fix: floor malformed allowedSites, fraudContracts and selectedToken entries (closes #362)

A stored allowedSites whose value was not a list rendered a working popup and then made every subsequent save fail silently, so the user operated a wallet that persisted nothing -- worse than a blank popup, which is at least visibly broken. fraudContracts and selectedToken had the same shape: a container floored by truthiness or not at all, while its entries were dereferenced. Entries are now floored as well as containers, following the idiom #311 established, and a failed save raises a persistent banner instead of vanishing into a swallowed rejection.

The per-field justifications that used to live in a hand-written header are replaced by a contract test that drives each field's hostile and falsy values through a real popup boot, so a claim about a field answers to the code rather than to prose. Its guarantee is stated narrowly and deliberately: no structural dereference on the code paths a wholly-corrupted profile takes, which is not every path a stored record takes. The paths it does not drive are named where the claim is made, and are tracked in #379.

tests/backNavigation.test.js

@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ describe("Back onto a view the reopened popup never rendered", () => {
 
     test("Back onto the transaction detail renders it", () => {
         reopenedOn("settings", ["main", "transaction"], {
-            viewData: { tx: { hash: "0xdead" } },
+            viewData: { tx: { hash: "0xdead", from: ADDRESS, to: ADDRESS } },
         });
         goBack();
         expect(calls).toEqual(["transactionDetail"]);
@@ -162,7 +162,14 @@ describe("Back onto a view the reopened popup never rendered", () => {
 
     test("Back onto the transaction confirmation restores it", () => {
         reopenedOn("settings", ["main", "confirm-tx"], {
-            viewData: { pendingTx: { to: ADDRESS, amount: "1" } },
+            viewData: {
+                pendingTx: {
+                    token: "ETH",
+                    from: ADDRESS,
+                    to: ADDRESS,
+                    amount: "1",
+                },
+            },
         });
         goBack();
         expect(calls).toEqual(["confirmTx"]);
@@ -171,7 +178,7 @@ describe("Back onto a view the reopened popup never rendered", () => {
 
     test("Back onto the success screen renders it", () => {
         reopenedOn("settings", ["main", "success-tx"], {
-            viewData: { hash: "0xdead" },
+            viewData: { hash: "0xdead", to: ADDRESS },
         });
         goBack();
         expect(calls).toEqual(["successTx"]);
@@ -180,7 +187,7 @@ describe("Back onto a view the reopened popup never rendered", () => {
 
     test("Back onto the failure screen renders it", () => {
         reopenedOn("settings", ["main", "error-tx"], {
-            viewData: { message: "execution reverted" },
+            viewData: { message: "execution reverted", to: ADDRESS },
         });
         goBack();
         expect(calls).toEqual(["errorTx"]);

tests/persistedEntryFloors.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,404 @@
+// A persisted container that is checked while its ENTRIES are dereferenced
+// unchecked (https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/362).
+//
+// https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/311 settled the idiom — floor the
+// container AND its entries, dropping anything that cannot be safely
+// dereferenced — and applied it to trackedTokens and tokenBalances. These are
+// the fields it did not reach.
+//
+// allowedSites is the worst shape in the codebase, and it is what the boot
+// tests below measure: a stored `{"0x…": "notalist"}` passes the gate, renders
+// a WORKING popup, and then throws `base.map is not a function` inside
+// saveState()'s merge — so every save from then on fails while the UI looks
+// entirely healthy and the user goes on operating a wallet that is persisting
+// nothing. A blank popup is at least visibly broken; this is not. So the
+// assertion here is never merely "the popup rendered": it is "the popup
+// rendered AND the write actually landed in storage".
+//
+// Observed at ad6aa7b, with the floors below removed:
+//   allowedSites: {"0x…": "notalist"}   -> views=["main"], errors=[], and
+//       storage.set NEVER called: the stored record kept no schemaVersion, so
+//       nothing the user did was persisted.
+//   fraudContracts: "0x…"               -> renderSendTokenSelect() threw
+//       "(state.fraudContracts || []).map is not a function"
+//   fraudContracts: [42]                -> threw "a.toLowerCase is not a
+//       function"
+//   selectedToken: 42 (restoring onto address-token) -> views=[], errors=
+//       ["tokenId.toLowerCase is not a function"] — a blank popup.
+
+const { normalizePersisted } = require("../src/shared/persistedState");
+const { makeStorageStub } = require("./support/storageStub");
+const {
+    bootPopup,
+    cleanupPopup,
+    unversionedValidProfile,
+    ADDRESS,
+    TOKEN_ADDRESS,
+} = require("./support/popupBoot");
+
+// One extension page: a fresh module registry over the given storage. state.js
+// resolves the storage API at require time, so the stub has to be installed
+// before the module is loaded.
+function loadStateModule(storage) {
+    jest.resetModules();
+    globalThis.chrome = { storage: { local: storage.local } };
+    return require("../src/shared/state");
+}
+
+afterEach(() => {
+    cleanupPopup();
+});
+
+// ------------------------------------------------------- the floor itself
+
+describe("the floor under allowedSites and deniedSites", () => {
+    for (const field of ["allowedSites", "deniedSites"]) {
+        test(`${field} that is not a record becomes an empty record`, () => {
+            for (const bad of ["nope", 42, true, [ADDRESS], null]) {
+                expect(normalizePersisted({ [field]: bad })[field]).toEqual({});
+            }
+        });
+
+        test(`an ${field} entry whose value is not a hostname list is dropped`, () => {
+            for (const bad of ["dapp.example", 42, null, { a: 1 }, true]) {
+                expect(
+                    normalizePersisted({ [field]: { [ADDRESS]: bad } })[field],
+                ).toEqual({});
+            }
+        });
+
+        test(`a hostname that is not text is dropped from an ${field} entry`, () => {
+            expect(
+                normalizePersisted({
+                    [field]: { [ADDRESS]: [42, null, "dapp.example", {}] },
+                })[field],
+            ).toEqual({ [ADDRESS]: ["dapp.example"] });
+        });
+
+        test(`a real ${field} map survives, copied not shared`, () => {
+            const saved = { [field]: { [ADDRESS]: ["dapp.example"] } };
+
+            const out = normalizePersisted(saved);
+
+            expect(out[field]).toEqual(saved[field]);
+            expect(out[field]).not.toBe(saved[field]);
+            expect(out[field][ADDRESS]).not.toBe(saved[field][ADDRESS]);
+        });
+
+        test(`a good ${field} entry beside a malformed one survives`, () => {
+            const out = normalizePersisted({
+                [field]: { [ADDRESS]: ["dapp.example"], [TOKEN_ADDRESS]: 42 },
+            });
+
+            expect(out[field]).toEqual({ [ADDRESS]: ["dapp.example"] });
+        });
+
+        test(`a stored own "__proto__" key in ${field} is dropped`, () => {
+            // JSON can carry the key. It can never be a wallet address, so it
+            // grants and denies nothing and goes the way of every other key
+            // whose value is unusable; keeping it would only keep a value that
+            // saveState()'s merge hands to the prototype setter on the next
+            // write.
+            const saved = JSON.parse(
+                '{"' + field + '":{"__proto__":["evil.invalid"]}}',
+            );
+
+            const out = normalizePersisted(saved);
+
+            expect(Object.getPrototypeOf(out[field])).toBe(Object.prototype);
+            expect(Object.keys(out[field])).toEqual([]);
+        });
+    }
+});
+
+describe('a stored own "__proto__" key surviving a save', () => {
+    // The floor writes map keys with defineProperty; saveState()'s merge is one
+    // layer downstream of it and used to write them with plain assignment,
+    // which hands "__proto__" to the prototype setter and records no entry.
+    // networkEndpoints is where a key that is not a known id is deliberately
+    // KEPT, so it is where that undoing shows.
+    test("does not move a prototype or vanish from networkEndpoints", async () => {
+        const profile = unversionedValidProfile();
+        profile.networkEndpoints = JSON.parse(
+            '{"__proto__":{"rpcUrl":"https://kept.invalid"}}',
+        );
+        const storage = makeStorageStub({ autistmask: profile });
+        const { state, loadState, saveState } = loadStateModule(storage);
+
+        await loadState();
+        state.theme = "dark";
+        await saveState();
+
+        // Not compared against Object.prototype by identity: the storage stub
+        // clones through structuredClone, which builds the result in the host
+        // realm, so the two Object.prototypes are different objects.
+        const stored = storage.read("autistmask").networkEndpoints;
+        expect(Object.getPrototypeOf(stored).rpcUrl).toBeUndefined();
+        expect(Object.keys(stored)).toContain("__proto__");
+    });
+});
+
+describe("the floor under fraudContracts", () => {
+    test("fraudContracts that is not a list becomes an empty list", () => {
+        for (const bad of ["nope", 42, true, { a: 1 }]) {
+            expect(
+                normalizePersisted({ fraudContracts: bad }).fraudContracts,
+            ).toEqual([]);
+        }
+    });
+
+    test("a fraudContracts entry that is not text is dropped", () => {
+        expect(
+            normalizePersisted({
+                fraudContracts: [42, null, TOKEN_ADDRESS, {}, []],
+            }).fraudContracts,
+        ).toEqual([TOKEN_ADDRESS]);
+    });
+
+    test("a real fraudContracts list survives, copied not shared", () => {
+        const saved = { fraudContracts: [TOKEN_ADDRESS] };
+
+        const out = normalizePersisted(saved);
+
+        expect(out.fraudContracts).toEqual(saved.fraudContracts);
+        expect(out.fraudContracts).not.toBe(saved.fraudContracts);
+    });
+});
+
+describe("the floor under selectedToken", () => {
+    // Found by the sweep for this defect class, not named in the issue: the
+    // restore gate in src/popup/viewRouter.js checks truthiness only, and both
+    // src/popup/views/addressToken.js and src/popup/views/receive.js then
+    // dereference it as text.
+    test("a selectedToken that is not text becomes null", () => {
+        for (const bad of [42, true, { a: 1 }, [TOKEN_ADDRESS]]) {
+            expect(
+                normalizePersisted({ selectedToken: bad }).selectedToken,
+            ).toBeNull();
+        }
+    });
+
+    test("a real selectedToken survives; the empty string becomes null", () => {
+        expect(
+            normalizePersisted({ selectedToken: TOKEN_ADDRESS }).selectedToken,
+        ).toBe(TOKEN_ADDRESS);
+        expect(normalizePersisted({ selectedToken: "ETH" }).selectedToken).toBe(
+            "ETH",
+        );
+        expect(
+            normalizePersisted({ selectedToken: "" }).selectedToken,
+        ).toBeNull();
+    });
+});
+
+// ----------------------------------------- what the user actually gets
+
+describe("a malformed allowedSites entry", () => {
+    const MALFORMED = [
+        { name: "a string", value: "notalist" },
+        { name: "a number", value: 42 },
+        { name: "a record", value: { hostnames: ["dapp.example"] } },
+    ];
+
+    for (const { name, value } of MALFORMED) {
+        test(`whose value is ${name}: a working popup whose writes persist`, async () => {
+            const env = await bootPopup(
+                unversionedValidProfile({
+                    allowedSites: { [ADDRESS]: value },
+                }),
+            );
+
+            expect({
+                visibleViews: env.visibleViews(),
+                errors: env.pageErrors,
+            }).toEqual({ visibleViews: ["main"], errors: [] });
+
+            // The half that matters. A popup that renders and never persists
+            // again is worse than one that renders nothing, because nothing
+            // tells the user. The version stamp is proof a write landed: it
+            // is absent from the stored record until saveState() writes one.
+            expect(env.storage.set).toHaveBeenCalled();
+            const stored = env.storage.read("autistmask");
+            expect(stored.schemaVersion).toBe(1);
+            expect(stored.wallets[0].encryptedSecret).toBe(
+                "encrypted-secret-1",
+            );
+            expect(stored.allowedSites).toEqual({});
+        });
+    }
+
+    test("the well-formed entries beside it keep working", async () => {
+        const env = await bootPopup(
+            unversionedValidProfile({
+                allowedSites: {
+                    [ADDRESS]: ["dapp.example"],
+                    [TOKEN_ADDRESS]: "notalist",
+                },
+            }),
+        );
+
+        expect(env.pageErrors).toEqual([]);
+        expect(env.storage.read("autistmask").allowedSites).toEqual({
+            [ADDRESS]: ["dapp.example"],
+        });
+    });
+
+    test("a later save still lands, not just the first", async () => {
+        // The failure this closes was in the MERGE, which runs on every save
+        // against whatever is in storage at the time. One write landing is not
+        // enough: the field has to stay mergeable.
+        const storage = makeStorageStub({
+            autistmask: unversionedValidProfile({
+                allowedSites: { [ADDRESS]: "notalist" },
+            }),
+        });
+        const { state, loadState, saveState } = loadStateModule(storage);
+
+        await loadState();
+        state.theme = "dark";
+        await saveState();
+        state.utcTimestamps = true;
+        await saveState();
+
+        const stored = storage.read("autistmask");
+        expect(stored.theme).toBe("dark");
+        expect(stored.utcTimestamps).toBe(true);
+        expect(stored.allowedSites).toEqual({});
+        expect(stored.wallets[0].encryptedSecret).toBe("encrypted-secret-1");
+    });
+});
+
+describe("a malformed fraudContracts", () => {
+    // The send screen, which is where this one lands: the boot path only
+    // reaches fraudContracts through loadHomeTxs(), which catches, so the
+    // consequence is an unusable send screen rather than silent data loss.
+    function stubSendDocument() {
+        const select = { innerHTML: "", children: [] };
+        select.appendChild = (child) => select.children.push(child);
+        globalThis.document = {
+            getElementById: (id) => (id === "send-token" ? select : null),
+            createElement: () => ({ value: "", textContent: "" }),
+        };
+        return select;
+    }
+
+    const HELD = {
+        address: TOKEN_ADDRESS,
+        symbol: "AAA",
+        decimals: 18,
+        balance: "12.5",
+        holders: 50000,
+    };
+
+    async function sendScreenTokens(fraudContracts) {
+        const storage = makeStorageStub({
+            autistmask: unversionedValidProfile({ fraudContracts }),
+        });
+        const { loadState } = loadStateModule(storage);
+        await loadState();
+        const select = stubSendDocument();
+        const { renderSendTokenSelect } = require("../src/popup/views/send");
+
+        renderSendTokenSelect({ address: ADDRESS, tokenBalances: [HELD] });
+
+        return select.children.map((opt) => opt.value);
+    }
+
+    for (const bad of ["notalist", 42, { a: 1 }, [42], [null], [{}]]) {
+        test(`${JSON.stringify(bad)}: a usable send screen`, async () => {
+            await expect(sendScreenTokens(bad)).resolves.toEqual([
+                TOKEN_ADDRESS,
+            ]);
+        });
+    }
+
+    test("a real fraud entry beside a malformed one still hides its token", async () => {
+        await expect(
+            sendScreenTokens([42, TOKEN_ADDRESS.toLowerCase()]),
+        ).resolves.toEqual([]);
+    });
+});
+
+describe("a malformed selectedToken", () => {
+    test("does not blank the popup on restore", async () => {
+        const env = await bootPopup(
+            unversionedValidProfile({
+                currentView: "address-token",
+                selectedWallet: 0,
+                selectedAddress: 0,
+                selectedToken: 42,
+                viewStack: ["main", "address"],
+            }),
+        );
+
+        expect({
+            visibleViews: env.visibleViews(),
+            errors: env.pageErrors,
+        }).toEqual({ visibleViews: ["main"], errors: [] });
+    });
+});
+
+// --------------------------------------------- a save that fails is told
+
+describe("a save that fails", () => {
+    function failingStorage(profile) {
+        const storage = makeStorageStub({ autistmask: profile });
+        const realSet = storage.local.set;
+        storage.local.set = jest.fn(async () => {
+            throw new Error("QUOTA_BYTES quota exceeded");
+        });
+        storage.restoreWrites = () => {
+            storage.local.set = realSet;
+        };
+        return storage;
+    }
+
+    test("is reported, not swallowed by the save queue", async () => {
+        const storage = failingStorage(unversionedValidProfile());
+        const { state, loadState, saveState, onSaveFailure } =
+            loadStateModule(storage);
+        const failures = [];
+        onSaveFailure((e) => failures.push(String(e && e.message)));
+
+        await loadState();
+        state.theme = "dark";
+        // Not awaited, which is how showView() saves on every navigation and
+        // how the failure used to disappear entirely.
+        saveState();
+        for (let i = 0; i < 50; i++) await Promise.resolve();
+
+        expect(failures).toEqual(["QUOTA_BYTES quota exceeded"]);
+    });
+
+    test("still rejects for a caller that awaits it", async () => {
+        const storage = failingStorage(unversionedValidProfile());
+        const { state, loadState, saveState, onSaveFailure } =
+            loadStateModule(storage);
+        onSaveFailure(() => {});
+
+        await loadState();
+        state.theme = "dark";
+
+        await expect(saveState()).rejects.toThrow("QUOTA_BYTES");
+    });
+
+    test("puts a banner on the popup saying nothing is being saved", async () => {
+        const env = await bootPopup(undefined, {
+            storage: failingStorage(unversionedValidProfile()),
+        });
+
+        // The popup is still usable — the point is that it no longer looks
+        // healthy while silently persisting nothing.
+        expect(env.visibleViews()).toEqual(["main"]);
+        const banner = env.node("save-failure-banner");
+        expect(banner).not.toBeNull();
+        expect(banner.textContent).toContain("NOT SAVED");
+        expect(banner.textContent).toContain("QUOTA_BYTES quota exceeded");
+    });
+
+    test("no banner appears on a popup whose saves work", async () => {
+        const env = await bootPopup(unversionedValidProfile());
+
+        expect(env.node("save-failure-banner")).toBeNull();
+    });
+});

tests/persistedFieldContract.test.js

@@ -0,0 +1,864 @@
+// What the floor under each persisted field actually guarantees — as a table
+// that RUNS, one row per field.
+//
+// This file replaces a hand-written per-field justification in the header of
+// src/shared/stateSchema.js. That comment shipped a false claim in three
+// consecutive changes: every author wrote plausible prose about thirty fields,
+// every reviewer re-derived it by hand, and it kept being wrong in a different
+// place each time. The artifact was the problem. A claim nobody can execute is
+// worse than no claim, because it is believed.
+//
+// So the claim is a row here instead:
+//
+//   KIND.REFUSED   assertStateUsable() refuses the record outright. Proven by
+//                  stateProblem() naming a problem for every hostile value.
+//   KIND.ENTRIES   normalizePersisted() floors the container AND its entries.
+//                  Proven by holds() over the normalized value.
+//   KIND.SCALAR    normalizePersisted() floors it to one scalar type, or to a
+//                  fixed fallback. Proven the same way.
+//   KIND.LOOSE     `saved.x || default`, no type check at all. The claim is
+//                  that no structural dereference of it is reachable from a
+//                  stored record — which cannot be argued, only driven, so the
+//                  proof is a boot of the REAL popup entry point over a stored
+//                  record carrying the hostile value, ONTO EVERY RESTORABLE
+//                  VIEW. Home is not where this class of defect lives.
+//
+// Every row is driven through a boot regardless of kind, but only a LOOSE row
+// (or a row that sets `alsoSweep`) is swept across the restore path: that is
+// what declaring LOOSE costs. ENTRIES and SCALAR rows are proven by their
+// holds() instead, because a floored value is not hostile by the time a
+// renderer sees it. A LOOSE row must additionally prove it is loose: if
+// someone floors the field — even partially — and leaves the row saying LOOSE,
+// the "survives verbatim" assertion fails. A field added to PERSISTED_FIELDS
+// with no row fails the first test in the file.
+//
+// The sweep is what makes a LOOSE row falsifiable, so read how it is driven
+// before trusting it. A row the ROUTER reads (`routes`) gets its own boot per
+// view, because a hostile value in it legitimately changes which view renders.
+// Every other swept field is corrupted on the SAME boot, one boot per view per
+// slot, and that boot has to land on the view it stored — so a field that does
+// move the routing cannot hide in the crowd. Every swept field is driven at
+// BOTH POLARITIES: a value nothing in src/ writes is a wrong-typed one and so
+// always truthy, which leaves `if (!state.x) { state.y.deref() }` unentered on
+// the very boot that corrupts x. The last slot is the falsy one for that
+// reason, and a field that cannot be falsy after the floor says so in its row
+// and is proven so.
+//
+// READ THE CLAIM NARROWLY. What this file proves is: NO STRUCTURAL
+// DEREFERENCE ON THE CODE PATHS A WHOLLY-CORRUPTED PROFILE TAKES. That is not
+// every path a stored record takes, and the difference is the whole of what
+// this file does not cover:
+//
+//   - Only the values in the table, in the SLOT arrangement below: four value
+//     combinations per view, not the product of twelve fields. A dereference
+//     reached only under a pairing no slot produces is not driven at all.
+//   - Only what a stored record reaches by ITSELF. A view only forward
+//     navigation opens, and anything behind a click, is not driven.
+//   - Nothing about the paths a HEALTHY profile takes, which is most of the
+//     popup. This file is a floor under one defect class, not a proof about
+//     the renderers.
+//
+// Within that boundary it is unconditional: if one of these boots leaves the
+// popup unhealthy or off the view it stored, this file goes red — including
+// when it takes two corrupted fields at once, because the verdict is the
+// combined boot itself and the per-field re-boot below can only decorate the
+// message. That last part is the one thing an earlier version got wrong: it
+// asserted on the per-field list, so an observed dead popup that no single
+// field reproduced was reported green.
+//
+// Booting every field separately at every value would be several hundred boots
+// and most of the suite's budget; this is forty-four. Widening it further is
+// out of scope — proving no field is dereferenced on any reachable render path
+// is exhaustive verification of the popup, not a floor under a stored record.
+//
+// The three claims this replaced, all false, all caught here by construction:
+// rpcUrl reaching `new JsonRpcProvider()` (a synchronous throw, not a caught
+// request); viewData's ENTRIES being dereferenced by four restore branches
+// that gate on one truthy field each; and selectedWallet, where a stale
+// integer index is the SAFE case and `wallets["map"]` is the throwing one.
+
+const {
+    PERSISTED_FIELDS,
+    normalizePersisted,
+} = require("../src/shared/persistedState");
+const { stateProblem } = require("../src/shared/stateSchema");
+const { RESTORABLE_VIEWS } = require("../src/shared/restorableViews");
+const {
+    bootPopup,
+    cleanupPopup,
+    unversionedValidProfile,
+    ADDRESS,
+    TOKEN_ADDRESS,
+} = require("./support/popupBoot");
+
+const KIND = {
+    REFUSED: "refused by the gate",
+    ENTRIES: "container and entries type-checked",
+    SCALAR: "scalar type-checked",
+    LOOSE: "loosely floored; safety proven by driving the popup",
+};
+
+const isText = (v) => typeof v === "string";
+const isRecord = (v) =>
+    typeof v === "object" && v !== null && !Array.isArray(v);
+const isIndexOrNull = (v) => v === null || (Number.isInteger(v) && v >= 0);
+const isTextOrNull = (v) => v === null || (isText(v) && v !== "");
+const everyEntry = (v, fn) => Array.isArray(v) && v.every(fn);
+
+// A row is SWEPT — driven onto every restorable view rather than only onto
+// Home — when its claim is that no restore path dereferences the field. That
+// is what LOOSE means. The two index rows opt in with `alsoSweep` although
+// they are floored, because the restore path is precisely why they gained a
+// floor and the sweep is the regression guard on it.
+const swept = (row) => row.kind === KIND.LOOSE || Boolean(row.alsoSweep);
+
+// Every value a swept row drives through a boot: the hostile set, plus the
+// falsy slot that gives the field its other polarity. `hostile` values are all
+// TRUTHY by nature — a value nothing in src/ writes is a wrong-typed one, and
+// wrong-typed values are objects, non-empty strings and non-zero numbers. A
+// field that is only ever truthy on the boot that corrupts it cannot falsify
+// `if (!state.x) { state.y.deref() }`, so the falsy slot is not optional.
+const sweptValues = (row) => [...row.hostile, ...(row.falsy || [])];
+
+// ------------------------------------------------------------------ the table
+//
+// `hostile` is values a stored record can carry that nothing in src/ ever
+// writes. Each one is driven through the floor AND through a real popup boot —
+// and, for a swept row, through one boot per restorable view — so keep the
+// list short and pointed. `floorOnly` is extra values checked against the
+// floor alone, which is pure and free. `hostileRestore` is extra values driven
+// through the restore path only, for a value that means nothing until a
+// particular branch's gate has let it past.
+//
+// `falsy` is the other POLARITY of a swept field, driven for the same reason.
+// It is not a value src/ never writes — for three of these fields it is the
+// DEFAULT_STATE default, which is the branch every ordinary install takes —
+// and that is the point: without it, a dereference behind `if (!state.x)` is
+// unreachable on the one boot that corrupts x. A swept row that cannot supply
+// one says `neverFalsy` instead, which is proven rather than asserted: every
+// falsy value stored under that field comes back TRUTHY from the floor, so no
+// `!state.x` branch is reachable from a stored record at all.
+
+const CONTRACT = [
+    {
+        field: "wallets",
+        kind: KIND.REFUSED,
+        hostile: [42, "notastructure", { a: 1 }, [null], [{ addresses: 1 }]],
+    },
+    {
+        field: "networkId",
+        kind: KIND.REFUSED,
+        hostile: [42, "notanetwork", { a: 1 }, "__proto__"],
+    },
+    {
+        field: "trackedTokens",
+        kind: KIND.ENTRIES,
+        hostile: [42, "notalist", { a: 1 }],
+        floorOnly: [[1, 2], [null], [{}], [[TOKEN_ADDRESS]]],
+        holds: (v) => everyEntry(v, (t) => isRecord(t) && isText(t.address)),
+    },
+    {
+        field: "allowedSites",
+        kind: KIND.ENTRIES,
+        hostile: [42, "notarecord", { [ADDRESS]: "notalist" }],
+        floorOnly: [
+            [ADDRESS],
+            { [ADDRESS]: 42 },
+            { [ADDRESS]: [42, null, {}] },
+            JSON.parse('{"__proto__":["evil.invalid"]}'),
+        ],
+        holds: siteMapHolds,
+    },
+    {
+        field: "deniedSites",
+        kind: KIND.ENTRIES,
+        hostile: [42, "notarecord", { [ADDRESS]: "notalist" }],
+        floorOnly: [
+            [ADDRESS],
+            { [ADDRESS]: 42 },
+            { [ADDRESS]: [42, null, {}] },
+            JSON.parse('{"__proto__":["evil.invalid"]}'),
+        ],
+        holds: siteMapHolds,
+    },
+    {
+        field: "fraudContracts",
+        kind: KIND.ENTRIES,
+        hostile: [42, "notalist", { a: 1 }],
+        floorOnly: [[42], [null], [{}], [[TOKEN_ADDRESS]]],
+        holds: (v) => everyEntry(v, isText),
+    },
+    {
+        field: "viewStack",
+        kind: KIND.ENTRIES,
+        hostile: [42, "notalist", ["main", "show-phrase", "settings"]],
+        floorOnly: [[1, 2], [null], [{}], ["export-privkey"]],
+        // Truncated at the first entry the popup will not reopen onto, rather
+        // than filtered: every surviving entry's Back target has to stay the
+        // one it had. restorableStack() may also substitute ["main"] under a
+        // view restored below the root, so this is the one ENTRIES field whose
+        // result is not always a subset of what was stored.
+        holds: (v) => everyEntry(v, (e) => RESTORABLE_VIEWS.has(e)),
+    },
+    {
+        field: "networkEndpoints",
+        kind: KIND.ENTRIES,
+        hostile: [42, "notarecord", { mainnet: "notapair" }],
+        floorOnly: [
+            [1, 2],
+            { mainnet: { rpcUrl: 42, blockscoutUrl: {} } },
+            { mainnet: { rpcUrl: "", blockscoutUrl: [] } },
+            { sepolia: 42 },
+        ],
+        // Entries are coerced rather than dropped: an unknown network id is
+        // KEPT, so a profile that has been on a build with more networks does
+        // not lose their endpoints here. What is floored is the two URL fields
+        // inside the pair, which applyChainSwitchFields() assigns straight onto
+        // s.rpcUrl / s.blockscoutUrl on the next switch.
+        holds: (v) =>
+            isRecord(v) &&
+            Object.keys(v).every((id) => {
+                const pair = v[id];
+                return (
+                    isRecord(pair) &&
+                    (pair.rpcUrl === undefined ||
+                        (isText(pair.rpcUrl) && pair.rpcUrl !== "")) &&
+                    (pair.blockscoutUrl === undefined ||
+                        (isText(pair.blockscoutUrl) &&
+                            pair.blockscoutUrl !== ""))
+                );
+            }),
+    },
+    {
+        field: "rpcUrl",
+        kind: KIND.SCALAR,
+        hostile: [42, true, { a: 1 }],
+        floorOnly: [[], "", null],
+        holds: (v) => isText(v) && v !== "",
+        // The claim this row replaced said a bad value "fails the request on a
+        // path that already catches". It does not: getProvider() hands rpcUrl
+        // to `new JsonRpcProvider()`, which throws SYNCHRONOUSLY, from two call
+        // sites outside any try — and a stored `currentView: "wait-tx"` reaches
+        // one of them through restoreView(). So the row proves the claim
+        // against the real constructor rather than describing it.
+        alsoProven: (normalized, hostile) => {
+            // requireActual: bootPopup() mocks this module out for the boots
+            // above, and a mocked getProvider() would prove nothing at all
+            // about the constructor this row is a claim about.
+            const { getProvider } = jest.requireActual(
+                "../src/shared/balances",
+            );
+            expect(() => getProvider(hostile, "mainnet")).toThrow();
+            const provider = getProvider(normalized, "mainnet");
+            expect(provider).toBeTruthy();
+            provider.destroy();
+        },
+    },
+    {
+        field: "blockscoutUrl",
+        kind: KIND.SCALAR,
+        hostile: [42, true, { a: 1 }],
+        floorOnly: [[], "", null],
+        holds: (v) => isText(v) && v !== "",
+    },
+    {
+        field: "activeAddress",
+        kind: KIND.SCALAR,
+        hostile: [42, true, { a: 1 }],
+        floorOnly: [[ADDRESS], ""],
+        holds: isTextOrNull,
+    },
+    {
+        field: "selectedToken",
+        kind: KIND.SCALAR,
+        hostile: [42, true, { a: 1 }],
+        floorOnly: [[TOKEN_ADDRESS], ""],
+        holds: isTextOrNull,
+    },
+    {
+        field: "selectedWallet",
+        kind: KIND.SCALAR,
+        // The prototype members are the whole point: `wallets["map"]` is
+        // TRUTHY, so hasValidAddress()'s `&&` does not short-circuit and
+        // `.addresses[…]` throws. A stale INTEGER is the safe case.
+        hostile: ["map", "__proto__", { a: 1 }],
+        floorOnly: ["length", "constructor", "toString", "0", -1, 1.5, true],
+        holds: isIndexOrNull,
+        // SCALAR, and swept anyway: the restore path is precisely why this
+        // field gained a floor, so the sweep is the regression guard on it.
+        alsoSweep: true,
+        routes: true,
+        // A stale INTEGER index, which reaches the restore path by a different
+        // route from the prototype members above — falsy or out of range
+        // rather than truthy — and has to keep being the safe case.
+        hostileRestore: [{ value: "length" }, { value: 5 }],
+    },
+    {
+        field: "selectedAddress",
+        kind: KIND.SCALAR,
+        hostile: ["map", "__proto__", { a: 1 }],
+        floorOnly: ["length", "constructor", "toString", "0", -1, 1.5, true],
+        holds: isIndexOrNull,
+        alsoSweep: true,
+        routes: true,
+        hostileRestore: [{ value: 5 }],
+    },
+    {
+        field: "currentView",
+        kind: KIND.LOOSE,
+        routes: true,
+        // Compared, and concatenated into the debug banner's textContent
+        // (src/popup/views/helpers.js) with no gate in front of it, which
+        // coerces. Nothing renders FROM it without RESTORABLE_VIEWS.has()
+        // first, and Set.has() answers false for any value.
+        hostile: [42, "no-such-view", { a: 1 }],
+        // `saved.currentView || null`: the falsy polarity is the popup landing
+        // on Home, which every boot in "booting onto Home" below also drives.
+        falsy: [""],
+    },
+    {
+        field: "viewData",
+        kind: KIND.LOOSE,
+        routes: true,
+        // The container is taken verbatim; what makes its ENTRIES safe is the
+        // per-branch guard in src/popup/viewRouter.js. The sweep drives the
+        // container shapes below onto every restorable view; hostileRestore
+        // adds the records that PASS a branch's gate and then hand its
+        // renderer something it dereferences, which is where the entries are
+        // actually decided.
+        hostile: [42, "notarecord", { a: 1 }, [1, 2]],
+        // `structuredClone(saved.viewData || {})`: the container is never falsy
+        // in state whatever was stored, so no `!state.viewData` branch exists to
+        // drive.
+        neverFalsy: true,
+        hostileRestore: [
+            // success-tx passes on `data.hash`, and renderSuccess() then calls
+            // toAddressHtml(d.to) -> addressTitle() -> address.toLowerCase().
+            { value: { hash: "0x1" }, views: ["success-tx"] },
+            { value: { hash: "0x1", to: 42 }, views: ["success-tx"] },
+            {
+                value: { hash: "0x1", to: ADDRESS, decoded: { details: 7 } },
+                views: ["success-tx"],
+            },
+            {
+                value: {
+                    hash: "0x1",
+                    to: ADDRESS,
+                    decoded: { details: [{ address: 42 }] },
+                },
+                views: ["success-tx"],
+            },
+            // error-tx passes on `data.message`, same dereference.
+            { value: { message: "boom" }, views: ["error-tx"] },
+            { value: { message: "boom", to: 42 }, views: ["error-tx"] },
+            // transaction passes on `data.tx`.
+            { value: { tx: { hash: "0x1" } }, views: ["transaction"] },
+            {
+                value: {
+                    tx: {
+                        hash: "0x1",
+                        from: ADDRESS,
+                        to: ADDRESS,
+                        contractAddress: 42,
+                    },
+                },
+                views: ["transaction"],
+            },
+            // confirm-tx passes on `data.pendingTx`.
+            { value: { pendingTx: { amount: "1" } }, views: ["confirm-tx"] },
+            {
+                value: {
+                    pendingTx: {
+                        token: 42,
+                        from: ADDRESS,
+                        to: ADDRESS,
+                        amount: "1",
+                    },
+                },
+                views: ["confirm-tx"],
+            },
+            // wait-tx passes on `pendingWait.hash`; restoreWait() has checked
+            // the fields below it since it was written, and this is the
+            // regression guard.
+            {
+                value: {
+                    pendingWait: {
+                        hash: "0x1",
+                        txInfo: { to: 42, amount: "1" },
+                    },
+                },
+                views: ["wait-tx"],
+            },
+            // A record that passes EVERY branch's gate at once, driven onto
+            // every restorable view: a branch a view does not read must stay
+            // one it does not read, and each renderer must survive the fields
+            // another branch left behind.
+            {
+                value: {
+                    hash: "0x1",
+                    message: "boom",
+                    tx: { hash: "0x1" },
+                    pendingTx: { amount: "1" },
+                    pendingWait: { hash: "0x1" },
+                },
+            },
+        ],
+    },
+    {
+        field: "lastBalanceRefresh",
+        kind: KIND.LOOSE,
+        // Arithmetic only: `now - (s.lastBalanceRefresh || 0)` compares false
+        // for a non-number and forces a refresh.
+        hostile: [true, "notatime", { a: 1 }],
+        // `|| 0` collapses every falsy stored value to 0, so 0 IS the whole
+        // falsy polarity of this field — and it is the DEFAULT_STATE default,
+        // the value a profile carries until its first refresh lands.
+        falsy: [0],
+    },
+    {
+        field: "tokenHolderCache",
+        kind: KIND.LOOSE,
+        // Nothing DEREFERENCES it structurally. It is read by the
+        // field-agnostic snapshotPersisted()/deepEqual() in
+        // src/shared/state.js, which are safe for any value, and otherwise
+        // only reset wholesale in src/shared/chainSwitchFields.js.
+        hostile: [42, "notarecord", [1, 2]],
+        // `structuredClone(saved.tokenHolderCache || {})`.
+        neverFalsy: true,
+    },
+    {
+        field: "theme",
+        kind: KIND.LOOSE,
+        // Compared against "dark"/"light" in applyTheme() and otherwise falls
+        // to the system branch; assigned into an input .value, which coerces.
+        hostile: [42, "chartreuse", { a: 1 }],
+        // `saved.theme || "system"`.
+        neverFalsy: true,
+    },
+    {
+        field: "dustThresholdGwei",
+        kind: KIND.LOOSE,
+        hostile: ["notanumber", true, { a: 1 }],
+        // Survives verbatim, so the falsy slot is also wrong-typed: "" reaches
+        // filterTransactions() as a comparand and a settings input .value.
+        falsy: [""],
+    },
+    ...[
+        "rememberSiteChoice",
+        "showZeroBalanceTokens",
+        "hideSpoofedSymbols",
+        "hideLowHolderTokens",
+        "hideFraudContracts",
+        "hideDustTransactions",
+        "utcTimestamps",
+        "debugMode",
+    ].map((field) => ({
+        field,
+        kind: KIND.LOOSE,
+        // A flag: only ever tested for truthiness, and written back verbatim.
+        hostile: [42, "notabool", { a: 1 }],
+        // Both answers to that truthiness test have to be driven, and 0 is a
+        // value src/ never writes for a flag. For utcTimestamps and debugMode
+        // the falsy answer is also the DEFAULT_STATE default.
+        falsy: [0],
+    })),
+];
+
+function siteMapHolds(v) {
+    return (
+        isRecord(v) &&
+        Object.getPrototypeOf(v) === Object.prototype &&
+        !Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(v, "__proto__") &&
+        Object.keys(v).every((key) => everyEntry(v[key], isText))
+    );
+}
+
+afterEach(() => {
+    cleanupPopup();
+});
+
+// -------------------------------------------------------------- exhaustive
+
+describe("the contract covers the record", () => {
+    test("every persisted field has exactly one row, and no row invents one", () => {
+        const rows = CONTRACT.map((row) => row.field);
+
+        expect([...rows].sort()).toEqual([...PERSISTED_FIELDS].sort());
+    });
+
+    test("every row declares a kind this file knows how to prove", () => {
+        const kinds = Object.values(KIND);
+        for (const row of CONTRACT) {
+            expect(kinds).toContain(row.kind);
+            expect(row.hostile.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+        }
+    });
+});
+
+// ------------------------------------------------------------- the floors
+
+function profileWith(field, value) {
+    return unversionedValidProfile({ [field]: value });
+}
+
+describe("the floor each row claims", () => {
+    // The falsy slot is deliberately NOT in here. `saved.x || default` is a
+    // floor on falsy values and on nothing else, so a falsy value is the one
+    // thing a LOOSE field need not carry through verbatim; what it has to carry
+    // through is being falsy, which "both polarities" below asserts.
+    for (const row of CONTRACT) {
+        const values = [...row.hostile, ...(row.floorOnly || [])];
+
+        if (row.kind === KIND.REFUSED) {
+            test(`${row.field}: the gate refuses it`, () => {
+                for (const value of values) {
+                    expect(
+                        typeof stateProblem(profileWith(row.field, value)),
+                    ).toBe("string");
+                }
+            });
+            continue;
+        }
+
+        test(`${row.field}: ${row.kind}`, () => {
+            for (const value of values) {
+                const out = normalizePersisted(profileWith(row.field, value));
+                if (row.kind === KIND.LOOSE) {
+                    // The claim IS that there is no floor. A field that grows
+                    // one has to move to another kind rather than keep a row
+                    // saying its readers are what make it safe.
+                    continue;
+                }
+                expect({
+                    value: value,
+                    holds: row.holds(out[row.field]),
+                }).toEqual({ value: value, holds: true });
+            }
+        });
+
+        if (row.kind === KIND.LOOSE) {
+            test(`${row.field}: is genuinely unfloored`, () => {
+                // EVERY value, not some: a PARTIAL floor is still a floor, and
+                // a row that keeps saying LOOSE because one hostile value out
+                // of three still survives is exactly the stale claim this file
+                // exists to stop.
+                for (const value of values) {
+                    const out = normalizePersisted(
+                        profileWith(row.field, value),
+                    );
+                    expect({
+                        value: value,
+                        survived: JSON.stringify(out[row.field]),
+                    }).toEqual({
+                        value: value,
+                        survived: JSON.stringify(value),
+                    });
+                }
+            });
+        }
+    }
+});
+
+// --------------------------------------------- driving the real popup boot
+
+// A booted popup is healthy when nothing threw out of init() and something is
+// on screen. A throw out of restoreView() is neither: init() does not guard it,
+// so the rest of popup init never runs and the user gets a popup with no view,
+// no message and no control on it.
+async function bootHealth(profile) {
+    const env = await bootPopup(profile);
+    return {
+        errors: env.pageErrors,
+        blank: env.visibleViews().length === 0,
+    };
+}
+
+const HEALTHY = { errors: [], blank: false };
+
+// unversionedValidProfile() stores no currentView, so every boot in here lands
+// on Home. That is the cheap half of the proof; the restore path below is the
+// half that matters.
+// Both polarities of every swept field are driven, or the field is proven
+// unable to take one of them. This is the guard on the sweep itself: a hostile
+// set is all-truthy by construction, so without a falsy slot a dereference
+// behind `if (!state.x)` is never reached on the boot that corrupts x — the
+// same falsy-collapse blind spot the fields below were floored for.
+describe("both polarities of every swept field are driven", () => {
+    const FALSY_STORED = [0, "", false, null];
+    const floored = (field, value) =>
+        normalizePersisted(profileWith(field, value))[field];
+
+    for (const row of CONTRACT) {
+        if (!swept(row)) continue;
+
+        if (row.neverFalsy) {
+            test(`${row.field}: cannot be falsy in state at all`, () => {
+                for (const value of FALSY_STORED) {
+                    expect({
+                        stored: value,
+                        truthy: Boolean(floored(row.field, value)),
+                    }).toEqual({ stored: value, truthy: true });
+                }
+            });
+            continue;
+        }
+
+        test(`${row.field}: truthy and falsy`, () => {
+            // What the boots below actually drive, floored the way a renderer
+            // sees it — not what the row says it drives.
+            const driven = [
+                ...sweptValues(row),
+                ...(row.hostileRestore || []).map((entry) => entry.value),
+            ].map((value) => floored(row.field, value));
+
+            expect({
+                truthy: driven.some((value) => Boolean(value)),
+                falsy: driven.some((value) => !value),
+            }).toEqual({ truthy: true, falsy: true });
+        });
+    }
+});
+
+describe("a hostile value for one field, booting onto Home", () => {
+    for (const row of CONTRACT) {
+        for (const value of sweptValues(row)) {
+            test(`${row.field} = ${JSON.stringify(value)}`, async () => {
+                await expect(
+                    bootHealth(profileWith(row.field, value)),
+                ).resolves.toEqual(HEALTHY);
+            });
+        }
+    }
+});
+
+describe("a row's extra proof against the real reader", () => {
+    for (const row of CONTRACT) {
+        if (!row.alsoProven) continue;
+        test(row.field, () => {
+            for (const value of row.hostile) {
+                const out = normalizePersisted(profileWith(row.field, value));
+                row.alsoProven(out[row.field], value);
+            }
+        });
+    }
+});
+
+// ------------------------------------------------ driving the restore path
+
+// Everything above lands on Home. Home is not where this class of defect
+// lives: all three of the false claims this file replaced were falsified by a
+// RESTORE, through the unguarded restoreView() in src/popup/index.js. So a
+// swept row's hostile values are driven onto EVERY restorable view, one boot
+// each.
+//
+// This is what makes a LOOSE row falsifiable. A field that gains a structural
+// dereference on any restorable view — `state.theme.toLowerCase()` in a view's
+// show(), say — turns the row red here, instead of waiting for a reviewer to
+// re-derive the claim by hand.
+
+// restoreWait() resumes from this, so it has to be a finite number and recent
+// enough that the resumed deadline has not already passed — a wait that has
+// outlived its deadline resolves on the first poll instead of staying on
+// screen. Read once at module load, so every boot in one run shares it.
+const BROADCAST_TIME = Date.now();
+
+// A viewData well formed for every restorable branch at once, so the only
+// thing a swept boot can fail on is the field the row corrupts. "the base
+// profile the sweep corrupts" below proves this really does render each view
+// rather than falling back — without that, a sweep could pass by never
+// reaching a renderer at all.
+const WELL_FORMED_DATA = {
+    hash: "0x1",
+    message: "boom",
+    to: ADDRESS,
+    decoded: { details: [{ address: TOKEN_ADDRESS }] },
+    tx: { hash: "0x1", from: ADDRESS, to: ADDRESS, contractAddress: null },
+    pendingTx: {
+        token: "ETH",
+        from: ADDRESS,
+        to: ADDRESS,
+        amount: "1",
+        balance: "2",
+    },
+    pendingWait: {
+        hash: "0x1",
+        txInfo: { to: ADDRESS, amount: "1" },
+        broadcastTime: BROADCAST_TIME,
+    },
+};
+
+function restoringOnto(view, extra) {
+    return unversionedValidProfile({
+        currentView: view,
+        selectedWallet: 0,
+        selectedAddress: 0,
+        selectedToken: TOKEN_ADDRESS,
+        viewStack: ["main"],
+        viewData: WELL_FORMED_DATA,
+        ...extra,
+    });
+}
+
+// A boot that RESTORED is healthy and landed on the view it stored, rather
+// than falling back to Home — which a healthy boot also does, and which would
+// let a sweep pass by never running the renderer it is aimed at.
+async function restoredHealth(profile, view) {
+    const env = await bootPopup(profile);
+    return {
+        errors: env.pageErrors,
+        restored: env.visibleViews().includes(view),
+    };
+}
+
+const RESTORED = { errors: [], restored: true };
+
+describe("the base profile the sweep corrupts", () => {
+    for (const view of RESTORABLE_VIEWS) {
+        test(`renders ${view} rather than falling back`, async () => {
+            await expect(
+                restoredHealth(restoringOnto(view), view),
+            ).resolves.toEqual(RESTORED);
+        });
+    }
+});
+
+// A field the ROUTER itself reads — the two it gates on and the two
+// hasValidAddress() indexes with. A hostile value in one of these legitimately
+// changes which view renders, so each gets its own boot per view and is held
+// only to "healthy", not to "restored onto the view it stored".
+const routes = (row) => Boolean(row.routes);
+
+// Every routing row × every hostile value × every restorable view. Profiles
+// are deduplicated because a hostile `currentView` REPLACES the view being
+// restored onto, which would otherwise be the same boot eleven times.
+describe("a hostile routing value restoring onto", () => {
+    for (const row of CONTRACT) {
+        if (!swept(row) || !routes(row)) continue;
+        const seen = new Set();
+        for (const value of sweptValues(row)) {
+            for (const view of RESTORABLE_VIEWS) {
+                const profile = restoringOnto(view, { [row.field]: value });
+                const key = JSON.stringify(profile);
+                if (seen.has(key)) continue;
+                seen.add(key);
+                test(`${view}: ${row.field} = ${JSON.stringify(
+                    value,
+                )}`, async () => {
+                    await expect(bootHealth(profile)).resolves.toEqual(HEALTHY);
+                });
+            }
+        }
+    }
+});
+
+// Every OTHER swept field, corrupted at once, one boot per view per hostile
+// slot: twelve fields on one boot rather than twelve boots. A field is only in
+// here because it is not one the router reads — and that is ASSERTED, not
+// argued, because the boot has to land on `view`. A field that does move the
+// routing turns this red and has to declare `routes` and take the individual
+// sweep above.
+//
+// Combining hides one thing, and the last slot is what stops it. A hostile
+// value is wrong-typed and therefore TRUTHY, so on a boot where every swept
+// field is hostile, no `if (!state.x)` branch is entered — and a dereference
+// inside such a branch would go unseen however loudly it throws. The last slot
+// is the falsy one: every swept field that CAN be falsy is falsy on it, which
+// is also the state an ordinary install boots in for three of them, while the
+// fields that cannot be falsy stay hostile-truthy. That makes it a MIX, and a
+// deliberate one — the interaction between a falsy flag and a still-hostile
+// theme is a shape a stored record really produces.
+//
+// The verdict is the combined boot, always. When it goes red the same view is
+// re-booted one field at a time, so the failure NAMES a culprit instead of
+// leaving a reader to bisect twelve fields — but that loop only decorates the
+// message. It cannot clear the failure. A dereference that needs two corrupted
+// fields at once is reproduced by neither field alone, and a version of this
+// file that asserted on the named list reported exactly that case green while
+// watching the popup die.
+const UNROUTED = CONTRACT.filter((row) => swept(row) && !routes(row));
+const HOSTILE_SLOTS = Math.max(
+    ...UNROUTED.map((row) => sweptValues(row).length),
+);
+
+function unroutedValues(slot) {
+    const fields = {};
+    for (const row of UNROUTED) {
+        const values = sweptValues(row);
+        fields[row.field] = values[slot % values.length];
+    }
+    return fields;
+}
+
+describe("every field the router does not read, corrupted at once, onto", () => {
+    for (const view of RESTORABLE_VIEWS) {
+        for (let slot = 0; slot < HOSTILE_SLOTS; slot++) {
+            test(`${view}: hostile value ${slot + 1} in all ${
+                UNROUTED.length
+            } of them`, async () => {
+                const fields = unroutedValues(slot);
+                const together = await restoredHealth(
+                    restoringOnto(view, fields),
+                    view,
+                );
+
+                // The per-field re-boot only DECORATES the message. The
+                // verdict is `together`, unconditionally: a dereference that
+                // needs two corrupted fields at once is reproduced by NEITHER
+                // field alone, so an assertion on the named list would report
+                // an observed dead popup as green.
+                const named = [];
+                if (together.errors.length > 0 || !together.restored) {
+                    for (const row of UNROUTED) {
+                        const one = await restoredHealth(
+                            restoringOnto(view, {
+                                [row.field]: fields[row.field],
+                            }),
+                            view,
+                        );
+                        if (one.errors.length === 0 && one.restored) continue;
+                        named.push(
+                            `${row.field}=${JSON.stringify(
+                                fields[row.field],
+                            )}: ` +
+                                (one.errors.join("; ") || `fell off ${view}`),
+                        );
+                    }
+                    if (named.length === 0) {
+                        named.push(
+                            "no single field reproduces it; it takes two or " +
+                                `more of ${JSON.stringify(fields)}`,
+                        );
+                    }
+                }
+
+                expect({
+                    view: view,
+                    together: together,
+                    fields: named,
+                }).toEqual({ view: view, together: RESTORED, fields: [] });
+            });
+        }
+    }
+});
+
+// The values that only mean something on the restore path: a viewData that
+// PASSES a branch's gate and then hands its renderer something dereferenced,
+// and the index values whose route through hasValidAddress() differs from the
+// row's own hostile set.
+describe("a restore-only hostile value onto", () => {
+    for (const row of CONTRACT) {
+        for (const entry of row.hostileRestore || []) {
+            for (const view of entry.views || RESTORABLE_VIEWS) {
+                test(`${view}: ${row.field} = ${JSON.stringify(
+                    entry.value,
+                )}`, async () => {
+                    await expect(
+                        bootHealth(
+                            restoringOnto(view, { [row.field]: entry.value }),
+                        ),
+                    ).resolves.toEqual(HEALTHY);
+                });
+            }
+        }
+    }
+});

tests/popupElementIds.test.js

@@ -35,6 +35,11 @@ const POPUP_HTML_PATH = path.join(POPUP_DIR, "index.html");
 const RUNTIME_CREATED_IDS = new Set([
     // Created by updateDebugBanner() in src/popup/views/helpers.js.
     "debug-banner",
+    // Created by showSaveFailureBanner() in the same file, on the first save
+    // that fails. Absent from the markup on purpose: a popup where nothing has
+    // failed must not have to carry an empty banner
+    // (https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/362).
+    "save-failure-banner",
 ]);
 
 // Every id lookup the popup performs with a literal argument, as

tests/stateRecovery.test.js

@@ -13,61 +13,26 @@
 // calls, is exactly the defect: what has to be true is that BOOTING the popup
 // on a bad blob lands on it.
 //
-// The DOM stub is built FROM src/popup/index.html — every id in the markup,
-// with the classes the markup gives it — so "which views are visible" is
-// answered against the real element set, and a recovery screen with no markup
-// behind it cannot pass.
+// The boot harness and its DOM stub — built FROM src/popup/index.html, so
+// "which views are visible" is answered against the real element set — live in
+// tests/support/popupBoot.js, since tests/persistedEntryFloors.test.js needs
+// the same boot.
 //
 // The fourth case is the upgrade one, and it is the case that must NOT reach
 // the recovery screen: every install in the field has a valid profile with no
 // version field, and showing those users a wipe prompt would be a worse defect
 // than the one being fixed. It is migrated in place and keeps working.
 
-const fs = require("fs");
-const path = require("path");
-
-const { makeStorageStub } = require("./support/storageStub");
-
-const POPUP_HTML = fs.readFileSync(
-    path.join(__dirname, "..", "src", "popup", "index.html"),
-    "utf8",
-);
-
-// Fixed address, never used for anything but these tests.
-const ADDRESS = "0x66133E8ea0f5D1d612D2502a968757D1048c214a";
-// A fixed ERC-20 contract address, same rule.
-const TOKEN_ADDRESS = "0xAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA";
+const {
+    bootPopup,
+    cleanupPopup,
+    unversionedValidProfile,
+    ADDRESS,
+    TOKEN_ADDRESS,
+} = require("./support/popupBoot");
 
 // ------------------------------------------------------------- fixtures
 
-// A profile in the shape every install in the field has it: complete, valid,
-// and carrying no version field, because no build ever wrote one.
-function unversionedValidProfile() {
-    return {
-        hasWallet: true,
-        wallets: [
-            {
-                type: "hd",
-                name: "Wallet 1",
-                xpub: "xpub-wallet-1",
-                encryptedSecret: "encrypted-secret-1",
-                nextIndex: 1,
-                addresses: [
-                    { address: ADDRESS, balance: "1.5", tokenBalances: [] },
-                ],
-            },
-        ],
-        activeAddress: ADDRESS,
-        networkId: "mainnet",
-        rpcUrl: "https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com",
-        blockscoutUrl: "https://eth.blockscout.com/api/v2",
-        allowedSites: { [ADDRESS]: ["dapp.example"] },
-        deniedSites: {},
-        trackedTokens: [],
-        theme: "system",
-    };
-}
-
 // The three blobs from the issue, each with the error it produced.
 const CORRUPT_BLOBS = [
     {
@@ -103,235 +68,7 @@ const CORRUPT_BLOBS = [
     },
 ];
 
-// ------------------------------------------------------------- DOM stub
-
-function makeElement(id, className) {
-    const classes = new Set(
-        (className || "").split(/\s+/).filter((name) => name !== ""),
-    );
-    const el = {
-        id,
-        tagName: "DIV",
-        textContent: "",
-        value: "",
-        innerHTML: "",
-        href: "",
-        download: "",
-        disabled: false,
-        style: {},
-        dataset: {},
-        listeners: {},
-        clicked: 0,
-        classList: {
-            add: (...names) => names.forEach((n) => classes.add(n)),
-            remove: (...names) => names.forEach((n) => classes.delete(n)),
-            contains: (n) => classes.has(n),
-            toggle: (n, force) => {
-                const on = force === undefined ? !classes.has(n) : force;
-                if (on) classes.add(n);
-                else classes.delete(n);
-                return on;
-            },
-        },
-        addEventListener: (name, fn) => {
-            el.listeners[name] = el.listeners[name] || [];
-            el.listeners[name].push(fn);
-        },
-        removeEventListener: () => {},
-        appendChild: () => {},
-        remove: () => {},
-        focus: () => {},
-        select: () => {},
-        setAttribute: (name, value) => {
-            el[name] = value;
-        },
-        querySelector: () => null,
-        querySelectorAll: () => [],
-        click: () => {
-            el.clicked += 1;
-        },
-    };
-    return el;
-}
-
-// Every id in the markup, with the classes the markup gives it. A view the
-// popup is supposed to reveal has to exist here, which means it has to exist
-// in src/popup/index.html.
-function idsFromHtml(html) {
-    const out = new Map();
-    const tags = html.match(/<[a-zA-Z][^>]*>/g) || [];
-    for (const tag of tags) {
-        const id = /\bid="([^"]+)"/.exec(tag);
-        if (!id) continue;
-        const cls = /\bclass="([^"]*)"/.exec(tag);
-        out.set(id[1], cls ? cls[1] : "");
-    }
-    return out;
-}
-
-function makeDocument(html) {
-    const authored = idsFromHtml(html);
-    const els = new Map();
-    for (const [id, className] of authored) {
-        els.set(id, makeElement(id, className));
-    }
-    const created = [];
-    const doc = {
-        listeners: {},
-        getElementById(id) {
-            // Created on demand by updateDebugBanner(); absent is the state a
-            // non-debug, non-testnet popup is in.
-            if (id === "debug-banner") return null;
-            if (!els.has(id)) els.set(id, makeElement(id, ""));
-            return els.get(id);
-        },
-        createElement(tag) {
-            const el = makeElement("created-" + tag, "");
-            el.tagName = String(tag).toUpperCase();
-            created.push(el);
-            return el;
-        },
-        addEventListener(name, fn) {
-            doc.listeners[name] = doc.listeners[name] || [];
-            doc.listeners[name].push(fn);
-        },
-        querySelectorAll: () => [],
-        documentElement: makeElement("html", ""),
-        body: {
-            prepend: () => {},
-            appendChild: () => {},
-            removeChild: () => {},
-        },
-        elements: els,
-        authoredIds: authored,
-        created,
-    };
-    return doc;
-}
-
-// ------------------------------------------------------------- harness
-
-// Boot the real popup entry point over `stored`, exactly as the browser does:
-// storage already holds the record, the page loads, DOMContentLoaded fires.
-async function bootPopup(stored) {
-    jest.resetModules();
-
-    // The two modules that reach the network. Neither is on the path under
-    // test; both would make this suite hit the internet.
-    jest.doMock("../src/shared/prices", () => ({
-        prices: {},
-        refreshPrices: jest.fn(async () => {}),
-        clearPrices: jest.fn(),
-        getPrice: () => null,
-        formatUsd: () => "",
-        formatAddressTotal: () => "",
-        getAddressValue: () => ({ usd: null, partial: false }),
-        getWalletValue: () => ({ usd: null, partial: false }),
-        getTotalValue: () => ({ usd: null, partial: false }),
-    }));
-    jest.doMock("../src/shared/balances", () => ({
-        fetchTokenBalances: jest.fn(async () => []),
-        refreshBalances: jest.fn(async () => {}),
-        lookupTokenInfo: jest.fn(async () => null),
-        getProvider: () => ({}),
-        scanForAddresses: jest.fn(async () => []),
-    }));
-    jest.doMock("../src/shared/transactions", () => ({
-        fetchRecentTransactions: jest.fn(async () => []),
-        filterTransactions: () => [],
-    }));
-
-    const storage = makeStorageStub(
-        stored === undefined ? {} : { autistmask: stored },
-    );
-    const document = makeDocument(POPUP_HTML);
-    const reloads = [];
-
-    globalThis.chrome = {
-        storage: { local: storage.local },
-        runtime: {
-            sendMessage: jest.fn(async () => ({})),
-            getURL: (p) => "chrome-extension://autistmask/" + p,
-            onMessage: { addListener: () => {} },
-        },
-    };
-    globalThis.document = document;
-    globalThis.window = {
-        location: {
-            search: "",
-            href: "chrome-extension://autistmask/src/popup/index.html",
-            reload: () => reloads.push(Date.now()),
-        },
-        matchMedia: () => ({
-            matches: false,
-            addEventListener: () => {},
-            removeEventListener: () => {},
-        }),
-        addEventListener: () => {},
-    };
-    // The 10s refresh loop init() starts would outlive the test.
-    const realSetInterval = globalThis.setInterval;
-    globalThis.setInterval = () => 0;
-
-    require("../src/popup/index");
-
-    const booted = [];
-    for (const fn of document.listeners.DOMContentLoaded || []) {
-        booted.push(fn());
-    }
-
-    // What the browser console would have shown. A throw out of init() is the
-    // blank popup this issue is about, so it is captured rather than thrown:
-    // the assertion that matters is what ended up on screen.
-    const pageErrors = [];
-    for (const p of booted) {
-        try {
-            await p;
-        } catch (e) {
-            pageErrors.push(String((e && e.message) || e));
-        }
-    }
-    await settle();
-
-    globalThis.setInterval = realSetInterval;
-
-    return {
-        storage,
-        document,
-        pageErrors,
-        reloaded: () => reloads.length,
-        node: (id) => document.getElementById(id),
-        text: (id) => document.getElementById(id).textContent,
-        value: (id) => document.getElementById(id).value,
-        hidden: (id) =>
-            document.getElementById(id).classList.contains("hidden"),
-        click: async (id) => {
-            const el = document.getElementById(id);
-            const fns = el.listeners.click || [];
-            for (const fn of fns) await fn();
-            await settle();
-        },
-        // The view ids whose section is not hidden, as the audit measured them.
-        visibleViews: () => {
-            const out = [];
-            for (const [id, el] of document.elements) {
-                if (!id.startsWith("view-")) continue;
-                if (!el.classList.contains("hidden")) out.push(id.slice(5));
-            }
-            return out;
-        },
-    };
-}
-
-async function settle() {
-    for (let i = 0; i < 50; i++) await Promise.resolve();
-}
-
-afterEach(() => {
-    delete globalThis.chrome;
-    delete globalThis.document;
-    delete globalThis.window;
-});
+afterEach(cleanupPopup);
 
 // --------------------------------------------------------------- tests
 

tests/support/popupBoot.js

@@ -0,0 +1,347 @@
+// Boot the REAL popup entry point over a stored record, exactly as the browser
+// does: storage already holds the record, the page loads, DOMContentLoaded
+// fires.
+//
+// Written for https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/311 inside
+// tests/stateRecovery.test.js and lifted here unchanged in substance when
+// https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/362 needed the same boot for a
+// second field. Assertions about a corrupt stored profile have to be made
+// through the entry point rather than against a view module: a screen that
+// renders perfectly when something calls it, and that nothing calls, IS the
+// defect.
+//
+// The DOM stub is built FROM src/popup/index.html — every id in the markup,
+// with the classes the markup gives it — so "which views are visible" is
+// answered against the real element set, and a screen with no markup behind it
+// cannot pass.
+
+const fs = require("fs");
+const path = require("path");
+
+const { makeStorageStub } = require("./storageStub");
+
+const POPUP_HTML = fs.readFileSync(
+    path.join(__dirname, "..", "..", "src", "popup", "index.html"),
+    "utf8",
+);
+
+// Fixed addresses, never used for anything but these tests.
+const ADDRESS = "0x66133E8ea0f5D1d612D2502a968757D1048c214a";
+const TOKEN_ADDRESS = "0xAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA";
+
+// A profile in the shape every install in the field has it: complete, valid,
+// and carrying no version field, because no build ever wrote one. The starting
+// point for "and now corrupt exactly one field of it".
+function unversionedValidProfile(extra) {
+    return {
+        hasWallet: true,
+        wallets: [
+            {
+                type: "hd",
+                name: "Wallet 1",
+                xpub: "xpub-wallet-1",
+                encryptedSecret: "encrypted-secret-1",
+                nextIndex: 1,
+                addresses: [
+                    { address: ADDRESS, balance: "1.5", tokenBalances: [] },
+                ],
+            },
+        ],
+        activeAddress: ADDRESS,
+        networkId: "mainnet",
+        rpcUrl: "https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com",
+        blockscoutUrl: "https://eth.blockscout.com/api/v2",
+        allowedSites: { [ADDRESS]: ["dapp.example"] },
+        deniedSites: {},
+        trackedTokens: [],
+        theme: "system",
+        ...(extra || {}),
+    };
+}
+
+function makeElement(id, className) {
+    const classes = new Set(
+        (className || "").split(/\s+/).filter((name) => name !== ""),
+    );
+    const el = {
+        id,
+        tagName: "DIV",
+        textContent: "",
+        value: "",
+        innerHTML: "",
+        href: "",
+        download: "",
+        disabled: false,
+        style: {},
+        dataset: {},
+        listeners: {},
+        clicked: 0,
+        classList: {
+            add: (...names) => names.forEach((n) => classes.add(n)),
+            remove: (...names) => names.forEach((n) => classes.delete(n)),
+            contains: (n) => classes.has(n),
+            toggle: (n, force) => {
+                const on = force === undefined ? !classes.has(n) : force;
+                if (on) classes.add(n);
+                else classes.delete(n);
+                return on;
+            },
+        },
+        addEventListener: (name, fn) => {
+            el.listeners[name] = el.listeners[name] || [];
+            el.listeners[name].push(fn);
+        },
+        removeEventListener: () => {},
+        appendChild: () => {},
+        remove: () => {},
+        focus: () => {},
+        select: () => {},
+        setAttribute: (name, value) => {
+            el[name] = value;
+        },
+        querySelector: () => null,
+        querySelectorAll: () => [],
+        // The Receive view draws its QR onto #receive-qr through the qrcode
+        // package, which calls getContext("2d") and then createImageData/
+        // putImageData on the result. Without this the render throws from
+        // inside a promise the view does not await, which takes the whole node
+        // process down rather than failing a test — so a suite that boots onto
+        // Receive could not report anything.
+        getContext: () => ({
+            createImageData: (w, h) => ({
+                width: w,
+                height: h,
+                data: new Uint8ClampedArray(w * h * 4),
+            }),
+            putImageData: () => {},
+            clearRect: () => {},
+        }),
+        click: () => {
+            el.clicked += 1;
+        },
+    };
+    // src/ reaches parentElement only to hide or unhide the wrapper a field
+    // sits in (txStatus.js renderSuccess(), transactionDetail.js render()).
+    // The stub is flat — it is built from the ids in the markup, not from its
+    // tree — so each element gets a wrapper of its own, made on demand so this
+    // does not recurse. It is never registered by id, so nothing can mistake
+    // it for a view. Without it, success-tx and transaction throw on the first
+    // line that touches a wrapper and cannot be booted onto at all.
+    let parent = null;
+    Object.defineProperty(el, "parentElement", {
+        get() {
+            if (!parent) parent = makeElement(id + "-parent", "");
+            return parent;
+        },
+    });
+    return el;
+}
+
+// Every id in the markup, with the classes the markup gives it. A view the
+// popup is supposed to reveal has to exist here, which means it has to exist
+// in src/popup/index.html.
+function idsFromHtml(html) {
+    const out = new Map();
+    const tags = html.match(/<[a-zA-Z][^>]*>/g) || [];
+    for (const tag of tags) {
+        const id = /\bid="([^"]+)"/.exec(tag);
+        if (!id) continue;
+        const cls = /\bclass="([^"]*)"/.exec(tag);
+        out.set(id[1], cls ? cls[1] : "");
+    }
+    return out;
+}
+
+// Ids the popup creates at runtime rather than authoring in the markup, and
+// that must therefore read as ABSENT until something creates them. Answering
+// with a fresh element instead would make "is the banner up?" always true.
+const RUNTIME_IDS = new Set(["debug-banner", "save-failure-banner"]);
+
+function makeDocument(html) {
+    const authored = idsFromHtml(html);
+    const els = new Map();
+    for (const [id, className] of authored) {
+        els.set(id, makeElement(id, className));
+    }
+    const created = [];
+    const prepended = [];
+    const doc = {
+        listeners: {},
+        getElementById(id) {
+            if (RUNTIME_IDS.has(id) && !els.has(id)) return null;
+            if (!els.has(id)) els.set(id, makeElement(id, ""));
+            return els.get(id);
+        },
+        createElement(tag) {
+            const el = makeElement("created-" + tag, "");
+            el.tagName = String(tag).toUpperCase();
+            created.push(el);
+            return el;
+        },
+        addEventListener(name, fn) {
+            doc.listeners[name] = doc.listeners[name] || [];
+            doc.listeners[name].push(fn);
+        },
+        querySelectorAll: () => [],
+        documentElement: makeElement("html", ""),
+        body: {
+            // Recorded, and registered under its id: a banner the popup
+            // prepends is on the page from then on, and a test asking for it
+            // by id has to find it.
+            prepend: (el) => {
+                prepended.push(el);
+                if (el && el.id) els.set(el.id, el);
+            },
+            appendChild: () => {},
+            removeChild: () => {},
+        },
+        elements: els,
+        authoredIds: authored,
+        created,
+        prepended,
+    };
+    return doc;
+}
+
+async function settle() {
+    for (let i = 0; i < 50; i++) await Promise.resolve();
+}
+
+/**
+ * Boot the popup over `stored`.
+ *
+ * @param {*} stored the record storage holds, or undefined for a first run.
+ * @param {object} [options]
+ * @param {object} [options.storage] a storage stub from makeStorageStub(), for
+ *     a test that needs to make writes fail or to watch the round trips.
+ * @returns {Promise<object>} handles onto the booted page.
+ */
+async function bootPopup(stored, options) {
+    jest.resetModules();
+
+    // The three modules that reach the network. None is on the path under
+    // test; all would make the suite hit the internet.
+    jest.doMock("../../src/shared/prices", () => ({
+        prices: {},
+        refreshPrices: jest.fn(async () => {}),
+        clearPrices: jest.fn(),
+        getPrice: () => null,
+        formatUsd: () => "",
+        formatAddressTotal: () => "",
+        getAddressValue: () => ({ usd: null, partial: false }),
+        getWalletValue: () => ({ usd: null, partial: false }),
+        getTotalValue: () => ({ usd: null, partial: false }),
+    }));
+    jest.doMock("../../src/shared/balances", () => ({
+        fetchTokenBalances: jest.fn(async () => []),
+        refreshBalances: jest.fn(async () => {}),
+        lookupTokenInfo: jest.fn(async () => null),
+        getProvider: () => ({}),
+        scanForAddresses: jest.fn(async () => []),
+    }));
+    jest.doMock("../../src/shared/transactions", () => ({
+        fetchRecentTransactions: jest.fn(async () => []),
+        filterTransactions: () => [],
+    }));
+
+    const storage =
+        (options && options.storage) ||
+        makeStorageStub(stored === undefined ? {} : { autistmask: stored });
+    const document = makeDocument(POPUP_HTML);
+    const reloads = [];
+
+    globalThis.chrome = {
+        storage: { local: storage.local },
+        runtime: {
+            sendMessage: jest.fn(async () => ({})),
+            getURL: (p) => "chrome-extension://autistmask/" + p,
+            onMessage: { addListener: () => {} },
+        },
+    };
+    globalThis.document = document;
+    globalThis.window = {
+        location: {
+            search: "",
+            href: "chrome-extension://autistmask/src/popup/index.html",
+            reload: () => reloads.push(Date.now()),
+        },
+        matchMedia: () => ({
+            matches: false,
+            addEventListener: () => {},
+            removeEventListener: () => {},
+        }),
+        addEventListener: () => {},
+    };
+    // The 10s refresh loop init() starts would outlive the test.
+    const realSetInterval = globalThis.setInterval;
+    globalThis.setInterval = () => 0;
+
+    require("../../src/popup/index");
+
+    const booted = [];
+    for (const fn of document.listeners.DOMContentLoaded || []) {
+        booted.push(fn());
+    }
+
+    // What the browser console would have shown. A throw out of init() is the
+    // blank popup issue 311 is about, so it is captured rather than thrown:
+    // the assertion that matters is what ended up on screen.
+    const pageErrors = [];
+    for (const p of booted) {
+        try {
+            await p;
+        } catch (e) {
+            pageErrors.push(String((e && e.message) || e));
+        }
+    }
+    await settle();
+
+    globalThis.setInterval = realSetInterval;
+
+    return {
+        storage,
+        document,
+        pageErrors,
+        reloaded: () => reloads.length,
+        node: (id) => document.getElementById(id),
+        text: (id) => {
+            const el = document.getElementById(id);
+            return el ? el.textContent : null;
+        },
+        value: (id) => document.getElementById(id).value,
+        hidden: (id) =>
+            document.getElementById(id).classList.contains("hidden"),
+        click: async (id) => {
+            const el = document.getElementById(id);
+            const fns = el.listeners.click || [];
+            for (const fn of fns) await fn();
+            await settle();
+        },
+        settle,
+        // The view ids whose section is not hidden, as the audit measured them.
+        visibleViews: () => {
+            const out = [];
+            for (const [id, el] of document.elements) {
+                if (!id.startsWith("view-")) continue;
+                if (!el.classList.contains("hidden")) out.push(id.slice(5));
+            }
+            return out;
+        },
+    };
+}
+
+function cleanupPopup() {
+    delete globalThis.chrome;
+    delete globalThis.document;
+    delete globalThis.window;
+}
+
+module.exports = {
+    bootPopup,
+    cleanupPopup,
+    settle,
+    unversionedValidProfile,
+    ADDRESS,
+    TOKEN_ADDRESS,
+    POPUP_HTML,
+};