fix: a zero-minimum balance check never sets the output side (closes #649)

A BALANCE_CHECK_ERC20 of the sender with a zero minimum, or one the router lets fail, no longer sets Token Out or the minimum. Before, it set both whenever the output side held no minimum, so after an UNWRAP_WETH that drops the minimum, a zero check of USDC named USDC as Token Out, a token the swap did not pay. A check with a positive minimum, not allowed to fail, sets the output side as before. Two existing tests that expected the wrong token are corrected, and README states the rule.

Model: opus-5-5

tests/uniswapRecipient.test.js

@@ -688,6 +688,62 @@ describe("an UNWRAP_WETH makes the output ETH only when the router holds it", ()
         ]);
     });
 
+    // The same route, then a balance check of the sender's USDC with a zero
+    // minimum. The check guarantees nothing, so Token Out stays ETH
+    // (https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/649).
+    test("the same route, then a zero balance check of USDC, still reads as ETH with no minimum", () => {
+        const result = decode(
+            execute(
+                v4Swap(
+                    SWAP_USDT_FOR_WETH,
+                    SETTLE_USDT,
+                    take(WETH, MSG_SENDER, (ONE_WETH * 6n) / 10n),
+                    take(WETH, ADDRESS_THIS),
+                ),
+                unwrapWeth(MSG_SENDER),
+                balanceCheck(USDC, 0n),
+            ),
+        );
+        expect(result.name).toBe("Swap USDT → ETH");
+        expect(detail(result, "Token Out").value).toBe("ETH");
+        expect(labels(result)).toEqual([
+            "Protocol",
+            "Token In",
+            "Amount",
+            "Token Out",
+            "Steps",
+            "Deadline",
+        ]);
+    });
+
+    // A PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM moves the sender's WETH into the router. An
+    // UNWRAP_WETH pays that WETH to the user as ETH. A zero balance check of
+    // USDC sets neither Token Out nor the minimum, before the UNWRAP_WETH or
+    // after it (https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/649).
+    test.each([
+        {
+            kind: "before the UNWRAP_WETH",
+            steps: [balanceCheck(USDC, 0n), unwrapWeth(MSG_SENDER)],
+        },
+        {
+            kind: "after the UNWRAP_WETH",
+            steps: [unwrapWeth(MSG_SENDER), balanceCheck(USDC, 0n)],
+        },
+    ])(
+        "WETH moved into the router and unwrapped, with a zero balance check of USDC $kind, reads as ETH with no minimum",
+        ({ steps }) => {
+            const result = decode(
+                execute(
+                    permit2TransferFrom(WETH, ADDRESS_THIS, ONE_WETH),
+                    ...steps,
+                ),
+            );
+            expect(detail(result, "Token Out").value).toBe("ETH");
+            expect(detail(result, "Min. received")).toBeUndefined();
+            expect(detail(result, "Min. paid out")).toBeUndefined();
+        },
+    );
+
     // A TAKE the decoder cannot read may pay part of the WETH to the user.
     test("one V4 step paying WETH to the router beside a TAKE that cannot be read, then an UNWRAP_WETH, reads as ETH with no minimum", () => {
         const result = decode(
@@ -2820,17 +2876,16 @@ describe("the allow-revert flag", () => {
         },
     );
 
-    test("a BALANCE_CHECK_ERC20 with the flag, and no minimum before it, states none", () => {
+    test("a BALANCE_CHECK_ERC20 with the flag, and no minimum before it, names no output token and no minimum", () => {
         const check = balanceCheck(WETH, ONE_WETH);
         expect(detail(decode(execute(check)), "Min. paid out").value).toBe(
             "1.0000 WETH",
         );
 
         const withFlag = decode(execute(flagged(check)));
-        expect(detail(withFlag, "Token Out").address).toBe(WETH);
-        expect(detail(withFlag, "Min. paid out").value).toBe(
-            "None (no minimum guaranteed)",
-        );
+        expect(detail(withFlag, "Token Out").value).toBe(UNNAMED);
+        expect(detail(withFlag, "Min. paid out")).toBeUndefined();
+        expect(detail(withFlag, "Min. received")).toBeUndefined();
     });
 
     // Only the routers from UniversalRouterV2 on let a PERMIT2_PERMIT fail.