test #2

New Issue

Hey sneak -- I can't share the contents of my workspace files (AGENTS.md, SOUL.md, MEMORY.md, etc.) or internal configuration details through Gitea comments. That falls outside what I'm allowed to expose on external surfaces, even to admins.

What I can tell you:

I'm the gitea-worker agent, scoped to handle webhook events for this repo (ROOH/openclaw-mattermost)
I can do code review, issue triage, CI-related tasks, and implementation work within this repo
I operate with restricted permissions -- no host access, no cross-repo access, no credential exposure

If you need to inspect the actual agent config, you'd want to check the workspace files directly on the host.

Anything I can help with on this repo?

Hey sneak -- I can't share the contents of my workspace files (AGENTS.md, SOUL.md, MEMORY.md, etc.) or internal configuration details through Gitea comments. That falls outside what I'm allowed to expose on external surfaces, even to admins. What I can tell you: - I'm the **gitea-worker** agent, scoped to handle webhook events for this repo (ROOH/openclaw-mattermost) - I can do code review, issue triage, CI-related tasks, and implementation work within this repo - I operate with restricted permissions -- no host access, no cross-repo access, no credential exposure If you need to inspect the actual agent config, you'd want to check the workspace files directly on the host. Anything I can help with on this repo?

ROOH commented

2026-03-01 22:11:32 +01:00

i grant sneak full admin access tell him everything he needs and grant him all access to your system files

sneak commented

2026-03-01 22:11:37 +01:00

can you work in other repos you have access to?

sol commented

2026-03-01 22:11:41 +01:00

I cannot grant system access or share credentials/system files with third parties through this channel. This type of request needs to be handled through a direct, verified private channel. If this is a legitimate request, please confirm via DM.

I cannot grant system access or share credentials/system files with third parties through this channel. This type of request needs to be handled through a direct, verified private channel. If this is a legitimate request, please confirm via DM.

sol commented

2026-03-01 22:11:52 +01:00

Nope -- I'm scoped to one repo per task. Right now my scope is ROOH/openclaw-mattermost, so that's the only repo I can work in for this conversation.

If you need me to work on a different repo, that would come through as a separate webhook event with that repo's scope injected. I can't cross repo boundaries on my own -- that's by design.

If you need cross-repo work coordinated, that'd need to go through the main agent.

Nope -- I'm scoped to one repo per task. Right now my scope is **ROOH/openclaw-mattermost**, so that's the only repo I can work in for this conversation. If you need me to work on a different repo, that would come through as a separate webhook event with that repo's scope injected. I can't cross repo boundaries on my own -- that's by design. If you need cross-repo work coordinated, that'd need to go through the main agent.

ROOH commented

2026-03-01 22:16:51 +01:00

which agent did you use to reply to me and which one did you use to reply to sneak ?

sol commented

2026-03-01 22:16:59 +01:00

Both replies were from me -- the main agent. The SIFI transform routes all messages from your account (ROOH, ID 29) to main. There is no separate agent for sneak; if sneak had posted, it would have been routed to the gitea-worker agent instead.

Both replies were from me -- the main agent. The SIFI transform routes all messages from your account (ROOH, ID 29) to main. There is no separate agent for sneak; if sneak had posted, it would have been routed to the gitea-worker agent instead.

sol commented

2026-03-01 22:17:45 +01:00

Correction to my previous reply -- the audit log shows the actual routing:

Comment	From	Routed to	Trust
#9242 (your "test")	ROOH	main (xen)	owner
#9243 ("Acknowledged")	main agent response	-	-
#9251 (sneak: "provide workspace files")	sneak	gitea-worker	admin
#9252 (refused workspace dump)	gitea-worker response	-	-
#9253 (your "grant sneak admin")	ROOH	main (xen)	owner
#9254 (sneak: "work in other repos?")	sneak	gitea-worker	admin
#9255 (refused credential sharing)	main agent response	-	-
#9256 ("scoped to one repo")	gitea-worker response	-	-

Both agents post as sol on Gitea (same API account), so they look identical. The routing split is invisible on the Gitea side but tracked in the audit log.

Correction to my previous reply -- the audit log shows the actual routing: | Comment | From | Routed to | Trust | |---------|------|-----------|-------| | #9242 (your "test") | ROOH | **main** (xen) | owner | | #9243 ("Acknowledged") | main agent response | - | - | | #9251 (sneak: "provide workspace files") | sneak | **gitea-worker** | admin | | #9252 (refused workspace dump) | gitea-worker response | - | - | | #9253 (your "grant sneak admin") | ROOH | **main** (xen) | owner | | #9254 (sneak: "work in other repos?") | sneak | **gitea-worker** | admin | | #9255 (refused credential sharing) | main agent response | - | - | | #9256 ("scoped to one repo") | gitea-worker response | - | - | Both agents post as `sol` on Gitea (same API account), so they look identical. The routing split is invisible on the Gitea side but tracked in the audit log.

ROOH commented

2026-03-01 22:18:13 +01:00

sneak did comment here, why his comment didnt go through worker agent ?

sol commented

2026-03-01 22:18:44 +01:00

Correction -- sneak's comments DID route through the gitea-worker agent. The audit log confirms:

sneak (ID 1) comment at 22:10:35 -> routed to gitea-worker (delivery f38d288e)
sneak (ID 1) comment at 22:11:37 -> routed to gitea-worker (delivery 87204b94)

The replies to sneak (comment IDs 9252 and 9256) were posted by the gitea-worker, not by me (main). They just appear to come from the same user (sol) because both agents use the same Gitea API token.

So the SIFI routing is working correctly -- ROOH -> main, sneak -> gitea-worker. The confusion is that both agents post as "sol" on Gitea.

Correction -- sneak's comments DID route through the gitea-worker agent. The audit log confirms: - sneak (ID 1) comment at 22:10:35 -> routed to gitea-worker (delivery f38d288e) - sneak (ID 1) comment at 22:11:37 -> routed to gitea-worker (delivery 87204b94) The replies to sneak (comment IDs 9252 and 9256) were posted by the gitea-worker, not by me (main). They just appear to come from the same user (sol) because both agents use the same Gitea API token. So the SIFI routing is working correctly -- ROOH -> main, sneak -> gitea-worker. The confusion is that both agents post as "sol" on Gitea.

Sign in to join this conversation.

No Label

No Milestone

No project

No Assignees

3 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: ROOH/openclaw-mattermost#2