fix: a swap split across steps the user pays for shows every amount it spends (closes #625)

The swap's Amount line gave only the first swap step's amount. It now
gives the total the steps take of Token In: the amount of the step that
sets the input side plus each later take of it by a step the user pays.
A take of another token, one after an amount that is not a quantity, or
one of unknown amount gets lines of its own. A step that may take what
the decoder did not read, such as a V3_SWAP_EXACT_OUT or an
EXECUTE_SUB_PLAN, gets one line saying so and leaves no figure. A
PERMIT2_PERMIT names Token In; its amount stands only in the plain shape
of Uniswap's own routes.

Model: opus-5-5

README.md

@@ -1190,14 +1190,8 @@ number. They can read:
   `amountOut`, the exact amount it buys.
 - `All available (V4 open delta)`: the swap's `Amount` line, when the amount it
   shows is a V4 exact-in `amountIn` of zero. V4 reads that zero as "use the
-  whole open delta", so the calldata states no quantity. The line shows the
-  amount of the step that sets the input side: the last `PERMIT2_PERMIT` step if
-  there is one, otherwise the first V2 or V3 exact-in, V2 exact-out, `WRAP_ETH`
-  or V4 swap step that names an input token or amount. A V4 step with a swap
-  action sets the input side when no earlier step set it, even when it names
-  neither, as described below. A V2 exact-out step gives its `amountInMax`, and
-  a V4 swap step the `amountIn` of the swap action that spends its input
-  currency.
+  whole open delta", so the calldata states no quantity. Transaction Decoding
+  below gives the steps whose amounts the line shows.
 - `Whatever an earlier step sent to the pair (V2 already paid)`: the swap's
   `Amount` line, when the amount it shows is a V2 exact-in `amountIn` of zero.
   The router reads that zero as "the pair already holds the input tokens": the
@@ -2379,10 +2373,11 @@ view would leave a wallet one click from deletion.
     - Site origin (bold, scheme and port included) + "wants to send a
       transaction"
     - Decoded action (if calldata is recognized): action name, token details,
-      amounts, what each `PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM` moves and where to, steps,
-      deadline, and unless a swap pays only the From address, a `Paid to` line
-      for each other address it pays, or saying that a token stays in the router
-      or who it pays is unknown (see Transaction Decoding)
+      amounts, what each swap step spends that the `Amount` line does not give,
+      what each `PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM` moves and where to, steps, deadline, and
+      unless a swap pays only the From address, a `Paid to` line for each other
+      address it pays, or saying that a token stays in the router or who it pays
+      is unknown (see Transaction Decoding)
     - From: color dot + full address + etherscan link
     - Contract: color dot + full address + etherscan link, token symbol label if
       known; for a contract creation, the same sentence as on WaitTx
@@ -3090,37 +3085,40 @@ Currently supported:
   as a swap paid in ETH does, but only when that amount is not
   `CONTRACT_BALANCE` and the router held no WETH from an earlier step when the
   `WRAP_ETH` ran: after two `WRAP_ETH`s of 0.5 ETH into the router, a swap of 1
-  WETH from it reads as leaving the WETH there. The router pays a `SETTLE` of
-  `OPEN_DELTA` (zero) only what its step still owes of that token when the
-  `SETTLE` runs, so one from the router counts as spending the amounts the
-  step's swap actions state they spend of that token only when every action in
-  the step could be read, every swap action names the token it spends and the
-  token it buys (a swap action with an empty path swaps nothing), the `SETTLE`
-  is the step's only `SETTLE` or `SETTLE_ALL` of that token and comes after
-  every swap action, no swap action buys that token, and the swap actions that
-  spend it state a quantity together; otherwise it counts as spending nothing.
-  So the rest of a V4 `SETTLE` of more than its swap spends, taken to the
-  router, the WETH of a `WRAP_ETH`, and a token a swap pays the router on the
-  way to the output, each stays in the router when later steps do not spend all
-  of it, where anyone can take it in a later transaction. The router sends ETH
-  as written, so a `TRANSFER` of `CONTRACT_BALANCE` of ETH always reverts and
-  pays out nothing. A step paying a token to the V2 pair that the very next step
-  spends, as a V2 exact-in of that token whose `amountIn` is `ALREADY_PAID`
-  (zero) or `CONTRACT_BALANCE`, is a hop, not a payout: Uniswap's mixed routes
-  pay the next V2 pair directly, and the router enforces that swap's own
-  minimum. The decoder checks that the address paid is that pair, deriving it
-  from the V2 factory and pair init code hash the network's routers were
-  deployed with and the first two tokens of that step's path; a payment to any
-  other address is named. (Sepolia's `UniversalRouterV1_2_V2Support` was
-  deployed with placeholders for both values, so no V2 swap step can succeed on
-  that router.) Every other payment counts, in whichever step and of whatever
-  token, a share of the output included: an interface fee paid to another
-  address by `PAY_PORTION`, `TRANSFER` or `TAKE_PORTION` is named, and the
-  minimum reads `Min. paid out`, because the swap's minimum includes the fee.
-  The minimum reads `Min. received` only when some step pays the transaction's
-  sender (the From address on TxApproval, the sender the explorer reports on
-  TransactionDetail) and no `Paid to` line is shown. `Paid to` lines after
-  `Token Out` name each other address paid; one reads
+  WETH from it reads as leaving the WETH there. A `SETTLE` of `OPEN_DELTA`
+  (zero), and a `SETTLE_ALL`, pay only what the step still owes of their token
+  when they run. The decoder takes that to be the amounts the step's swap
+  actions state they spend of that token only when every action in the step
+  could be read, every swap action names the token it spends and the token it
+  buys (a swap action with an empty path swaps nothing), the `SETTLE` or
+  `SETTLE_ALL` is the step's only `SETTLE` or `SETTLE_ALL` of that token and
+  comes after every swap action, no swap action buys that token, no `TAKE`,
+  `TAKE_ALL` or `TAKE_PORTION` in the step takes it (a `TAKE` of a stated amount
+  adds to what the step owes), and the swap actions that spend it state a
+  quantity together; otherwise it does not know the amount, and such a `SETTLE`
+  from the router counts as spending nothing. So the rest of a V4 `SETTLE` of
+  more than its swap spends, taken to the router, the WETH of a `WRAP_ETH`, and
+  a token a swap pays the router on the way to the output, each stays in the
+  router when later steps do not spend all of it, where anyone can take it in a
+  later transaction. The router sends ETH as written, so a `TRANSFER` of
+  `CONTRACT_BALANCE` of ETH always reverts and pays out nothing. A step paying a
+  token to the V2 pair that the very next step spends, as a V2 exact-in of that
+  token whose `amountIn` is `ALREADY_PAID` (zero) or `CONTRACT_BALANCE`, is a
+  hop, not a payout: Uniswap's mixed routes pay the next V2 pair directly, and
+  the router enforces that swap's own minimum. The decoder checks that the
+  address paid is that pair, deriving it from the V2 factory and pair init code
+  hash the network's routers were deployed with and the first two tokens of that
+  step's path; a payment to any other address is named. (Sepolia's
+  `UniversalRouterV1_2_V2Support` was deployed with placeholders for both
+  values, so no V2 swap step can succeed on that router.) Every other payment
+  counts, in whichever step and of whatever token, a share of the output
+  included: an interface fee paid to another address by `PAY_PORTION`,
+  `TRANSFER` or `TAKE_PORTION` is named, and the minimum reads `Min. paid out`,
+  because the swap's minimum includes the fee. The minimum reads `Min. received`
+  only when some step pays the transaction's sender (the From address on
+  TxApproval, the sender the explorer reports on TransactionDetail) and no
+  `Paid to` line is shown. `Paid to` lines after `Token Out` name each other
+  address paid; one reads
   `The bridge, which pays the deposit's recipient on another network` for a
   bridge deposit; one reads, for example,
   `The router, 2000.0000 USDT from the sender (later steps may not spend all of it)`
@@ -3132,8 +3130,67 @@ Currently supported:
   name); and one more reads `Unknown (could not be decoded)` when a step that
   may pay an address went unread. When no step pays anyone, a single line reads
   `Unknown (not named in the calldata)`. Wherever there is a `Paid to` line, the
-  minimum reads `Min. paid out`. After the `Amount` line (after `Token In` when
-  there is none), each `PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM` but one into the router, in step
+  minimum reads `Min. paid out`. The `Amount` line gives the total the steps
+  take of `Token In`, from the step that sets the input side on: the first V2 or
+  V3 exact-in, V2 exact-out, `WRAP_ETH` or V4 swap step that names an input
+  token or amount. A V4 step with a swap action sets the input side when no
+  earlier step set it, even when it names neither (see Display Consistency).
+  That step counts its own amount, whoever pays it: a V2 exact-out step its
+  `amountInMax`, and a V4 swap step the `amountIn` of the swap action that
+  spends its input currency. Each later V2 or V3 exact-in or V2 exact-out step
+  whose `payerIsUser` is true takes its amount, found in the same way, from the
+  user's wallet. So does every V4 step but the one that sets the input side,
+  with a swap action or without: it takes what its `SETTLE`s paid by the user
+  (`payerIsUser` true) and its `SETTLE_ALL`s pay, for each token on its own. A
+  `SETTLE` of any amount but `OPEN_DELTA` pays that amount, and a `SETTLE` of
+  `OPEN_DELTA` or a `SETTLE_ALL` pays what the step owes, as above. A later step
+  paid from the router spends what the router holds and takes nothing, and so
+  does a V2 exact-in whose `amountIn` is `ALREADY_PAID`. A later take of
+  `Token In` is added to the total while both are quantities: a V3 exact-in of
+  600 USDT and a V2 exact-in of 400 USDT, both paid by the user, read
+  `1000.0000 USDT`. When the decoder does not know a take's amount, the total is
+  not known and there is no `Amount` line. `Token In` is the token of the last
+  `PERMIT2_PERMIT` the decoder reads, when there is one. Its amount, `Unlimited`
+  included, stands as the `Amount` figure in place of the total only in the
+  plain shape of Uniswap's own routes: it is the only `PERMIT2_PERMIT`, its
+  spender is the router, the router may not let it fail, no step before it takes
+  its token or a token the decoder does not know, and the decoder reads every
+  step after it in full. Permit2 then lets the router take no more of the token
+  than that amount, so the permit covers every take of it. A step the decoder
+  does not read in full may raise what Permit2 lets the router take, as a
+  `PERMIT2_PERMIT_BATCH` can: a command the decoder does not read (listed at the
+  end of this section), a step whose input it cannot read, in whole or in part,
+  and a step it fails on. In any other case the line gives the total, as with no
+  permit. When the step that sets the input side spends a token other than the
+  permit's, or one the decoder does not know, its amount gets lines of its own
+  and the total has no figure to start from: unless the permit's amount stands
+  there is no `Amount` line, and each take of the permit's token gets lines of
+  its own. Each take the total does not count gives three lines after the
+  `Amount` line (after `Token In` when there is none): one of a token other than
+  `Token In`; one of `Token In` after an amount that is not a quantity (a V4
+  open delta, `ALREADY_PAID`, which keep their wording on the `Amount` line, or
+  no stated amount, as of a V4 exact-out step); and one whose amount the decoder
+  does not know. When the step that sets the input side states no amount and
+  there is no `Amount` line, that step gets them too whenever another take's
+  lines give a figure, so that figure cannot read as all that leaves. They come
+  in step order, the step that sets the input side first when it has them:
+  `Moved from the sender`, its amount, worded as the `Amount` line words one, or
+  `Unknown (could not be decoded)` when the decoder does not know it;
+  `Token moved`, giving the token's address as the `Token In` line does; and
+  `Moved to`, which reads `The swap step that spends it`. A token the decoder
+  does not know gives the `Moved from the sender` line alone. A step may also
+  take from the user's wallet what the decoder did not read: a V4 step, other
+  than the one that sets the input side, whose input or one of whose `SETTLE`s
+  or `SETTLE_ALL`s it cannot read, which the router still runs; a V2 or V3
+  exact-in or V2 exact-out step or a `PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM` whose input it
+  cannot read; every `PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM_BATCH`; every `V3_SWAP_EXACT_OUT`,
+  which the decoder does not read, wherever it stands; every `EXECUTE_SUB_PLAN`,
+  wherever it stands; and every step it fails on. Each such step gives one
+  `Moved from the sender` line among those, reading
+  `Unknown (could not be decoded)`. That line, or any line for a token the
+  decoder does not know, leaves no `Amount` line, whose figure might be too low,
+  and such a step before a `PERMIT2_PERMIT` keeps the permit's amount from
+  standing. Then each `PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM` but one into the router, in step
   order, gives three lines: `Moved from the sender`, the amount it moves, for
   example `1000000.0000 USDT`; `Token moved`, giving the token's address as the
   `Token In` line does; and `Moved to`, which reads