Approve and window.close() left the popup on the next line, and the decision
and the disconnect the close caused travelled independent channels with nothing
ordering them. The disconnect handler settled a pending site approval as a
rejection, so whichever landed first decided the outcome. Driven in a tab the
teardown won every time: the user allowed the connection and the dApp was told
they had refused.
The decision now goes out on the approval port the popup already opens, which
is the same port the close disconnects. One channel is ordered -- a message
posted on a port is delivered before that port's own disconnect -- so the
approval is settled before the teardown is even seen, and the disconnect then
finds nothing pending to reject. Nothing waits, nothing is timed, and the popup
closes exactly as immediately as before.
windows.onRemoved no longer decides a site approval whose port is connected
either. In the fallback-window shape that event races the decision on a channel
of its own, which is the same defect one level over; the port disconnect says
the same thing in a defined order, so it is left to say it. A window that
closes before its popup ever connected has nothing else to speak for it and is
still rejected there, so no dApp is left waiting on a window that is gone.
Rejecting reports a rejection, and so does closing without deciding, in both
shapes. AUTISTMASK_APPROVAL_RESPONSE is gone; the port name carries the
approval id, so the popup no longer names one, and the sender check the message
carried moved to the port.
tests/backgroundApproval.test.js drives decide-then-disconnect with nothing
awaited in between, in the toolbar-popup shape that production uses and in the
fallback-window shape, and asserts every close-without-deciding path still
rejects. tests/e2e/run.js drops the deferred-window.close() accommodation it
carried for this bug, so the two site-prompt tests now drive the shipped
decide-then-close in a real Chromium.
The provider rebuilt every rejection as a bare Error carrying only a message,
so a dApp checking err.code === 4001 saw undefined and could not tell a user's
deliberate refusal from a failure. Well-behaved sites therefore showed an error
or retried instead of accepting the refusal. The code was produced correctly
and did cross the extension boundary; it was lost in the last hop.
Rejections now reach the page as a ProviderRpcError carrying code, and data
where present. The code is passed through verbatim rather than matched against
a whitelist, so a code added upstream later needs no change here. An error that
genuinely has no code stays a plain Error with no code property at all, rather
than advertising code: undefined -- 'code' in err is what a careful dApp asks.
Messages are unchanged for every path, verified byte-for-byte against the
previous provider across every background error shape.
The end-to-end assertion that printed the observed code now requires it.
The dApp signing path was the largest unverified surface in the milestone: the
only place where the content script, the inpage provider, the background worker
and the popup all have to work together, with unit tests covering each side in
isolation and none covering the seam.
A page served by the harness speaks EIP-1193 to the real provider -- asserted by
EIP-6963 object identity, not by shape -- and eth_requestAccounts, personal_sign,
eth_signTypedData_v4 and eth_sendTransaction are each driven through to approval
and to rejection.
Every signature is recovered and compared to the approved address; the broadcast
transaction is parsed from the bytes captured at eth_sendRawTransaction and
checked for signer, recipient, value, calldata and chain. A signature that
merely came back would pass against a wrong key, a wrong message or a wrong
chain, so each assertion was demonstrated failing against a variant that is
wrong in exactly one of those ways.
The password is asserted absent from every message crossing the extension
boundary, which gives #157's fix a permanent floor rather than a one-time
review.
Two defects this surfaced are tracked separately: EIP-1193 error codes never
reach the page (#274), and approving a site connection races the popup teardown
(#275). Neither is asserted as correct here. A real dApp with real funds against
mainnet remains an uncovered human pass and is documented as such.
ConfirmTx -- the screen that decides what gets signed -- had no automated
coverage of its own behaviour. The arithmetic underneath was well tested; the
wiring was not, so a mutant making the spend gate read the displayed fee
estimate instead of the reserve would have reintroduced the #154 overspend with
the suite still green.
Nine end-to-end tests now drive it for both the native and ERC-20 paths,
covering the pending, funded, over-balance and estimate-failed states, and
asserting that the gate reads the reserve rather than the estimate. Swapping the
two makes the suite fail. The view height is asserted constant across every
state transition rather than merely printed.
Reaching the screen needs a funded balance and a gas estimate, so the route
interception gains fixtures for both. Testing the estimate-failed state means
provoking the console error the code is supposed to emit, which the harness
otherwise fails a run on; an expectation mechanism consumes exactly one matching
record, is scoped to the declaring test, and fails that test if nothing matched,
so it cannot mask an unrelated error.
The dust-threshold field was the only validated input in Settings that rejected
without saying anything: the value silently changed back to the stored one with
no explanation. It now flashes "Please enter a whole number of gwei, zero or
greater." alongside the existing resync, matching the idiom the RPC URL field
already uses.
The parse moves to its own module and accepts plain decimal digits only, zero
or greater. Hex and exponent notation are refused rather than accepted: Number()
reads "0x10" as 16 and "1e3" as 1000, neither of which the previous parseInt
produced, and storing a number the user did not type is the same silent
substitution this change exists to remove.
The message must fit one line of the reserved flash area -- a wrapped message
pushes the settings view down, which the No Layout Shift policy forbids. That is
pinned by an end-to-end test measuring the rendered line height and the position
of the elements below it, in a single round trip because the flash clears after
two seconds.
Address rows on Home gain an [x] control, on wallets that derive addresses from
an extended key and hold more than one, opening a DeleteAddress confirmation
screen.
Removal cannot destroy anything: the key material stays. Derivation indices are
not renumbered, so the next "+" derives the next unused index rather than
resurrecting the removed one. The confirmation states the real route back --
delete the whole wallet in Settings, which asks for the password and destroys
the stored recovery phrase, then import it again -- and notes that the scan
which follows only finds addresses with on-chain activity. The copy varies by
wallet type, since an xprv wallet has no recovery phrase.
Removing an address that holds a balance is allowed, with a warning naming no
figure; the funds are at the address on-chain and stay there either way.
Selection and active address move only when the removed address was the one
selected, and site permissions are dropped for it alone.
The state transition shares its address comparison, permission cleanup and
active-changed broadcast with the wallet-level removal.
Runs the real popup in a pinned containerized Chrome and fails on any uncaught
page error or console.error. Also fixes the two defects it caught: the missing
showView import in addToken.js and the missing addressDotHtml import in
transactionDetail.js.
closes#150closes#151
