT, "dist", "chrome");
 // entry must name the issue that will remove it. This list is the one
 // concession in an otherwise zero-tolerance policy: an uncaught error is
 // how this harness caught issue #150 in the first place.
-const ALLOWED_ERRORS = [
+//
-    {
+// Empty, and worth keeping that way. Its only entry was the WASM
-        // libsodium ships a WASM build and an asm.js fallback. The
+// CompileError libsodium provoked on every popup load, deleted with #182
-        // extension CSP (script-src 'self', with no wasm-unsafe-eval)
+// when both manifests started allowing WASM; the run that used to need it
-        // refuses the WASM module on every popup load; libsodium catches
+// is now the run that proves the fix.
-        // it and falls back to asm.js, so the wallet works. Deciding
+const ALLOWED_ERRORS = [];
-        // which backend actually ships is issue #182, and this entry gets
-        // deleted when that lands.
-        issue: "#182",
-        pattern: /Refused to compile or instantiate WebAssembly module/,
-    },
-];
 
 function isAllowed(text) {
     return ALLOWED_ERRORS.some((a) => a.pattern.test(text));
@@ -247,6 +241,26 @@ async function visible(page, selector, timeout = 15000) {
     await page.waitForSelector(selector, { state: "visible", timeout });
 }
 
+// An empty WebAssembly module: magic number and version header, no
+// sections. Compiling it in the popup asks the one question that decides
+// libsodium's backend — may this realm compile WebAssembly — of the real
+// page under the real shipped manifest, which is the only place the
+// answer can be observed. Kept independent of src/shared/vault.js on
+// purpose: a bundle asked to grade itself proves less than an outside
+// observation of the same realm.
+const EMPTY_WASM_MODULE = [0x00, 0x61, 0x73, 0x6d, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00];
+
+async function pageCompilesWasm(page) {
+    return page.evaluate(async (bytes) => {
+        try {
+            await WebAssembly.compile(new Uint8Array(bytes));
+            return true;
+        } catch (_) {
+            return false;
+        }
+    }, EMPTY_WASM_MODULE);
+}
+
 async function openPopup(ctx, popupUrl) {
     const page = await ctx.newPage();
     await page.goto(popupUrl);
@@ -293,5 +307,6 @@ module.exports = {
     launch,
     openAddressDetail,
     openPopup,
+    pageCompilesWasm,
     visible,
 };

tests/e2e/run.js

@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ const {
     launch,
     openAddressDetail,
     openPopup,
+    pageCompilesWasm,
     visible,
 } = require("./harness");
 const { STUB_TOKEN, STUB_TX_HASH } = require("./network");
@@ -60,6 +61,27 @@ test("popup loads and reaches the welcome view", async (env) => {
     assert(title === "AutistMask", "unexpected popup title: " + title);
 });
 
+// The empirical half of #182. The manifest change is only a claim about
+// what the CSP permits; this is the observation. Two things have to hold
+// together, and the run covers both: the popup realm compiles WASM (here),
+// and no WASM refusal or abort is recorded anywhere in the run — the
+// harness allowlist that used to excuse exactly that error is now empty,
+// so a recurrence fails whichever test it lands in rather than being
+// tolerated. Since libsodium's WASM module is embedded in the bundle and
+// needs no fetch, a realm that compiles WASM is a realm where libsodium
+// takes the WASM path, and the next test drives a real vault encryption
+// through it.
+test("the popup compiles WebAssembly under the shipped CSP (#182)", async (env) => {
+    const ok = await pageCompilesWasm(env.page);
+    assert(
+        ok,
+        "the popup refused to compile WebAssembly. The shipped manifest CSP " +
+            "has lost 'wasm-unsafe-eval', so libsodium is back on its wasm2js " +
+            "fallback and every password derivation costs roughly 20x what it " +
+            "should — see the backend note in src/shared/vault.js",
+    );
+});
+
 test("wallet creation through the UI reaches the main view", async (env) => {
     env.phrase = await createWallet(env.page);
     assert(

tests/exportPrivkey.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,331 @@
+// Tests for the private key export screen (issue #221).
+//
+// The screen holds the one secret that owns an address outright, so what is
+// pinned here is disposal: the key is wiped from the DOM whenever the screen
+// is left by any route, and a decrypt still in flight when the screen is
+// left never writes at all. That last case is the one a per-button wipe and
+// a naive leave hook both miss — the write lands after the wipe, with
+// nothing scheduled to wipe it again.
+//
+// The view is driven against a minimal DOM stub rather than a real browser:
+// the module is deliberately shaped like src/popup/views/showPhrase.js, with
+// no dependency that needs a document beyond the nodes it reads and writes.
+
+const mockPrivateKey = "0x" + "ab".repeat(32);
+
+jest.mock("ethereum-blockies-base64", () => () => "");
+jest.mock("../src/shared/vault", () => ({
+    decryptWithPassword: jest.fn(),
+}));
+jest.mock("../src/shared/wallet", () => ({
+    getSignerForAddress: jest.fn(() => ({ privateKey: mockPrivateKey })),
+}));
+
+const { RESTORABLE_VIEWS } = require("../src/popup/restorableViews");
+
+const VIEW = "export-privkey";
+const PASSWORD = "correct horse battery";
+
+// ------------------------------------------------------------ DOM stub
+
+function makeElement(id, withParent) {
+    const classes = new Set();
+    const el = {
+        id,
+        textContent: "",
+        value: "",
+        innerHTML: "",
+        disabled: false,
+        style: {},
+        dataset: {},
+        listeners: {},
+        classList: {
+            add: (...names) => names.forEach((n) => classes.add(n)),
+            remove: (...names) => names.forEach((n) => classes.delete(n)),
+            contains: (n) => classes.has(n),
+            toggle: (n, force) => {
+                const on = force === undefined ? !classes.has(n) : force;
+                if (on) classes.add(n);
+                else classes.delete(n);
+                return on;
+            },
+        },
+        addEventListener: (name, fn) => {
+            el.listeners[name] = el.listeners[name] || [];
+            el.listeners[name].push(fn);
+        },
+        appendChild: () => {},
+        remove: () => {},
+        querySelectorAll: () => [],
+    };
+    el.parentElement = withParent ? makeElement(id + "-parent", false) : null;
+    return el;
+}
+
+function makeDocument() {
+    const els = new Map();
+    return {
+        getElementById(id) {
+            // The debug banner is created on demand by helpers.js; absent
+            // is the state a non-debug, non-testnet popup is in.
+            if (id === "debug-banner") return null;
+            if (!els.has(id)) els.set(id, makeElement(id, true));
+            return els.get(id);
+        },
+        createElement: () => makeElement("created", false),
+        addEventListener: () => {},
+        body: { prepend: () => {} },
+    };
+}
+
+// ------------------------------------------------------------ harness
+
+function load() {
+    jest.resetModules();
+    globalThis.chrome = {
+        storage: { local: { get: async () => ({}), set: async () => {} } },
+    };
+    globalThis.document = makeDocument();
+
+    const helpers = require("../src/popup/views/helpers");
+    const { state } = require("../src/shared/state");
+    const vault = require("../src/shared/vault");
+    const wallet = require("../src/shared/wallet");
+    const exportPrivkey = require("../src/popup/views/exportPrivkey");
+
+    state.wallets = [
+        {
+            name: "Wallet 1",
+            type: "key",
+            encryptedSecret: "ciphertext",
+            addresses: [
+                {
+                    address: "0x" + "11".repeat(20),
+                    balance: "0.0000",
+                    tokenBalances: [],
+                },
+                {
+                    address: "0x" + "22".repeat(20),
+                    balance: "0.0000",
+                    tokenBalances: [],
+                },
+            ],
+        },
+    ];
+    state.viewStack = [];
+    state.currentView = "address";
+
+    exportPrivkey.init();
+    return { helpers, state, vault, wallet, exportPrivkey };
+}
+
+function click(id) {
+    const el = globalThis.document.getElementById(id);
+    return Promise.all((el.listeners.click || []).map((fn) => fn()));
+}
+
+function node(id) {
+    return globalThis.document.getElementById(id);
+}
+
+// Start a reveal and hand back both the promise it returns and the resolver
+// for the decrypt it is waiting on, so a test can navigate away mid-flight.
+function startReveal(vault) {
+    let resolveDecrypt;
+    let rejectDecrypt;
+    vault.decryptWithPassword.mockImplementation(
+        () =>
+            new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
+                resolveDecrypt = resolve;
+                rejectDecrypt = reject;
+            }),
+    );
+    node("export-privkey-password").value = PASSWORD;
+    const pending = click("btn-export-privkey-confirm");
+    return {
+        pending,
+        resolve: (v) => resolveDecrypt(v),
+        reject: (e) => rejectDecrypt(e),
+    };
+}
+
+// ------------------------------------------------------------ tests
+
+describe("a decrypt still running when the screen is left", () => {
+    // The load-bearing case. Without the liveness guard in reveal(), the
+    // write lands after the leave hook has already wiped, and the key sits
+    // in the hidden view for the life of the popup.
+    test("never writes the key into the DOM", async () => {
+        const { helpers, vault, wallet, exportPrivkey } = load();
+        exportPrivkey.show(0, 0);
+
+        const reveal = startReveal(vault);
+        // The settings gear, mid-decrypt.
+        helpers.showView("settings");
+        reveal.resolve("wallet secret");
+        await reveal.pending;
+
+        expect(node("export-privkey-value").textContent).toBe("");
+        // Nothing was even derived: the guard sits in front of the
+        // derivation, not just in front of the write.
+        expect(wallet.getSignerForAddress).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+
+    // The generation counter, not merely the current-view check: by the time
+    // the stale decrypt resolves the user is back on the screen, so a guard
+    // that only asked "is this view showing?" would let the write through.
+    test("never writes it after the screen is re-entered", async () => {
+        const { helpers, vault, exportPrivkey } = load();
+        exportPrivkey.show(0, 0);
+
+        const stale = startReveal(vault);
+        helpers.showView("settings");
+        exportPrivkey.show(0, 1);
+        expect(node("export-privkey-value").textContent).toBe("");
+
+        stale.resolve("wallet secret");
+        await stale.pending;
+
+        expect(node("export-privkey-value").textContent).toBe("");
+        expect(node("export-privkey-result").classList.contains("hidden")).toBe(
+            true,
+        );
+    });
+
+    // Same hole on the failure path: a wrong-password error written after
+    // the wipe would restore the flash line on a screen the user has left.
+    test("never writes the failure message either", async () => {
+        const { helpers, vault, exportPrivkey } = load();
+        exportPrivkey.show(0, 0);
+
+        const reveal = startReveal(vault);
+        helpers.showView("settings");
+        reveal.reject(new Error("decryption failed"));
+        await reveal.pending;
+
+        expect(node("export-privkey-flash").textContent).toBe("");
+        expect(node("export-privkey-flash").style.visibility).toBe("hidden");
+    });
+});
+
+describe("a reveal that is not interrupted", () => {
+    // Guards the guard: a liveness check that rejected every write would
+    // pass every test above and ship a screen that reveals nothing.
+    test("puts the key on screen", async () => {
+        const { vault, exportPrivkey } = load();
+        exportPrivkey.show(0, 0);
+
+        const reveal = startReveal(vault);
+        reveal.resolve("wallet secret");
+        await reveal.pending;
+
+        expect(node("export-privkey-value").textContent).toBe(mockPrivateKey);
+        expect(node("export-privkey-result").classList.contains("hidden")).toBe(
+            false,
+        );
+        // The password is dropped as soon as it has been spent.
+        expect(node("export-privkey-password").value).toBe("");
+    });
+
+    test("writes nothing before the password is accepted", async () => {
+        const { vault, exportPrivkey } = load();
+        exportPrivkey.show(0, 0);
+
+        const reveal = startReveal(vault);
+        expect(node("export-privkey-value").textContent).toBe("");
+        reveal.resolve("wallet secret");
+        await reveal.pending;
+    });
+
+    test("reveals nothing when the password is wrong", async () => {
+        const { vault, exportPrivkey } = load();
+        exportPrivkey.show(0, 0);
+
+        const reveal = startReveal(vault);
+        reveal.reject(new Error("decryption failed"));
+        await reveal.pending;
+
+        expect(node("export-privkey-value").textContent).toBe("");
+        expect(node("export-privkey-flash").textContent).toBe(
+            "That password is not correct. Please try again.",
+        );
+    });
+});
+
+describe("leaving the screen after the key is on it", () => {
+    async function revealed() {
+        const loaded = load();
+        loaded.exportPrivkey.show(0, 0);
+        const reveal = startReveal(loaded.vault);
+        reveal.resolve("wallet secret");
+        await reveal.pending;
+        expect(node("export-privkey-value").textContent).toBe(mockPrivateKey);
+        return loaded;
+    }
+
+    test("the Back button clears the key", async () => {
+        await revealed();
+        await click("btn-export-privkey-back");
+
+        expect(node("export-privkey-value").textContent).toBe("");
+        expect(node("export-privkey-password").value).toBe("");
+    });
+
+    test("the settings gear clears the key", async () => {
+        const { helpers } = await revealed();
+        helpers.showView("settings");
+
+        expect(node("export-privkey-value").textContent).toBe("");
+        expect(node("export-privkey-password").value).toBe("");
+        // And the screen is back to its password prompt, not to a result
+        // panel that would flash an empty well on the next visit.
+        expect(node("export-privkey-result").classList.contains("hidden")).toBe(
+            true,
+        );
+        expect(
+            node("export-privkey-password-section").classList.contains(
+                "hidden",
+            ),
+        ).toBe(false);
+    });
+
+    // Any other navigation: the same hook covers routes that do not exist
+    // yet, which is the point of registering it on the view rather than on
+    // the controls that leave it.
+    test("any other navigation clears the key", async () => {
+        const { helpers } = await revealed();
+        helpers.showView("main");
+
+        expect(node("export-privkey-value").textContent).toBe("");
+    });
+});
+
+describe("views the popup may reopen onto", () => {
+    // Restoring onto this screen would put a private key on display with no
+    // password prompt in front of it, on a popup reopened by accident.
+    test("the private key export screen is not restorable", () => {
+        expect(RESTORABLE_VIEWS.has(VIEW)).toBe(false);
+    });
+
+    test("it is still a registered view", () => {
+        const { helpers } = load();
+        expect(helpers.VIEWS).toContain(VIEW);
+    });
+});
+
+describe("the key cannot reach the logger", () => {
+    const fs = require("fs");
+    const path = require("path");
+    const source = fs.readFileSync(
+        path.join(__dirname, "..", "src", "popup", "views", "exportPrivkey.js"),
+        "utf8",
+    );
+
+    test("the view does not import src/shared/log.js", () => {
+        expect(source).not.toMatch(/require\(["'][^"']*shared\/log["']\)/);
+    });
+
+    test("the view calls no logger method", () => {
+        expect(source).not.toMatch(/\blog\.(debugf|infof|warnf|errorf)\b/);
+    });
+});

tests/holders.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
+// Tests for src/shared/holders.js and the balance-list spam gate that reads
+// it (issue #230).
+//
+// The rule these pin down: an explorer that reports no holders_count has told
+// us nothing, and "nothing" must not be recorded as "zero holders".  Zero is
+// the strongest spam signal the wallet has, so handing it out for free turns
+// a missing field into a hidden asset.
+
+jest.mock("../src/shared/log", () => ({
+    log: {
+        debugf: () => {},
+        infof: () => {},
+        warnf: () => {},
+        errorf: () => {},
+    },
+    debugFetch: jest.fn(),
+    setRuntimeDebug: () => {},
+    isDebug: () => false,
+}));
+
+global.fetch = jest.fn(() => {
+    throw new Error("tests must not perform network requests");
+});
+global.chrome = { storage: { local: {} } };
+
+const {
+    LOW_HOLDER_THRESHOLD,
+    parseHoldersCount,
+    isLowHolderCount,
+} = require("../src/shared/holders");
+const { fetchTokenBalances } = require("../src/shared/balances");
+const { debugFetch } = require("../src/shared/log");
+
+const BLOCKSCOUT = "https://eth.blockscout.com/api/v2";
+const HOLDER = "0x66133e8ea0f5d1d612d2502a968757d1048c214a";
+const USDC_CONTRACT = "0xa0b86991c6218b36c1d19d4a2e9eb0ce3606eb48";
+const NOVEL_TOKEN = "0x1111111111111111111111111111111111111111";
+
+describe("parseHoldersCount", () => {
+    test("a reported count parses to that number", () => {
+        expect(parseHoldersCount("3500000")).toBe(3500000);
+        expect(parseHoldersCount(3500000)).toBe(3500000);
+    });
+
+    test('a reported "0" parses to 0, which is not null', () => {
+        expect(parseHoldersCount("0")).toBe(0);
+        expect(parseHoldersCount(0)).toBe(0);
+    });
+
+    test("an omitted, null or empty count is unknown", () => {
+        expect(parseHoldersCount(undefined)).toBeNull();
+        expect(parseHoldersCount(null)).toBeNull();
+        expect(parseHoldersCount("")).toBeNull();
+    });
+
+    test("an unparseable count is unknown rather than zero", () => {
+        expect(parseHoldersCount("many")).toBeNull();
+        expect(parseHoldersCount(NaN)).toBeNull();
+    });
+});
+
+describe("isLowHolderCount", () => {
+    test("the threshold is the documented 1,000 holders", () => {
+        expect(LOW_HOLDER_THRESHOLD).toBe(1000);
+    });
+
+    test("a reported count below the threshold is low", () => {
+        expect(isLowHolderCount(0)).toBe(true);
+        expect(isLowHolderCount(999)).toBe(true);
+    });
+
+    test("a reported count at or above the threshold is not low", () => {
+        expect(isLowHolderCount(1000)).toBe(false);
+        expect(isLowHolderCount(1001)).toBe(false);
+    });
+
+    test("an unknown count is not low", () => {
+        expect(isLowHolderCount(null)).toBe(false);
+        expect(isLowHolderCount(undefined)).toBe(false);
+    });
+});
+
+// fetchTokenBalances applies its own spam gate, which is not the low-holder
+// display filter: it has no setting behind it and decides what the balance
+// list contains at all.  It stays strict on an unknown count — see the
+// comment at the gate — but must stop recording that unknown as zero.
+describe("the balance-list spam gate", () => {
+    function respondWith(items) {
+        debugFetch.mockImplementation(async () => ({
+            ok: true,
+            status: 200,
+            statusText: "OK",
+            json: async () => items,
+        }));
+    }
+
+    function item(overrides = {}) {
+        const { token, ...rest } = overrides;
+        return {
+            value: "12500000",
+            ...rest,
+            token: {
+                type: "ERC-20",
+                address_hash: NOVEL_TOKEN,
+                symbol: "SPAMTKN",
+                name: "Spam Token",
+                decimals: "6",
+                holders_count: "50000",
+                ...token,
+            },
+        };
+    }
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+        debugFetch.mockReset();
+    });
+
+    test("a token with plenty of reported holders is listed", async () => {
+        respondWith([item()]);
+        const balances = await fetchTokenBalances(HOLDER, BLOCKSCOUT, []);
+        expect(balances).toHaveLength(1);
+        expect(balances[0].holders).toBe(50000);
+    });
+
+    test("a token reporting zero holders is still excluded", async () => {
+        respondWith([item({ token: { holders_count: "0" } })]);
+        expect(await fetchTokenBalances(HOLDER, BLOCKSCOUT, [])).toEqual([]);
+    });
+
+    test("an unknown holder count does not admit an unvouched token", async () => {
+        respondWith([item({ token: { holders_count: null } })]);
+        expect(await fetchTokenBalances(HOLDER, BLOCKSCOUT, [])).toEqual([]);
+    });
+
+    // The path that reaches the send selector and the history filter: a token
+    // the user vouched for by tracking it is listed whatever the explorer
+    // says, and it must carry the unknown count through as null, not as the
+    // zero that would then hide it downstream.
+    test("a tracked token with an unknown count is listed with holders null", async () => {
+        respondWith([item({ token: { holders_count: undefined } })]);
+        const balances = await fetchTokenBalances(HOLDER, BLOCKSCOUT, [
+            { address: NOVEL_TOKEN.toUpperCase() },
+        ]);
+        expect(balances).toHaveLength(1);
+        expect(balances[0].holders).toBeNull();
+    });
+
+    test("a known-list token with an unknown count is listed with holders null", async () => {
+        respondWith([
+            item({
+                token: {
+                    address_hash: USDC_CONTRACT,
+                    symbol: "USDC",
+                    holders_count: null,
+                },
+            }),
+        ]);
+        const balances = await fetchTokenBalances(HOLDER, BLOCKSCOUT, []);
+        expect(balances).toHaveLength(1);
+        expect(balances[0].holders).toBeNull();
+    });
+
+    test("no test in this file performed a network request", () => {
+        expect(global.fetch).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+});

tests/manifest.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+// The shipped Content Security Policy, pinned in both directions.
+//
+// This is the anti-regression check for #182. libsodium decides its
+// backend by trying to compile WebAssembly and catching the failure, so a
+// CSP that refuses WASM demotes the vault to the wasm2js translation —
+// roughly 20x slower per Argon2id derivation — and says so only in a
+// console message nobody reads. Dropping 'wasm-unsafe-eval' from either
+// manifest therefore has to fail a check, not a log line.
+//
+// It is equally a check against loosening. 'wasm-unsafe-eval' is granted
+// deliberately and narrowly (see the backend note in src/shared/vault.js);
+// 'unsafe-eval', 'unsafe-inline' and any remote script source are not, and
+// an exact match on the token set is what keeps the next edit from
+// smuggling one in alongside.
+//
+// build.js copies these files to dist/<target>/manifest.json verbatim, so
+// what is asserted here is what ships.
+
+const fs = require("fs");
+const path = require("path");
+
+const MANIFEST_DIR = path.join(__dirname, "..", "manifest");
+
+const EXPECTED_SCRIPT_SRC = ["'self'", "'wasm-unsafe-eval'"];
+const EXPECTED_OBJECT_SRC = ["'self'"];
+
+const FORBIDDEN_SOURCES = [
+    "'unsafe-eval'",
+    "'unsafe-inline'",
+    "http:",
+    "https:",
+    "data:",
+    "blob:",
+    "*",
+];
+
+function readManifest(name) {
+    return JSON.parse(
+        fs.readFileSync(path.join(MANIFEST_DIR, name + ".json"), "utf8"),
+    );
+}
+
+// "script-src 'self'; object-src 'self'" -> { "script-src": ["'self'"], ... }
+function parseCsp(policy) {
+    const directives = {};
+    for (const part of policy.split(";")) {
+        const tokens = part.trim().split(/\s+/).filter(Boolean);
+        if (tokens.length === 0) continue;
+        directives[tokens[0]] = tokens.slice(1);
+    }
+    return directives;
+}
+
+function assertPolicy(policy) {
+    const directives = parseCsp(policy);
+    expect(Object.keys(directives).sort()).toEqual([
+        "object-src",
+        "script-src",
+    ]);
+    expect(directives["script-src"].slice().sort()).toEqual(
+        EXPECTED_SCRIPT_SRC,
+    );
+    expect(directives["object-src"].slice().sort()).toEqual(
+        EXPECTED_OBJECT_SRC,
+    );
+    for (const source of FORBIDDEN_SOURCES) {
+        expect(directives["script-src"]).not.toContain(source);
+        expect(directives["object-src"]).not.toContain(source);
+    }
+}
+
+describe("shipped Content Security Policy", () => {
+    // MV3 takes an object and applies extension_pages to the popup and the
+    // background service worker, which is where libsodium runs.
+    test("chrome MV3 allows WASM and nothing else beyond 'self'", () => {
+        const csp = readManifest("chrome").content_security_policy;
+        expect(typeof csp).toBe("object");
+        expect(Object.keys(csp)).toEqual(["extension_pages"]);
+        assertPolicy(csp.extension_pages);
+    });
+
+    // MV2 takes the policy as a bare string. Firefox does not require
+    // 'wasm-unsafe-eval' for MV2 today — enforcement is report-only and
+    // Bugzilla 1770909 is still open — so that token is future-proofing
+    // for when it lands, not a mandate, and it stays inside Firefox's MV2
+    // base-CSP ceiling. object-src 'self' is the load-bearing half: a
+    // Firefox before 106 rejects an MV2 policy string that omits
+    // object-src and falls back to its own default, discarding everything
+    // declared here. Same policy as Chrome, different manifest shape.
+    test("firefox MV2 allows WASM and nothing else beyond 'self'", () => {
+        const csp = readManifest("firefox").content_security_policy;
+        expect(typeof csp).toBe("string");
+        assertPolicy(csp);
+    });
+
+    // The two targets share one codebase and one crypto path; a policy
+    // that drifts apart between them means one of the two builds is
+    // running a backend nothing tests.
+    test("both targets ship the same policy", () => {
+        const chrome =
+            readManifest("chrome").content_security_policy.extension_pages;
+        const firefox = readManifest("firefox").content_security_policy;
+        expect(firefox).toBe(chrome);
+    });
+});

tests/sendTokenSelect.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+// Tests for the token filtering in the Send view's token selector
+// (src/popup/views/send.js).
+//
+// The selector decides which of the user's tokens can be spent at all, so
+// over-filtering here is worse than in the history list: the asset is not
+// merely hidden, it becomes unspendable through the UI.  Issue #230: an
+// explorer that omits holders_count was read as "zero holders" and the token
+// disappeared from this list.
+//
+// renderSendTokenSelect only ever touches getElementById, createElement,
+// innerHTML, value, textContent and appendChild, so a small stub document is
+// enough to drive it; the real DOM behaviour of the view is covered by
+// tests/e2e/run.js.
+
+globalThis.chrome = {
+    storage: { local: { get: async () => ({}), set: async () => {} } },
+};
+
+const { state } = require("../src/shared/state");
+const { renderSendTokenSelect } = require("../src/popup/views/send");
+
+const USDC_CONTRACT = "0xA0b86991c6218b36c1d19D4a2e9Eb0cE3606eB48";
+const NOVEL_TOKEN = "0x1111111111111111111111111111111111111111";
+
+let select;
+
+function installStubDocument() {
+    select = { innerHTML: "", children: [] };
+    select.appendChild = (child) => select.children.push(child);
+    globalThis.document = {
+        getElementById: (id) => (id === "send-token" ? select : null),
+        createElement: () => ({ value: "", textContent: "" }),
+    };
+}
+
+// The symbols offered for sending, excluding the hardcoded ETH option that
+// renderSendTokenSelect writes straight into innerHTML.
+function offeredTokens() {
+    return select.children.map((opt) => opt.value.toLowerCase());
+}
+
+function tokenBalance(overrides) {
+    return {
+        address: NOVEL_TOKEN,
+        symbol: "SPAMTKN",
+        decimals: 18,
+        balance: "12.5",
+        holders: 50000,
+        ...overrides,
+    };
+}
+
+function render(tokenBalances) {
+    installStubDocument();
+    renderSendTokenSelect({ address: "0x" + "a".repeat(40), tokenBalances });
+}
+
+beforeEach(() => {
+    state.fraudContracts = [];
+    state.hideLowHolderTokens = true;
+});
+
+describe("the low-holder rule in the send token selector", () => {
+    test("ETH is always offered", () => {
+        render([]);
+        expect(select.innerHTML).toBe('<option value="ETH">ETH</option>');
+        expect(offeredTokens()).toEqual([]);
+    });
+
+    test("a token with plenty of holders is offered", () => {
+        render([tokenBalance()]);
+        expect(offeredTokens()).toEqual([NOVEL_TOKEN]);
+    });
+
+    test("a token reporting zero holders is withheld", () => {
+        render([tokenBalance({ holders: 0 })]);
+        expect(offeredTokens()).toEqual([]);
+    });
+
+    test("boundary: 999 holders is withheld, 1000 is offered", () => {
+        render([tokenBalance({ holders: 999 })]);
+        expect(offeredTokens()).toEqual([]);
+        render([tokenBalance({ holders: 1000 })]);
+        expect(offeredTokens()).toEqual([NOVEL_TOKEN]);
+    });
+
+    // Issue #230: an unknown holder count must not read as zero.  A token the
+    // user demonstrably holds — it has a balance — cannot be made unspendable
+    // by a field the block explorer failed to report.
+    test("a token whose holder count is unknown is still offered", () => {
+        render([tokenBalance({ holders: null })]);
+        expect(offeredTokens()).toEqual([NOVEL_TOKEN]);
+    });
+
+    test("a token balance carrying no holders field at all is offered", () => {
+        const t = tokenBalance();
+        delete t.holders;
+        render([t]);
+        expect(offeredTokens()).toEqual([NOVEL_TOKEN]);
+    });
+
+    test("the rule is bypassed entirely when the setting is off", () => {
+        state.hideLowHolderTokens = false;
+        render([tokenBalance({ holders: 0 })]);
+        expect(offeredTokens()).toEqual([NOVEL_TOKEN]);
+    });
+});
+
+describe("the other send-selector rules are unaffected", () => {
+    test("a token spoofing a known symbol from a wrong address is withheld", () => {
+        render([
+            tokenBalance({ symbol: "USDC", holders: null }),
+            tokenBalance({ address: USDC_CONTRACT, symbol: "USDC" }),
+        ]);
+        expect(offeredTokens()).toEqual([USDC_CONTRACT.toLowerCase()]);
+    });
+
+    test("a blocklisted fraud contract is withheld even with an unknown count", () => {
+        state.fraudContracts = [NOVEL_TOKEN.toUpperCase()];
+        render([tokenBalance({ holders: null })]);
+        expect(offeredTokens()).toEqual([]);
+    });
+});

tests/transactions.test.js

@@ -1473,6 +1473,65 @@ describe("fetchRecentTransactions merge and dedup", () => {
         expect(result.newFraudContracts).toEqual([FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT]);
     });
 
+    // Regression guards (#230): the explorer's holders_count is optional.  A
+    // missing field means the count is unknown; it does not mean the token
+    // has no holders.  Recording the two as the same number both hides a
+    // legitimate token and makes the `holders !== null` guard in
+    // filterTransactions unreachable for token transfers.
+    describe("an unreported holders_count is unknown, not zero", () => {
+        function spamTransferWithToken(token) {
+            return [
+                {
+                    transaction_hash: "0x" + "9".repeat(64),
+                    block_number: 21000070,
+                    timestamp: TS,
+                    from: { hash: ORDINARY_PEER },
+                    to: { hash: VICTIM },
+                    total: { value: "1500500000", decimals: "6" },
+                    token: token,
+                },
+            ];
+        }
+
+        const OMITTED = {
+            symbol: NOVEL_SPAM_SYMBOL,
+            address_hash: NOVEL_SPAM_CONTRACT,
+        };
+        const NULLED = { ...OMITTED, holders_count: null };
+        const ZERO = { ...OMITTED, holders_count: "0" };
+
+        test("an omitted holders_count parses to null", async () => {
+            respondWith([], spamTransferWithToken(OMITTED));
+            const txs = await fetchRecentTransactions(VICTIM, BLOCKSCOUT);
+            expect(txs[0].holders).toBeNull();
+        });
+
+        test("a null holders_count parses to null", async () => {
+            respondWith([], spamTransferWithToken(NULLED));
+            const txs = await fetchRecentTransactions(VICTIM, BLOCKSCOUT);
+            expect(txs[0].holders).toBeNull();
+        });
+
+        test("the transfer survives the low-holder filter", async () => {
+            respondWith([], spamTransferWithToken(OMITTED));
+            const txs = await fetchRecentTransactions(VICTIM, BLOCKSCOUT);
+            expect(filterTransactions(txs, filters()).transactions).toEqual(
+                txs,
+            );
+        });
+
+        // The regression this fix could cause: a token that genuinely
+        // reports zero holders must keep being filtered.  Unlike the fake
+        // "ETH" fixture above, this symbol is not in the token list, so the
+        // holder count is the only rule that can catch it.
+        test('a reported holders_count of "0" still parses to 0 and is filtered', async () => {
+            respondWith([], spamTransferWithToken(ZERO));
+            const txs = await fetchRecentTransactions(VICTIM, BLOCKSCOUT);
+            expect(txs[0].holders).toBe(0);
+            expect(filterTransactions(txs, filters()).transactions).toEqual([]);
+        });
+    });
+
     test("failed responses yield an empty list rather than throwing", async () => {
         debugFetch.mockImplementation(async () => ({
             ok: false,

tests/txStatus.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,482 @@
+// Lifecycle tests for the post-broadcast transaction status views
+// (src/popup/views/txStatus.js).
+//
+// The bug these pin down: the receipt poll rendered both outcomes on the tick
+// that crossed the 60-second deadline, so a confirmed transaction was replaced
+// by "not confirmed within 60 seconds" — the user is told their transaction
+// failed when it succeeded. The same shape applies to any callback that
+// outlives its wait: a receipt lookup still in flight when the view is left
+// must not render over whatever replaced it.
+//
+// Fake timers make the race deterministic: the receipt promise is already
+// resolved when the deadline tick runs, so in the unfixed code showSuccess()
+// is always followed by showError() on that tick.
+//
+// No network: getProvider is mocked at the module boundary and there is no
+// jsdom in this repo, so the handful of DOM calls these views make are served
+// by the stub below.
+
+jest.mock("../src/shared/log", () => ({
+    log: {
+        debugf: () => {},
+        infof: () => {},
+        warnf: () => {},
+        errorf: () => {},
+    },
+    debugFetch: jest.fn(),
+    setRuntimeDebug: () => {},
+    isDebug: () => false,
+}));
+
+const mockReceiptLookup = jest.fn();
+jest.mock("../src/shared/balances", () => ({
+    getProvider: () => ({ getTransactionReceipt: mockReceiptLookup }),
+    refreshBalances: jest.fn(),
+}));
+
+global.fetch = jest.fn(() => {
+    throw new Error("tests must not perform network requests");
+});
+
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+// Minimal DOM. Every element is created on demand and remembered by id, so a
+// test can read back what a view wrote into it.
+// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+const elements = new Map();
+
+function makeElement(id) {
+    const classes = new Set(["view", "hidden"]);
+    const el = {
+        id,
+        textContent: "",
+        innerHTML: "",
+        style: {},
+        classList: {
+            add: (c) => classes.add(c),
+            remove: (c) => classes.delete(c),
+            contains: (c) => classes.has(c),
+            toggle: (c, on) => (on ? classes.add(c) : classes.delete(c)),
+        },
+        addEventListener: () => {},
+        querySelectorAll: () => [],
+        remove: () => {},
+        prepend: () => {},
+    };
+    // Views reach for .parentElement to hide whole sections.
+    Object.defineProperty(el, "parentElement", {
+        get: () => getElement(id + "-parent"),
+    });
+    return el;
+}
+
+function getElement(id) {
+    if (!elements.has(id)) elements.set(id, makeElement(id));
+    return elements.get(id);
+}
+
+global.document = {
+    getElementById: (id) => getElement(id),
+    // escapeHtml() builds a detached div; textContent in, escaped HTML out.
+    createElement: () => {
+        const el = { innerHTML: "" };
+        Object.defineProperty(el, "textContent", {
+            set(v) {
+                el.innerHTML = String(v)
+                    .replace(/&/g, "&")
+                    .replace(/</g, "&lt;")
+                    .replace(/>/g, "&gt;");
+            },
+        });
+        return el;
+    },
+    body: { prepend: () => {} },
+    addEventListener: () => {},
+};
+
+global.window = { location: { search: "" } };
+
+const stored = {};
+global.chrome = {
+    storage: {
+        local: {
+            set: (obj) => {
+                Object.assign(stored, obj);
+                return Promise.resolve();
+            },
+            get: () => Promise.resolve(stored),
+        },
+    },
+};
+
+const txStatus = require("../src/popup/views/txStatus");
+const { state } = require("../src/shared/state");
+const { RESTORABLE_VIEWS } = require("../src/popup/restorableViews");
+
+const TX_HASH =
+    "0x85215772ed26ea8b39c2b3b18779030487efbe0b5fd7e882592b2f62b837be84";
+const RECIPIENT = "0x66133E8ea0f5D1d612D2502a968757D1048c214a";
+const TX_INFO = {
+    to: RECIPIENT,
+    amount: "0.0050",
+    token: "ETH",
+    tokenSymbol: null,
+};
+
+// True when a view element is not hidden.
+function visible(view) {
+    return !getElement("view-" + view).classList.contains("hidden");
+}
+
+function waitStatusText() {
+    return getElement("wait-tx-status").textContent;
+}
+
+beforeEach(() => {
+    jest.useFakeTimers();
+    jest.setSystemTime(new Date("2026-08-11T12:00:00Z"));
+    elements.clear();
+    mockReceiptLookup.mockReset();
+    state.wallets = [];
+    state.viewData = {};
+    state.viewStack = [];
+    state.currentView = null;
+    txStatus.init({ doRefreshAndRender: jest.fn() });
+});
+
+afterEach(() => {
+    txStatus.endWait();
+    jest.useRealTimers();
+});
+
+describe("WaitTx receipt/timeout race", () => {
+    test("a receipt arriving on the deadline tick leaves the user on SuccessTx", async () => {
+        // No receipt for the first five polls; the sixth — the tick at
+        // t=60s, which is also the timeout deadline — returns one.
+        mockReceiptLookup
+            .mockResolvedValueOnce(null)
+            .mockResolvedValueOnce(null)
+            .mockResolvedValueOnce(null)
+            .mockResolvedValueOnce(null)
+            .mockResolvedValueOnce(null)
+            .mockResolvedValue({ blockNumber: 21000000 });
+
+        txStatus.showWait(TX_INFO, TX_HASH);
+        expect(visible("wait-tx")).toBe(true);
+
+        await jest.advanceTimersByTimeAsync(60000);
+
+        expect(visible("success-tx")).toBe(true);
+        expect(visible("error-tx")).toBe(false);
+        expect(state.currentView).toBe("success-tx");
+        expect(state.viewData.blockNumber).toBe(21000000);
+        expect(state.viewData.message).toBeUndefined();
+
+        // And nothing is left running to undo it.
+        expect(jest.getTimerCount()).toBe(0);
+        await jest.advanceTimersByTimeAsync(300000);
+        expect(state.currentView).toBe("success-tx");
+        expect(mockReceiptLookup).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(6);
+    });
+
+    test("a genuine timeout still shows ErrorTx with the hash", async () => {
+        mockReceiptLookup.mockResolvedValue(null);
+
+        txStatus.showWait(TX_INFO, TX_HASH);
+        await jest.advanceTimersByTimeAsync(60000);
+
+        expect(visible("error-tx")).toBe(true);
+        expect(state.currentView).toBe("error-tx");
+        expect(state.viewData.message).toMatch(
+            /not confirmed within 60 seconds/,
+        );
+        expect(state.viewData.hash).toBe(TX_HASH);
+        // The hash section carries the hash and the etherscan link.
+        expect(getElement("error-tx-hash").innerHTML).toContain(TX_HASH);
+        expect(getElement("error-tx-hash").innerHTML).toContain(
+            "/tx/" + TX_HASH,
+        );
+        expect(jest.getTimerCount()).toBe(0);
+    });
+
+    test("a receipt still in flight when the view is left does not render over it", async () => {
+        let resolveReceipt;
+        mockReceiptLookup.mockReturnValue(
+            new Promise((r) => {
+                resolveReceipt = r;
+            }),
+        );
+
+        txStatus.showWait(TX_INFO, TX_HASH);
+        await jest.advanceTimersByTimeAsync(10000);
+        expect(mockReceiptLookup).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+
+        // User leaves the wait (popup navigation / teardown) while the
+        // lookup is outstanding, then the lookup finally answers.
+        txStatus.endWait();
+        state.currentView = "main";
+        resolveReceipt({ blockNumber: 21000000 });
+        await Promise.resolve();
+        await Promise.resolve();
+
+        expect(state.currentView).toBe("main");
+        expect(visible("success-tx")).toBe(false);
+    });
+
+    test("no timer survives the view being left", async () => {
+        mockReceiptLookup.mockResolvedValue(null);
+
+        txStatus.showWait(TX_INFO, TX_HASH);
+        expect(jest.getTimerCount()).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+
+        txStatus.endWait();
+        expect(jest.getTimerCount()).toBe(0);
+
+        await jest.advanceTimersByTimeAsync(120000);
+        expect(mockReceiptLookup).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+});
+
+describe("WaitTx persistence across popup close", () => {
+    test("restoreWait resumes the poll with the deadline running from broadcast", async () => {
+        mockReceiptLookup.mockResolvedValue(null);
+
+        txStatus.showWait(TX_INFO, TX_HASH);
+        expect(state.viewData.pendingWait.hash).toBe(TX_HASH);
+        const persisted = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(state.viewData));
+
+        // Popup closes: timers die with the page.
+        txStatus.endWait();
+
+        // 45 seconds pass with the popup shut, then it is reopened.
+        jest.advanceTimersByTime(45000);
+        state.viewData = persisted;
+        expect(txStatus.restoreWait()).toBe(true);
+
+        expect(visible("wait-tx")).toBe(true);
+        // Elapsed is counted from the broadcast, not from the reopen.
+        expect(waitStatusText()).toBe("Waiting for confirmation... 45s");
+        // The immediate poll on resume has already run.
+        await Promise.resolve();
+        expect(mockReceiptLookup).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+
+        // The deadline is 15 seconds away, not 60.
+        await jest.advanceTimersByTimeAsync(20000);
+        expect(state.currentView).toBe("error-tx");
+    });
+
+    test("a rejected lookup on the resume poll keeps waiting instead of reporting failure", async () => {
+        // A wait resumed after the deadline has already passed: the first
+        // poll is immediate and past 60s, so a thrown lookup must not be
+        // read as "no receipt". It means "no answer this tick" — keep
+        // polling, because the transaction may well have confirmed.
+        mockReceiptLookup.mockResolvedValue(null);
+        txStatus.showWait(TX_INFO, TX_HASH);
+        const persisted = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(state.viewData));
+        txStatus.endWait();
+
+        // Ten minutes with the popup shut, then it is reopened and the
+        // first receipt lookup fails transiently.
+        jest.advanceTimersByTime(600000);
+        mockReceiptLookup.mockReset();
+        mockReceiptLookup
+            .mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error("rpc unavailable"))
+            .mockResolvedValue({ blockNumber: 21000000 });
+
+        state.viewData = persisted;
+        expect(txStatus.restoreWait()).toBe(true);
+        await jest.advanceTimersByTimeAsync(0);
+
+        // The wait is still alive: no timeout was declared off one error.
+        expect(visible("wait-tx")).toBe(true);
+        expect(visible("error-tx")).toBe(false);
+        expect(state.currentView).toBe("wait-tx");
+        expect(jest.getTimerCount()).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+
+        // And the next tick answers, so the confirmed transaction is
+        // reported as confirmed.
+        await jest.advanceTimersByTimeAsync(10000);
+        expect(state.currentView).toBe("success-tx");
+        expect(state.viewData.blockNumber).toBe(21000000);
+    });
+
+    test("a lookup returning null past the deadline still times out", async () => {
+        // The counterpart to the test above: the deadline must still fire
+        // when the lookup actually answers "no receipt".
+        mockReceiptLookup.mockResolvedValue(null);
+        txStatus.showWait(TX_INFO, TX_HASH);
+        const persisted = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(state.viewData));
+        txStatus.endWait();
+
+        jest.advanceTimersByTime(600000);
+        state.viewData = persisted;
+        expect(txStatus.restoreWait()).toBe(true);
+        await jest.advanceTimersByTimeAsync(0);
+
+        expect(state.currentView).toBe("error-tx");
+        expect(state.viewData.message).toMatch(
+            /not confirmed within 60 seconds/,
+        );
+    });
+
+    test("restoreWait reports nothing to resume when no wait is persisted", () => {
+        state.viewData = {};
+        expect(txStatus.restoreWait()).toBe(false);
+        expect(jest.getTimerCount()).toBe(0);
+    });
+
+    test("restoreWait rejects a persisted wait missing its txInfo or broadcast time", () => {
+        for (const bad of [
+            { hash: TX_HASH, broadcastTime: Date.now() },
+            { hash: TX_HASH, txInfo: TX_INFO },
+            { hash: TX_HASH, txInfo: TX_INFO, broadcastTime: "soon" },
+            { hash: TX_HASH, txInfo: TX_INFO, broadcastTime: NaN },
+            { hash: TX_HASH, txInfo: "nope", broadcastTime: Date.now() },
+            // An object that merely lacks a field startWait() dereferences
+            // is the shape that actually escaped: txInfo.to reaches
+            // addressTitle(), which calls address.toLowerCase(). typeof []
+            // is "object", so an array passes an object check.
+            { hash: TX_HASH, txInfo: {}, broadcastTime: Date.now() },
+            { hash: TX_HASH, txInfo: [], broadcastTime: Date.now() },
+            { hash: TX_HASH, txInfo: { to: 42 }, broadcastTime: Date.now() },
+            // Otherwise complete but for a non-string `to`: only the `to`
+            // check rejects this one, and without it addressTitle() throws
+            // out of restoreView().
+            {
+                hash: TX_HASH,
+                txInfo: { to: 42, amount: "0.0050" },
+                broadcastTime: Date.now(),
+            },
+            // Otherwise complete but an array: only Array.isArray() rejects
+            // it, since typeof [] is "object" and the fields are present.
+            {
+                hash: TX_HASH,
+                txInfo: Object.assign([], { to: RECIPIENT, amount: "0.0050" }),
+                broadcastTime: Date.now(),
+            },
+            {
+                hash: TX_HASH,
+                txInfo: { to: RECIPIENT },
+                broadcastTime: Date.now(),
+            },
+        ]) {
+            state.viewData = { pendingWait: bad };
+            expect(txStatus.restoreWait()).toBe(false);
+            expect(jest.getTimerCount()).toBe(0);
+        }
+    });
+
+    test("restoreWait resumes a wait whose recipient is the empty string", () => {
+        // The shape a contract-deployment approval persists: approval.js
+        // writes `to: toAddr || ""`, and showWait() renders it without
+        // complaint. Validation must not be stricter than the live path, or
+        // that wait is silently abandoned on every popup open.
+        mockReceiptLookup.mockResolvedValue(null);
+        state.viewData = {
+            pendingWait: {
+                hash: TX_HASH,
+                txInfo: { ...TX_INFO, to: "" },
+                broadcastTime: Date.now(),
+            },
+        };
+        expect(txStatus.restoreWait()).toBe(true);
+        expect(visible("wait-tx")).toBe(true);
+    });
+});
+
+describe("WaitTx against an RPC that never answers", () => {
+    test("a permanently failing lookup ends the wait instead of polling forever", async () => {
+        mockReceiptLookup.mockRejectedValue(new Error("rpc unavailable"));
+
+        txStatus.showWait(TX_INFO, TX_HASH);
+
+        // Six consecutive failures is 60 seconds at the 10s cadence — the
+        // same patience as the confirmation deadline.
+        await jest.advanceTimersByTimeAsync(60000);
+
+        expect(state.currentView).toBe("error-tx");
+        expect(visible("wait-tx")).toBe(false);
+        // The user is told what actually happened: the lookup failed. It is
+        // not the same fact as "the transaction did not confirm".
+        expect(state.viewData.message).toMatch(/could not be reached/i);
+        expect(state.viewData.message).not.toMatch(/not confirmed within/);
+        expect(state.viewData.hash).toBe(TX_HASH);
+
+        // Nothing is left running, and nothing is left to resume onto.
+        expect(jest.getTimerCount()).toBe(0);
+        expect(state.viewData.pendingWait).toBeUndefined();
+
+        const calls = mockReceiptLookup.mock.calls.length;
+        await jest.advanceTimersByTimeAsync(3600000);
+        expect(mockReceiptLookup).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(calls);
+        expect(state.currentView).toBe("error-tx");
+    });
+
+    test("an answered lookup clears the failure count, so the bound is on consecutive failures", async () => {
+        // The bound counts failures in a row, not failures in total: a
+        // flaky RPC that keeps answering in between must not accumulate its
+        // way to a false "network unreachable".
+        //
+        // Polls 1-5 (t=10s..50s) alternate reject / null, so three fail and
+        // the last answer resets the count at poll 4. From poll 6 on every
+        // lookup fails. Six in a row is then poll 10, at t=100s. A counter
+        // that never reset would have reached six at poll 8, t=80s, so the
+        // window between those two is what this test occupies.
+        mockReceiptLookup.mockImplementation(() => {
+            const n = mockReceiptLookup.mock.calls.length;
+            if (n <= 5 && n % 2 === 0) return Promise.resolve(null);
+            return Promise.reject(new Error("flaky"));
+        });
+
+        txStatus.showWait(TX_INFO, TX_HASH);
+
+        // t=90s: eight failures in total, five of them in a row. A
+        // cumulative counter has long since fired; a consecutive one has not.
+        await jest.advanceTimersByTimeAsync(90000);
+        expect(state.currentView).toBe("wait-tx");
+        expect(visible("wait-tx")).toBe(true);
+        expect(jest.getTimerCount()).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+
+        // t=100s: the sixth in a row.
+        await jest.advanceTimersByTimeAsync(10000);
+        expect(state.currentView).toBe("error-tx");
+        expect(state.viewData.message).toMatch(/could not be reached/i);
+        // No lookup ever answered "no receipt" past the deadline, so this
+        // is not the timeout and must not be reported as one.
+        expect(state.viewData.message).not.toMatch(/not confirmed within/);
+        expect(jest.getTimerCount()).toBe(0);
+    });
+
+    test("a resumed wait against a dead RPC also terminates", async () => {
+        // The reopen path is the one that made this unbounded: the wait is
+        // persisted, so without a bound every popup open resumes it forever.
+        mockReceiptLookup.mockResolvedValue(null);
+        txStatus.showWait(TX_INFO, TX_HASH);
+        const persisted = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(state.viewData));
+        txStatus.endWait();
+
+        jest.advanceTimersByTime(3600000);
+        mockReceiptLookup.mockReset();
+        mockReceiptLookup.mockRejectedValue(new Error("rpc unavailable"));
+
+        state.viewData = persisted;
+        expect(txStatus.restoreWait()).toBe(true);
+        await jest.advanceTimersByTimeAsync(60000);
+
+        expect(state.currentView).toBe("error-tx");
+        expect(state.viewData.message).toMatch(/could not be reached/i);
+        expect(jest.getTimerCount()).toBe(0);
+        expect(state.viewData.pendingWait).toBeUndefined();
+    });
+});
+
+describe("wait-tx is a view the popup may reopen onto", () => {
+    // The resume feature is wired through RESTORABLE_VIEWS: restoreView()
+    // refuses any view not in the set, so dropping "wait-tx" from it kills
+    // the resume silently — the tests above call restoreWait() directly and
+    // would all still pass. This pins the membership. Mirrors the exclusion
+    // assertions in tests/showPhrase.test.js.
+    test("wait-tx is restorable", () => {
+        expect(RESTORABLE_VIEWS.has("wait-tx")).toBe(true);
+    });
+});

tests/vaultBackend.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+// The unit tests must exercise the libsodium backend that actually ships
+// (#182). Before this, they could not: node compiles WebAssembly happily,
+// the extension CSP refused it, and so the browser silently ran the
+// wasm2js translation while every test ran the WASM build.
+//
+// With 'wasm-unsafe-eval' in both manifests the two agree, and these tests
+// hold that agreement in place from the node side. tests/manifest.test.js
+// holds up the CSP end of it, and the end-to-end suite observes the real
+// popup.
+
+const { cryptoBackend } = require("../src/shared/vault");
+
+// The module libsodium-wrappers-sumo itself requires and drives. Not a new
+// dependency: it is inspected here, never used to perform crypto, because
+// it is the only thing that can say which backend is loaded.
+const SODIUM_CORE = "libsodium-sumo";
+
+describe("libsodium backend", () => {
+    test("this realm compiles WebAssembly, so the tests run the WASM build", async () => {
+        await expect(cryptoBackend()).resolves.toBe("wasm");
+    });
+
+    test("libsodium did not swap in the wasm2js fallback", async () => {
+        const core = require(SODIUM_CORE);
+        await require("libsodium-wrappers-sumo").ready;
+        // useBackupModule is the entry point to the fallback; taking it
+        // replaces the module's exports with the translation's, and the
+        // entry point goes with them. Still present after ready means the
+        // WASM module is the one in place. The test below is what keeps
+        // that inference honest.
+        expect(typeof core.useBackupModule).toBe("function");
+    });
+
+    // Deliberately last, and deliberately destructive: it takes the
+    // fallback, which replaces the loaded module for the rest of this
+    // file. Jest gives each test file its own module registry, so nothing
+    // outside sees it.
+    //
+    // Without this, the check above would be a claim about libsodium's
+    // internals with nothing holding it to account: if a future version
+    // kept useBackupModule on the fallback module too, the marker would
+    // quietly become true in both backends and the test would pass while
+    // measuring nothing. Forcing the fallback and watching the marker
+    // disappear is what makes its presence mean something.
+    test("the fallback marker distinguishes the two backends", async () => {
+        const core = require(SODIUM_CORE);
+        await require("libsodium-wrappers-sumo").ready;
+        expect(typeof core.useBackupModule).toBe("function");
+        await core.useBackupModule();
+        expect(typeof core.useBackupModule).toBe("undefined");
+    });
+});

tests/walletDefects.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,290 @@
+// Tests for the stored-state half of the non-master extended key problem.
+//
+// Refusing a non-master xprv at import time does nothing for a wallet that is
+// already in storage: the import that created it ran before the refusal
+// existed. Such a wallet used to sign for the wrong tree and now throws on the
+// send screen instead. These tests pin down that it is named and explained in
+// the wallet list, that nothing on the way there throws, and that a wallet
+// imported from a real master key is untouched by any of it.
+
+const { HDNodeWallet, Mnemonic } = require("ethers");
+
+const wallet = require("../src/shared/wallet");
+const {
+    walletDefect,
+    walletDefectHtml,
+    NON_MASTER_XPRV,
+} = require("../src/shared/walletDefects");
+
+// BIP-39 test vector phrase, published; never used for real funds.
+const VECTOR_PHRASE =
+    "test test test test test test test test test test test junk";
+
+function seedNode(phrase) {
+    return HDNodeWallet.fromSeed(Mnemonic.fromPhrase(phrase, "").computeSeed());
+}
+
+// The master (depth-0) key, which is what the import flow accepts today.
+function masterXprv(phrase) {
+    return seedNode(phrase).extendedKey;
+}
+
+// The account-level (depth-3) key m/44'/60'/0'. A normal thing for a user to
+// hold, and what the import flow used to accept.
+function accountXprv(phrase) {
+    return seedNode(phrase).derivePath("m/44'/60'/0'").extendedKey;
+}
+
+// The wallet record the CURRENT import path writes for a master key: the
+// neutered m/44'/60'/0'/0 node, four levels below a depth-0 key.
+function healthyXprvWallet(name = "Master") {
+    const { xpub, firstAddress } = wallet.hdWalletFromXprv(
+        masterXprv(VECTOR_PHRASE),
+    );
+    return {
+        name,
+        type: "xprv",
+        xpub,
+        nextIndex: 1,
+        encryptedSecret: "irrelevant-to-these-tests",
+        addresses: [{ address: firstAddress, balance: "0.0000" }],
+    };
+}
+
+// The wallet record the PRE-#210 import path wrote for an account-level key:
+// the same four levels, but derived as a relative path *beneath* the key, so
+// the stored xpub sits at depth 3 + 4 = 7. Built here the way the old code
+// built it rather than by calling the module under test, which now refuses.
+function brokenXprvWallet(name = "Imported xprv") {
+    const node = HDNodeWallet.fromExtendedKey(
+        accountXprv(VECTOR_PHRASE),
+    ).derivePath("44'/60'/0'/0");
+    return {
+        name,
+        type: "xprv",
+        xpub: node.neuter().extendedKey,
+        nextIndex: 1,
+        encryptedSecret: "irrelevant-to-these-tests",
+        addresses: [
+            { address: node.deriveChild(0).address, balance: "0.0000" },
+        ],
+    };
+}
+
+describe("the fixtures are what the two import paths actually produced", () => {
+    test("a master import stores a depth-4 xpub", () => {
+        expect(
+            HDNodeWallet.fromExtendedKey(healthyXprvWallet().xpub).depth,
+        ).toBe(4);
+    });
+
+    test("the pre-fix account-level import stored a depth-7 xpub", () => {
+        expect(
+            HDNodeWallet.fromExtendedKey(brokenXprvWallet().xpub).depth,
+        ).toBe(7);
+    });
+});
+
+describe("walletDefect", () => {
+    test("names the defect on a stored non-master xprv wallet", () => {
+        const defect = walletDefect(brokenXprvWallet());
+
+        expect(defect).not.toBeNull();
+        expect(defect.id).toBe(NON_MASTER_XPRV);
+    });
+
+    test("a depth-0 xprv wallet has no defect", () => {
+        expect(walletDefect(healthyXprvWallet())).toBeNull();
+    });
+
+    test("hd and key wallets are never assessed", () => {
+        expect(
+            walletDefect({ type: "hd", xpub: brokenXprvWallet().xpub }),
+        ).toBe(null);
+        expect(walletDefect({ type: "key" })).toBeNull();
+    });
+
+    test("an xprv wallet whose xpub cannot be parsed makes no claim", () => {
+        // No basis to say the key was non-master, so nothing is asserted
+        // about it rather than guessing.
+        expect(walletDefect({ type: "xprv", xpub: "not-a-key" })).toBeNull();
+        expect(walletDefect({ type: "xprv" })).toBeNull();
+    });
+
+    test("nothing about the wallet record is modified by the check", () => {
+        const w = brokenXprvWallet();
+        const before = JSON.stringify(w);
+
+        walletDefect(w);
+
+        expect(JSON.stringify(w)).toBe(before);
+    });
+});
+
+describe("the explanatory copy", () => {
+    const defect = walletDefect(brokenXprvWallet());
+
+    test("every sentence of it is a full sentence", () => {
+        for (const text of [defect.heading, ...defect.paragraphs]) {
+            expect(text).toMatch(/^[A-Z]/);
+            expect(text.trimEnd()).toMatch(/\.$/);
+        }
+    });
+
+    test("it says what was derived wrongly and that these are not the standard addresses", () => {
+        const body = defect.paragraphs.join(" ");
+
+        expect(body).toContain("not a master key");
+        expect(body).toMatch(/standard path/);
+    });
+
+    test("it does not claim the funds are safe and does not claim a loss", () => {
+        const all = [defect.heading, ...defect.paragraphs].join(" ");
+
+        expect(all).not.toMatch(/\bsafe\b/i);
+        expect(all).not.toMatch(/\blost\b|\bstolen\b|\bgone\b/i);
+    });
+
+    test("it says the wallet is not deleted and what the user can do", () => {
+        const body = defect.paragraphs.join(" ");
+
+        expect(body).toMatch(/until you delete it yourself/);
+        expect(body).toMatch(/recovery phrase/);
+    });
+
+    test("it uses the project's vocabulary", () => {
+        const all = [
+            defect.heading,
+            ...defect.paragraphs,
+            defect.shortMessage,
+        ].join(" ");
+
+        expect(all).not.toMatch(/seed phrase|mnemonic|passphrase/i);
+        expect(all).not.toMatch(/\baccounts?\b/i);
+    });
+});
+
+describe("walletDefectHtml", () => {
+    test("renders the heading and every paragraph for a defective wallet", () => {
+        const defect = walletDefect(brokenXprvWallet());
+        const html = walletDefectHtml(brokenXprvWallet());
+
+        expect(html).toContain(defect.heading);
+        for (const p of defect.paragraphs) {
+            expect(html).toContain(p);
+        }
+    });
+
+    test("renders nothing at all for a healthy wallet", () => {
+        expect(walletDefectHtml(healthyXprvWallet())).toBe("");
+    });
+});
+
+describe("the wallet list", () => {
+    let home;
+    let state;
+
+    beforeAll(() => {
+        global.chrome = {
+            storage: { local: { get: async () => ({}), set: async () => {} } },
+            runtime: { sendMessage: () => {} },
+        };
+        home = require("../src/popup/views/home");
+        state = require("../src/shared/state").state;
+    });
+
+    afterEach(() => {
+        state.wallets = [];
+        state.activeAddress = null;
+    });
+
+    test("a stored depth-3 xprv wallet renders the explanation", () => {
+        state.wallets = [brokenXprvWallet("Imported xprv")];
+
+        const html = home.walletListHtml();
+
+        expect(html).toContain(walletDefect(state.wallets[0]).heading);
+        expect(html).toContain("Imported xprv");
+    });
+
+    test("it does not offer to derive further addresses from that wallet", () => {
+        state.wallets = [brokenXprvWallet()];
+
+        expect(home.walletListHtml()).not.toContain("btn-add-address");
+    });
+
+    test("a normal depth-0 xprv wallet renders exactly as it did before", () => {
+        state.wallets = [healthyXprvWallet("Master")];
+
+        const html = home.walletListHtml();
+
+        expect(html).not.toContain(walletDefect(brokenXprvWallet()).heading);
+        expect(html).toContain("btn-add-address");
+        expect(html).toContain(state.wallets[0].addresses[0].address);
+    });
+
+    test("the defective wallet's notice does not bleed onto a healthy one", () => {
+        state.wallets = [brokenXprvWallet("Broken"), healthyXprvWallet("Fine")];
+
+        const html = home.walletListHtml();
+        const healthyPart = html.slice(html.indexOf("Fine"));
+
+        expect(html).toContain(walletDefect(state.wallets[0]).heading);
+        expect(healthyPart).not.toContain(
+            walletDefect(state.wallets[0]).heading,
+        );
+        expect(healthyPart).toContain("btn-add-address");
+    });
+});
+
+describe("no path throws an unhandled error for a defective wallet", () => {
+    test("address derivation from the stored xpub still works", () => {
+        // The stored xpub is at a non-standard depth but is a valid extended
+        // key; deriving from it is what the list render already does.
+        const w = brokenXprvWallet();
+
+        expect(() => wallet.deriveAddressFromXpub(w.xpub, 0)).not.toThrow();
+        expect(wallet.deriveAddressFromXpub(w.xpub, 0)).toBe(
+            w.addresses[0].address,
+        );
+    });
+
+    test("the wallet list renders without throwing", () => {
+        const { state } = require("../src/shared/state");
+        const home = require("../src/popup/views/home");
+        state.wallets = [brokenXprvWallet()];
+
+        expect(() => home.walletListHtml()).not.toThrow();
+
+        state.wallets = [];
+    });
+
+    test("signing refuses with the named defect rather than a bare failure", () => {
+        // getSignerForAddress is the backstop behind the UI gate. It must
+        // still refuse, and it must say why in a sentence the user can read.
+        let thrown = null;
+        try {
+            wallet.getSignerForAddress(
+                { type: "xprv" },
+                0,
+                accountXprv(VECTOR_PHRASE),
+            );
+        } catch (e) {
+            thrown = e;
+        }
+
+        expect(thrown).not.toBeNull();
+        expect(thrown.message).toMatch(/master key/);
+        expect(thrown.message.trimEnd()).toMatch(/\.$/);
+    });
+
+    test("a healthy xprv wallet signs as it always did", () => {
+        const signer = wallet.getSignerForAddress(
+            { type: "xprv" },
+            0,
+            masterXprv(VECTOR_PHRASE),
+        );
+
+        expect(signer.address).toBe(healthyXprvWallet().addresses[0].address);
+    });
+});