fix: distinguish an unknown holder count from zero so a legitimate token is not filtered (closes #230)
All checks were successful
check / check (push) Successful in 39s
All checks were successful
check / check (push) Successful in 39s
This commit was merged in pull request #244.
This commit is contained in:
123
tests/sendTokenSelect.test.js
Normal file
123
tests/sendTokenSelect.test.js
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
|
||||
// Tests for the token filtering in the Send view's token selector
|
||||
// (src/popup/views/send.js).
|
||||
//
|
||||
// The selector decides which of the user's tokens can be spent at all, so
|
||||
// over-filtering here is worse than in the history list: the asset is not
|
||||
// merely hidden, it becomes unspendable through the UI. Issue #230: an
|
||||
// explorer that omits holders_count was read as "zero holders" and the token
|
||||
// disappeared from this list.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// renderSendTokenSelect only ever touches getElementById, createElement,
|
||||
// innerHTML, value, textContent and appendChild, so a small stub document is
|
||||
// enough to drive it; the real DOM behaviour of the view is covered by
|
||||
// tests/e2e/run.js.
|
||||
|
||||
globalThis.chrome = {
|
||||
storage: { local: { get: async () => ({}), set: async () => {} } },
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const { state } = require("../src/shared/state");
|
||||
const { renderSendTokenSelect } = require("../src/popup/views/send");
|
||||
|
||||
const USDC_CONTRACT = "0xA0b86991c6218b36c1d19D4a2e9Eb0cE3606eB48";
|
||||
const NOVEL_TOKEN = "0x1111111111111111111111111111111111111111";
|
||||
|
||||
let select;
|
||||
|
||||
function installStubDocument() {
|
||||
select = { innerHTML: "", children: [] };
|
||||
select.appendChild = (child) => select.children.push(child);
|
||||
globalThis.document = {
|
||||
getElementById: (id) => (id === "send-token" ? select : null),
|
||||
createElement: () => ({ value: "", textContent: "" }),
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// The symbols offered for sending, excluding the hardcoded ETH option that
|
||||
// renderSendTokenSelect writes straight into innerHTML.
|
||||
function offeredTokens() {
|
||||
return select.children.map((opt) => opt.value.toLowerCase());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function tokenBalance(overrides) {
|
||||
return {
|
||||
address: NOVEL_TOKEN,
|
||||
symbol: "SPAMTKN",
|
||||
decimals: 18,
|
||||
balance: "12.5",
|
||||
holders: 50000,
|
||||
...overrides,
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function render(tokenBalances) {
|
||||
installStubDocument();
|
||||
renderSendTokenSelect({ address: "0x" + "a".repeat(40), tokenBalances });
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
beforeEach(() => {
|
||||
state.fraudContracts = [];
|
||||
state.hideLowHolderTokens = true;
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
describe("the low-holder rule in the send token selector", () => {
|
||||
test("ETH is always offered", () => {
|
||||
render([]);
|
||||
expect(select.innerHTML).toBe('<option value="ETH">ETH</option>');
|
||||
expect(offeredTokens()).toEqual([]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test("a token with plenty of holders is offered", () => {
|
||||
render([tokenBalance()]);
|
||||
expect(offeredTokens()).toEqual([NOVEL_TOKEN]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test("a token reporting zero holders is withheld", () => {
|
||||
render([tokenBalance({ holders: 0 })]);
|
||||
expect(offeredTokens()).toEqual([]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test("boundary: 999 holders is withheld, 1000 is offered", () => {
|
||||
render([tokenBalance({ holders: 999 })]);
|
||||
expect(offeredTokens()).toEqual([]);
|
||||
render([tokenBalance({ holders: 1000 })]);
|
||||
expect(offeredTokens()).toEqual([NOVEL_TOKEN]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Issue #230: an unknown holder count must not read as zero. A token the
|
||||
// user demonstrably holds — it has a balance — cannot be made unspendable
|
||||
// by a field the block explorer failed to report.
|
||||
test("a token whose holder count is unknown is still offered", () => {
|
||||
render([tokenBalance({ holders: null })]);
|
||||
expect(offeredTokens()).toEqual([NOVEL_TOKEN]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test("a token balance carrying no holders field at all is offered", () => {
|
||||
const t = tokenBalance();
|
||||
delete t.holders;
|
||||
render([t]);
|
||||
expect(offeredTokens()).toEqual([NOVEL_TOKEN]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test("the rule is bypassed entirely when the setting is off", () => {
|
||||
state.hideLowHolderTokens = false;
|
||||
render([tokenBalance({ holders: 0 })]);
|
||||
expect(offeredTokens()).toEqual([NOVEL_TOKEN]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
describe("the other send-selector rules are unaffected", () => {
|
||||
test("a token spoofing a known symbol from a wrong address is withheld", () => {
|
||||
render([
|
||||
tokenBalance({ symbol: "USDC", holders: null }),
|
||||
tokenBalance({ address: USDC_CONTRACT, symbol: "USDC" }),
|
||||
]);
|
||||
expect(offeredTokens()).toEqual([USDC_CONTRACT.toLowerCase()]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test("a blocklisted fraud contract is withheld even with an unknown count", () => {
|
||||
state.fraudContracts = [NOVEL_TOKEN.toUpperCase()];
|
||||
render([tokenBalance({ holders: null })]);
|
||||
expect(offeredTokens()).toEqual([]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user