fix: answer the page when a background handler throws (closes #280)

handleRpc(...).then(sendResponse) had no .catch(), and sendResponse is the only
thing that settles the dApp's window.ethereum.request() promise. Any throw
inside handleRpc therefore sent nothing back: the content script posted nothing,
and the page's promise stayed pending forever with no error and no timeout,
indistinguishable from a slow wallet. handleRpc does real work -- state loads,
provider calls, transaction population, approval plumbing -- so "it does not
throw today" was not a property anyone was maintaining.

A rejected handleRpc now answers { code: -32603, message }. -32603 is the
JSON-RPC internal error EIP-1474 defines and EIP-1193 defers to for RPC-layer
failures; no EIP-1193 4xxx code describes "the wallet broke" and none was
invented for it. The cause is not put in the message: the page gets a stable
sentence, the background console gets the method and the throw, so the failure
is visible rather than swallowed.

The two async IIFEs behind AUTISTMASK_TX_RESPONSE and AUTISTMASK_SIGN_RESPONSE
are the same shape one level down. Every statement is inside a try, but a throw
from one of the catch blocks escapes as an unhandled rejection and neither the
popup nor the page is answered. Each gets a last-resort .catch() that settles
the approval through settleApproval() -- the existing chokepoint, with no new
delete or resolve -- and answers the popup. The transaction one reports the
broadcast stage, because it cannot tell whether the transaction reached the
network and that is the wording that does not invite a second send. Every other
message handler on the path is synchronous and cannot leave a promise pending.

Each of the three is driven by a real failure rather than a hook in the handler:
a rejecting extension-storage read, which getState() awaits unguarded, and a
failure classifier that throws while classifying a genuine verification failure.
All three were demonstrated failing against the unfixed code, the RPC one with
sendResponse at zero calls, which is precisely the page-side hang.

README.md

@@ -638,21 +638,6 @@ ExportPrivKey and ShowRecoveryPhrase — are deliberately absent from that list,
 so the popup can never reopen onto one of them with no password prompt in front
 of it.
 
-A reopened popup renders the wallet list and the one screen it restores onto,
-and nothing else, so every screen on the stack behind that one is still the
-blank template from `index.html`. "Back" therefore renders its target rather
-than only unhiding it, through the same dispatch and data guards as the restore
-(`src/popup/viewRouter.js`), and falls back to Home when the state the target
-would render is gone.
-
-It renders only a screen this page load has not rendered yet. Forward navigation
-renders as it goes, and `viewRouter.js` records every screen that reaches
-`showView()`, so "Back" onto a screen already on the page unhides it and nothing
-more — rendering it a second time would re-fetch and overwrite what it holds,
-such as an edit typed into Settings and not yet saved. Home is the one screen
-"Back" always re-renders, so the wallet list reflects anything that changed
-while the user was away from it.
-
 Every screen that holds secret material in the page registers a cleanup with
 `onViewLeave()` (`src/popup/views/helpers.js`), which `showView()` runs on every
 exit from that screen rather than only on its "Back" button, so nothing secret

TODO.md

@@ -45,23 +45,53 @@ undefined identifiers, which is how
 
 # Completed Steps
 
-- 2026-08-12: "Back" now renders the screen it lands on instead of only unhiding
+- 2026-08-14: A background message handler that throws now rejects the page
-  it. A reopened popup renders the wallet list and the one screen it restores
+  instead of hanging it. `handleRpc(...).then(sendResponse)` had no `.catch()`,
-  onto, so every screen further down the stack was still the blank template from
+  and `sendResponse` is the only thing that settles the dApp's
-  `index.html`, and Back walked straight onto it — an empty address, no
+  `window.ethereum.request()` promise — so any throw inside `handleRpc` left
-  balances, no QR code. The Back path now goes through the same per-view
+  that promise pending forever, with no error and no timeout, indistinguishable
-  dispatch and data guards as the restore (`src/popup/viewRouter.js`, shared
+  from a slow wallet. It now answers `{ code: -32603, message }` (the JSON-RPC
-  with `restoreView()`), falling back to Home when the state the target would
+  internal error EIP-1474 defines and EIP-1193 defers to; no EIP-1193 4xxx code
-  render is gone. It renders only a view this page load has not rendered yet:
+  describes "the wallet broke" and none was invented) and logs the method and
-  `viewRouter.js` records every view that reaches `showView()`, which is where
+  the throw to the background console rather than swallowing them. The two async
-  forward navigation and the restore both end, so Back onto a view already on
+  IIFEs behind `AUTISTMASK_TX_RESPONSE` and `AUTISTMASK_SIGN_RESPONSE` were the
-  the page unhides it and nothing more. That is what keeps a second render from
+  same shape one level down — every statement inside a `try`, but a throw out of
-  re-fetching and overwriting what the view holds — an unsaved edit in Settings,
+  a `catch` block escaping unhandled — and each got a last-resort `.catch()`
-  a transaction list already loaded. Home is the exception and is always
+  settling the approval through `settleApproval()` and answering the popup; the
-  re-rendered, as it was before. Covered by unit tests on the real `goBack()`
+  transaction one reports the broadcast stage, because it cannot tell whether
-  and by three end-to-end cases against the real popup, each demonstrated
+  the transaction reached the network. Every other handler on the path is
-  failing on the unfixed build
+  synchronous. All three are driven by real failures — a rejecting storage read,
-  ([#268](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/268)).
+  and a failure classifier that throws while classifying a genuine verification
+  failure — and were demonstrated failing first, the RPC one with `sendResponse`
+  at zero calls ([#280](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/280)).
+- 2026-08-12: EIP-1193 error codes now reach the page. `src/content/inpage.js`
+  rebuilt every failure as `new Error(error.message)`, so the code the
+  background produced and the content script relayed intact was dropped in the
+  last hop and a dApp checking `err.code === 4001` saw `undefined` — a wallet
+  the user deliberately declined was indistinguishable from one that broke. The
+  provider now rejects with a `ProviderRpcError` carrying `code` and, where the
+  boundary sent one, `data`, passed through verbatim rather than matched against
+  a list, so 4001, 4100 and 4902 all arrive and a future code needs no edit
+  here. An error the background sent with no code stays a plain `Error` with no
+  `code` property, and `message` is unchanged in every case. All four request
+  entry points (`request`, `enable`, `send`, `sendAsync`) are covered by
+  `tests/inpageErrors.test.js`, and the e2e probe that printed the missing code
+  now requires it on the page's Error as well as on the wire, for all four
+  rejected flows ([#274](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/274)).
+- 2026-08-12: `KNOWN_SYMBOLS` now maps a symbol to the set of contract addresses
+  that bear it, not to one of them. A ticker is not unique: seven of the 512
+  bundled tokens — `FRAX`, `REUSD`, `TON`, `EURE`, `MSUSD`, `MUSD` and `JPYC` —
+  share a symbol with another bundled entry at a different real contract, and
+  the table, built from the list first-wins, kept only the earlier one. The
+  other seven were judged spoofs of their own symbol at their own address and
+  hidden from the balance list, the history and the send selector, so a holder
+  could not spend them. Both contracts of each pair come from the same CoinGecko
+  fetch of 2026-02-27, so neither was stale and neither was dropped.
+  `isSpoofedSymbol()` asks set membership instead of equality, which does not
+  loosen the rule — a contract outside the set is still a spoof — and a test now
+  walks `TOKENS` asserting no bundled token is filtered at its own address,
+  which is the walk the suite lacked
+  ([#276](https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/276)).
 - 2026-08-12: The dApp approval round trips are driven end to end in the
   browser. A test page served by the harness speaks EIP-1193 to the real inpage
   provider through the real content script, background worker and approval popup

src/background/index.js

@@ -57,6 +57,16 @@ const connectedSites = {};
 // Pending approval requests: { id: { origin, hostname, resolve } }
 const pendingApprovals = {};
 
+// What the page is told when a request failed in a way the wallet has no
+// specific answer for. -32603 is the JSON-RPC internal error EIP-1474 defines
+// and EIP-1193 defers to for RPC-layer failures; no EIP-1193 4xxx code
+// describes "the wallet broke", and one is not invented here. The cause is
+// logged rather than put in the message: the page gets a stable sentence, the
+// background console gets the throw.
+const INTERNAL_ERROR_CODE = -32603;
+const INTERNAL_ERROR_MESSAGE =
+    "AutistMask could not complete this request because of an internal error.";
+
 async function getState() {
     const result = await storageApi.get("autistmask");
     return (
@@ -865,8 +875,25 @@ runtime.onMessage.addListener((msg, sender, sendResponse) => {
                 // keep fallback
             }
         }
-        handleRpc(msg.method, msg.params, trustedOrigin).then((response) => {
+        handleRpc(msg.method, msg.params, trustedOrigin)
+            .then((response) => {
                 sendResponse(response);
+            })
+            .catch((err) => {
+                // Without this the page's window.ethereum.request() promise
+                // stays pending forever: no response is sent, the content
+                // script posts nothing back, and the dApp cannot tell the
+                // failure from a slow wallet. handleRpc does real work —
+                // state loads, provider calls, transaction population — so
+                // "it does not throw today" is not a property anyone is
+                // maintaining.
+                log.errorf("RPC request failed:", msg.method, err);
+                sendResponse({
+                    error: {
+                        code: INTERNAL_ERROR_CODE,
+                        message: INTERNAL_ERROR_MESSAGE,
+                    },
+                });
             });
         return true;
     }
@@ -1051,7 +1078,31 @@ runtime.onMessage.addListener((msg, sender, sendResponse) => {
                     stage: TX_STAGE_BROADCAST,
                 });
             }
-        })();
+        })().catch((e) => {
+            // Every statement above is inside a try, but a throw from one of
+            // the catch blocks escapes as an unhandled rejection and neither
+            // the popup nor the page is ever answered. Settle both, through
+            // the same chokepoint as every other retirement. The stage is
+            // broadcast because this cannot tell whether the transaction
+            // reached the network, and that is the wording that does not
+            // invite a second send.
+            log.errorf("transaction approval response failed:", e);
+            settleApproval(
+                msg.id,
+                {
+                    error: {
+                        code: INTERNAL_ERROR_CODE,
+                        message: INTERNAL_ERROR_MESSAGE,
+                    },
+                },
+                { holdsClaim: true },
+            );
+            sendResponse({
+                error: INTERNAL_ERROR_MESSAGE,
+                retryable: false,
+                stage: TX_STAGE_BROADCAST,
+            });
+        });
         return true;
     }
 
@@ -1135,7 +1186,25 @@ runtime.onMessage.addListener((msg, sender, sendResponse) => {
                 }
                 sendResponse({ error: errMsg, retryable });
             }
-        })();
+        })().catch((e) => {
+            // Same shape as the transaction path: a throw out of the catch
+            // block above would leave the popup and the page both waiting.
+            log.errorf("sign approval response failed:", e);
+            settleApproval(
+                msg.id,
+                {
+                    error: {
+                        code: INTERNAL_ERROR_CODE,
+                        message: INTERNAL_ERROR_MESSAGE,
+                    },
+                },
+                { holdsClaim: true },
+            );
+            sendResponse({
+                error: INTERNAL_ERROR_MESSAGE,
+                retryable: false,
+            });
+        });
         return true;
     }
 

src/content/inpage.js

@@ -11,6 +11,39 @@
     let nextId = 1;
     const pending = {};
 
+    // EIP-1193 ProviderRpcError: `code`, `message`, optional `data`. A class
+    // rather than properties bolted onto an Error because this object crosses
+    // no boundary after construction — it is built in the page's own realm and
+    // handed straight to the caller's catch — so the prototype survives and
+    // `error.name` is a stable thing for a dApp to see.
+    class ProviderRpcError extends Error {
+        constructor(code, message, data) {
+            super(message);
+            this.name = "ProviderRpcError";
+            this.code = code;
+            if (data !== undefined) this.data = data;
+        }
+    }
+
+    // Rebuild a boundary error as the error the page catches, carrying the
+    // code (and data) the extension reported. Without this a dApp cannot tell
+    // a user's refusal (4001) from a wallet that broke, and retries or shows
+    // an error instead of accepting the refusal.
+    //
+    // Whatever code arrived is passed through verbatim rather than being
+    // matched against a list: the extension emits 4001, 4100 and 4902 today,
+    // and a code this file has never heard of is still the truth about what
+    // happened. An error reported with no code at all stays a plain Error —
+    // a ProviderRpcError whose `code` is undefined would advertise a
+    // conformance it does not have. `message` is untouched in every case.
+    function toPageError(error) {
+        const message = (error && error.message) || "Request failed";
+        if (error && error.code !== undefined && error.code !== null) {
+            return new ProviderRpcError(error.code, message, error.data);
+        }
+        return new Error(message);
+    }
+
     // Listen for responses from the content script
     window.addEventListener("message", function onUuid(event) {
         if (event.source !== window) return;
@@ -20,7 +53,7 @@
         if (!p) return;
         delete pending[id];
         if (error) {
-            p.reject(new Error(error.message || "Request failed"));
+            p.reject(toPageError(error));
         } else {
             p.resolve(result);
         }

src/popup/index.js

@@ -9,17 +9,16 @@ const {
     $,
     showView,
     updateDebugBanner,
-    setBackRenderer,
+    setRenderMain,
     pushCurrentView,
     goBack,
     clearViewStack,
 } = require("./views/helpers");
 const { applyTheme } = require("./theme");
-// Renders a view the popup lands on without having navigated to it forward:
+// Views that can be fully re-rendered from persisted state. All others fall
-// on restore here, and on Back. Only the views that can be fully re-rendered
+// back to the nearest restorable parent; see the module for why the
-// from persisted state (RESTORABLE_VIEWS, src/popup/restorableViews.js) go
+// secret-bearing views are absent.
-// through it; anything else falls back to the nearest restorable parent.
+const { RESTORABLE_VIEWS } = require("./restorableViews");
-const { renderView, makeBackRenderer } = require("./viewRouter");
 
 const home = require("./views/home");
 const welcome = require("./views/welcome");
@@ -109,23 +108,92 @@ const ctx = {
     },
 };
 
-// The view modules the router renders through, keyed as it expects them.
+function needsAddress(view) {
-const viewModules = {
+    return (
-    main: { show: () => fallbackView() },
+        view === "address" ||
-    addressDetail,
+        view === "address-token" ||
-    addressToken,
+        view === "receive" ||
-    receive,
+        view === "transaction"
-    settings,
+    );
-    settingsAddToken,
+}
-    confirmTx,
+
-    transactionDetail,
+function hasValidAddress() {
-    txStatus,
+    return (
-};
+        state.selectedWallet !== null &&
+        state.selectedAddress !== null &&
+        state.wallets[state.selectedWallet] &&
+        state.wallets[state.selectedWallet].addresses[state.selectedAddress]
+    );
+}
 
 function restoreView() {
-    if (!renderView(state.currentView, state, viewModules)) {
+    const view = state.currentView;
+    if (!view || !RESTORABLE_VIEWS.has(view)) {
+        return fallbackView();
+    }
+
+    if (needsAddress(view) && !hasValidAddress()) {
+        return fallbackView();
+    }
+
+    if (view === "address-token" && !state.selectedToken) {
+        return fallbackView();
+    }
+
+    switch (view) {
+        case "address":
+            addressDetail.show();
+            break;
+        case "address-token":
+            addressToken.show();
+            break;
+        case "receive":
+            receive.show();
+            break;
+        case "settings":
+            settings.show();
+            break;
+        case "settings-addtoken":
+            settingsAddToken.show();
+            break;
+        case "confirm-tx":
+            if (state.viewData && state.viewData.pendingTx) {
+                confirmTx.restore();
+            } else {
                 fallbackView();
             }
+            break;
+        case "transaction":
+            if (state.viewData && state.viewData.tx) {
+                transactionDetail.render();
+            } else {
+                fallbackView();
+            }
+            break;
+        case "wait-tx":
+            // Resumes the receipt poll from the persisted broadcast time.
+            if (!txStatus.restoreWait()) {
+                fallbackView();
+            }
+            break;
+        case "success-tx":
+            if (state.viewData && state.viewData.hash) {
+                txStatus.renderSuccess();
+            } else {
+                fallbackView();
+            }
+            break;
+        case "error-tx":
+            if (state.viewData && state.viewData.message) {
+                txStatus.renderError();
+            } else {
+                fallbackView();
+            }
+            break;
+        default:
+            fallbackView();
+            break;
+    }
 }
 
 function fallbackView() {
@@ -179,7 +247,7 @@ async function init() {
         settings.show();
     });
 
-    setBackRenderer(makeBackRenderer(state, viewModules));
+    setRenderMain(renderWalletList);
 
     welcome.init(ctx);
     addWallet.init(ctx);

src/popup/viewRouter.js

@@ -1,167 +0,0 @@
-// Rendering a view the popup lands on without having navigated to it
-// forward: on restore, and on Back. In both cases the view may never have
-// been rendered in this page load — a reopened popup renders only the
-// wallet list and the view it restores onto, so every other view is still
-// the blank static template from index.html — so unhiding it is not enough.
-//
-// Forward navigation renders as it goes and must NOT come through here:
-// rendering a second time would re-fetch and clobber whatever the view has
-// in flight.
-//
-// The view modules are injected and nothing here touches the DOM, so the
-// dispatch and its data guards can be tested directly; src/popup/index.js
-// cannot be required outside a browser.
-
-const { RESTORABLE_VIEWS } = require("./restorableViews");
-
-// The views this page load has rendered.
-//
-// The Back path cannot otherwise tell its two cases apart. A view the popup
-// never rendered is still the blank template from index.html and has to be
-// rendered; a view already on the page must NOT be rendered again, because
-// a second render re-fetches and overwrites whatever the user has typed
-// into it and not yet saved.
-//
-// Registration is showView() in views/helpers.js, which is the last thing
-// every render path runs — restoreView()'s, the Back path's, and every
-// forward show(). That is the point of putting it there rather than in the
-// individual views: a view added later registers itself with no one having
-// to remember it, so this cannot decay.
-//
-// Module scope is page-load scope: the popup loads this module once per
-// page load, and a reopened popup gets a fresh, empty set — which is
-// exactly the state that makes the Back path render.
-const renderedViews = new Set();
-
-function markViewRendered(view) {
-    if (view) renderedViews.add(view);
-}
-
-// Begin a fresh page-load scope. The popup gets one by being loaded; the
-// unit tests, which simulate several page loads against one module
-// instance, ask for one.
-function resetRenderedViews() {
-    renderedViews.clear();
-}
-
-// Home is the exception: Back re-renders it every time, which is what the
-// popup did before this router existed (index.js registered
-// renderWalletList() as setRenderMain(), and goBack() called it on every
-// Back onto "main"). It must stay that way — the wallet list has to reflect
-// what changed while the user was away from it, such as a wallet renamed or
-// an address removed in Settings — and Home holds no unsaved input to lose.
-const ALWAYS_RENDER_ON_BACK = new Set(["main"]);
-
-// Views that render an address the user picked and cannot be rendered
-// without one.
-const ADDRESS_VIEWS = new Set([
-    "address",
-    "address-token",
-    "receive",
-    "transaction",
-]);
-
-function needsAddress(view) {
-    return ADDRESS_VIEWS.has(view);
-}
-
-function hasValidAddress(state) {
-    return Boolean(
-        state.selectedWallet !== null &&
-        state.selectedAddress !== null &&
-        state.wallets[state.selectedWallet] &&
-        state.wallets[state.selectedWallet].addresses[state.selectedAddress],
-    );
-}
-
-// Render `view` from persisted state. Each view module shows itself, so a
-// true return means the view is both rendered and on screen.
-//
-// Returns false when the view is not one the popup renders from state, or
-// when the state it would render is gone — a token no longer selected, a
-// transaction no longer persisted. The caller falls back rather than
-// putting an empty template on screen.
-function renderView(view, state, views) {
-    if (!view || !RESTORABLE_VIEWS.has(view)) return false;
-    if (needsAddress(view) && !hasValidAddress(state)) return false;
-    if (view === "address-token" && !state.selectedToken) return false;
-
-    const data = state.viewData || {};
-    switch (view) {
-        case "main":
-            views.main.show();
-            return true;
-        case "address":
-            views.addressDetail.show();
-            return true;
-        case "address-token":
-            views.addressToken.show();
-            return true;
-        case "receive":
-            views.receive.show();
-            return true;
-        case "settings":
-            views.settings.show();
-            return true;
-        case "settings-addtoken":
-            views.settingsAddToken.show();
-            return true;
-        case "confirm-tx":
-            if (!data.pendingTx) return false;
-            views.confirmTx.restore();
-            return true;
-        case "transaction":
-            if (!data.tx) return false;
-            views.transactionDetail.render();
-            return true;
-        case "wait-tx":
-            // Resumes the receipt poll from the persisted broadcast time,
-            // and answers false when there is nothing resumable left.
-            return Boolean(views.txStatus.restoreWait());
-        case "success-tx":
-            if (!data.hash) return false;
-            views.txStatus.renderSuccess();
-            return true;
-        case "error-tx":
-            if (!data.message) return false;
-            views.txStatus.renderError();
-            return true;
-        default:
-            return false;
-    }
-}
-
-// The Back-path renderer, registered with setBackRenderer() in
-// views/helpers.js.
-//
-// Returns false — leaving goBack() to unhide the view, as it always did —
-// in the two cases where the view is known to be on the page already:
-//
-//   - It is not one the popup renders from persisted state. The restored
-//     stack is filtered against RESTORABLE_VIEWS, so such a view can only
-//     be on the stack from this page load, where forward navigation
-//     rendered it on the way in.
-//   - This page load has rendered it. Re-rendering would re-fetch and
-//     clobber what it holds; Home is rendered anyway, see above.
-//
-// What is left is the case the router exists for: a view on the stack that
-// this page load has never rendered, whose template is still blank.
-function makeBackRenderer(state, views) {
-    return function renderBack(view) {
-        if (!RESTORABLE_VIEWS.has(view)) return false;
-        if (renderedViews.has(view) && !ALWAYS_RENDER_ON_BACK.has(view)) {
-            return false;
-        }
-        if (!renderView(view, state, views)) {
-            views.main.show();
-        }
-        return true;
-    };
-}
-
-module.exports = {
-    renderView,
-    makeBackRenderer,
-    markViewRendered,
-    resetRenderedViews,
-};

src/popup/views/helpers.js

@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ const {
     getAddressValueUsd,
 } = require("../../shared/prices");
 const { state, saveState, currentNetwork } = require("../../shared/state");
-const { markViewRendered } = require("../viewRouter");
 
 // When views are added, removed, or transitions between them change,
 // update the view-navigation documentation in README.md to match.
@@ -77,10 +76,6 @@ function showView(name) {
     }
     clearFlash();
     state.currentView = name;
-    // A view's show() ends here, so this is where the Back path learns the
-    // view is no longer the blank template from index.html and must not be
-    // rendered a second time. See viewRouter.js.
-    markViewRendered(name);
     saveState();
     updateDebugBanner(name);
 }
@@ -116,19 +111,12 @@ function updateDebugBanner(viewName) {
     }
 }
 
-// Callback that renders a view being navigated BACK onto. Set once by
+// Callback to re-render the main/home view when navigating back to it.
-// index.js via setBackRenderer(), which routes the view through the same
+// Set once by index.js via setRenderMain().
-// per-view render and data guards restoreView() uses.
+let _renderMain = null;
-//
-// It answers true when it took the navigation — the view is rendered and
-// shown, or its backing data was gone and it fell back — and false for a
-// view the popup does not render from persisted state. Those can only be
-// on the stack from this page load, because the stack is filtered on load,
-// so they have already been rendered and only need unhiding.
-let _renderBack = null;
 
-function setBackRenderer(fn) {
+function setRenderMain(fn) {
-    _renderBack = fn;
+    _renderMain = fn;
 }
 
 // Push the current view onto the navigation stack so goBack() can
@@ -148,11 +136,9 @@ function goBack() {
     } else {
         target = "main";
     }
-    // A popped view is landed on, not navigated to. If the popup has been
+    if (target === "main" && _renderMain) {
-    // closed and reopened since the view was pushed, nothing has ever
+        _renderMain();
-    // rendered it in this page load and its template is still blank, so it
+    }
-    // has to be rendered here rather than merely unhidden.
-    if (_renderBack && _renderBack(target)) return;
     showView(target);
 }
 
@@ -484,7 +470,7 @@ module.exports = {
     showView,
     onViewLeave,
     updateDebugBanner,
-    setBackRenderer,
+    setRenderMain,
     pushCurrentView,
     goBack,
     clearViewStack,

src/shared/symbolSpoof.js

@@ -8,12 +8,19 @@
 // either verdict alone, because the balance list is where the user forms
 // their belief about what they own (issue #235).
 //
-// KNOWN_SYMBOLS maps a symbol to the lowercased contract address that may
+// KNOWN_SYMBOLS maps a symbol to the set of lowercased contract addresses
-// bear it, or to null.  Null means the symbol belongs to the native asset,
+// that may bear it, or to null.  Null means the symbol belongs to the native
-// which has no contract at all, so no contract may bear it and every one
+// asset, which has no contract at all, so no contract may bear it and every
-// that does is a spoof.  "ETH" is the only such entry today; the rule is
+// one that does is a spoof.  "ETH" is the only such entry today; the rule is
 // written so that a second one needs no change here or at any call site.
 //
+// The value is a set because a ticker is not unique: seven symbols in the
+// bundled list belong to two real contracts each, and answering with one of
+// them hid the other one's holders' money (issue #276).  Membership, not
+// equality, is therefore the question — but it is the same question, asked of
+// a table that can now state the truth.  Every address in a set is one the
+// wallet ships as a real token; a contract outside the set is still a spoof.
+//
 // The symbol is attacker-controlled — it is whatever the ERC-20 contract
 // returns — so the lookup is done on a normalized form (issue #260): the
 // question is whether the symbol reaches the user's eye as a known one,
@@ -93,7 +100,7 @@ function isSpoofedSymbol(symbol, contractAddress) {
     if (!KNOWN_SYMBOLS.has(sym)) return false;
     const legit = KNOWN_SYMBOLS.get(sym);
     if (legit === null) return true;
-    return contract !== normalizeAddress(legit);
+    return !legit.has(contract);
 }
 
 module.exports = {

src/shared/tokenList.js

@@ -3607,14 +3607,33 @@ for (const t of TOKENS) {
     TOKEN_BY_ADDRESS.set(t.address.toLowerCase(), t);
 }
 
-// Build a map of symbol (uppercased) -> legitimate contract address (lowercased).
+// Build a map of symbol (uppercased) -> the set of contract addresses
-// Used for spoofed-symbol detection. "ETH" maps to null (native token).
+// (lowercased) that legitimately bear it.  Used for spoofed-symbol detection.
+// "ETH" maps to null: the native asset has no contract, so no contract may
+// bear its symbol.
+//
+// The value is a set and not a single address because tickers are not unique
+// and the list above proves it: seven of these 512 tokens share a symbol with
+// another entry — FRAX, REUSD, TON, EURE, MSUSD, MUSD and JPYC — at two
+// different real contracts each, all of them from the same source fetch.  A
+// one-address-per-symbol table can only answer that by picking a winner, and
+// the loser is then a token in our own bundled list that the spoof filter
+// hides from the balance list, the history and the send selector at its own
+// address, so the user cannot spend it (issue #276).  Naming every address
+// that bears the symbol is the only shape that says what is true; it does not
+// loosen the rule, because a contract outside the set is still a spoof.
 const KNOWN_SYMBOLS = new Map();
 KNOWN_SYMBOLS.set("ETH", null);
 for (const t of TOKENS) {
     const upper = t.symbol.toUpperCase();
     if (!KNOWN_SYMBOLS.has(upper)) {
-        KNOWN_SYMBOLS.set(upper, t.address.toLowerCase());
+        KNOWN_SYMBOLS.set(upper, new Set());
+    }
+    const addresses = KNOWN_SYMBOLS.get(upper);
+    // A null entry is the native asset and stays null: an ERC-20 that reports
+    // the native symbol does not thereby become entitled to it.
+    if (addresses !== null) {
+        addresses.add(t.address.toLowerCase());
     }
 }
 

tests/backNavigation.test.js

@@ -1,329 +0,0 @@
-// Back after reopening the popup (#268).
-//
-// A reopened popup renders the wallet list and the one view it restores
-// onto; every other view is still the blank static template from
-// index.html. goBack() used to only unhide its target, so Back landed on
-// that blank template for any view the popup had not rendered in this page
-// load. These tests drive the real goBack() with the real router wired to
-// recording view modules, so what is asserted is which view render ran —
-// the thing that was missing.
-//
-// The rendering itself is asserted against the real popup in a real
-// browser by tests/e2e/run.js; here the DOM is a stub, because goBack()
-// only needs showView() to work.
-
-const els = new Map();
-
-function fakeEl() {
-    return {
-        textContent: "",
-        innerHTML: "",
-        classList: {
-            toggle() {},
-            add() {},
-            remove() {},
-            contains: () => false,
-        },
-        remove() {},
-    };
-}
-
-globalThis.document = {
-    getElementById(id) {
-        if (!els.has(id)) els.set(id, fakeEl());
-        return els.get(id);
-    },
-};
-
-// helpers.js pulls in state.js, which reads chrome.storage.local at load.
-globalThis.chrome = {
-    storage: { local: { get: async () => ({}), set: async () => {} } },
-};
-
-const {
-    showView,
-    goBack,
-    setBackRenderer,
-    pushCurrentView,
-} = require("../src/popup/views/helpers");
-const {
-    makeBackRenderer,
-    markViewRendered,
-    resetRenderedViews,
-} = require("../src/popup/viewRouter");
-const { state } = require("../src/shared/state");
-
-const ADDRESS = "0x1111111111111111111111111111111111111111";
-const TOKEN = "0xa0b86991c6218b36c1d19d4a2e9eb0ce3606eb48";
-
-let calls;
-
-// Stand-ins for the view modules. Each records itself and then shows its
-// view, which is what every real view render ends with — so the assertions
-// can tell "rendered and shown" apart from "merely unhidden".
-function recorder(name, view) {
-    return () => {
-        calls.push(name);
-        showView(view);
-    };
-}
-
-function makeViews() {
-    return {
-        main: { show: recorder("main", "main") },
-        addressDetail: { show: recorder("addressDetail", "address") },
-        addressToken: { show: recorder("addressToken", "address-token") },
-        receive: { show: recorder("receive", "receive") },
-        settings: { show: recorder("settings", "settings") },
-        settingsAddToken: {
-            show: recorder("settingsAddToken", "settings-addtoken"),
-        },
-        confirmTx: { restore: recorder("confirmTx", "confirm-tx") },
-        transactionDetail: {
-            render: recorder("transactionDetail", "transaction"),
-        },
-        txStatus: {
-            restoreWait: () => {
-                calls.push("waitTx");
-                showView("wait-tx");
-                return true;
-            },
-            renderSuccess: recorder("successTx", "success-tx"),
-            renderError: recorder("errorTx", "error-tx"),
-        },
-    };
-}
-
-// The popup as it stands just after a reopen: one wallet with one address,
-// the view the popup restored onto, and the stack behind it.
-//
-// A reopen is a fresh page load, so the record of what has been rendered
-// starts empty — that emptiness is what makes the Back path render at all.
-// Returns the view modules so a test can drive forward navigation through
-// the same recorders the router renders through.
-function reopenedOn(view, stack, extra) {
-    calls = [];
-    resetRenderedViews();
-    state.wallets = [
-        {
-            name: "Wallet 1",
-            addresses: [{ address: ADDRESS, balance: "0", tokenBalances: [] }],
-        },
-    ];
-    state.selectedWallet = 0;
-    state.selectedAddress = 0;
-    state.selectedToken = null;
-    state.viewData = null;
-    state.currentView = view;
-    state.viewStack = stack.slice();
-    Object.assign(state, extra || {});
-    // Restoring onto a view renders it, so the reopened popup has that one
-    // view on the page and nothing else.
-    markViewRendered(view);
-    const views = makeViews();
-    setBackRenderer(makeBackRenderer(state, views));
-    return views;
-}
-
-// The reproduction from the issue, step for step.
-describe("Back onto a view the reopened popup never rendered", () => {
-    test("Back from settings renders the address detail underneath", () => {
-        reopenedOn("settings", ["main", "address"]);
-        goBack();
-        expect(calls).toEqual(["addressDetail"]);
-        expect(state.currentView).toBe("address");
-        expect(state.viewStack).toEqual(["main"]);
-    });
-
-    test("Back onto the token detail renders it", () => {
-        reopenedOn("settings", ["main", "address", "address-token"], {
-            selectedToken: TOKEN,
-        });
-        goBack();
-        expect(calls).toEqual(["addressToken"]);
-        expect(state.currentView).toBe("address-token");
-    });
-
-    test("Back onto Receive renders it", () => {
-        reopenedOn("settings", ["main", "address", "receive"]);
-        goBack();
-        expect(calls).toEqual(["receive"]);
-        expect(state.currentView).toBe("receive");
-    });
-
-    test("Back onto the transaction detail renders it", () => {
-        reopenedOn("settings", ["main", "transaction"], {
-            viewData: { tx: { hash: "0xdead" } },
-        });
-        goBack();
-        expect(calls).toEqual(["transactionDetail"]);
-        expect(state.currentView).toBe("transaction");
-    });
-
-    test("Back onto the transaction confirmation restores it", () => {
-        reopenedOn("settings", ["main", "confirm-tx"], {
-            viewData: { pendingTx: { to: ADDRESS, amount: "1" } },
-        });
-        goBack();
-        expect(calls).toEqual(["confirmTx"]);
-        expect(state.currentView).toBe("confirm-tx");
-    });
-
-    test("Back onto the success screen renders it", () => {
-        reopenedOn("settings", ["main", "success-tx"], {
-            viewData: { hash: "0xdead" },
-        });
-        goBack();
-        expect(calls).toEqual(["successTx"]);
-        expect(state.currentView).toBe("success-tx");
-    });
-
-    test("Back onto the failure screen renders it", () => {
-        reopenedOn("settings", ["main", "error-tx"], {
-            viewData: { message: "execution reverted" },
-        });
-        goBack();
-        expect(calls).toEqual(["errorTx"]);
-        expect(state.currentView).toBe("error-tx");
-    });
-
-    test("Back onto Home renders the wallet list", () => {
-        reopenedOn("settings", ["main"]);
-        goBack();
-        expect(calls).toEqual(["main"]);
-        expect(state.currentView).toBe("main");
-    });
-
-    test("Back with an empty stack renders Home", () => {
-        reopenedOn("settings", []);
-        goBack();
-        expect(calls).toEqual(["main"]);
-        expect(state.currentView).toBe("main");
-    });
-});
-
-// The guards are restoreView()'s, so a popped view whose backing data is
-// gone lands on Home rather than on an empty template.
-describe("Back onto a view whose backing data is gone", () => {
-    test("the token detail with no token selected falls back to Home", () => {
-        reopenedOn("settings", ["main", "address-token"]);
-        goBack();
-        expect(calls).toEqual(["main"]);
-        expect(state.currentView).toBe("main");
-    });
-
-    test("the transaction detail with no transaction falls back to Home", () => {
-        reopenedOn("settings", ["main", "transaction"]);
-        goBack();
-        expect(calls).toEqual(["main"]);
-        expect(state.currentView).toBe("main");
-    });
-
-    test("the confirmation with no pending transaction falls back to Home", () => {
-        reopenedOn("settings", ["main", "confirm-tx"]);
-        goBack();
-        expect(calls).toEqual(["main"]);
-        expect(state.currentView).toBe("main");
-    });
-
-    test("an address view with no address selected falls back to Home", () => {
-        reopenedOn("settings", ["main", "receive"], {
-            selectedAddress: null,
-        });
-        goBack();
-        expect(calls).toEqual(["main"]);
-        expect(state.currentView).toBe("main");
-    });
-
-    test("the success screen with no transaction hash falls back to Home", () => {
-        reopenedOn("settings", ["main", "success-tx"]);
-        goBack();
-        expect(calls).toEqual(["main"]);
-        expect(state.currentView).toBe("main");
-    });
-
-    test("the failure screen with no message falls back to Home", () => {
-        reopenedOn("settings", ["main", "error-tx"]);
-        goBack();
-        expect(calls).toEqual(["main"]);
-        expect(state.currentView).toBe("main");
-    });
-
-    test("a wait that can no longer be resumed falls back to Home", () => {
-        reopenedOn("settings", ["main", "wait-tx"]);
-        const views = makeViews();
-        views.txStatus.restoreWait = () => false;
-        setBackRenderer(makeBackRenderer(state, views));
-        goBack();
-        expect(calls).toEqual(["main"]);
-        expect(state.currentView).toBe("main");
-    });
-});
-
-// Forward navigation renders as it goes, and a second render would re-fetch
-// and clobber whatever the view holds — an unsaved edit, a request in
-// flight. So the Back path renders only a view this page load has never
-// rendered, and merely unhides every other one: the views it does not
-// render from persisted state, and the views already on the page.
-describe("what the Back path leaves alone", () => {
-    test("forward navigation renders nothing by itself", () => {
-        reopenedOn("address", ["main"]);
-        pushCurrentView();
-        showView("send");
-        expect(calls).toEqual([]);
-        expect(state.viewStack).toEqual(["main", "address"]);
-    });
-
-    test("Back onto a live-session view only unhides it", () => {
-        reopenedOn("confirm-tx", ["main", "address", "send"]);
-        goBack();
-        expect(calls).toEqual([]);
-        expect(state.currentView).toBe("send");
-    });
-
-    test("Back renders its target exactly once", () => {
-        reopenedOn("settings", ["main", "address"]);
-        goBack();
-        expect(calls.filter((c) => c === "addressDetail")).toHaveLength(1);
-    });
-
-    test("Back onto a view this page load already rendered only unhides it", () => {
-        const views = reopenedOn("main", []);
-        pushCurrentView();
-        views.addressDetail.show();
-        pushCurrentView();
-        views.settings.show();
-        calls = [];
-        goBack();
-        expect(calls).toEqual([]);
-        expect(state.currentView).toBe("address");
-    });
-
-    // The unit mirror of the regression the browser suite pins: Settings
-    // reassigns its fields from persisted state on every render, so a
-    // re-render on the way back discards an edit the user has not saved.
-    test("Back onto Settings visited earlier in this page load does not re-render it", () => {
-        const views = reopenedOn("main", []);
-        pushCurrentView();
-        views.settings.show();
-        pushCurrentView();
-        views.settingsAddToken.show();
-        calls = [];
-        goBack();
-        expect(calls).toEqual([]);
-        expect(state.currentView).toBe("settings");
-    });
-
-    // Home is the deliberate exception, unchanged from the popup's
-    // behaviour before the router existed: it re-renders on every Back so
-    // the wallet list reflects what changed while the user was away.
-    test("Back onto Home renders it again even when it is already on the page", () => {
-        const views = reopenedOn("main", []);
-        pushCurrentView();
-        views.addressDetail.show();
-        calls = [];
-        goBack();
-        expect(calls).toEqual(["main"]);
-        expect(state.currentView).toBe("main");
-    });
-});

tests/backgroundApproval.test.js

@@ -133,6 +133,14 @@ function loadBackground(options) {
         ensureRecurringAlarms: jest.fn(async () => {}),
         registerAlarmHandlers: jest.fn(),
     }));
+    // The real verification module, except where a test replaces one export
+    // with a throw to drive the handler's own error handling into failing.
+    if (opts.approvalVerify) {
+        jest.doMock("../src/shared/approvalVerify", () => ({
+            ...jest.requireActual("../src/shared/approvalVerify"),
+            ...opts.approvalVerify,
+        }));
+    }
 
     const persisted = {
         wallets: [
@@ -152,7 +160,10 @@ function loadBackground(options) {
     global.chrome = {
         storage: {
             local: {
-                get: jest.fn(async () => ({ autistmask: persisted })),
+                get: jest.fn(
+                    opts.storageGet ||
+                        (async () => ({ autistmask: persisted })),
+                ),
                 set: jest.fn(async () => {}),
             },
         },
@@ -280,6 +291,25 @@ async function settle() {
     for (let i = 0; i < 50; i++) await Promise.resolve();
 }
 
+// Node aborts the worker process on an unhandled rejection; an extension
+// service worker does not — the promise is simply never settled, nothing is
+// sent back, and the page's window.ethereum.request() waits forever. Recording
+// them instead of dying on them keeps that difference visible: the assertion
+// that the page WAS answered is what reports the failure, and the recording is
+// asserted empty alongside it.
+const unhandledRejections = [];
+process.on("unhandledRejection", (reason) => {
+    unhandledRejections.push(reason);
+});
+
+// Node reports an unhandled rejection on the macrotask turn after the promise
+// was left unhandled, which is past everything settle() waits for.
+async function settleIncludingRejections() {
+    await settle();
+    await new Promise((resolve) => setImmediate(resolve));
+    await new Promise((resolve) => setImmediate(resolve));
+}
+
 afterEach(() => {
     delete global.chrome;
     jest.resetModules();
@@ -1034,6 +1064,147 @@ describe("a claimed approval outlives every other retirement path", () => {
     });
 });
 
+// A handler that throws must still answer. `sendResponse` is the only thing
+// that settles the page's window.ethereum.request() promise, so a throw that
+// escapes a handler leaves that promise pending forever — no error, no
+// timeout, indistinguishable from a slow wallet. Each case below drives a real
+// throw out of a handler rather than asserting the catch block exists.
+describe("a handler that throws still settles the page", () => {
+    const INTERNAL_ERROR = {
+        code: -32603,
+        message:
+            "AutistMask could not complete this request because of an internal error.",
+    };
+
+    let errorLog;
+    beforeEach(() => {
+        errorLog = jest.spyOn(console, "error").mockImplementation(() => {});
+        unhandledRejections.length = 0;
+    });
+    afterEach(() => {
+        errorLog.mockRestore();
+    });
+
+    // getState() awaits extension storage unguarded, and every read path in
+    // handleRpc goes through it. A storage read that rejects is the whole
+    // failure — no hook in the handler itself.
+    test("a rejected handleRpc rejects the page instead of hanging it", async () => {
+        const bg = loadBackground({
+            storageGet: async () => {
+                throw new Error("storage unavailable");
+            },
+        });
+
+        const answer = bg.send(
+            { type: "AUTISTMASK_RPC", method: "eth_accounts", params: [] },
+            { origin: ORIGIN },
+        );
+        await settleIncludingRejections();
+
+        // The channel is held open for the async answer, and the answer
+        // arrives.
+        expect(answer.kept).toBe(true);
+        expect(answer.sendResponse).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
+            error: INTERNAL_ERROR,
+        });
+        expect(unhandledRejections).toEqual([]);
+        // Not swallowed: the throw is on the background console, which is how
+        // this class gets caught in future.
+        expect(errorLog).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+            "[AutistMask]",
+            "RPC request failed:",
+            "eth_accounts",
+            expect.objectContaining({ message: "storage unavailable" }),
+        );
+    });
+
+    // The transaction response handler wraps every statement in a try, so what
+    // escapes it is a throw from inside one of its catch blocks. Here the
+    // failure classifier itself throws while classifying a real verification
+    // failure — the approval is left claimed, so nothing else can settle it.
+    test("a throw while handling a failed transaction settles both the page and the popup", async () => {
+        const bg = loadBackground({
+            approvalVerify: {
+                describeTxFailure: () => {
+                    throw new Error("classifier broke");
+                },
+            },
+        });
+        const pending = bg.requestTx();
+        await settle();
+        const id = pending.id();
+
+        // A real verification failure: the artifact is signed at a nonce the
+        // approval never displayed.
+        const answer = bg.send(
+            {
+                type: "AUTISTMASK_TX_RESPONSE",
+                id,
+                approved: true,
+                rawSignedTx: await signedAtNonce(NONCE + 1),
+            },
+            { url: bg.fromPopup.url },
+        );
+        await settleIncludingRejections();
+
+        expect(bg.broadcastTransaction).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+        expect(pending.result()).toEqual({ error: INTERNAL_ERROR });
+        expect(answer.sendResponse).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
+            error: INTERNAL_ERROR.message,
+            retryable: false,
+            // The handler cannot tell whether the transaction reached the
+            // network, so the popup must not say "start again from the site".
+            stage: "broadcast",
+        });
+        expect(unhandledRejections).toEqual([]);
+        expect(errorLog).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+            "[AutistMask]",
+            "transaction approval response failed:",
+            expect.objectContaining({ message: "classifier broke" }),
+        );
+    });
+
+    test("a throw while handling a failed signature settles both the page and the popup", async () => {
+        const bg = loadBackground({
+            approvalVerify: {
+                failureIsRetryable: () => {
+                    throw new Error("classifier broke");
+                },
+            },
+        });
+        const pending = bg.requestSign();
+        await settle();
+
+        // A real verification failure: the active address moved after the
+        // approval was raised.
+        bg.setActiveAddress(other.address);
+        const answer = bg.send(
+            {
+                type: "AUTISTMASK_SIGN_RESPONSE",
+                id: pending.id(),
+                approved: true,
+                signature: await signer.signMessage(
+                    Buffer.from(MESSAGE.slice(2), "hex"),
+                ),
+            },
+            { url: bg.fromPopup.url },
+        );
+        await settleIncludingRejections();
+
+        expect(pending.result()).toEqual({ error: INTERNAL_ERROR });
+        expect(answer.sendResponse).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
+            error: INTERNAL_ERROR.message,
+            retryable: false,
+        });
+        expect(unhandledRejections).toEqual([]);
+        expect(errorLog).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+            "[AutistMask]",
+            "sign approval response failed:",
+            expect.objectContaining({ message: "classifier broke" }),
+        );
+    });
+});
+
 describe("popup-only messages", () => {
     test("a page sender cannot answer an approval", async () => {
         const bg = loadBackground();

tests/e2e/network.js

@@ -86,9 +86,11 @@ const DAPP_URL = DAPP_ORIGIN + "/";
 // never drive the popup that has to settle it; start() files the promise
 // under a key and settle() collects it once the prompt has been dealt with.
 //
-// The rejection branch records `code` as it arrives. EIP-1193 says a user
+// The rejection branch records the whole observable shape of the error as it
-// rejection is a ProviderRpcError carrying code 4001; what the page can
+// arrives — name, message, and whether a `code` is present at all as distinct
-// actually see is recorded here rather than assumed, and asserted in run.js.
+// from its value. EIP-1193 says a user rejection is a ProviderRpcError
+// carrying code 4001; what the page can actually see is recorded here rather
+// than assumed, and asserted in run.js.
 //
 // The message log is the page's half of the boundary observation: every
 // AUTISTMASK_* message that crosses between this page and the content
@@ -120,6 +122,7 @@ const DAPP_HTML = [
     "                    return {",
     "                        settled: 'rejected',",
     "                        message: String((error && error.message) || error),",
+    "                        name: error ? error.name : undefined,",
     "                        hasCode: !!error && 'code' in Object(error),",
     "                        code: error ? error.code : undefined,",
     "                    };",

tests/e2e/run.js

@@ -419,172 +419,6 @@ test("reopening the popup never lands on the phrase screen (#161)", async (env)
     assertWiped(st, env.phrase, "after reopening the popup");
 });
 
-// ------------------------------- Back after reopening the popup (#268)
-
-// A reopened popup renders the wallet list and the view it restores onto,
-// and nothing else: every other screen is still the blank static template
-// from index.html. Back used to only unhide its target, which is why these
-// have to run against the real popup — the template is present and
-// well-formed, so only its emptiness distinguishes the defect, and only a
-// real reopen produces it.
-
-// Everything the address screen must have on it, read out of the DOM.
-function addressScreenState(page) {
-    return page.evaluate(() => {
-        const line = document.getElementById("address-line");
-        const balances = document.getElementById("address-balances");
-        return {
-            hidden: document
-                .getElementById("view-address")
-                .classList.contains("hidden"),
-            line: line ? line.innerText.trim() : "",
-            balances: balances ? balances.innerText.trim() : "",
-        };
-    });
-}
-
-// Close and reopen the page rather than reload it: that is what the toolbar
-// popup does, and it is the only thing that produces the unrendered views.
-async function reopenPopup(env, restoredView) {
-    await env.page.close();
-    env.page = await openPopup(env.ctx, env.popupUrl);
-    await visible(env.page, restoredView);
-}
-
-// The reproduction from the issue, step for step.
-test("Back after reopening the popup renders the address screen (#268)", async (env) => {
-    await openAddressDetail(env.page);
-    const before = await addressScreenState(env.page);
-    assert(
-        before.line.length > 0,
-        "the address screen was blank to begin with",
-    );
-
-    await env.page.click("#btn-settings");
-    await visible(env.page, "#view-settings");
-
-    await reopenPopup(env, "#view-settings");
-
-    await env.page.click("#btn-settings-back");
-    await visible(env.page, "#view-address");
-
-    const after = await addressScreenState(env.page);
-    assert(
-        after.line === before.line,
-        "the address line reads " +
-            JSON.stringify(after.line) +
-            ", expected " +
-            JSON.stringify(before.line),
-    );
-    assert(
-        after.balances.includes("ETH"),
-        "the balances read " + JSON.stringify(after.balances),
-    );
-});
-
-// The same defect one screen further in. Receive holds the address twice
-// over — as text and as the QR code the sender scans — and a blank one is
-// worse than a missing screen.
-// Everything the Receive screen must have on it. The QR code is read as
-// pixels, not as an element: the blank template carries the canvas too, a
-// default 300x150 one with nothing drawn on it and every pixel fully
-// transparent. A drawn QR paints an opaque background across the whole
-// canvas, so a single opaque pixel is the whole question.
-function receiveScreenState(page) {
-    return page.evaluate(() => {
-        const block = document.getElementById("receive-address-block");
-        const canvas = document.getElementById("receive-qr");
-        const px = canvas
-            .getContext("2d")
-            .getImageData(0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height).data;
-        let opaque = 0;
-        for (let i = 3; i < px.length; i += 4) {
-            if (px[i] > 0) opaque += 1;
-        }
-        return {
-            address: block.dataset.full || "",
-            text: block.innerText.trim(),
-            qrOpaquePixels: opaque,
-        };
-    });
-}
-
-test("Back after reopening the popup renders the Receive screen (#268)", async (env) => {
-    await openAddressDetail(env.page);
-    await env.page.click("#btn-receive");
-    await visible(env.page, "#view-receive");
-    const before = await receiveScreenState(env.page);
-    assert(
-        /^0x[0-9a-fA-F]{40}$/.test(before.address),
-        "Receive showed no address to begin with: " +
-            JSON.stringify(before.address),
-    );
-
-    await env.page.click("#btn-settings");
-    await visible(env.page, "#view-settings");
-
-    await reopenPopup(env, "#view-settings");
-
-    await env.page.click("#btn-settings-back");
-    await visible(env.page, "#view-receive");
-
-    const shown = await receiveScreenState(env.page);
-    assert(
-        shown.address === before.address,
-        "Receive shows " +
-            JSON.stringify(shown.address) +
-            ", expected " +
-            JSON.stringify(before.address),
-    );
-    assert(
-        shown.text.includes(before.address),
-        "the Receive address is not on screen: " + JSON.stringify(shown.text),
-    );
-    assert(shown.qrOpaquePixels > 0, "Receive shows an unpainted QR code");
-
-    // Leave the suite where it found it.
-    await env.page.click("#btn-receive-back");
-    await visible(env.page, "#view-address");
-    await env.page.click("#btn-address-back");
-    await visible(env.page, "#view-main");
-});
-
-// The other half of the requirement: Back renders a screen this page load
-// never rendered, and must NOT re-render one it already has on screen.
-// settings.show() reassigns #settings-rpc from persisted state, so
-// re-rendering Settings on the way back would silently revert whatever the
-// user typed and had not saved yet — and they could then press Save and
-// store the value they believed they had replaced. No reopen here: this is
-// an ordinary in-session forward-and-back, which is exactly why the render
-// must not happen.
-test("Back onto Settings keeps unsaved input (#268)", async (env) => {
-    await visible(env.page, "#view-main");
-    await env.page.click("#btn-settings");
-    await visible(env.page, "#view-settings");
-
-    const typed = "https://rpc.example.invalid/unsaved";
-    await env.page.fill("#settings-rpc", typed);
-
-    await env.page.click("#btn-settings-add-token");
-    await visible(env.page, "#view-settings-addtoken");
-    await env.page.click("#btn-settings-addtoken-back");
-    await visible(env.page, "#view-settings");
-
-    const kept = await env.page.inputValue("#settings-rpc");
-    assert(
-        kept === typed,
-        "the unsaved RPC URL reads " +
-            JSON.stringify(kept) +
-            ", expected " +
-            JSON.stringify(typed),
-    );
-
-    // Leave the suite where it found it. The typed value was never saved,
-    // and Settings reloads the field from state next time it renders.
-    await env.page.click("#btn-settings-back");
-    await visible(env.page, "#view-main");
-});
-
 // -------------------------------------------- address removal (#162)
 
 // Number of address rows across every wallet in the list, counted in the DOM
@@ -1757,15 +1591,14 @@ async function lastResponseError(page) {
 }
 
 // A rejected prompt, asserted at both ends: the page's promise rejected
-// rather than hanging or resolving, and the response that crossed the
+// rather than hanging or resolving, and EIP-1193 code 4001 is present both
-// boundary carried EIP-1193 code 4001.
+// on the wire and on the Error the calling page catches.
 //
-// The code is asserted on the wire because that is the only place it
+// Both ends matter because they used to disagree. The code crossed the
-// survives. src/content/inpage.js rebuilds the rejection as `new
+// boundary correctly and src/content/inpage.js then threw it away, rebuilding
-// Error(error.message)`, so the Error the calling page catches carries the
+// every rejection as `new Error(error.message)` — so a dApp branching on
-// message and no code. That is reported rather than asserted either way —
+// `err.code === 4001` saw undefined and could not tell a refusal from a
-// locking in the current behaviour would make the gap permanent, and
+// failure (#274). Asserting only the wire would leave that gap invisible.
-// asserting the code on the Error would fail today.
 async function assertUserRejection(page, key, label) {
     const outcome = await settleRequest(page, key);
     assert(
@@ -1787,15 +1620,32 @@ async function assertUserRejection(page, key, label) {
             " did not carry EIP-1193 code 4001 across the boundary: " +
             JSON.stringify(error),
     );
+    assert(
+        outcome.hasCode,
+        label +
+            " reached the page as an error with no code property at all, so a " +
+            "dApp cannot tell the user's refusal from a failure: " +
+            JSON.stringify(outcome),
+    );
+    assert(
+        outcome.code === 4001,
+        label +
+            " reached the page with code " +
+            JSON.stringify(outcome.code) +
+            " rather than EIP-1193 4001",
+    );
+    assert(
+        outcome.name === "ProviderRpcError",
+        label +
+            " reached the page as " +
+            JSON.stringify(outcome.name) +
+            " rather than an EIP-1193 ProviderRpcError",
+    );
     console.log(
         "# " +
             label +
-            ": boundary code=" +
+            ": code 4001 on the wire and on the page's " +
-            error.code +
+            outcome.name,
-            " page Error.code=" +
-            JSON.stringify(outcome.code) +
-            " page Error carries a code=" +
-            outcome.hasCode,
     );
     return outcome;
 }

tests/inpageErrors.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,310 @@
+// The EIP-1193 error the page actually catches (src/content/inpage.js).
+//
+// The bug this pins down (issue #274): the provider rebuilt every failure as
+// `new Error(error.message)`, so the `code` the background produced and the
+// content script relayed intact was thrown away in the last hop. A dApp
+// checking `err.code === 4001` — the standard way to tell "the user said no"
+// from "the wallet broke" — saw undefined, and well-behaved sites showed an
+// error or retried instead of accepting the refusal.
+//
+// inpage.js is a bare IIFE injected into the page's JS context, not a module:
+// it takes no import and exports nothing, and reaches for `window` at load.
+// So it is evaluated here the way the browser evaluates it, against a stub
+// window, and the provider is collected from `window.ethereum`. The globals it
+// touches are passed in as function parameters rather than assigned to
+// globalThis: nothing leaks between tests, and the source is compiled in this
+// realm, so the errors it constructs are comparable against this file's own
+// `Error` — which a second realm's intrinsics would silently defeat.
+//
+// There is no jsdom in this repo; see tests/txStatus.test.js.
+
+const fs = require("fs");
+const path = require("path");
+const { webcrypto } = require("crypto");
+
+const SOURCE = fs.readFileSync(
+    path.join(__dirname, "..", "src", "content", "inpage.js"),
+    "utf8",
+);
+
+const loadInto = new Function(
+    "window",
+    "self",
+    "crypto",
+    "Event",
+    "CustomEvent",
+    SOURCE,
+);
+
+class StubEvent {
+    constructor(type) {
+        this.type = type;
+    }
+}
+
+class StubCustomEvent extends StubEvent {
+    constructor(type, init) {
+        super(type);
+        this.detail = init && init.detail;
+    }
+}
+
+// Every code the background emits on the RPC path today, read out of
+// src/background/index.js. The provider must not know this list — it passes
+// through whatever arrived — but the cases below are the real ones.
+const REJECTED = 4001; // user rejected the request
+const UNAUTHORIZED = 4100; // site not connected / wrong address
+const UNRECOGNIZED_CHAIN = 4902; // switch/add to an unsupported chain
+
+// A stub window with the four things inpage.js touches: message listeners,
+// postMessage out to the content script, window.ethereum, and dispatchEvent
+// for the EIP-6963 announcement.
+function loadProvider() {
+    const messageListeners = [];
+    const posted = [];
+
+    const win = {
+        addEventListener(type, fn) {
+            if (type === "message") messageListeners.push(fn);
+        },
+        removeEventListener(type, fn) {
+            const i = messageListeners.indexOf(fn);
+            if (type === "message" && i !== -1) messageListeners.splice(i, 1);
+        },
+        postMessage(data) {
+            posted.push(data);
+        },
+        dispatchEvent() {
+            return true;
+        },
+    };
+    win.window = win;
+
+    loadInto(win, win, webcrypto, StubEvent, StubCustomEvent);
+
+    // Deliver the content script's answer to an outstanding request. The id is
+    // read back off the wire rather than assumed: inpage.js issues its own
+    // eth_chainId at load, so the first id a test sees is not 1.
+    function respond(response) {
+        const request = posted
+            .filter((m) => m.type === "AUTISTMASK_REQUEST")
+            .pop();
+        expect(request).toBeDefined();
+        const event = {
+            source: win,
+            data: { type: "AUTISTMASK_RESPONSE", id: request.id, ...response },
+        };
+        for (const fn of messageListeners.slice()) fn(event);
+    }
+
+    return { provider: win.ethereum, posted, respond };
+}
+
+// Start a request, answer it with `response`, and hand back the rejection.
+// Fails the test if the call resolves instead.
+async function rejectionFrom(start, response) {
+    const { provider, respond } = loadProvider();
+    const settled = start(provider).then(
+        (result) => ({ resolved: result }),
+        (error) => ({ error }),
+    );
+    // The provider posts synchronously, so the request is already on the wire.
+    respond(response);
+    const outcome = await settled;
+    expect(outcome).not.toHaveProperty("resolved");
+    return outcome.error;
+}
+
+describe("an EIP-1193 code reaches the page", () => {
+    test("a user rejection arrives as code 4001", async () => {
+        const err = await rejectionFrom(
+            (p) => p.request({ method: "eth_requestAccounts" }),
+            {
+                error: {
+                    code: REJECTED,
+                    message: "User rejected the request.",
+                },
+            },
+        );
+        expect(err.code).toBe(REJECTED);
+        expect(err.message).toBe("User rejected the request.");
+    });
+
+    test("it is a ProviderRpcError, and an Error", async () => {
+        const err = await rejectionFrom(
+            (p) => p.request({ method: "eth_requestAccounts" }),
+            {
+                error: {
+                    code: REJECTED,
+                    message: "User rejected the request.",
+                },
+            },
+        );
+        expect(err).toBeInstanceOf(Error);
+        expect(err.name).toBe("ProviderRpcError");
+    });
+
+    test("4100 unauthorized arrives intact", async () => {
+        const err = await rejectionFrom(
+            (p) => p.request({ method: "personal_sign", params: ["0x00"] }),
+            { error: { code: UNAUTHORIZED, message: "Unauthorized" } },
+        );
+        expect(err.code).toBe(UNAUTHORIZED);
+        expect(err.message).toBe("Unauthorized");
+    });
+
+    test("4902 unrecognized chain arrives intact", async () => {
+        const message =
+            "AutistMask supports Ethereum Mainnet and Sepolia Testnet only.";
+        const err = await rejectionFrom(
+            (p) => p.request({ method: "wallet_switchEthereumChain" }),
+            { error: { code: UNRECOGNIZED_CHAIN, message } },
+        );
+        expect(err.code).toBe(UNRECOGNIZED_CHAIN);
+        expect(err.message).toBe(message);
+    });
+
+    // The provider is not allowed to know the list above: a code added to the
+    // background later must reach the page without this file being edited.
+    test("a code the provider has never heard of is passed through", async () => {
+        const err = await rejectionFrom(
+            (p) => p.request({ method: "eth_accounts" }),
+            { error: { code: 4900, message: "Disconnected" } },
+        );
+        expect(err.code).toBe(4900);
+    });
+
+    test("data is carried when the boundary sent it", async () => {
+        const err = await rejectionFrom(
+            (p) => p.request({ method: "eth_call" }),
+            {
+                error: {
+                    code: -32000,
+                    message: "execution reverted",
+                    data: "0x08c379a0",
+                },
+            },
+        );
+        expect(err.code).toBe(-32000);
+        expect(err.data).toBe("0x08c379a0");
+    });
+
+    test("no data property is invented when the boundary sent none", async () => {
+        const err = await rejectionFrom(
+            (p) => p.request({ method: "eth_requestAccounts" }),
+            {
+                error: {
+                    code: REJECTED,
+                    message: "User rejected the request.",
+                },
+            },
+        );
+        expect("data" in err).toBe(false);
+    });
+});
+
+describe("the message is untouched", () => {
+    test("a coded error keeps the message byte for byte", async () => {
+        const message =
+            "This site asked to sign as an address that is not " +
+            "the active one.";
+        const err = await rejectionFrom(
+            (p) => p.request({ method: "personal_sign" }),
+            { error: { code: UNAUTHORIZED, message } },
+        );
+        expect(err.message).toBe(message);
+    });
+
+    test("an error the background sent with no code keeps its message", async () => {
+        const err = await rejectionFrom(
+            (p) => p.request({ method: "eth_sendTransaction" }),
+            { error: { message: "No accounts available" } },
+        );
+        expect(err.message).toBe("No accounts available");
+    });
+
+    // A ProviderRpcError whose code is undefined would claim a conformance it
+    // does not have, and `'code' in err` is exactly what a careful dApp asks.
+    test("an error with no code gets no code property at all", async () => {
+        const err = await rejectionFrom(
+            (p) => p.request({ method: "eth_sendTransaction" }),
+            { error: { message: "No accounts available" } },
+        );
+        expect(err).toBeInstanceOf(Error);
+        expect("code" in err).toBe(false);
+    });
+
+    test("an error with no message keeps the generic fallback", async () => {
+        const err = await rejectionFrom(
+            (p) => p.request({ method: "eth_sendTransaction" }),
+            { error: { code: REJECTED } },
+        );
+        expect(err.message).toBe("Request failed");
+        expect(err.code).toBe(REJECTED);
+    });
+});
+
+// Every entry point the provider exposes, not just eth_requestAccounts. They
+// all funnel through the same response listener, and this is what says so.
+describe("every request path carries the code", () => {
+    const rejection = {
+        error: { code: REJECTED, message: "User rejected the request." },
+    };
+
+    test("request()", async () => {
+        const err = await rejectionFrom(
+            (p) => p.request({ method: "eth_requestAccounts" }),
+            rejection,
+        );
+        expect(err.code).toBe(REJECTED);
+    });
+
+    test("enable()", async () => {
+        const err = await rejectionFrom((p) => p.enable(), rejection);
+        expect(err.code).toBe(REJECTED);
+    });
+
+    test("send(method, params)", async () => {
+        const err = await rejectionFrom(
+            (p) => p.send("eth_requestAccounts", []),
+            rejection,
+        );
+        expect(err.code).toBe(REJECTED);
+    });
+
+    test("send({ method, params })", async () => {
+        const err = await rejectionFrom(
+            (p) => p.send({ method: "personal_sign", params: ["0x00"] }),
+            rejection,
+        );
+        expect(err.code).toBe(REJECTED);
+    });
+
+    test("sendAsync() hands the code to its callback", async () => {
+        const { provider, respond } = loadProvider();
+        const called = new Promise((resolve) => {
+            provider.sendAsync({ id: 1, method: "eth_requestAccounts" }, (e) =>
+                resolve(e),
+            );
+        });
+        respond(rejection);
+        const err = await called;
+        expect(err.name).toBe("ProviderRpcError");
+        expect(err.code).toBe(REJECTED);
+        expect(err.message).toBe("User rejected the request.");
+    });
+});
+
+describe("the success path is unchanged", () => {
+    test("a result still resolves", async () => {
+        const { provider, respond } = loadProvider();
+        const settled = provider.request({ method: "eth_requestAccounts" });
+        respond({ result: ["0xb61264DEFB0c4B8afb3D73724be15310036743a5"] });
+        await expect(settled).resolves.toEqual([
+            "0xb61264DEFB0c4B8afb3D73724be15310036743a5",
+        ]);
+        expect(provider.selectedAddress).toBe(
+            "0xb61264DEFB0c4B8afb3D73724be15310036743a5",
+        );
+    });
+});

tests/symbolSpoof.test.js

@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ global.chrome = {
 };
 
 const { isSpoofedSymbol } = require("../src/shared/symbolSpoof");
-const { KNOWN_SYMBOLS } = require("../src/shared/tokenList");
+const { TOKENS, KNOWN_SYMBOLS } = require("../src/shared/tokenList");
 const { filterTransactions } = require("../src/shared/transactions");
 const {
     fetchTokenBalances,
@@ -284,12 +284,138 @@ describe("the shared rule: symbols that render as a known symbol", () => {
     // asserts the claim it stands for — `[ -~]` would admit an interior
     // space and let a whitespace-bearing entry through the guard.
     test("no bundled symbol is touched by the normalization", () => {
-        for (const [symbol, address] of KNOWN_SYMBOLS) {
+        for (const [symbol, addresses] of KNOWN_SYMBOLS) {
             expect(symbol).toBe(symbol.trim());
             expect(symbol).toMatch(/^[!-~]+$/);
-            if (address === null) continue;
+            if (addresses === null) continue;
+            for (const address of addresses) {
                 expect(isSpoofedSymbol(symbol, address)).toBe(false);
             }
+        }
+    });
+});
+
+// Issue #276: the guard that was missing.  The suite walked KNOWN_SYMBOLS,
+// which is built from TOKENS, so it could only ever assert that the table
+// agrees with itself.  Seven symbols appear twice in the bundled list at two
+// different real contracts, and the table kept whichever came first, so the
+// other seven contracts — tokens in our own shipped list, at their own
+// addresses — were judged spoofs and hidden from the balance list, the
+// history and the send selector.  That is the over-filtering direction: it
+// hides a holding the user cannot then spend.
+//
+// This walk is over TOKENS, the data the wallet actually ships, so it fails
+// whenever a bundled token would be filtered at its own address no matter
+// which side of the table the mistake is on.
+describe("the shipped token list", () => {
+    test("no bundled token is filtered at its own address", () => {
+        const filtered = TOKENS.filter((t) =>
+            isSpoofedSymbol(t.symbol, t.address),
+        ).map((t) => t.symbol + " @ " + t.address);
+        expect(filtered).toEqual([]);
+    });
+
+    // The third failure mode the issue asks about: a symbol whose table entry
+    // names an address that is in neither the table nor the list would be a
+    // contract we vouch for and do not ship.  There is none, and the table is
+    // built from the list, so this asserts the derivation has not acquired a
+    // hand-written entry.
+    test("every address the table vouches for is a bundled token", () => {
+        const bundled = new Set(TOKENS.map((t) => t.address.toLowerCase()));
+        for (const [symbol, addresses] of KNOWN_SYMBOLS) {
+            if (addresses === null) continue;
+            expect(addresses.size).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+            for (const address of addresses) {
+                expect(address).toBe(address.toLowerCase());
+                expect(bundled.has(address)).toBe(true);
+                // And it is the token that actually reports that symbol.
+                const token = TOKENS.find(
+                    (t) => t.address.toLowerCase() === address,
+                );
+                expect(token.symbol.toUpperCase()).toBe(symbol);
+            }
+        }
+    });
+
+    // Both contracts behind a shared ticker must pass, from either side: a
+    // rule that admits only the one the table happens to visit first is the
+    // bug, not the fix.
+    test("both contracts behind a shared ticker are admitted", () => {
+        const bySymbol = new Map();
+        for (const t of TOKENS) {
+            const upper = t.symbol.toUpperCase();
+            if (!bySymbol.has(upper)) bySymbol.set(upper, []);
+            bySymbol.get(upper).push(t);
+        }
+        const shared = [...bySymbol].filter(([, list]) => list.length > 1);
+        // The shared tickers are a fact about the shipped data; if a future
+        // list has none, this test would silently assert nothing.
+        expect(shared.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+        for (const [, list] of shared) {
+            for (const t of list) {
+                expect(isSpoofedSymbol(t.symbol, t.address)).toBe(false);
+            }
+        }
+    });
+
+    // The seven from issue #276, named so that the reconciliation is a fact
+    // in the suite: each is two real contracts from the same source fetch,
+    // and the table now holds both rather than the one that came first.
+    test("the seven shared tickers each name both bundled contracts", () => {
+        const expected = {
+            TON: [
+                "0x582d872a1b094fc48f5de31d3b73f2d9be47def1", // Toncoin
+                "0x2be5e8c109e2197d077d13a82daead6a9b3433c5", // Tokamak Network
+            ],
+            FRAX: [
+                "0x853d955acef822db058eb8505911ed77f175b99e", // Legacy Frax Dollar
+                "0x3432b6a60d23ca0dfca7761b7ab56459d9c964d0", // Frax (prev. FXS)
+            ],
+            REUSD: [
+                "0x5086bf358635b81d8c47c66d1c8b9e567db70c72", // Re Protocol reUSD
+                "0x57ab1e0003f623289cd798b1824be09a793e4bec", // Resupply USD
+            ],
+            EURE: [
+                "0x39b8b6385416f4ca36a20319f70d28621895279d", // Monerium EUR emoney
+                "0x3231cb76718cdef2155fc47b5286d82e6eda273f", // Monerium EUR emoney [OLD]
+            ],
+            MSUSD: [
+                "0x4ba01f22827018b4772cd326c7627fb4956a7c00", // Main Street USD
+                "0xab5eb14c09d416f0ac63661e57edb7aecdb9befa", // Metronome Synth USD
+            ],
+            MUSD: [
+                "0xaca92e438df0b2401ff60da7e4337b687a2435da", // MetaMask USD
+                "0xdd468a1ddc392dcdbef6db6e34e89aa338f9f186", // Mezo USD
+            ],
+            JPYC: [
+                "0x431d5dff03120afa4bdf332c61a6e1766ef37bdb", // JPY Coin
+                "0x2370f9d504c7a6e775bf6e14b3f12846b594cd53", // JPY Coin v1
+            ],
+        };
+        for (const [symbol, addresses] of Object.entries(expected)) {
+            expect([...KNOWN_SYMBOLS.get(symbol)].sort()).toEqual(
+                [...addresses].sort(),
+            );
+            for (const address of addresses) {
+                expect(isSpoofedSymbol(symbol, address)).toBe(false);
+            }
+        }
+    });
+
+    // The other direction, on the same symbols: widening the table to hold
+    // every bundled address for a ticker must not turn it into a pass for
+    // any other contract.
+    test("a shared ticker from a third contract is still a spoof", () => {
+        const bySymbol = new Map();
+        for (const t of TOKENS) {
+            const upper = t.symbol.toUpperCase();
+            if (!bySymbol.has(upper)) bySymbol.set(upper, []);
+            bySymbol.get(upper).push(t);
+        }
+        for (const [symbol, list] of bySymbol) {
+            if (list.length < 2) continue;
+            expect(isSpoofedSymbol(symbol, FAKE_ETH_CONTRACT)).toBe(true);
+        }
     });
 });
 

tests/transactions.test.js

@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@ describe("token list assumptions the fixtures rely on", () => {
     });
 
     test("USDC and WETH map to their genuine lowercased contracts", () => {
-        expect(KNOWN_SYMBOLS.get("USDC")).toBe(USDC_CONTRACT);
+        expect([...KNOWN_SYMBOLS.get("USDC")]).toEqual([USDC_CONTRACT]);
-        expect(KNOWN_SYMBOLS.get("WETH")).toBe(WETH_CONTRACT);
+        expect([...KNOWN_SYMBOLS.get("WETH")]).toEqual([WETH_CONTRACT]);
     });
 
     test("the spam fixture symbol is not in the known token list", () => {