fix: a zero-minimum balance check never sets the output side (closes #649)

A BALANCE_CHECK_ERC20 of the sender with a zero minimum guarantees
nothing, and neither does one the router lets fail. Such a check set
Token Out and the minimum whenever the output side held no minimum.
After an UNWRAP_WETH that drops the minimum, a zero check of USDC
named USDC as Token Out. Such a check now sets neither line. A check
with a positive minimum is unchanged.

Model: opus-5-5

tests/uniswap.test.js

@@ -4380,10 +4380,9 @@ describe("uniswap decoder", () => {
         expect(detail(result, "Min. received").value).toBe("2.0000 USDC");
     });
 
-    // With no minimum stated before it, a zero balance check is what sets the
-    // output side, and it guarantees nothing. No step pays anyone, so the
-    // minimum is not said to be received.
-    test("a zero balance check with no earlier minimum states no minimum", () => {
+    // A zero balance check sets neither Token Out nor the minimum. The route
+    // pays only the WRAP_ETH's WETH, to the router, where it stays.
+    test("a zero balance check after a WRAP_ETH into the router names no output token and no minimum", () => {
         const data = buildExecute(
             solidityPacked(["uint8", "uint8"], [0x0b, 0x0e]),
             [
@@ -4396,9 +4395,16 @@ describe("uniswap decoder", () => {
         const result = uniswap.decode(data, ROUTER_ADDR, "0x1", {}, USER_ADDR);
         expect(result).not.toBeNull();
 
-        expect(detail(result, "Token Out").value).toContain("USDT");
-        expect(detail(result, "Min. paid out").value).toBe(
-            "None (no minimum guaranteed)",
+        expect(detail(result, "Token Out").value).toBe(
+            "Unknown (not named in the calldata)",
+        );
+        expect(detail(result, "Min. paid out")).toBeUndefined();
+        expect(detail(result, "Min. received")).toBeUndefined();
+        expect(detail(result, "Paid to").value).toBe(
+            "The router, where it stays (no later step pays it out)",
+        );
+        expect(detail(result, "Token moved into the router").address).toBe(
+            WETH_ADDR,
         );
     });
 

tests/uniswapRecipient.test.js

@@ -688,6 +688,62 @@ describe("an UNWRAP_WETH makes the output ETH only when the router holds it", ()
         ]);
     });
 
+    // The same route, then a balance check of the sender's USDC with a zero
+    // minimum. The check guarantees nothing, so Token Out stays ETH
+    // (https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/649).
+    test("the same route, then a zero balance check of USDC, still reads as ETH with no minimum", () => {
+        const result = decode(
+            execute(
+                v4Swap(
+                    SWAP_USDT_FOR_WETH,
+                    SETTLE_USDT,
+                    take(WETH, MSG_SENDER, (ONE_WETH * 6n) / 10n),
+                    take(WETH, ADDRESS_THIS),
+                ),
+                unwrapWeth(MSG_SENDER),
+                balanceCheck(USDC, 0n),
+            ),
+        );
+        expect(result.name).toBe("Swap USDT → ETH");
+        expect(detail(result, "Token Out").value).toBe("ETH");
+        expect(labels(result)).toEqual([
+            "Protocol",
+            "Token In",
+            "Amount",
+            "Token Out",
+            "Steps",
+            "Deadline",
+        ]);
+    });
+
+    // A PERMIT2_TRANSFER_FROM moves the sender's WETH into the router. An
+    // UNWRAP_WETH pays that WETH to the user as ETH. A zero balance check of
+    // USDC sets neither Token Out nor the minimum, before the UNWRAP_WETH or
+    // after it (https://git.eeqj.de/sneak/AutistMask/issues/649).
+    test.each([
+        {
+            kind: "before the UNWRAP_WETH",
+            steps: [balanceCheck(USDC, 0n), unwrapWeth(MSG_SENDER)],
+        },
+        {
+            kind: "after the UNWRAP_WETH",
+            steps: [unwrapWeth(MSG_SENDER), balanceCheck(USDC, 0n)],
+        },
+    ])(
+        "WETH moved into the router and unwrapped, with a zero balance check of USDC $kind, reads as ETH with no minimum",
+        ({ steps }) => {
+            const result = decode(
+                execute(
+                    permit2TransferFrom(WETH, ADDRESS_THIS, ONE_WETH),
+                    ...steps,
+                ),
+            );
+            expect(detail(result, "Token Out").value).toBe("ETH");
+            expect(detail(result, "Min. received")).toBeUndefined();
+            expect(detail(result, "Min. paid out")).toBeUndefined();
+        },
+    );
+
     // A TAKE the decoder cannot read may pay part of the WETH to the user.
     test("one V4 step paying WETH to the router beside a TAKE that cannot be read, then an UNWRAP_WETH, reads as ETH with no minimum", () => {
         const result = decode(
@@ -2820,17 +2876,16 @@ describe("the allow-revert flag", () => {
         },
     );
 
-    test("a BALANCE_CHECK_ERC20 with the flag, and no minimum before it, states none", () => {
+    test("a BALANCE_CHECK_ERC20 with the flag, and no minimum before it, names no output token and no minimum", () => {
         const check = balanceCheck(WETH, ONE_WETH);
         expect(detail(decode(execute(check)), "Min. paid out").value).toBe(
             "1.0000 WETH",
         );
 
         const withFlag = decode(execute(flagged(check)));
-        expect(detail(withFlag, "Token Out").address).toBe(WETH);
-        expect(detail(withFlag, "Min. paid out").value).toBe(
-            "None (no minimum guaranteed)",
-        );
+        expect(detail(withFlag, "Token Out").value).toBe(UNNAMED);
+        expect(detail(withFlag, "Min. paid out")).toBeUndefined();
+        expect(detail(withFlag, "Min. received")).toBeUndefined();
     });
 
     // Only the routers from UniversalRouterV2 on let a PERMIT2_PERMIT fail.