Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
13d444c3aa test: drive the EIP-1193 dApp approval round trips in the browser (closes #183)
All checks were successful
check / check (push) Successful in 33s
The seam between the content script, the inpage provider, the background worker
and the approval popup had no coverage at all. The unit suite covers each side
in isolation, so a wallet that signed the wrong payload, handed back a signature
from the wrong key, hung on a rejected prompt, or put the user's password back
on the extension messaging boundary would have passed everything.

Ten end-to-end tests now drive it. The route handler serves a local test page on
a reserved-TLD origin; window.ethereum arrives there from the shipped MAIN-world
content script, not from anything the fixture installs, and the page's own
EIP-6963 announcement is required to be that provider by object identity. The
page then speaks eth_requestAccounts, personal_sign, eth_signTypedData_v4 and
eth_sendTransaction through the real prompts, approved and rejected.

The assertions are the point:

  - every signature is recovered in the runner with verifyMessage,
    verifyTypedData and Transaction.from(), and compared against the active
    address read out of extension storage. The background verifies too; nothing
    here leans on its verdict.
  - the transaction is checked against the raw signed bytes captured at
    eth_sendRawTransaction, which the RPC stub now records and answers with the
    transaction's real hash. Signer, recipient, value, call data and chain id
    are all compared there, and the hash the page received is required to be the
    hash of those bytes.
  - a rejected prompt must reach the page as a rejection rather than hang or
    resolve, and must carry EIP-1193 code 4001 across the boundary. The code is
    asserted on the wire because that is where it survives: the inpage provider
    rebuilds the rejection as a bare Error, so the calling page catches a message
    and no code. Reported, not asserted either way.
  - the password must appear in no message the approval window sends to the
    background, observed directly by wrapping chrome.runtime.sendMessage before
    Approve is clicked, with the response message that would carry it required
    to be present so the check cannot pass on an empty record.

Every one of those was run against a deliberately broken variant and seen to
fail: a corrupted recovered signer, a payload carrying the password again, a
provider that resolves instead of rejecting, and approval screens displaying the
wrong message, value and call data.

Two honest limits. The RPC is stubbed throughout, so this does not discharge a
real dApp with real funds against a real network. And the site-connection prompt
goes through chrome.action.openPopup(), whose browser-action popup headless
Chromium will not expose as a page, so that one prompt is driven at the URL the
extension puts on the action instead — same page, same approval id, but a real
toolbar click is not observable from a headless harness. Both are stated in
README.md rather than presented as covered.

Test-only: nothing under src/ changes.
2026-08-12 11:01:45 +00:00
5af89a1b63 test: drive ConfirmTx in the e2e suite, gate assertion included (closes #238)
All checks were successful
check / check (push) Successful in 38s
ConfirmTx -- the screen that decides what gets signed -- had no automated
coverage of its own behaviour. The arithmetic underneath was well tested; the
wiring was not, so a mutant making the spend gate read the displayed fee
estimate instead of the reserve would have reintroduced the #154 overspend with
the suite still green.

Nine end-to-end tests now drive it for both the native and ERC-20 paths,
covering the pending, funded, over-balance and estimate-failed states, and
asserting that the gate reads the reserve rather than the estimate. Swapping the
two makes the suite fail. The view height is asserted constant across every
state transition rather than merely printed.

Reaching the screen needs a funded balance and a gas estimate, so the route
interception gains fixtures for both. Testing the estimate-failed state means
provoking the console error the code is supposed to emit, which the harness
otherwise fails a run on; an expectation mechanism consumes exactly one matching
record, is scoped to the declaring test, and fails that test if nothing matched,
so it cannot mask an unrelated error.
2026-08-12 11:35:20 +02:00
c6a1f97247 fix: explain a rejected dust threshold instead of silently snapping back (closes #233)
All checks were successful
check / check (push) Successful in 33s
The dust-threshold field was the only validated input in Settings that rejected
without saying anything: the value silently changed back to the stored one with
no explanation. It now flashes "Please enter a whole number of gwei, zero or
greater." alongside the existing resync, matching the idiom the RPC URL field
already uses.

The parse moves to its own module and accepts plain decimal digits only, zero
or greater. Hex and exponent notation are refused rather than accepted: Number()
reads "0x10" as 16 and "1e3" as 1000, neither of which the previous parseInt
produced, and storing a number the user did not type is the same silent
substitution this change exists to remove.

The message must fit one line of the reserved flash area -- a wrapped message
pushes the settings view down, which the No Layout Shift policy forbids. That is
pinned by an end-to-end test measuring the rendered line height and the position
of the elements below it, in a single round trip because the flash clears after
two seconds.
2026-08-12 11:29:09 +02:00
937f699fb1 feat: remove an address from an HD wallet, behind a confirmation (closes #162)
All checks were successful
check / check (push) Successful in 36s
Address rows on Home gain an [x] control, on wallets that derive addresses from
an extended key and hold more than one, opening a DeleteAddress confirmation
screen.

Removal cannot destroy anything: the key material stays. Derivation indices are
not renumbered, so the next "+" derives the next unused index rather than
resurrecting the removed one. The confirmation states the real route back --
delete the whole wallet in Settings, which asks for the password and destroys
the stored recovery phrase, then import it again -- and notes that the scan
which follows only finds addresses with on-chain activity. The copy varies by
wallet type, since an xprv wallet has no recovery phrase.

Removing an address that holds a balance is allowed, with a warning naming no
figure; the funds are at the address on-chain and stay there either way.
Selection and active address move only when the removed address was the one
selected, and site permissions are dropped for it alone.

The state transition shares its address comparison, permission cleanup and
active-changed broadcast with the wallet-level removal.
2026-08-12 11:16:29 +02:00
bf1dbec87c fix: run libsodium on WebAssembly under the extension CSP (closes #182)
All checks were successful
check / check (push) Successful in 26s
2026-08-12 10:30:15 +02:00
3e5d6323ce feat: password-gated recovery phrase display for HD wallets (closes #161)
Some checks failed
check / check (push) Has been cancelled
2026-08-11 15:25:17 +02:00
e8ad8325c8 test: containerized Chrome end-to-end harness that drives the real popup (closes #181)
Some checks failed
check / check (push) Has been cancelled
Runs the real popup in a pinned containerized Chrome and fails on any uncaught
page error or console.error. Also fixes the two defects it caught: the missing
showView import in addToken.js and the missing addressDotHtml import in
transactionDetail.js.

closes #150
closes #151
2026-08-10 15:49:32 +02:00