fix: render a hostile token symbol as text, and put a floor under the CSP (closes #307)

A token's symbol is whatever its symbol() returns, the block explorer passes it
through unfiltered, and balanceLine() interpolated it into an innerHTML string.
A token with the 1,000 holders the spam filter asks for, airdropped to the
victim, could therefore paint a full-viewport cross-origin iframe over the
wallet's own UI, on the screens where the user is used to typing their password.

escapeHtml moves to the new src/shared/html.js as a pure string replace over &,
<, >, " and '. The implementation it replaces round-tripped through a detached
element's textContent, which escapes neither quote character, and it was already
in use inside data-copy="..." and would have been inside href="...". Being pure
also makes it testable without a DOM shim.

Every interpolation into an innerHTML string across src/popup/views/ was audited
rather than only the reported one. Also unescaped: the transaction lists'
direction label (the explorer's method name, attacker-chosen for an attacker's
contract), the wallet name and ENS name in the Home wallet list, the URL in the
explorer link's href, the blockie data: URI, and the confirmation screen's
warning line, which carries only fixed strings today but is one wiring change
from carrying scraped explorer text. Explorer URLs are now built by one helper
that percent-encodes the path segment, so a from/to out of explorer JSON cannot
re-point the link. Where a value is a markup fragment this code just built, or a
loop index, or a locally computed number, it stays bare; the rule and the reason
are stated at the top of helpers.js.

Both manifests now declare default-src 'self' with frame-src 'none'. Four
directives had to stay looser than 'self' and none of them generalises:
style-src needs 'unsafe-inline' because the popup sets presentation through
style="..." attributes and Firefox has never implemented style-src-attr; img-src
needs data: for the blockies; connect-src needs https: and http: because the RPC
endpoint is user-configurable and a local node over http://127.0.0.1 is a
supported configuration. frame-src, form-action and base-uri are named rather
than inherited, because the last two do not fall back to default-src at all.
tests/manifest.test.js now pins the whole directive set exactly, in both
directions, and README.md carries the reasoning.

Displayed symbols are capped at 12 characters, the bound lookupTokenInfo()
already applied to a symbol read straight off a contract; the explorer path had
none. The cap is a layout bound and is documented as not being the security
control. isSpoofedSymbol() is untouched: it answers whether a symbol collides
with a known ticker, which is a different question, and repurposing it here
would have been the wrong control.

Verified failing first, four ways. Restricting escapeHtml to & < > (the escape
the old textContent round trip actually performed) fails 5 unit tests including
the data-copy attribute break-out. Removing the length cap fails 3. Dropping
default-src from manifest/chrome.json fails 2. Removing both the escape and the
cap and running the full Chrome suite fails the new browser test with the
attack reproduced: an <iframe id="pwn"> in the popup DOM, intercepting pointer
events over the Back button.

tests/manifest.test.js

@@ -13,6 +13,33 @@
 // an exact match on the token set is what keeps the next edit from
 // smuggling one in alongside.
 //
+// It is also the anti-regression check for #307. The policy used to declare
+// script-src and object-src and nothing else, which left every directive
+// that does not fall back to them — and, absent default-src, every one that
+// does — wide open: a hostile ERC-20 symbol that reached innerHTML could
+// load a full-viewport cross-origin iframe over the wallet's own UI. The
+// escaping in src/shared/html.js is the primary fix; default-src is what
+// stops the next escape that slips from reaching the network.
+//
+// Every directive below is pinned exactly, because each of the four
+// loosenings is load-bearing and none of them may grow:
+//
+//   style-src 'unsafe-inline'  src/popup/index.html and the view helpers
+//                              use style="..." attributes throughout, which
+//                              CSP blocks without it. Chrome enforces this
+//                              on attributes, not just <style> blocks, and
+//                              Firefox has never implemented style-src-attr,
+//                              so there is no narrower spelling available.
+//   img-src data:              blockies are data: PNGs assigned to img.src.
+//   connect-src https: http:   the RPC endpoint is user-configurable, and a
+//                              local node over http://127.0.0.1 is a
+//                              supported configuration — the Firefox e2e
+//                              suite runs on exactly that.
+//   frame-src/form-action/base-uri  named rather than inherited: form-action
+//                              and base-uri do not fall back to default-src
+//                              at all, and frame-src 'none' is what kills
+//                              the reported attack outright.
+//
 // build.js copies these files to dist/<target>/manifest.json verbatim, so
 // what is asserted here is what ships.
 
@@ -21,8 +48,22 @@ const path = require("path");
 
 const MANIFEST_DIR = path.join(__dirname, "..", "manifest");
 
-const EXPECTED_SCRIPT_SRC = ["'self'", "'wasm-unsafe-eval'"];
-const EXPECTED_OBJECT_SRC = ["'self'"];
+const EXPECTED_DIRECTIVES = {
+    "default-src": ["'self'"],
+    "script-src": ["'self'", "'wasm-unsafe-eval'"],
+    "object-src": ["'self'"],
+    "style-src": ["'self'", "'unsafe-inline'"],
+    "img-src": ["'self'", "data:"],
+    "connect-src": ["'self'", "http:", "https:"],
+    "frame-src": ["'none'"],
+    "form-action": ["'none'"],
+    "base-uri": ["'none'"],
+};
+
+// Directives that fetch script. Nothing that can execute code may name a
+// remote source, an eval form, or an inline form; 'wasm-unsafe-eval' is the
+// single deliberate exception and it is pinned above.
+const SCRIPT_DIRECTIVES = ["default-src", "script-src", "object-src"];
 
 const FORBIDDEN_SOURCES = [
     "'unsafe-eval'",
@@ -53,26 +94,31 @@ function parseCsp(policy) {
 
 function assertPolicy(policy) {
     const directives = parseCsp(policy);
-    expect(Object.keys(directives).sort()).toEqual([
-        "object-src",
-        "script-src",
-    ]);
-    expect(directives["script-src"].slice().sort()).toEqual(
-        EXPECTED_SCRIPT_SRC,
+    // Exact, in both directions: a directive that appears here and not in
+    // EXPECTED_DIRECTIVES is an unreviewed addition, and one that
+    // disappears silently reopens whatever it was closing.
+    expect(Object.keys(directives).sort()).toEqual(
+        Object.keys(EXPECTED_DIRECTIVES).sort(),
     );
-    expect(directives["object-src"].slice().sort()).toEqual(
-        EXPECTED_OBJECT_SRC,
-    );
-    for (const source of FORBIDDEN_SOURCES) {
-        expect(directives["script-src"]).not.toContain(source);
-        expect(directives["object-src"]).not.toContain(source);
+    for (const [name, sources] of Object.entries(EXPECTED_DIRECTIVES)) {
+        expect([name, directives[name].slice().sort()]).toEqual([
+            name,
+            sources.slice().sort(),
+        ]);
+    }
+    for (const name of SCRIPT_DIRECTIVES) {
+        for (const source of FORBIDDEN_SOURCES) {
+            expect(name + " " + directives[name].join(" ")).not.toContain(
+                " " + source,
+            );
+        }
     }
 }
 
 describe("shipped Content Security Policy", () => {
     // MV3 takes an object and applies extension_pages to the popup and the
     // background service worker, which is where libsodium runs.
-    test("chrome MV3 allows WASM and nothing else beyond 'self'", () => {
+    test("chrome MV3 ships the pinned policy, default-src included", () => {
         const csp = readManifest("chrome").content_security_policy;
         expect(typeof csp).toBe("object");
         expect(Object.keys(csp)).toEqual(["extension_pages"]);
@@ -87,7 +133,7 @@ describe("shipped Content Security Policy", () => {
     // Firefox before 106 rejects an MV2 policy string that omits
     // object-src and falls back to its own default, discarding everything
     // declared here. Same policy as Chrome, different manifest shape.
-    test("firefox MV2 allows WASM and nothing else beyond 'self'", () => {
+    test("firefox MV2 ships the pinned policy, default-src included", () => {
         const csp = readManifest("firefox").content_security_policy;
         expect(typeof csp).toBe("string");
         assertPolicy(csp);