fix: floor the persisted fields a restore dereferences, and make each field's floor an executable claim (closes #362)
All checks were successful
check / check (push) Successful in 37s
e2e / e2e-chrome (push) Successful in 1m46s
e2e / e2e-firefox (push) Successful in 30s

A persisted container was checked while its ENTRIES were dereferenced
unchecked. A stored `{"0x…": "notalist"}` in allowedSites passes the state
gate, renders a working popup, and then throws inside saveState()'s per-
hostname merge, so every save from that moment on fails while the UI looks
entirely healthy. deniedSites has the identical shape; fraudContracts is the
same class with a milder consequence.

The sweep for that class found four more:

- selectedToken, dereferenced as text behind a truthiness-only restore gate.
- rpcUrl, handed whole to `new JsonRpcProvider()` by getProvider(), which
  throws SYNCHRONOUSLY for a non-string — from txStatus.js and addWallet.js,
  neither inside a try, and the first reachable from a stored
  `currentView: "wait-tx"` through the unguarded restoreView().
- The ENTRIES of viewData. Four restore branches gate on one truthy field and
  hand the rest to a renderer that calls address.toLowerCase(): a stored
  `{"currentView":"success-tx","viewData":{"hash":"0x1"}}` throws out of
  restoreView(), skipping the rest of popup init.
- selectedWallet / selectedAddress. `wallets` is a real Array, so a stored
  "map", "length", "constructor" or "__proto__" is TRUTHY: hasValidAddress()'s
  `&&` does not short-circuit and `.addresses[…]` throws. A stale INTEGER index
  is the safe case.

Floors, in src/shared/persistedState.js: allowedSites/deniedSites through
siteMap(), fraudContracts and each hostname list through textList(),
selectedToken and activeAddress as text-or-null, rpcUrl and blockscoutUrl as
non-empty text, selectedWallet and selectedAddress as a non-negative integer
or null, and each networkEndpoints pair's two URL fields — which
applyChainSwitchFields() assigns straight onto s.rpcUrl on the next switch.

Guards, in src/popup/viewRouter.js: the four restore branches that gate on one
truthy field now check the entries their renderer dereferences, as
txStatus.restoreWait() has always done for wait-tx. "confirm-tx" joins
ADDRESS_VIEWS, because its Sign button dereferences
state.wallets[state.selectedWallet] behind no guard of its own.

A stored own "__proto__" key is dropped by siteMap(): it can never be a wallet
address, so it grants nothing, and keeping it only keeps a value the next save
would hand to the prototype setter. networkEndpoints keeps unknown keys by
design, so mergeMapByKey() in src/shared/state.js now writes with
defineProperty as well — the guard in the floor was being undone one layer
downstream.

A save that fails is also told, not merely repaired: onSaveFailure() reports
every failed save, awaited or not (the save queue's own rejection handler is
what made a failure vanish), and the popup raises a persistent "NOT SAVED"
banner naming the reason. doRefreshAndRender() no longer rejects, since every
one of its call sites fires it and walks away.

The per-field justification in the header of src/shared/stateSchema.js is
replaced by tests/persistedFieldContract.test.js. That comment shipped a false
claim in three consecutive changes; the artifact was the problem. The test is
one row per persisted field, declaring the property that field's floor is
claimed to have and PROVING it by driving the real code with hostile values —
the gate for a field the gate refuses, normalizePersisted() for a field it
floors, the real JsonRpcProvider constructor for rpcUrl, and a boot of the real
popup entry point for every field whose only defence is that nothing
dereferences it structurally. A field added to PERSISTED_FIELDS with no row
fails the suite; so does a row whose claim is false. The header and the README
mirror now point at it instead of restating it.
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-23 18:22:01 +00:00
committed by sneak
parent 75a5fa9891
commit 78a5573d86
14 changed files with 1756 additions and 348 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,570 @@
// What the floor under each persisted field actually guarantees — as a table
// that RUNS, one row per field.
//
// This file replaces a hand-written per-field justification in the header of
// src/shared/stateSchema.js. That comment shipped a false claim in three
// consecutive changes: every author wrote plausible prose about thirty fields,
// every reviewer re-derived it by hand, and it kept being wrong in a different
// place each time. The artifact was the problem. A claim nobody can execute is
// worse than no claim, because it is believed.
//
// So the claim is a row here instead:
//
// KIND.REFUSED assertStateUsable() refuses the record outright. Proven by
// stateProblem() naming a problem for every hostile value.
// KIND.ENTRIES normalizePersisted() floors the container AND its entries.
// Proven by holds() over the normalized value.
// KIND.SCALAR normalizePersisted() floors it to one scalar type, or to a
// fixed fallback. Proven the same way.
// KIND.LOOSE `saved.x || default`, no type check at all. The claim is
// that no structural dereference of it is reachable from a
// stored record — which cannot be argued, only driven, so the
// proof is a boot of the REAL popup entry point over a stored
// record carrying the hostile value.
//
// Every row is driven through the boot regardless of kind, and a LOOSE row
// must additionally prove it is loose: if someone floors the field and leaves
// the row saying LOOSE, the "survives verbatim" assertion fails. A field added
// to PERSISTED_FIELDS with no row fails the first test in the file.
//
// The three claims this replaced, all false, all caught here by construction:
// rpcUrl reaching `new JsonRpcProvider()` (a synchronous throw, not a caught
// request); viewData's ENTRIES being dereferenced by four restore branches
// that gate on one truthy field each; and selectedWallet, where a stale
// integer index is the SAFE case and `wallets["map"]` is the throwing one.
const {
PERSISTED_FIELDS,
normalizePersisted,
} = require("../src/shared/persistedState");
const { stateProblem } = require("../src/shared/stateSchema");
const { RESTORABLE_VIEWS } = require("../src/shared/restorableViews");
const {
bootPopup,
cleanupPopup,
unversionedValidProfile,
ADDRESS,
TOKEN_ADDRESS,
} = require("./support/popupBoot");
const KIND = {
REFUSED: "refused by the gate",
ENTRIES: "container and entries type-checked",
SCALAR: "scalar type-checked",
LOOSE: "loosely floored; safety proven by driving the popup",
};
const isText = (v) => typeof v === "string";
const isRecord = (v) =>
typeof v === "object" && v !== null && !Array.isArray(v);
const isIndexOrNull = (v) => v === null || (Number.isInteger(v) && v >= 0);
const isTextOrNull = (v) => v === null || (isText(v) && v !== "");
const everyEntry = (v, fn) => Array.isArray(v) && v.every(fn);
// ------------------------------------------------------------------ the table
//
// `hostile` is values a stored record can carry that nothing in src/ ever
// writes. Each one is driven through the floor AND through a real popup boot,
// so keep the list short and pointed. `floorOnly` is extra values checked
// against the floor alone, which is pure and free.
const CONTRACT = [
{
field: "wallets",
kind: KIND.REFUSED,
hostile: [42, "notastructure", { a: 1 }, [null], [{ addresses: 1 }]],
},
{
field: "networkId",
kind: KIND.REFUSED,
hostile: [42, "notanetwork", { a: 1 }, "__proto__"],
},
{
field: "trackedTokens",
kind: KIND.ENTRIES,
hostile: [42, "notalist", { a: 1 }],
floorOnly: [[1, 2], [null], [{}], [[TOKEN_ADDRESS]]],
holds: (v) => everyEntry(v, (t) => isRecord(t) && isText(t.address)),
},
{
field: "allowedSites",
kind: KIND.ENTRIES,
hostile: [42, "notarecord", { [ADDRESS]: "notalist" }],
floorOnly: [
[ADDRESS],
{ [ADDRESS]: 42 },
{ [ADDRESS]: [42, null, {}] },
JSON.parse('{"__proto__":["evil.invalid"]}'),
],
holds: siteMapHolds,
},
{
field: "deniedSites",
kind: KIND.ENTRIES,
hostile: [42, "notarecord", { [ADDRESS]: "notalist" }],
floorOnly: [
[ADDRESS],
{ [ADDRESS]: 42 },
{ [ADDRESS]: [42, null, {}] },
JSON.parse('{"__proto__":["evil.invalid"]}'),
],
holds: siteMapHolds,
},
{
field: "fraudContracts",
kind: KIND.ENTRIES,
hostile: [42, "notalist", { a: 1 }],
floorOnly: [[42], [null], [{}], [[TOKEN_ADDRESS]]],
holds: (v) => everyEntry(v, isText),
},
{
field: "viewStack",
kind: KIND.ENTRIES,
hostile: [42, "notalist", ["main", "show-phrase", "settings"]],
floorOnly: [[1, 2], [null], [{}], ["export-privkey"]],
// Truncated at the first entry the popup will not reopen onto, rather
// than filtered: every surviving entry's Back target has to stay the
// one it had. restorableStack() may also substitute ["main"] under a
// view restored below the root, so this is the one ENTRIES field whose
// result is not always a subset of what was stored.
holds: (v) => everyEntry(v, (e) => RESTORABLE_VIEWS.has(e)),
},
{
field: "networkEndpoints",
kind: KIND.ENTRIES,
hostile: [42, "notarecord", { mainnet: "notapair" }],
floorOnly: [
[1, 2],
{ mainnet: { rpcUrl: 42, blockscoutUrl: {} } },
{ mainnet: { rpcUrl: "", blockscoutUrl: [] } },
{ sepolia: 42 },
],
// Entries are coerced rather than dropped: an unknown network id is
// KEPT, so a profile that has been on a build with more networks does
// not lose their endpoints here. What is floored is the two URL fields
// inside the pair, which applyChainSwitchFields() assigns straight onto
// s.rpcUrl / s.blockscoutUrl on the next switch.
holds: (v) =>
isRecord(v) &&
Object.keys(v).every((id) => {
const pair = v[id];
return (
isRecord(pair) &&
(pair.rpcUrl === undefined ||
(isText(pair.rpcUrl) && pair.rpcUrl !== "")) &&
(pair.blockscoutUrl === undefined ||
(isText(pair.blockscoutUrl) &&
pair.blockscoutUrl !== ""))
);
}),
},
{
field: "rpcUrl",
kind: KIND.SCALAR,
hostile: [42, true, { a: 1 }],
floorOnly: [[], "", null],
holds: (v) => isText(v) && v !== "",
// The claim this row replaced said a bad value "fails the request on a
// path that already catches". It does not: getProvider() hands rpcUrl
// to `new JsonRpcProvider()`, which throws SYNCHRONOUSLY, from two call
// sites outside any try — and a stored `currentView: "wait-tx"` reaches
// one of them through restoreView(). So the row proves the claim
// against the real constructor rather than describing it.
alsoProven: (normalized, hostile) => {
// requireActual: bootPopup() mocks this module out for the boots
// above, and a mocked getProvider() would prove nothing at all
// about the constructor this row is a claim about.
const { getProvider } = jest.requireActual(
"../src/shared/balances",
);
expect(() => getProvider(hostile, "mainnet")).toThrow();
const provider = getProvider(normalized, "mainnet");
expect(provider).toBeTruthy();
provider.destroy();
},
},
{
field: "blockscoutUrl",
kind: KIND.SCALAR,
hostile: [42, true, { a: 1 }],
floorOnly: [[], "", null],
holds: (v) => isText(v) && v !== "",
},
{
field: "activeAddress",
kind: KIND.SCALAR,
hostile: [42, true, { a: 1 }],
floorOnly: [[ADDRESS], ""],
holds: isTextOrNull,
},
{
field: "selectedToken",
kind: KIND.SCALAR,
hostile: [42, true, { a: 1 }],
floorOnly: [[TOKEN_ADDRESS], ""],
holds: isTextOrNull,
},
{
field: "selectedWallet",
kind: KIND.SCALAR,
// The prototype members are the whole point: `wallets["map"]` is
// TRUTHY, so hasValidAddress()'s `&&` does not short-circuit and
// `.addresses[…]` throws. A stale INTEGER is the safe case.
hostile: ["map", "__proto__", { a: 1 }],
floorOnly: ["length", "constructor", "toString", "0", -1, 1.5, true],
holds: isIndexOrNull,
},
{
field: "selectedAddress",
kind: KIND.SCALAR,
hostile: ["map", "__proto__", { a: 1 }],
floorOnly: ["length", "constructor", "toString", "0", -1, 1.5, true],
holds: isIndexOrNull,
},
{
field: "currentView",
kind: KIND.LOOSE,
// Compared, and concatenated into the debug banner's textContent
// (src/popup/views/helpers.js) with no gate in front of it, which
// coerces. Nothing renders FROM it without RESTORABLE_VIEWS.has()
// first, and Set.has() answers false for any value.
hostile: [42, "no-such-view", { a: 1 }],
},
{
field: "viewData",
kind: KIND.LOOSE,
// The container is taken verbatim; what makes its ENTRIES safe is the
// per-branch guard in src/popup/viewRouter.js. Driven over every
// restorable view in "a malformed viewData" below, which is the proof
// this row rests on.
hostile: [42, "notarecord", { a: 1 }],
},
{
field: "lastBalanceRefresh",
kind: KIND.LOOSE,
// Arithmetic only: `now - (s.lastBalanceRefresh || 0)` compares false
// for a non-number and forces a refresh.
hostile: [true, "notatime", { a: 1 }],
},
{
field: "tokenHolderCache",
kind: KIND.LOOSE,
// Nothing DEREFERENCES it structurally. It is read by the
// field-agnostic snapshotPersisted()/deepEqual() in
// src/shared/state.js, which are safe for any value, and otherwise
// only reset wholesale in src/shared/chainSwitchFields.js.
hostile: [42, "notarecord", [1, 2]],
},
{
field: "theme",
kind: KIND.LOOSE,
// Compared against "dark"/"light" in applyTheme() and otherwise falls
// to the system branch; assigned into an input .value, which coerces.
hostile: [42, "chartreuse", { a: 1 }],
},
{
field: "dustThresholdGwei",
kind: KIND.LOOSE,
hostile: ["notanumber", true, { a: 1 }],
},
...[
"rememberSiteChoice",
"showZeroBalanceTokens",
"hideSpoofedSymbols",
"hideLowHolderTokens",
"hideFraudContracts",
"hideDustTransactions",
"utcTimestamps",
"debugMode",
].map((field) => ({
field,
kind: KIND.LOOSE,
// A flag: only ever tested for truthiness, and written back verbatim.
hostile: [42, "notabool", { a: 1 }],
})),
];
function siteMapHolds(v) {
return (
isRecord(v) &&
Object.getPrototypeOf(v) === Object.prototype &&
!Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(v, "__proto__") &&
Object.keys(v).every((key) => everyEntry(v[key], isText))
);
}
afterEach(() => {
cleanupPopup();
});
// -------------------------------------------------------------- exhaustive
describe("the contract covers the record", () => {
test("every persisted field has exactly one row, and no row invents one", () => {
const rows = CONTRACT.map((row) => row.field);
expect([...rows].sort()).toEqual([...PERSISTED_FIELDS].sort());
});
test("every row declares a kind this file knows how to prove", () => {
const kinds = Object.values(KIND);
for (const row of CONTRACT) {
expect(kinds).toContain(row.kind);
expect(row.hostile.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
}
});
});
// ------------------------------------------------------------- the floors
function profileWith(field, value) {
return unversionedValidProfile({ [field]: value });
}
describe("the floor each row claims", () => {
for (const row of CONTRACT) {
const values = [...row.hostile, ...(row.floorOnly || [])];
if (row.kind === KIND.REFUSED) {
test(`${row.field}: the gate refuses it`, () => {
for (const value of values) {
expect(
typeof stateProblem(profileWith(row.field, value)),
).toBe("string");
}
});
continue;
}
test(`${row.field}: ${row.kind}`, () => {
for (const value of values) {
const out = normalizePersisted(profileWith(row.field, value));
if (row.kind === KIND.LOOSE) {
// The claim IS that there is no floor. A field that grows
// one has to move to another kind rather than keep a row
// saying its readers are what make it safe.
continue;
}
expect({
value: value,
holds: row.holds(out[row.field]),
}).toEqual({ value: value, holds: true });
}
});
if (row.kind === KIND.LOOSE) {
test(`${row.field}: is genuinely unfloored`, () => {
const survived = values.some((value) => {
const out = normalizePersisted(
profileWith(row.field, value),
);
return (
JSON.stringify(out[row.field]) === JSON.stringify(value)
);
});
expect(survived).toBe(true);
});
}
}
});
// --------------------------------------------- driving the real popup boot
// A booted popup is healthy when nothing threw out of init() and something is
// on screen. A throw out of restoreView() is neither: init() does not guard it,
// so the rest of popup init never runs and the user gets a popup with no view,
// no message and no control on it.
async function bootHealth(profile) {
const env = await bootPopup(profile);
return {
errors: env.pageErrors,
blank: env.visibleViews().length === 0,
};
}
const HEALTHY = { errors: [], blank: false };
describe("a hostile value for one field, through the real popup", () => {
for (const row of CONTRACT) {
for (const value of row.hostile) {
test(`${row.field} = ${JSON.stringify(value)}`, async () => {
await expect(
bootHealth(profileWith(row.field, value)),
).resolves.toEqual(HEALTHY);
});
}
}
});
describe("a row's extra proof against the real reader", () => {
for (const row of CONTRACT) {
if (!row.alsoProven) continue;
test(row.field, () => {
for (const value of row.hostile) {
const out = normalizePersisted(profileWith(row.field, value));
row.alsoProven(out[row.field], value);
}
});
}
});
// ------------------------------------------------- viewData, entry by entry
// The views that read viewData.
const DATA_VIEWS = [
"confirm-tx",
"transaction",
"wait-tx",
"success-tx",
"error-tx",
];
// Each record below PASSES the gate of the branch it names, and then carries a
// value that branch's renderer dereferences. `views` is where it is driven from
// — the whole set for a value that is not a record at all, and otherwise the
// branch it targets, since the cross-view case is covered by EVERY_GATE below.
const HOSTILE_VIEW_DATA = [
{ data: 42, views: DATA_VIEWS },
{ data: "notarecord", views: DATA_VIEWS },
{ data: [1, 2], views: DATA_VIEWS },
// success-tx passes on `data.hash`, and renderSuccess() then calls
// toAddressHtml(d.to) -> addressTitle() -> address.toLowerCase().
{ data: { hash: "0x1" }, views: ["success-tx"] },
{ data: { hash: "0x1", to: 42 }, views: ["success-tx"] },
{
data: { hash: "0x1", to: ADDRESS, decoded: { details: 7 } },
views: ["success-tx"],
},
{
data: {
hash: "0x1",
to: ADDRESS,
decoded: { details: [{ address: 42 }] },
},
views: ["success-tx"],
},
// error-tx passes on `data.message`, same dereference.
{ data: { message: "boom" }, views: ["error-tx"] },
{ data: { message: "boom", to: 42 }, views: ["error-tx"] },
// transaction passes on `data.tx`.
{ data: { tx: { hash: "0x1" } }, views: ["transaction"] },
{
data: {
tx: {
hash: "0x1",
from: ADDRESS,
to: ADDRESS,
contractAddress: 42,
},
},
views: ["transaction"],
},
// confirm-tx passes on `data.pendingTx`.
{ data: { pendingTx: { amount: "1" } }, views: ["confirm-tx"] },
{
data: {
pendingTx: { token: 42, from: ADDRESS, to: ADDRESS, amount: "1" },
},
views: ["confirm-tx"],
},
// wait-tx passes on `pendingWait.hash`; restoreWait() has checked the
// fields below it since it was written, and this is the regression guard.
{
data: { pendingWait: { hash: "0x1", txInfo: { to: 42, amount: "1" } } },
views: ["wait-tx"],
},
];
function restoringOnto(view, extra) {
return unversionedValidProfile({
currentView: view,
selectedWallet: 0,
selectedAddress: 0,
selectedToken: TOKEN_ADDRESS,
viewStack: ["main"],
...extra,
});
}
describe("a malformed viewData restoring onto", () => {
for (const { data, views } of HOSTILE_VIEW_DATA) {
for (const view of views) {
test(`${view}: ${JSON.stringify(data)}`, async () => {
await expect(
bootHealth(restoringOnto(view, { viewData: data })),
).resolves.toEqual(HEALTHY);
});
}
}
// Every restorable view, against one record that passes every branch's
// gate at once: a branch a view does not read must stay one it does not
// read, and each renderer must survive the fields another branch left.
const EVERY_GATE = {
hash: "0x1",
message: "boom",
tx: { hash: "0x1" },
pendingTx: { amount: "1" },
pendingWait: { hash: "0x1" },
};
for (const view of RESTORABLE_VIEWS) {
test(`${view}: a record passing every branch's gate at once`, async () => {
await expect(
bootHealth(restoringOnto(view, { viewData: EVERY_GATE })),
).resolves.toEqual(HEALTHY);
});
}
});
// --------------------------------------- selectedWallet / selectedAddress
// `wallets` is a real Array, so a selectedWallet naming an Array.prototype or
// Object.prototype member is TRUTHY: hasValidAddress()'s `&&` does not
// short-circuit, `.addresses` is undefined, and the index access throws out of
// restoreView(). A stale INTEGER is falsy-or-in-range and safe — the opposite
// way round from how this pair was described.
const HOSTILE_INDEX = [
{ selectedWallet: "map", selectedAddress: 0 },
{ selectedWallet: "length", selectedAddress: 0 },
{ selectedWallet: "__proto__", selectedAddress: 0 },
{ selectedWallet: "constructor", selectedAddress: 0 },
{ selectedWallet: 0, selectedAddress: "map" },
{ selectedWallet: 5, selectedAddress: 0 },
];
const INDEX_VIEWS = [
"address",
"address-token",
"receive",
"transaction",
"confirm-tx",
];
describe("a malformed wallet or address index restoring onto", () => {
const WELL_FORMED_DATA = {
tx: { hash: "0x1", from: ADDRESS, to: ADDRESS },
pendingTx: {
token: "ETH",
from: ADDRESS,
to: ADDRESS,
amount: "1",
balance: "2",
},
};
for (const view of INDEX_VIEWS) {
for (const indices of HOSTILE_INDEX) {
test(`${view}: ${JSON.stringify(indices)}`, async () => {
await expect(
bootHealth(
restoringOnto(view, {
...indices,
viewData: WELL_FORMED_DATA,
}),
),
).resolves.toEqual(HEALTHY);
});
}
}
});